<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[On-Demand Operator IntraLinks Shoots for an IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/intra.jpg" alt="" />Since 1999, IntraLinks has tried to go public twice, with the last time being 2005. But since then, the company's market -- on-demand software -- has surged in popularity.<br />
<br />
So is time for another try at an IPO? Definitely. This week, IntraLinks <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1488075/000114420410019461/v177537_s1.htm">filed</a> the necessary papers with the Securities and Exchange Commision. The company plans to raise as much as $150 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>On-Demand Operator IntraLinks Shoots for an IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/">On-Demand Operator IntraLinks Shoots for an IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19435759/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/on-demand-operator-intralinks-shoots-for-an-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Intralinks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Study looks at leaky M&amp;A deals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/intralinks.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In a typical merger, the parties will sign a confidentiality agreement. It's serious stuff. In fact, if a public company is involved, there are insider trading laws that are triggered.</p>
<p>Despite all this, there are often leaks. And, if they get some press, there's a good chance that the stock price will spike. Actually, a leak may mean that a deal falls apart.</p>
<p>Now, we have some academic validation. That is, <a href="http://www.intralinks.com">Intralinks</a> and London's Cass Business School conducted a study on <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202421945737">350,000 deals from 1994 to 2007</a>. Among the deals that had leaks, only 49% closed. This compares to a 72% close rate for deals without leaks.</p>
<p>Why? I think there are several reasons. First of all, a leak will engender some distrust. Is the other side manipulating things?</p>
<p>What's more, a leak is likely to make a deal more expensive as traders and hedge funds jump into the stock. </p>
<p>Interesting enough, in light of the current environment -- where credit is constrained -- this may put even more pressure on potential deals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli"><em>Tom Taulli</em></a><em> is the author of various books, including</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" width="1" border="0" /> and</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" width="1" border="0" />. He also operates </em><a href="http://www.mergerbook.com"><em>MergerBook.com</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/">Study looks at leaky M&amp;A deals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1219077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/study-looks-at-leaky-manda-deals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Intralinks</category><category>leaks</category><category>MA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
