<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bac-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Early Friday morning, Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) reported a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/b-of-a-posts-quarterly-loss-2011-01-21" target="_blank">fourth-quarter loss</a> of 16 cents per share ($1.2 billion). This includes the company's previously announced goodwill impairment charge of $2 billion that was related to its home loans and insurance business. Taking this charge out of the equation, BAC earned 4 cents per share. It could be an interesting morning for BAC, as experts predicted earnings of 18 cents per share.<br />
<br />
Shares of BAC were down more than 2% as we await the opening bell. This drop should push the stock low enough to mount a serious challenge to the support of both BAC's 20-month moving average and the $14 level.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/">Bank of America Posts $1.24 Billion Loss for Fourth Quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19809842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/bank-of-america-earnings-1-24-billion-loss-during-fourth-quart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bac earnings</category><category>bac loss</category><category>bac stock price</category><category>bank of america</category><category>banking</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment bank</category><category>investment banking</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Bank Earnings: Look Beneath the Headlines]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/bank.earnings.stacks-of-dollars.getty2.jpg" alt="stacks of money - bank earnings" />Bank earnings are upon us. Citi (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) reported a $4.4 billion profit, the largest positive number in three years. Last week JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and Bank Of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) had great numbers to crow about as well. Part of the good news came from lower loan loss reserves as the economy begins to get some traction on the up side. But some of the positive report was a result of bond trading and/or investment banking. And that's a little troubling.</p>
<p>The reason for investor concern is that bond trading and investment banking are not sustainable business models. They are more like geysers: they shoot up beautifully when the timing is right -- but one never knows when that timing is, unless the geyser is Old Faithful, which none of the bond trading or investment banking deals are. Yes, they contribute hugely to the bottom line as bond traders catch a trend in interest rates and make extraordinary gains or develop new products that create new revenues. But just as quickly the bond market can turn (like the stock market), and large gains turn to losses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Bank Earnings: Look Beneath the Headlines</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/">Comfort Zone Investing: Bank Earnings: Look Beneath the Headlines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19448583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/24/comfort-zone-investing-bank-earnings-look-beneath-the-headline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business models</category><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>investment banking</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Ted Allrich</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/rich.jpg"  alt="" />Thanks to a trillion dollars in credit losses write-downs on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mortgage/">mortgage</a>-related securities in 2007 and 2008, financial companies around the world had a lot of capital to recapture. So, in the first half of 2009, they issued stock. More than half the new shares to come out worldwide in those six months were <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">issued by banks and brokers</a>. All this stock, of course, translated to fees for investment banks. In a strange way, consequently, the financial industry healed itself.<br />
<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">According to Bloomberg</a>, investment banking fees surged 13% in 2009, from $53.1 billion to $59.8 billion. This is still far short of the $86.9 billion record set in 2007, but it's at least a step in the right direction. Even with the surge of bank and broker shares issued in the first two quarters last year, total activity was still lower than in 2008.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/">JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>credit suisse</category><category>cs</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>merck</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MRK</category><category>ms</category><category>Schering-Plough</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/linkedin-logo.jpg" />The financial crisis, employment market and social media explosion have converged, providing a new level of clarity into what is happening in the world around us. Where was ground zero for this financial catastrophe? Well, <a href="http://blog.linkedin.com/2010/02/18/linkedin-analytics-financial/" target="_blank">according to the LinkedIn blog</a>, five companies have shown the most action: Barclays (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys" target="_blank">BCS</a>), Credit Suisse (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys" target="_blank">CS</a>), Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>), Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) and JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>). Interestingly, Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>), among the biggest winners now that we're pulling out from the recession, didn't see as much play.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/">Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19366607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Barclays</category><category>bcs</category><category>citigroup</category><category>credit suisse</category><category>CreditSuisse</category><category>cs</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial services</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment bankers</category><category>investment banking</category><category>investment banks</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>Nomura</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking sites</category><category>social networks</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/jpm-logo-200x150.gif" />Thanks to strong results from its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/investmentbanking/">investment banking</a> unit, JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>) was able to turn in a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60E1UO20100115">fourth quarter profit</a> of $3.3 billion. This is a profound increase from the Q4 profit of $702 million posted in 2008. <br /><br />JPM, which is the second largest bank in the U.S. in terms of assets, has performed best throughout the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialcrisis/">financial crisis</a>, as evidenced by its substantial year-over-year increase in Q4 profit. For the last quarter of last year, JPM generated $25.2 billion in revenue.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/">Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60E1UO20100115>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>banks</category><category>featured</category><category>investment bank</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />Brokerage firm Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has started <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703735004574572363440861826.html">meeting its major investors</a> in an attempt to stop criticism over its record compensation, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported. Think this is a bit of overkill? Not when the average GS employee is set to earn $700,000 this year (how do I sign up for that gig?). These meetings are the first of their kind and are expected to continue for several more weeks. The Wall Street firm is defending its pay, especially in the wake of the economic crisis that some contend it partially behind. <br /><br />GS is trying to win support for its compensation packages, which is why the company is going to the shareholders. These investors are the actual owners of the firm and hold the power to change the company's compensation structure. Of course, employees and executives are hoping there would be no change, and the campaigning is heavy. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/">Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19263483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Blackstone make magic with Merlin?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bx-blackstone-logo.jpg" width="160" height="28" />What has <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys" target="_blank">Blackstone</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys" target="_blank">BX</a>) been doing with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/blackstone-piles-to-be-made-from-theme-parks/" target="_blank">all those theme parks it's been buying</a>? Well, the answer is becoming a bit clearer now. The private equity firm is getting ready to take theme park operator Merlin Entertainments public early next year.</p>
<p>Several investment banks have already been called to advise on the transaction, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-bank-ag-germany/db/nys" target="_blank">Deutsche Bank</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-bank-ag-germany/db/nys" target="_blank">DB</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys" target="_blank">UBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys" target="_blank">UBS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nomura-holdings-inc/nmr/nys" target="_blank">Nomura</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nomura-holdings-inc/nmr/nys" target="_blank">NMR</a>). If all goes as planned, the deal could be good for $3.33 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Blackstone make magic with Merlin?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/">Will Blackstone make magic with Merlin?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19208541/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/will-blackstone-make-magic-with-merlin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blackstone group</category><category>blackstone group ipo</category><category>bx</category><category>citigroup</category><category>db</category><category>deutsche bank</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>ipo</category><category>merlin entertainment</category><category>nomura</category><category>theme parks</category><category>ubs</category><category>walt disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan (JPM): A breakout buy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Technician <a href="http://www.tickertapedigest.com">Leo Fasciocco</a>, who focuses on stocks breaking out of resistance zones, is banking on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), as a breakout buy on its rise over $39. Here's the latest from <a href="http://www.tickertapedigest.com">Ticker Tape Digest</a>.</p>
<p>"JPM is one of the dominant financial firms. It has 30 million consumer customers and the world's most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients.</p>
<p>"Recent tape action indicates good institutional buying interest. JPM's long-term chart shows the stock making a bottom around 15 in March. It has since rallied and double in price. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan (JPM): A breakout buy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/">JPMorgan (JPM): A breakout buy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19122388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/bank-on-j-p-morgan-jpm-breakout-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking stocks</category><category>breakout stocks</category><category>finance stocks</category><category>investment banking</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>leo fasciocco</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>technical stocks</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>ticker tape digest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[For Barclays, dealmaking saves the day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/bcs.jpg" />Banking crisis? Well, banks continue to post profits. Look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">Barclays PLC</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">BCS</a>), which today <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/5965016/Barclays-profits-set-to-reignite-bonus-debate.html">reported</a> a $3.15 billion profit for the first half of 2009.</p>
<p>Why the growth? Interestingly enough, Barclays got a big boost from its investment banking division (which is focused on mergers &amp; acquisitions, public offerings and capital raises). Keep in mind that the company purchased the U.S. operations of Lehman Brothers.</p>
<p>And the strength is no fluke. Other major banks -- such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys">Credit Suisse</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys">CS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) -- also posted strong results with investment banking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>For Barclays, dealmaking saves the day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/">For Barclays, dealmaking saves the day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19117265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/for-barclays-dealmaking-saves-the-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barclays</category><category>BCS</category><category>Blackrock</category><category>BLK</category><category>Credit Suisse</category><category>CS</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>IPOs</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>MA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hedge fund goes public . . . through the backdoor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/cown.jpg" alt="" />Since early 2007, it's been rough for the shareholders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cowen-group-inc/cown/nas">Cowen Group Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cowen-group-inc/cown/nas">COWN</a>), a mid-tier investment bank. The company's stock price has gone from $20 to low of $3.54.<br /><br />But lately, Cowen's stock price has perked up, primarily because of takeover overtures. For example, there was an offer from Rodman &amp; Renshaw at $7 per share.<br /><br />However, this was rebuffed. Instead, yesterday Cowen <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=avTVck0nBn7c">agreed</a> to a so-called "reverse merger" with hedge fund Ramius LLC, which will own 71% of the new entity. On the news, Cowen's shares increased 37%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hedge fund goes public . . . through the backdoor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/">Hedge fund goes public . . . through the backdoor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19058608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/hedge-fund-goes-public-through-the-backdoor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cowen</category><category>cown</category><category>Hedge Funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investment Banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>Ramius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A day ahead of earnings, Goldman Sachs raises $5.5 billion for private equity fund]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/gs-goldman-sachs-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Earlier this morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) announced that it <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Goldman-raises-55B-for-apf-14908201.html?sec=topStories&amp;pos=4&amp;asset=TBD&amp;ccode=TBD">raised its fifth dedicated private equity secondaries fund</a> -- GS Vintage Fund V -- with roughly $5.5 billion in capital commitments. This news was hinted at on Friday in <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> and was confirmed by the investment bank. The fund will focus on acquiring portfolios of private equity assets and includes private investors throughout America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. <br /><br />This isn't the only news GS will make this week, as the firm is slated to step into the earnings spotlight. The current quarterly earnings <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">estimate stands at $1.59 per share</a>. Let's take a quick technical look at the investment bank and see what could happen if earnings miss or beat expectations.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A day ahead of earnings, Goldman Sachs raises $5.5 billion for private equity fund</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/">A day ahead of earnings, Goldman Sachs raises $5.5 billion for private equity fund</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1515364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/a-day-ahead-of-earnings-goldman-sachs-raises-5-5-billion-for-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>private equity fund</category><category>PrivateEquityFund</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman and Morgan: Revving up the money machines?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/gs160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The nearly universal sentiment about investment banking is that it's dead. And I can understand why. M&amp;A is tepid. IPOs are gone. Lending is extremely difficult. So, where can firms like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) make money?</p>
<p>Bear in mind that these firms think about this every day. Over decades, they have also found ways to make big-bucks in almost any environment.</p>
<p>Actually, according to a cover story in <a href="http://www.barrons.com">Barron's</a> [a paid publication], it looks like these firms may have yet-again found another way to thrive in a difficult environment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman and Morgan: Revving up the money machines?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/">Goldman and Morgan: Revving up the money machines?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1488061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/15/goldman-and-morgan-revving-up-the-money-machines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) may cut 5% of its workforce. Given the drop-off in investment banking activity and asset management, the number may not be high enough, but it is a start. Wall Street is still worried about the bank's future, as its stock price shows. Shares change hands at $21, down more than 50% during that last year. Morgan is doing better than some other companies in its sector, but the deepening recession could hurt earnings more than last year.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123327814481231565.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription requited), "The New York firm, which let go of about 7,000 employees last year, may decide on another round of staffing cuts in the next two weeks."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/">If Morgan Stanley (MS) cuts jobs, stock may rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123327814481231565.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/if-morgan-stanley-ms-cuts-jobs-stock-may-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>MS</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg"  alt="" />Just when you think you've heard it all, you hear more. In the last year, Wall Street -- or more specifically, the brokerage units of New York financial companies -- lost <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?ref=business">$35 billion</a>. (Worldwide, financial institutions have taken $1 trillion in write-offs of bad assets). Those firms received a large proportion of the $350 billion TARP and persuaded the Treasury to guarantee losses from hundreds of billions worth of their financial toxic waste. Their reward? $18.4 billion in bonuses.</p>
<p>How much of the TARP went to paying for those bonuses? The banks have cleverly neglected to report that. But let's face it -- money is fungible. So if they did not use the money from the deposits they received from the Treasury to pay bonuses, our tax dollars freed up cash they may have had from other sources that did go to paying those $18.4 billion in bonuses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/">Wall Street loses $35 billion in 2008, uses TARP for $18.4 billion bonus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>TARP</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan up on earnings report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" />JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) posted earnings Thursday. In a surprise to analysts, who had been expecting a break-even quarter, JPM reported earning 7 cents for the fourth quarter. </p>
<p>While the report showed a 76% decline from the previous year, the news pushed the stock to early gains in the face of a <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stock-market-nightmare.html">drop in the Dow</a>.</p>
<p>Typical of the lack of conviction in the markets, JPM gave up early gains. Subsequent trading restored the stock to the positive column before it succumbed to a late-day sell-off that shaved more than 6% from its market value.</p>
<p>The mid-morning decline in JPM occurred as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) plummeted to a new low at $7.50. BAC is sagging under the weight of absorbing Countrywide and Merrill Lynch, both of which have proven more <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2008/12/the-best-way-to-trade-the-banks-in-early-2009.html">difficult to digest</a> than earlier thought.</p>
<p>Bank stocks in general are under heavy selling pressure after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke declared Wednesday that <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/the-best-stock-for-2009.html">billions more will be required</a> to restore stability to the nation's (and the world's) banking system.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan up on earnings report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/">JPMorgan up on earnings report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idCASP40184620090116?rpc=33>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1431136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/jpmorgan-up-on-earnings-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stocks</category><category>banks</category><category>BankStocks</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>featured</category><category>financial stocks</category><category>financials</category><category>FinancialStocks</category><category>investment banking</category><category>investment banks</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>InvestmentBanks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Stock Picks '09: Gladstone Capital (GLAD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a special annual report -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/favorite-stocks-for-2009-top-picks-from-75-advisors/">Top Stock Picks '09</a> -- in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked 75 leading newsletter advisors to select their favorite investment for the new year.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/mark_skousen2.gif" align="left" vspace="4" border="1" />"I've followed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gladstone-capital-corporation-closed-end-fund/glad/nas">Gladstone Capital</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gladstone-capital-corporation-closed-end-fund/glad/nas">GLAD</a>) for many years," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2734 ">Mark Skousen</a> in <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2734 ">Forecasts &amp; Strategies</a>. Here, he chooses the business development company as a top idea for 2009.</p>
<p>"Gladstone is a business development company (BDC) run by the 'father of BDCs,' David Gladstone. Gladstone is a conservative investor who is careful in his lending.</p>
<p>"His investment company, Gladstone Capital, specializes in debt investments in small- and medium-sized companies that seek additional funding, recapitalization, debt reduction, and short-term bridge financing.</p>
<p>"Unlike other BDCs, Gladstone always has been prudent in its lending. It has no exposure to subprime mortgages and no exposure to home building -- but it is being hurt by U.S. recession fears.</p>
<p>"Though the shares are volatile, I think the stock is dirt cheap, having suffered a sharp sell-off due to the deep recession and financial crisis.</p>
<p>"It is off 70% so far this year, which is far too much, in my judgment. With any kind of economic recovery under an Obama administration, I expect Gladstone to be back in good form.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Stock Picks '09: Gladstone Capital (GLAD)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/">Top Stock Picks '09: Gladstone Capital (GLAD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1413766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/top-stock-picks-09-gladstone-capital-glad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking stocks</category><category>david gladstone</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>finance stocks</category><category>forecasts strategies</category><category>glad</category><category>gladstone capital</category><category>high yield stocks</category><category>income stocks</category><category>investment banking</category><category>mark skousen</category><category>mezzanine financing stocks</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>venture capital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New accounting rules could curb investment banking fees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p>Bad news for money-hungry college grads looking to cash in as investment bankers: New disclosure rules could change the way you're paid.<br /><br /><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123139142604063849.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">reports</a> (subscription required) that "New accounting rules are taking hold for mergers and acquisitions that will shine a perhaps scary light on just how much corporations pay the investment banks and bankers that advise them on deals."<br /><br />Here's how it currently works: Companies that make acquisitions are now able to lump the "advisory fees" in with the price of the target company as part of the "goodwill" that is mainly used to cover the cost paid for the company above and beyond its book value. But new rules would require companies to disclose investment banking fees as a separate expense.<br /><br />According to Dealogic, investment banking revenue fell 35% in 2008. New rules that require companies to show how much they're paying for advice on deals that generally end up destroying value could set the industry up for further declines.<br /><br />If this keeps up, top business school graduates might have no choice but to take jobs that actually create something.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/">New accounting rules could curb investment banking fees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123139142604063849.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1422674/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/08/new-accounting-rules-could-curb-investment-banking-fees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Accounting</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investment Banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>Mergers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Credit Suisse hands out illiquid junk for bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p>With bonuses down big across Wall Street as the market meltdown send income statements deep into the red, a lot of investment bankers aren't going to be too pleased with their bonuses this year.<br /><br />Credit Suisse is trying something a little bit different. Credit Suisse will be paying it bankers their bonuses with a combination of the usual cash and nearly impossible to trade junk bonds: the kind of garbage that banks have been trying to sell to the Treasury Department to dump the liquidity problem onto taxpayers.<br /><br />I like this plan: If the bonds really are just illiquid -- and not total crap, as I'm inclined to suspect -- then the bankers will make out like bandits in a few years when credit markets stabilize and liquidity returns.<br /><br />Another part of Credit Suisse's bonus program is generating some controversy: a portfolio of the cash bonuses paid out will have a "clawback" provision requiring that they be repaid if the employee leaves within two years. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122991986742725825.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According </a>(subscription required) to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, this could lead to some lawsuits<br /><br />I'm not exactly sure what the problem is: As long as employees are notified of the terms of their pay package before they do the work, the banks can pay them whatever/however they want.<br /><br />They should be happy to be receiving bonuses at all.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/">Credit Suisse hands out illiquid junk for bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122991986742725825.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1408328/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/credit-suisse-hands-out-illiquid-junk-for-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Credit Suisse</category><category>CreditSuisse</category><category>CSFB</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>Inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Internet banking at Goldman Sachs (GS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/gs-goldman-sachs-logo.jpg" />It would be pretty nifty to bank online with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). It is the world's premier investment bank, although it has converted itself to a commercial bank to get government funding.</p>
<p>Still, saying I bank online with Goldman sounds better than saying I bank online with the First National Bank of Akron Ohio.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122827665438875247.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "If Goldman goes ahead, the new unit will seek deposits that can be used to fund various businesses now that Goldman is a bank-holding company." In other words, now that Goldman is a bank, it wants to drive up deposits. Starting an online bank is cheaper than going out and buying a number of regional banks to pick up their depositor bases.</p>
<p>All kidding aside, the chance to have an account at such a prestigious financial institution could draw a great deal of money, especially from the well-to-do. A marquis name should make for marquis customers. And, that should bring Goldman a lot of the assets it needs to fund its more profitable businesses.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/">Internet banking at Goldman Sachs (GS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122827665438875247.html?mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1389658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/03/internet-banking-at-goldman-sachs-gs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banking industry may lose 350,000 jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><em>Bloomberg </em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aWgNOBGHp3hM&amp;refer=home">is reporting that</a> the global banking industry could lose 350,000 jobs by the middle of next year. That would be about 20% of the employees in the sector.</p>
<p>That level of unemployment represents an almost unimaginable human tragedy and one that might have been avoided in part if management at large financial house had not bet the bank on mortgage derivatives. But, that is water under the bridge.</p>
<p>The question which gets begged is where all of those people will go. Many bankers are not qualified for other high-paying jobs, which means they will stay unemployed for long periods or will face having to take significant cuts in their incomes. Either way, the shift will take a large toll on government services such as unemployment benefits.  Let's not forget the lost taxes.<br /></p>
<p>The destruction of the banking industry is a microcosm of what many happen across sector after sector if the recession bites hard. Autos may be the next domino to fall, but retail and hospitality won't be far behind it. Suddenly hundreds of thousands of jobs become millions, and, if things get especially bad, tens of millions.</p>
<p>Financial services is the canary in the coal mine. If the industry cannot fine some employment equilibrium it is bad for everyone.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/">Banking industry may lose 350,000 jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aWgNOBGHp3hM&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379105/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/banking-industry-may-lose-350-000-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
