<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Pervasive bad advice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/cash-wad.jpg" />We keep hearing that consumer spending propels 70% of our economy and that we will not see real growth without an increase in consumer confidence, meaning spend, spend, spend. This is very bad advice! Let other people spend -- <em>you should be saving!</em><br /><br />This is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/">a theme I have been hammering on all year</a> and I will continue to do so. I believe this is so important to our personal and national long term health that any true investment discussion, be it on the web, radio, television, newspapers or magazines, is just blowing smoke if it is not a primary focus.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Pervasive bad advice</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/">Sunday Funnies: Pervasive bad advice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19175509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/sunday-funnies-pervasive-bad-advice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>debt</category><category>investment advice</category><category>InvestmentAdvice</category><category>saving</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>sunday funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Two stock exercises to try ... for better wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><em><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/comfortzone.jpg" />Ted Allrich i</strong>s the founder of <a href="http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/">The Online Investor</a> and author of the just released book: <a href="http://www.comfortzoneinvesting.com">Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. </a>In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.</em><br /></p>
<p>Try this exercise: The next time the stock market rockets higher, look at your portfolio and sell part of a position in a stock where you have a profit, a stock you know is overvalued. This action takes only a few minutes to do and allows you to put money in the bank. Done on a regular basis, this is a sure way to lock up gains, have money for investing in stocks that are <em>underpriced,</em> and make yourself feel great. </p>
<p>This is an excellent exercise for investors. It puts discipline into investing. Just like regular exercising, discipline is the key to success. Trading is not the goal here. Rather, you're looking to take advantage of "irrational exuberance" in a stock that has gone well beyond a decent valuation, such as a P/E (price to earnings) ratio that is much higher than the growth rate. Also, you're not looking to sell all your position. In fact, you may want to buy your full position back when a more rational valuation returns. If the stock continues on its irrational way, you still own shares and can sell those at an even higher price.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Two stock exercises to try ... for better wealth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/">Comfort Zone Investing: Two stock exercises to try ... for better wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1004249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/2-stock-exercises-try-these-for-better-wealth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beginning investors</category><category>BeginningInvestors</category><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>ComfortZoneInvesting</category><category>featured</category><category>investment advice</category><category>InvestmentAdvice</category><category>Ted Allrich</category><category>TedAllrich</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coca-Cola: no one ever went broke, holding Coke]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cce/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/fly-logo-live.gif" /></a>Wall Street, financial arbiter in the capital of the world, has amassed dozens of adages since the dawn of publicly-traded companies. Adages that -- while not proving to be 100% accurate for every historical case study -- nevertheless do contain substantial amounts of truth. <br /><br />And one of Wall Street's adages is: "No one ever went broke, holding Coke."<br /><br />That's The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>), not the bottler. Coke's shares closed Friday at $48.24 up 14 cents.<br /><br />Sluggish sales, as well as competition from generic colas, and the U.S.'s trend toward the consumption of health-oriented, non-carbonated sports drinks, like Gatorade, have created a substantially different soft drink sector than a generation ago, when KO was dominant both domestically and internationally.<br /><br />And that sluggishness has been reflected in Coke's stock price, which, for the most part, has been stuck in a $40-$55 range for about 6 years.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coca-Cola: no one ever went broke, holding Coke</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/">Coca-Cola: no one ever went broke, holding Coke</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/747676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/04/coca-cola-no-one-ever-went-broke-holding-coke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advice</category><category>buy and hold</category><category>BuyAndHold</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>coke</category><category>consumer</category><category>consumer investing</category><category>ConsumerInvesting</category><category>hold</category><category>investing</category><category>investing strategies</category><category>InvestingStrategies</category><category>investment</category><category>investment advice</category><category>InvestmentAdvice</category><category>ko</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Cramer "Show" can cost you big!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>What happens if you miss a show? Yesterday I wrote about investment strategist and "Mad Money" host Jim Cramer changing his opinion so swiftly (see: <a title="View Cramer pumps Tech, then hates it days later on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/cramer-pumps-tech-then-hates-it-a-week-later/" target="_blank">Cramer pumps tech, then hates it days later</a>). I started thinking about the repercussions of missing the second show. Suppose you had seen the show promoting technology stocks last week and missed the show where he did an about face, trashing the sector in the blink of an eye? If you chose to act on last weeks supremely confident push into tech and were still buying when Cramer was telling everyone to dump tech stocks -- that could definitely cost you big!</p>
<p>I oppose rapid fire trading. I oppose short term trading as speculation, not investing. Cramer has every right to change his mind and he is usually honest when it comes to admitting his mistakes. He does get you to think; that's a good thing. And he does have some good ideas given so much experience on Wall Street to share; there is no question about that either. But as time passes his show continues to move more in the direction of entertainment and further from investment guidance. So watch it with that in mind.</p>
<p>Cramer has attracted a strong following. Not only has he started a media empire but he has inspired many websites that are tracking his commentary and stock picks. It is well understood now that a Cramer bump takes effect after he makes a buy recomendation. A new level of sophistication to tracking his picks and pans would be to figure out what happens if you miss a show? What happens if you only watch every other show? What happens if you only watch the first half or the last half? Is it possible to create an algorithm to monitor the time and frequency of Cramer viewing so that you could hedge in favor of better results? Alas, this would this be the unauthorized new "Cramer Hedge Fund" for the 21st century....now I'm being silly....bring me back to earth. </p>
<p>I would like to express my sympathy to all of you investment advisors out there throughout the country and throughout the world perhaps, that each day must now respond to your clients inquiries and comments about what Cramer said. This must be getting old fast. It must be particularly tough when you are trying to help someone establish long term goals and understand issues of portfolio asset allocation and having to repond to daily play-by-play heckling stimulated by a television show.</p>
<p>As for Cramer's recent tech swings, I think he was wrong in both cases. I think the tech sector will be jumping all over the place all year. You should pick companies, not sectors, to invest in. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Check out my other posts for BloggingStocks <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/sheldon-liber/">here</a>. Be sure and read <a title="View You don't have to be 007 to find the best picks for 2007! on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/you-dont-have-to-be-007-to-find-the-best-picks-for-2007/" target="_blank">You don't have to be 007 to find the best picks for 2007!</a> <br /><em><br />Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/">The Cramer "Show" can cost you big!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/738902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/19/the-cramer-show-can-cost-you-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Allocating Resources</category><category>AllocatingResources</category><category>Investment Advice</category><category>InvestmentAdvice</category><category>James Cramer</category><category>JamesCramer</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock sectors</category><category>StockSectors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[All Cramer needs now is a PIE in the FACE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><a href="http://aolsearch.aol.com/aol/imageDetails?invocationType=imageDetails&amp;query=soupy+sales&amp;img=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sonic.net%2Fdukenrat%2Fchapter10%2Fsoupy%2520sales%2520pied.jpg&amp;site=www.sonic.net&amp;host=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sonic.net%2Fdukenrat%2Fchapter10%2Fchapter10.htm&amp;b=image%3Fquery%3Dsoupy%2Bsales%26page%3D2%26userid%3D44fe060d-000ca-07910-e2960c40%26invocationType%3DxImage%26clickstreamid%3D207575884387544885"><img height="104" hspace="4" src="http://images-partners.google.com/images?q=tbn:Mgj3cDEoOUnOGM:www.sonic.net/dukenrat/chapter10/soupy%2520sales%2520pied.jpg" width="94" align="right" border="0" alt="" /></a>From my perspective <strong>Jim Cramer</strong> has gone from Wall Street trader, to hedge fund manager, to stock market analyst and media guru -- <em>and finally reached the stage of TV buffoon.</em></p>
<p>I used to appreciate his investment sensibilities and still find him entertaining on occasion (on radio) but now he has gone too far. For those of you Baby Boomer's who watched children's television as I did you will remember <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soupy_Sales">Soupy Sales</a> and all the props and gags<em>,</em> but none more vivid than the <em><strong>whipped cream pie-in-the-face!</strong></em></p>
<p>That's about all Cramer is missing at this stage. His antics are no different than a carnival sideshow. If you track his stock market advice lately you will see poor results, and if you follow his advice your chances of "winning" will resemble your chances at the carnival games. You can't deny the sights and sounds are similar, and if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....? </p>
<p>There you have it folks, <strong><em>Cramer has created a stock market carnival on television!</em></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>All Cramer needs now is a PIE in the FACE</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/">All Cramer needs now is a PIE in the FACE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bells and whistles</category><category>BellsAndWhistles</category><category>Bozo the Clown</category><category>BozoTheClown</category><category>carnival games</category><category>CarnivalGames</category><category>entertainment</category><category>Hedge fund management fees</category><category>HedgeFundManagementFees</category><category>investment advice</category><category>InvestmentAdvice</category><category>James Cramer</category><category>JamesCramer</category><category>Pie in the face gags</category><category>PieInTheFaceGags</category><category>Popeye</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Soupy Sales</category><category>SoupySales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:54:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
