<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[A good year for oil discoveries]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="oil industry" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/indigoprime.jpg" />The oil industry has been working hard to find new oil reserves, and so far this year <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/business/energy-environment/24oil.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">the efforts have been paying off</a>.<br />
<br />
It has been a year with some major discoveries that have put the oil industry in a good position to make it the year with the highest level of new discoveries since 2000.<br />
<br />
A big reason for the increase in discoveries is improvements in technology that has allowed oil hunters to drill deeper and break through tougher rocks than they were previously able to do.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A good year for oil discoveries</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/">A good year for oil discoveries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19172460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/a-good-year-for-oil-discoveries/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Australia</category><category>featured</category><category>Gulf of Mexico</category><category>GulfOfMexico</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Israel</category><category>oil</category><category>oil exploration</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilExploration</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A seesaw day for oil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oklahoma-city-oil-derrick.jpg" alt="" />Oil got off to a strong start today, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&amp;sid=aDJbHIgxeCMY&amp;refer=canada" target="_blank">climbing over $3 earlier in the session</a>, but the last couple hours have seen the precious crude give back its earlier gains and is now trading down slightly on the day at $80.88, down $0.31.<br /><br />The early day jump was in reaction to continued optimism that a full blown global recession could be avoided with the infusion of $125 billion by the U.S. government into nine major banks.<br /><br />Last week at this time, we were pretty much all asking ourselves the question of just how bad are things going to get, and this led to a week-long panic in the market that sent all the major international exchanges into free fall. Now it seems like, for the moment, the panic is behind us and investors are starting to suspect that perhaps things are not going to be as bad as people were beginning to believe last week. We won't be looking at the next Great Depression, or so we hope, but with this market, emotion seems to change in a heartbeat.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A seesaw day for oil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/">A seesaw day for oil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/a-seesaw-day-for-oil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilProduction</category><category>OPEC</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will OPEC be able to stop oil's rise to $150, and beyond?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>At first glance - - investigating whether OPEC will be able to stunt oil's rise to $150 per barrel may seem moot. <br /><br />Not so, says energy trader Jim Dietz, and he cited three reasons.<br /> <br />First, the oil shorts - - those who believe oil is overpriced / too high - - are likely to mount a rigorous defense of $150. (<a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> traded up $4.75 to $146.40 per barrel Friday at mid-day after hitting a record high of $147.27 earlier in the day.) "It will not be an easy barrier to mount. It will be easier to break than the $100 barrier but keep in mind it took several months and at least 5 sequences to break $100, once we got within the range," Dietz said. "Look for almost as tough price resistance at $150."<br /><br />Second, many oil longs - - those who calculated that oil is trending higher - - will take profits at $150, Dietz said. "The $150 mark will result in many players and institutions cashing in their long trades, on rationality grounds," Dietz said. "For example, if you established trades at $80 or $85, common sense says $150 represents a good time to exit. Likewise for more-daring institutions that went long above $100. The thinking will be 'We're at $150 after a high entry point. How long do we expect this insanity to go on? Let's take some profits and reduce our exposure.' That will add to selling pressure." Dietz added that he is presently flat, or has no open energy trading positions - - his normal stance for a Friday in the summer. <br /><br />Finally, those facts, combined with already-announced oil production increases by Saudi Arabia, will enhance OPEC's ability to slow gains in the price of oil near/at $150 per barrel, Dietz said. Further, Dietz believes Saudi Arabia will announce still another production increase, perhaps as large as 300,000 barrels, to calm markets, "and eliminate doubts in some energy corners about its spare capacity and ability to ramp-up production."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will OPEC be able to stop oil's rise to $150, and beyond?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/">Will OPEC be able to stop oil's rise to $150, and beyond?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1202845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/will-opec-be-able-to-stop-oils-rise-to-150-and-beyond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Asia</category><category>dollar</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>euro</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>gdp</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil pushes past $145 on dollar decline concerns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Another day, another oil record. <br /><br />Oil easily pushed past $145 Thursday morning after traders calculated that the already weak dollar has further to fall after the <a href="http://www.ecb.int/press/pressconf/2008/html/is080703.en.html">European Central Bank</a> increased a key interest rate by a quarter point to 4.25%.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> rose as much as $2.28 to $145.85 per barrel -- an all-time high -- before easing back slightly to trade at $144.40 at mid-day.<br /><br />Oil tends to rise when the dollar falls as investors/traders seek to preserve purchasing power of the decreased value of dollar-denominated commodities by bidding their price up. However, it's important to note that the dollar/oil correlation is not perfect: there have been instances in which the dollar fell and oil fell.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil pushes past $145 on dollar decline concerns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/">Oil pushes past $145 on dollar decline concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1244630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/03/oil-pushes-past-145-on-dollar-decline-concerns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bubble</category><category>bubbles</category><category>dollar</category><category>ECB</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>euro</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>NYSE</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OPEC</category><category>speculation</category><category>speculators</category><category>stock market</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three nations that could really increase global oil supply]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oilpic.jpg" alt="" />Oil's record price rise in 2007-2008 rivals price increases during the two previous oil shocks, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis">1973-74</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis">1979-80.</a> <br /><br />Moreover, while we'll leave for sector analysts and economists to declare if <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil's 100% gain in 2008</a> and 400% gain since 2000 qualifies for an oil shock, those analysts and economists generally agree that the price rise has been driven by rising demand, particularly increased demand for oil in emerging markets, such as China and India. <br /><br />However, that's not to say that the weak dollar and speculators / institutional investors have not affected the price of oil to the upside: they have, economists generally agree. Further, most analysts also believe oil's price contains a 'geopolitical / civil unrest risk' premium, as well. But all of the aforementioned does not blot-out the primary driver: the fact that about 1 billion new consumers of oil in emerging markets (in the form of car owners, factories, and commercial trucks) are being incorporated into the industrialized world, as the initial decade of globalization progresses.<br /> <br />Given the demand characteristics, and ignoring. for the moment, conservation / efficiency issues and alternative energy sources, a natural question concerns supply. Are there any nations that could increase supply by large amounts? Indeed there are three, but the answer is not as simple as 1-2-3. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The 3 major oil reserve nations</span><br />
<ul>
    <li>Iraq - The possessor of the third largest proved reserves (115 billion barrels), Iraq's oil production has been depressed by the Iraq War, and delays in massive required repairs to its infrastructure. By extension, a sustained increase in production assumes a cessation of hostilities and a political solution, and these are not on the immediate horizon. But the point here is that Iraq is capable of producing 6, 7, even 8 million barrels of oil per day, given investment and a stable government. Iraq's current output is about 2.5 million barrels per day, <a href="http://www.mees.com/Energy_Tables/crude-oil.htm">according to the Middle East Economic Survey. </a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three nations that could really increase global oil supply</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/">Three nations that could really increase global oil supply</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1236995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>globalization</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OilShock</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Amazon profit from McClellan book?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/amzn-amazon.com-logo.jpg" alt="" />The White House is in overdrive promoting former press secretary Scott McClellan's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/What-Happened-Washingtons-Culture-Deception/dp/1586485563/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1212064278&amp;sr=8-1"><em>What Happened</em></a>. That promotion has helped drive it to the number one selling position on Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN). While Amazon will benefit from the sales of the book, the stock is more than fairly valued.</p>
<p>The White House's promotion is based on its passionate response to the <strong>confirmation bias</strong> it demonstrated in the run up to the Iraq war. As I wrote in this <em><a href="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2007.00488.x?cookieSet=1&amp;journalCode=busr">Business Strategy Review</a></em> article, confirmation bias is when facing a major decision, one exhibits an unwillingness to admit conflicting data - no matter how salient - to influence a closed point of view. Mclellan points out that the White House decided to go to war against Iraq a year before its start and manufactured a false "case" to sell it.</p>
<p>McClellan pointing this out is hardly news. But I thought his comments about George W. Bush's cocaine use, as reported by <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/national_world&amp;id=6170740"><em>6abc.com</em></a>, were more revealing. Recalling a 1999 conversation with Bush, McClellan writes: <em>"'The media won't let go of these ridiculous cocaine rumors,' I heard Bush say. 'You know, the truth is I honestly don't remember whether I tried it or not. We had some pretty wild parties back in the day, and I just don't remember.' </em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Amazon profit from McClellan book?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/">Will Amazon profit from McClellan book?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 May 2008 10:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1209157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/29/will-amazon-profit-from-mclellan-book/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon.com</category><category>cocaine</category><category>confirmation bias</category><category>ConfirmationBias</category><category>george bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>iraq</category><category>scott mcclellan</category><category>ScottMcclellan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil gushes through the $125 mark!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" />I know that last thing you probably wanted to hear this morning was that oil prices moved even higher, but that is exactly what is taking place, as <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-surpasses-125-per-barrel-ahead-of-us/n20080509065609990043">oil rose as high as $125.98</a> and is currently trading at $125.60.<br /><br />Leading the charge today is the weak dollar as investors continue to seek refuge from the falling U.S. currency in commodities -- most notably, oil. The dollar has fallen today against the euro, the British pound, and the Japanese yen. The euro was sitting at $1.5404 last night, but has moved higher today, up to a current price of $1.5466.<br /><br />The market is also concerned about the upcoming peak driving season for Americans. With the season getting under way, oil prices will definitely continue to rise, and if gasoline stockpiles continue to fall, you can be sure that gasoline prices are also going to keep moving higher over the next couple of months. Will we see national averages of $4 or greater? I don't think so, but at the current rate prices are moving, nothing is out of the question right now.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil gushes through the $125 mark!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/">Oil gushes through the $125 mark!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 May 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1190955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/09/oil-gushes-through-the-125-mark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>British pound</category><category>BritishPound</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>Hezbollah</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Japan</category><category>Lebanon</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil supplies</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilSupplies</category><category>OPEC</category><category>tourism</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Americans sense $5 gas is near, and $122 oil says they're probably right]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/gaspic.jpg" />American motorists, already stung by an 80% increase in gasoline prices in the past year, sense that $5 per gallon is ahead, and they may be (regrettably) right.   </p>
<p>A <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/as-oil-tops-121-most-say-5-gas-is-near/20080505162209990001">CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll found</a> that 94% of respondents expect to pay $4 per gallon this year, and 78% expect to pay as much as $5, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/as-oil-tops-121-most-say-5-gas-is-near/20080505162209990001">CNNMoney reported Tuesday.</a>   </p>
<p>The national average currently is $3.62 per gallon as tracked by the Lundberg Survey, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&amp;refer=&amp;sid=aXwVdwUIZJww">Bloomberg News reported.</a> Many higher-cost areas of the United States -- including New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Boston -- are already experiencing prices over $4 per gallon.   </p>
<p>Further, traders and analysts say seasonal, structural, and geopolitical factors are likely to push gasoline considerably higher in the weeks ahead -- with gasoline's upward arc lasting months, if the price of oil continues to rise.  </p>
<p><strong>Primary culprit: Rising oil prices</strong>  </p>
<p>The biggest factor in gasoline's rise is the price of oil, which Tuesday topped $122 per barrel in <a href="http://www.nymex.com">NYMEX trading</a> for the first time in its history. Oil is up more than 100% since 2006. In November 2001, oil traded at about $17 per barrel. Moreover, because the crude component accounts for more than 60% of the price of a gallon of gasoline, refiners have passed that added cost onto consumers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Americans sense $5 gas is near, and $122 oil says they're probably right</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/">Americans sense $5 gas is near, and $122 oil says they're probably right</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 May 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1187757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/americans-sense-5-gas-is-near-and-122-oil-says-theyre-probab/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Asia</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>EmergingMarkets</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Latin America</category><category>LatinAmerica</category><category>Mexico</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>Venezuela</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil moves past $122]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" alt="" />Oil <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-hits-record-above-121-on-supply-woes/n20080506095909990011" target="_blank">continues its charge today</a>, with prices rising above $122. At noon, oil is at $122.21, up $2.21.   </p>
<p>The bulls have definitely had plenty of reason to continue to push prices higher this week. Concerns over supplies and the weak U.S. dollar continue to lead headlines, adding a boost to the current record high prices. Unfortunately for consumers at the gasoline pumps, higher oil will probably continue to prop up gasoline prices.  </p>
<p>In an already uncertain market, any sort of rumors over supplies will always lead to higher prices, and that is definitely playing a part in the current market. Fresh concerns are flowing out of Iraq after Kurdish rebels threatened to start running suicide operations against American interests in the country. Iran is (as always) in the minds of traders as the country continues to defy the United Nations over its nuclear program.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil moves past $122</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/">Oil moves past $122</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 May 2008 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1187817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/oil-moves-past-122/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dollar</category><category>featured</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil supply</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilSupply</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil jumps past $119 after ship fires warning shots at Iranian boats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil zoomed past $119 per barrel Friday at mid-day after a cargo ship hired by U.S. military fired warning shots at boats suspected to be Iranian, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00939920080425">Reuters reported Friday.</a><br /><br />According to a U.S. Navy Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet spokeswoman, the Westward Venture, a cargo ship chartered by the U.S. Department of Defense, fired "a few bursts" of machine gun and rifle fire to warn two, approaching, unidentified small boats believed to be Iranian vessels, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00939920080425">Reuters reported Friday.</a> The small boats left the area, a short time later, the spokeswoman said.<br /><br /><strong>Oil jumps $3</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> surged $3.04 to $119.10 per barrel on word of the incident. The other major energy commodities also rose on the news. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> rose about 4 cents to $3.30 per gallon, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> added about 4 cents to $3.05 per gallon, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> gained 13 cents to $10.92 per million BTUs.<br /><br />Independent energy trader Jim Dietz said the incident underscores how one unexpected event in today's oil-challenged world can send the oil markets into buy-mode in seconds.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil jumps past $119 after ship fires warning shots at Iranian boats</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/">Oil jumps past $119 after ship fires warning shots at Iranian boats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1177480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/oil-jumps-past-119-after-u-s-dod-hired-ship-fires-warning-shot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>U.S. Navy</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil dips to $106 on renewed flows from Iraq pipeline]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil prices fell to $106 Friday morning on word that oil flows from a southern pipeline hit by saboteurs had resumed, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&amp;sid=aoqj7GDS6hAU&amp;refer=canada">Bloomberg News reported.</a> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> fell $1.50 to $106.08 per barrel in early trading Friday. The other major energy commodities also retreated on the news. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> fell about 4 cents to $3.10 per gallon, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> declined about 2 cents to $2.70 per gallon, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> rose fell 2 cents to $9.70 per million BTUs.<br /><br />Iraqi oil flows through the country's southern pipeline system to the Basra export terminal returned to normal at about 10 p.m. local time Thursday, an oil official said, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&amp;sid=aoqj7GDS6hAU&amp;refer=canada">Bloomberg News reported Friday.</a> <br /><br />One of Iraq's two main oil export pipelines near the southern city of Basra was blown up by saboteurs on Thursday. The pipeline transports oil from the Zubair oil field to the Al-Faw storage facility, where it is exported.<br /><br /><strong>Oil Analysis:</strong> Prior to the Iraq incident, oil had been corrected to the $100 range, on likely lower oil demand and gasoline consumption stemming from the U.S. economic slowdown, and from record-high gasoline prices. However, two incidents this week, the Iraq pipe attack and a below-consensus weekly U.S. oil inventory report, caused a sudden reversal and a $7 spike in oil prices. Assuming bearish fundamentals remain the same -- and there are no further disruptions to supply globally -- traders now expect oil to resume its downward track as the spring season progresses.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/">Oil dips to $106 on renewed flows from Iraq pipeline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1151554/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/oil-dips-to-106-on-renewed-flows-from-iraq-pipeline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>global oil supply</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>inventories</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil rises to $107 after Iraq pipeline attack]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oil-pipeline.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Oil prices briefly jumped above $107 Thursday morning on news that saboteurs had blown up a major Iraqi export pipeline, <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3yj077TBCe4pRDC9icZLe1XNDKA">the Agence France-Presse reported. </a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> rose $1.26 to $107.16 per barrel in early trading Thursday, before moderating some, to about $106.50. The other major energy commodities also jumped on the news in early trading Wednesday. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> rose about 5 cents to $3.09 per gallon, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> added 1 cent to $2.72 per gallon, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> rose about 3 cents to $9.43 per million BTUs.<br /><br />One of Iraq's two main oil export pipelines near the southern city of Basra was blown up by saboteurs on Thursday, Samir al-Maksusi, Southern Oil Company spokesman, <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3yj077TBCe4pRDC9icZLe1XNDKA">told the AFP.</a> The pipeline transports oil from the Zubair oil field to the Al-Faw storage facility, where it is exported.<br /><br /><strong>Oil spikes</strong><br /><br />The Iraq incident marks the second consecutive day a bullish data point has pushed oil prices substantially higher, and underscores the skittish price qualities of the world's most vital commodity, according to independent energy trader Jim Dietz. Dietz said that heading into the week many traders had expected oil to continue to trend lower on sluggish demand for oil and oil products in the U.S., due to its economic slowdown.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil rises to $107 after Iraq pipeline attack</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/">Oil rises to $107 after Iraq pipeline attack</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/oil-rises-to-107-after-iraq-pipeline-attack/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>global oil demand</category><category>global oil supply</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>HeatingOil</category><category>HeatingOilPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil closed Thursday up $2.95 to $102.59 per barrel -- another record-high print close -- after a combination of geopolitical, production, and trading factors sent investors piling into crude oil futures as an investment/inflation hedge, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3nQCExVHxPo&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Thursday.</a><br /><br />Earlier in the day <a href="http://www.nymex.com">oil</a> hit an intra-session high of $102.70 -- within 10 cents of the all-time high, in inflation-adjusted terms, of $102.80 per barrel set in April 1980. <br /><br />The other major energy commodities also rose. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> surged about 6 cents to $2.83 per gallon, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> climbed about 2 cent to $2.49, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> rocketed 39 cents to $9.45 per million BTUs.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/">Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>inflation</category><category>inventories</category><category>investment funds</category><category>Iraq</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Turkey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Middle Eastern tensions push oil higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="5" hspace="5" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" alt="" />Oil prices are off to a strong start this week, as traders are pushing prices higher in reaction to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-rises-to-near-100-on-turkey-news/n20080225035609990015">multiple concerns stemming out of the Middle East</a>.<br /><br />The first factor that is weighing on traders mind's is the Turkish invasion to Iraq. Tension between Turkey and the Kurds in Northern Iraq is nothing new to the area (and violence between the two goes all the way back to 1984), but the current activity is the first confirmed operation by Turkey since the United States began its Iraqi campaign in 2003.<br /><br />Over the weekend, Turkey announced that one of its helicopters had gone down in Northern Iraq, killing 8 Turkish soldiers. In reaction to that news, Turkey stepped up its force by firing in excess of 40 <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/salvo" target="_blank">salvos</a> of artillery into the territory.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Middle Eastern tensions push oil higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/">Middle Eastern tensions push oil higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-rises-to-near-100-on-turkey-news/n20080225035609990015>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1123656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/middle-eastern-tensions-push-oil-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Kurds</category><category>Mahmoud Ahmadinejad</category><category>MahmoudAhmadinejad</category><category>Middle East</category><category>MiddleEast</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>Turkey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil closes near $99, records highest 3-day close ever]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil Friday closed up 65 cents to $98.85 -- shaking off earlier profit-taking -- after word that Turkey had launched a ground incursion across the border into northern Iraq. <br /><br />It was the highest three-day print close for oil ever. Oil gained more than $3 this week and closed above $100 twice. (Oil hit an all-time high, in inflation-adjusted terms, of $102.80 per barrel in April 1980.) <br /><br /><strong>Oil: bull, bear battle</strong><br /><br />Independent energy trader Jim Dietz told BloggingStocks Friday the market remains volatile and conflicted. <br /><br />"What we have now is a battle royale. Oil inventories have risen for five weeks and gasoline demand is slowing. Gasoline demand is up less than 1% year-over-year, and that suggests a major drop in oil's price is ahead. Bigtime," Dietz said. "But the bulls aren't giving up. They point to Venezuela's threats to cut-off oil to the U.S., the civil strife in Nigeria that never seems to go away, OPEC's possible March cut, and now Turkey crossing the Iraq border, as bullish signs, and they have a point. So it's a pretty conflicted market right now."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil closes near $99, records highest 3-day close ever</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/">Oil closes near $99, records highest 3-day close ever</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122075/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/oil-closes-near-99-records-highest-3-day-close-ever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Turkey</category><category>Venezuela</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does support of our troops affect your perception of a company?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img height="NaN" alt="question mark" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/question-mark01.jpg" width="125" align="right" />The comments on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/starbucks-nationwide-to-close-for-emergency-re-training-feb-26/">a recent blog post by Sarah Gilbert, about Starbucks retraining efforts</a> took an interesting turn towards discussion about whether or not that company supports our troops. This seems to be a subject which elicits strong passion among many blog readers, which prompts me to ask this question of you: Does a company's position, openly declared or not, regarding support for our troops, affect your perception of that company and whether or not you'll intentionally do business with them?<br /><br />This issue can be difficult to assess, because often times a company's position on the matter is cloaked, unavailable or skewed by misinformation. The comments on Sarah's blog post give clear evidence of that. Some folks seem convinced that Starbucks doesn't care about our troops, yet packages bearing its logo are reported to arrive at military addresses every day. What's more is the fact that often companies elect not to state a position regarding our restructuring efforts in Iraq. To some people, silence on the matter is interpreted as contempt rather than consent.<br /><br />I must admit that my own opinions about individual companies regarding their stance on our military involvements are sometimes colored by unconfirmed email commentary and careless internet banter. That is why I generally refrain from discussing the issue. What about you? Do you base your opinions on random emails which purport to reveal a company's stance regarding our military, or do you research the topic before coming to your conclusions?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does support of our troops affect your perception of a company?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/">Does support of our troops affect your perception of a company?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/starbucks-nationwide-to-close-for-emergency-re-training-feb-26/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1115237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/does-support-of-our-troops-affect-your-perception-of-a-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Airforce</category><category>Army</category><category>corporate</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Marines</category><category>military</category><category>National Guard</category><category>NationalGuard</category><category>Navy</category><category>opinion</category><category>political</category><category>President Bush</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>public</category><category>soldiers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" />American President George Bush announced his <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bush-unveils-31-trillion-spending-plan/20080204114409990002">new budget spending plan</a> today, and the package came out to a total of $3.1 trillion.<br /><br />Today's federal budget proposal marks the first time in America's history that a budget plan has been in excess of $3 trillion. Bush claims that his budget is "good" and "solid" and that the passing of this budget will help keep the troubled American economy growing.<br /><br />All in all, this budget looks to lift government spending by 6% during the fiscal year 2009, and it will probably come to no one's surprise that defense gets a nice little boost from today's budget. Bush is looking to allocate 8.2% of his spending on security, and the budget is looking to stake a $70 billion "placeholder" for war costs during 2009. The Pentagon should be pleased with its figures, as Bush is looking to allocate $515.4 billion its way... the highest allocation since WWII (and represents a 7.5% jump).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/">Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>FederalBudget</category><category>George Bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>HarryReid</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Judd Gregg</category><category>JuddGregg</category><category>Kent Conrad</category><category>KentConrad</category><category>medicare</category><category>Pentagon</category><category>politics</category><category>Senate</category><category>Steny Hoyer</category><category>StenyHoyer</category><category>war</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Bush looks to reassure Americans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" />When President George Bush prepared for his final State of the Union address, his speech writers definitely had their hands full, with recession fears, and growing impatience over the Iraqi war looming on American's minds. He put on a good face, and did his best to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120155112434023093.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">assure Americans that all was OK</a>, but did the American people buy it?<br /><br />Bush's second term as America's 43rd president has been a rocky road. The President has dealt with low approval ratings, resulting from growing disapproval over the war in Iraq, and most recently the mortgage crisis and slowing economy. Earlier this week, he tried to reassure the country that things were in good shape, and that the country had good things to look forward to in 2008.<br /><br />The main thing on the minds of most Americans right now is a possible recession getting ready to hit the country. While the President admitted that "growth is slowing," he pointed out that the benefits from a recently agreed upon stimulus package would go a long way to fight off any looming recession. <br /><br />The package cleared its first hurdle recently with the House of Representatives passing a $146 billion recovery package. Now it moves on to the Senate where <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/house-passes-economy-stimulus-package/20080128141409990001">its future is a bit more uncertain</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Bush looks to reassure Americans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/">President Bush looks to reassure Americans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1101077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/president-bush-looks-to-reassure-americans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>George Bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Iraq War</category><category>IraqWar</category><category>President</category><category>recession</category><category>State of the Union</category><category>StateOfTheUnion</category><category>stimulus package</category><category>StimulusPackage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street to Iowa Caucuses: You ain't got a clue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img width="125" height="NaN" align="right" alt="question mark" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/question-mark01.jpg" />I was motivated to write this by a recent blog post by Jonathan Berr entitled, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/iowa-to-wall-street-drop-dead/">Iowa to Wall Street: Drop dead</a>. In that post Jonathan made one assertion to which I take exception. Mr. Berr claims that the American voter is scared and that our fear shall rule the ballot box this coming November. With all due respect (and much is due) to Jonathan Berr, I must make this one assertion, it's not fear that we shall carry to the ballot box in November, it's anger. We as a public are very angry and we have every right to be mad as hell.<br /><br />We're mad because we know that as major banks were writing off losses they brought upon themselves, they sold those debt portfolios to collection agencies and pools of lawyers who relentlessly chased those dollars until the cows came home. Yeah, it's a loss on the books but those debts are still real and collectible. Do they honestly think we don't know that?<br /><br />We're angry because our government is silently allowing the sale of large stakes in major domestic financial institutions to foreign entities.<br /><br />We're upset that our government is underwriting the foolishness of producing ethanol from foodstuffs for use in internal combustion engines when good sense tells us that ethanol should be made from waste and used at it's source for electrical generation.<br /><br />We're mad as hell that we're potentially facing a government made up mainly of turncoat Democrats who sanctioned a war with their votes and now haughtily claim they were misled. They're liars or they're stupid... which is it?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street to Iowa Caucuses: You ain't got a clue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/">Wall Street to Iowa Caucuses: You ain't got a clue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/iowa-to-wall-street-drop-dead/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077107/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/wall-street-to-iowa-caucuses-you-aint-got-a-clue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Afganistan</category><category>banks</category><category>caucuses</category><category>Clinton</category><category>crisis</category><category>debt</category><category>Edwards</category><category>election</category><category>ethanol</category><category>featured</category><category>Giuliani</category><category>government</category><category>Iowa</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Obama</category><category>presidential</category><category>recovery</category><category>Romney</category><category>war</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could Iraq's oil output ease global supply concerns?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/soldier-iraq-oil.jpg"  alt="A U.S. soldier stands guard near the Iraqi Northern Oil Refinery near Baiji " title="A U.S. soldier stands guard near the Iraqi Northern Oil Refinery near Baiji " />It's hard to picture an oil sector projecting production in Iraq as a significant factor in global oil supply, but that, in fact, is what some analysts in the sector are doing.<br /><br />While the policy debate on the political merits and national security impact of the Iraq war continues at full-throttle in the United States -- the issue is almost certain to be a factor in the 2008 U.S. president election, many political analysts agree -- Iraq's oil sector continues to make slow, but nevertheless steady progress.<br /><br />With the decline in successful sabotage against Iraq's petroleum facilities, oil output has increased by 400,000 barrels daily to about 2.4 million barrels per day, inching closer to Iraq's production of 2.8 million barrels per day before the removal of Saddam Hussein in 2003, <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1217/p17s01-wmgn.html"><em>The Christian Science Monitor</em> reported Monday.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could Iraq's oil output ease global supply concerns?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/">Could Iraq's oil output ease global supply concerns?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1064974/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/could-iraqs-oil-output-ease-global-supply-concerns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Iraq War</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:16:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
