<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Marvel getting away?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /> Ah, an upgrade of an old favorite of mine. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>). I've owned this one in the past. Never lost money on it. I'd like to be back in Marvel. Only one problem.
<p> </p>
<p>Yesterday, Marvel, a company whose comic library competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and its own stable of superheroes, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/">received an upgrade</a> from JPMorgan. It now is in the Overweight camp. Before, it was merely Neutral. As you might expect, the stock reacted. There was no way the market was going to ignore this because, really, Marvel is one of those stocks that does show a lot of promise considering that the sequel to <em>Iron Man</em> is due out next summer. Shares closed over 5% higher on Wednesday in reaction to the headline. The professional traders must loved the action. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Marvel getting away?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/">Is Marvel getting away?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19084546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/is-marvel-getting-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>iron man 2</category><category>IronMan</category><category>IronMan2</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>robert downey jr.</category><category>RobertDowneyJr.</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Marvel beat estimates in Q1 -- is its stock set to fly to new heights?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ironman_head.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>), whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q1-eps-of-057-reflecting/rfid210486623">first-quarter</a> report on Tuesday. </p>
<p>The market liked what it saw. That's because the comic-book concern beat analyst estimates by a pretty significant margin. Hey, what else would you expect from the company that brought you <em>Iron Man</em>?</p>
<p>Marvel delivered 57 cents per share in income. According to <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNewsUS/idUKTRE5442OJ20090505">analysts</a>, Wall Street was hoping for 37 cents per share. Quite a surprise. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Marvel beat estimates in Q1 -- is its stock set to fly to new heights?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/">Marvel beat estimates in Q1 -- is its stock set to fly to new heights?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 May 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q1-eps-of-057-reflecting/rfid210486623>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1538125/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/marvel-beat-estimates-in-q1-is-its-stock-set-to-fly-to-new-he/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>comic book</category><category>ComicBook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Avengers</category><category>TheAvengers</category><category>Thor</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Marvel's Q4 performance change my opinion of the stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Recently, I wrote <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/">a piece</a> about my reluctance to believe that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) was necessarily a buy based on an upgrade. Well, Marvel released Q4 earnings this week, and I admit, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-achieves-recordresults-in-2008/rfid188274091">they were impressive</a>. Net sales were $224 million, and income was 80 cents per share. Both of those numbers more than doubled last year's stats. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/">Expectations</a> were for 71 cents per share for the bottom line. </p>
<p>If you followed the stock at all this week, you may have noticed that shares rallied on Tuesday when the earnings report was issued. Marvel would have made for an excellent trade ahead of the release. But that's all in the past. I have to concede that the performance did make me want to be back in Marvel. I've made money on the stock before, and I do believe in its long-term prospects. </p>
<p>I think the big question now is: Will this deadly market simply be too much for the Marvel bulls? My answer to that question is <em>yes</em>. Of course, I'm not the one who decides what the price action is going to be from this point on. That's the market's collective call. Maybe the shares will begin to trend higher. But I think that buying any stock this year is going to be an exercise in exasperation. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Marvel's Q4 performance change my opinion of the stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/">Does Marvel's Q4 performance change my opinion of the stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-achieves-recordresults-in-2008/rfid188274091>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471963/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/does-marvels-q4-performance-change-my-opinion-of-the-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) is a great company. It's got a lot of cool characters in its vast comic book portfolio. Spider-Man, Hulk, X-Men, you know them all. And it's a fun stock to both invest in and trade. It's a more direct play on movies than a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) or a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is. I've made money on Marvel in the past. I don't currently own it, so I was pretty interested when I heard that <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Wedbush+Morgan+Upgrades+Marvel+Entertainment+%28MVL%29+to+Buy+on+Strong+Earnings+Power/4404992.html">Wedbush Morgan</a> issued an upgrade this week. </p>
<p>Wedbush Morgan basically said that the market is undervaluing Marvel's potential. It sees a price target of $31. I myself think Marvel will break $30 yet again, but the problem I have is with sentiment. Exactly how will the market react to Marvel's shares this year? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/">Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Wedbush+Morgan+Upgrades+Marvel+Entertainment+(MVL)+to+Buy+on+Strong+Earnings+Power/4404992.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463679/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>wedbush morgan</category><category>WedbushMorgan</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p>So, I'm still <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ironman_head.jpg" />trying to figure out a strategy for the coming year for my portfolio. Stocks are starting to feel a little better to me, but I'm very, very cautious about timing in terms of trades. For instance, I'd rather wait until we see a substantial pullback from the recent rally before taking some of my cash on the sidelines and putting it to work. But I've got two ideas in the movie sector that I'm looking at: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>).
<p>First off, both are great companies. No, not every move they make is perfect (example: Marvel still can't properly monetize its Incredible Hulk property with a decent film). But both stocks have held up relatively well, in my opinion, during the financial implosion. Both stocks are also below their respective 52-week high's and above their respective 52-week low's. That's not a bad position to be in (although I should point out that I generally would like to get these two around their 52-week low's). But which stock has the edge?</p>
<p>Well, Marvel's shares have been strong lately. According to the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">AOL quote</a> at the time of this writing, Marvel is in the green in all time frames (year-to-date, one-month, one-year, etc.). DreamWorks Animation is in the red in a couple spots, but for the most part, it's been performing somewhat similarly to Marvel. I don't really see that much of a difference in terms of strength. Plus, both are arguably essentially equal in terms of valuation (at least in my opinion).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/">DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>film</category><category>Incredible Hulk</category><category>IncredibleHulk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel Entertainment</category><category>MarvelEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I'm out of Marvel Entertainment ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" alt="" />Well, I've finally done it. I sold my entire position of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>). It wasn't an easy decision.</p>
<p>When I covered Marvel's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/">latest earnings report</a>, I alluded to the issue of emotion. My emotion, to be specific. I stated that it most likely would be in my best interest to get out of the stock since there really weren't many catalysts coming up in 2009 to propel the stock higher. </p>
<p>In fact, it would be easy to make the argument that, since the market has been so haywire and irrational, one must take profits when one has a profit to indeed take. Marvel is just such a stock in my portfolio. I have several paper losses, but Marvel retains its green status on my board. I love the company's story on a long-term basis, absolutely adore it, but I think it is incumbent upon every trade and investor to build a cash stash that can be used for opportunities the market may throw their way.</p>
<p>The Marvel position that I liquidated on Tuesday was one I owned for quite a while. It had a nice profit attached to it. I feel good about preserving that capital, especially since Marvel is lower today (at least, it's lower as I write this; as we all know, that could change in a heartbeat).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>I'm out of Marvel Entertainment </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/">I'm out of Marvel Entertainment </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1377137/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/im-out-of-marvel-entertainment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>Thor</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hasbro attempts to put best foot forward on analysts' call]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/hasbro-has-logo.jpg" />Hasbro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys">HAS</a>) management recently spoke to analysts at its Investor Day conference. Here's the <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/105916-hasbro-inc-fall-2008-analyst-event-transcript?page=-1">transcript</a>. We all know the deal about these conferences: companies want to put their best foot forward and convince Wall Street that, if things are going good they are about to get even better, or, if things are going bad they won't be as bad as people thought and they will be improving either soon or on a long-term basis. You can bet that it was the latter tone taken by Team Hasbro at the event. In fact, CEO Brian Goldner said something which I thought was quite amazing: did you know that there actually <em>will</em> be a Christmas this year? </p>
<p>Frankly, I had my doubts. Of course, even though there will be a Christmas, and even though Santa will be delivering a lot of toys to kids this holiday season, it's not going to be a pleasant one for toy manufacturers. We're in a bad recession, folks, which is about to wreak psychological havoc on even the strongest consumer mind. Hasbro wants investors to know that parents will buy the stuff on their children's lists. Hasbro is further betting that the company's products will be on a lot of those lists. <br /></p>
<p>The brand equity inherent in its portfolio was mentioned as a particular strength, one that will help keep margins strong and defend the company against competition not only from the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKKS Pacific</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKK</a>) but also from companies that put out more generic playthings. Management also mentioned that Hasbro is in a position of financial strength because of its cash flow, and that it remains confident that revenue expansion can go beyond increases in costs and expenses. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hasbro attempts to put best foot forward on analysts' call</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/">Hasbro attempts to put best foot forward on analysts' call</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://seekingalpha.com/article/105916-hasbro-inc-fall-2008-analyst-event-transcript?page=-1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375117/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/hasbro-attempts-puts-best-foot-forward-on-analysts-call/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>JAKKS Pacific</category><category>JakksPacific</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>MVL</category><category>toys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Marvel was powerful in Q3, but should you sell the stock now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>), whose competitors include media companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), reported Q3 <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q3-eps-of-064-reflecting/rfid155049109">numbers</a> on Tuesday. Revenues increased a whopping 48% to $182.5 million. Earnings per diluted share soared 42% to $0.64. And net cash from operations was more powerful than a locomotive (wait, I might be mixing universes with that metaphor): they went up more than ten times, coming in at $172.2 million. </p>
<p>All of that is impressive. It shows that Marvel's movie model can bring in the money. Projects such as <em>Iron Man</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), and <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal, helped to drive the quarter. <br /></p>
<p>However, as this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idESBNG40107620081104?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">article</a> points out, Marvel isn't expecting much from 2009. Why's that? Because there are no new self-produced movies scheduled for release in that calendar year. That's going to drive long-term shareholders crazy, since I'd have to assume the stock won't be doing much during that time period. Traders might get some opportunities if the stock becomes volatile, but either way, there really are no big catalysts on the horizon. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Marvel was powerful in Q3, but should you sell the stock now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/">Marvel was powerful in Q3, but should you sell the stock now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q3-eps-of-064-reflecting/rfid155049109>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idESBNG40107620081104?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1362100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/marvel-was-powerful-in-q3-but-should-you-sell-the-stock-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ben Stiller finally bests Batman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p>Has <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Tropic Thunder</em> succeeded where the Joker has failed? Has the film beaten <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>The Dark Knight</em>? According to early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, it has. Can you believe it? <em>Tropic Thunder</em>, which stars Ben Stiller<em>,</em> right now has $26 million to its credit, enough to capture the top spot. That number will change most likely when final tallies are in, but it doesn't matter, since <em>The Dark Knight</em> is believed to have taken in a little under $17 million over the three-day weekend at domestic multiplexes, giving it a second-place finish. This is good news for shareholders of Viacom, who have so far been pretty happy with the studio's successful summer output. Box-office hits like <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>Iron Man</em> have powered the media company.</p>
<p>Now, Time Warner's new animated flick, <em>Star Wars: The Clone Wars</em>, actually did worse than I expected. It came in third with $15 million. I admit, I totally misread this one. Believe it or not, I thought the film might do a huge number, like between $40 million and $50 million. I'm not sure the box-office dynamics at this time of year would have supported a statistic like that for this kind of film. And I guess I overestimated the number of geeks out there who were waiting to see it during the first weekend out. I really blew it on that one. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) horror flick <em>Mirrors</em> came in fourth place, while <em>Pineapple Express</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), came in fifth. I saw <em>Express</em> last week. Cool movie.</p>
  <span style="font-style: italic;" /><br />
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ben Stiller finally bests Batman</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/">Ben Stiller finally bests Batman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1286838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/ben-stiller-finally-bests-batman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Stiller</category><category>BenStiller</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>indiana jones and the kingdom of the crystal skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Pineapple Express</category><category>PineappleExpress</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Tropic Thunder</category><category>TropicThunder</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should I have sold Marvel before the earnings?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) reported earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q2-eps-of-059-on-strength/rfid127892822">second quarter</a> on Tuesday, and as one might imagine, even though the numbers were solid, the stock sold off. Hey, this is Marvel we're talking about here. Its shares can be volatile little suckers. They're used as trading instruments by many. I'm even questioning if I should have trimmed my position before the report. As I write this at 2 pm, the stock is off by almost 9%. Let's see what the stats tell us. </p>
<p>The top line rose by 55% to $156.9 million. The bottom line increased by a whopping 73% to $0.59 per diluted share. Talk about hulking up! According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=mvl">Earnings.com</a>, the call was for $0.45 per share. That's a $0.14 beat, and that freakin' rules. <br /></p>
<p>As one might imagine, <em>Iron Man</em>, which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), and <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, placed in theaters by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal, helped drive the results. The films gave Marvel some nice licensing revenues and foreign pre-sale monies. There were no contributions from the box-office side of things yet. Marvel will certainly see a good boost to its revenues if, down the line, the home-video release of the projects sell well (which I think they will). Judging from statements made in the conference call (transcribed at <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/89171-marvel-entertainment-q2-2008-earnings-call-transcript?&amp;page=-1">Seeking Alpha</a>), we'll see most of the ancillary benefit from the movies next year. I was disappointed to see that publishing was weak (there were some tough comps there), but I'll tell you what was pretty strong: cash flow. Net cash from operations for the last six months more than doubled to over $68 million. And I love cash.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should I have sold Marvel before the earnings?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/">Should I have sold Marvel before the earnings?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/marvel-reports-q2-eps-of-059-on-strength/rfid127892822>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://seekingalpha.com/article/89171-marvel-entertainment-q2-2008-earnings-call-transcript?&amp;page=-1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1276057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/should-i-have-sold-marvel-before-the-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>Universal</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>X-Men</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom proves me wrong with results driven by box-office hits]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/viacomlogo.jpg" alt="" />Well, you can't win 'em all. I certainly found that out with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) latest <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/viacom-reports-second-quarter-2008/rfid126052276">quarterly results</a>. The media company delivered the complete opposite of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/">my expectations</a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/">. Let's go through the numbers.</a></p>
<p>Revenues for the second quarter increased 21% to almost $3.9 billion. Net income from continuing operations expanded 19% to 64 cents per share. That beat the estimate I was using by three pennies (other sources listed a <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1790227/">lower estimate</a> for earnings). No matter how you slice it, Viacom showed Wall Street how it's done. </p>
<p>Now, let me admit how wrong I was. I thought media networks would shine during the quarter and that the film division might not do as well. Operating income at media networks increased 4%, while Paramount and its colleagues increased their segment's profit by almost 300%! You can thank the new <em>Indiana Jones</em> movie, as well as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>Iron Man</em> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) <em>Kung Fu Panda</em>, for bringing the crowds into the multiplex and the money into Viacom's coffers. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Viacom proves me wrong with results driven by box-office hits</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/">Viacom proves me wrong with results driven by box-office hits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/viacom-reports-second-quarter-2008/rfid126052276>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1270255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/viacom-proves-me-wrong-with-results-driven-by-box-office-hits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>Indiana Jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Kung Fu Panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>Marvel</category><category>media companies</category><category>MediaCompanies</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rock Band</category><category>RockBand</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Will Viacom's results boost its stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/viacomlogo.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) is due to report Q2 earnings on Tuesday, July 29, after the market closes. What will be in store for the media company and fierce competitor of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>)? According to data at <a href="http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=estimates&amp;t=via">Zacks.com</a>, the company may report something in the vicinity of $0.61 per share, which would be good for 12% growth on the bottom line. Viacom has a reasonable chance of beating the estimate, based on past history.</p>
<p>There will be a few key elements that investors will be looking at. One product that has been a driving factor for Viacom's success is, believe it or not, a video game. <em>Rock Band</em>, which competes against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvid/nas">Activision Blizzard</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvid/nas">ATVID</a>) <em>Guitar Hero</em> titles, has been a boon for the company, and the MTV segment specifically. The game, which is distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>), will have a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/rock-band-2-coming-this-fall/">sequel coming out this fall</a>, and I hope management enlightens Wall Street about how it feels it will do against Activision Blizzard's new iteration of its own musical-gaming system and how it plans to promote it. Will there be any special synergies between MTV and the sequel? Watch for data on the number of song downloads that <em>Rock Band </em>is fueling. </p>
<p>When I took a look at Viacom's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/viacoms-q1-earnings-were-solid-how-does-the-stock-look/">last earnings report</a>, I found that the media-networks division was doing great business. Its operating income had jumped 15%. The media segment, which includes the valuable MTV Networks, should do well again in Q2, and I would expect something close to this kind of growth rate. However, I would be watching for signs from management that the economy may be affecting advertising. Going forward, this will be the challenge for MTV, Nickelodeon, etc. And speaking of Nickelodeon, are there any initiatives on the board to counteract the incredible growth that the Disney Channel has seen thanks to properties such as <em>Hannah Montana</em>? Investors should listen to the conference call for information about marketing plans and new shows, as well as merchandising schemes for the upcoming holiday season. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Will Viacom's results boost its stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/">Earnings preview: Will Viacom's results boost its stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zacks.com/research/report.php?type=estimates&amp;t=via>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/business/media/27scene.html?em&amp;ex=1217304000&amp;en=2197be071b258e44&amp;ei=5087%0A>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1268317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/earnings-preview-will-viacoms-results-boost-its-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Activision Blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVID</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>Electronic Arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>featured</category><category>Guitar Hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Kung Fu Panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rock Band</category><category>RockBand</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How big will Time Warner's 'Dark Knight' be?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p>There will be five superheroes competing for the attention of weekend moviegoers come Friday. There's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>)'s duo <em>Iron Man</em> and <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>)'s <em>Hancock</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>)'s <em>Hellboy</em> (distributed by GE's Universal), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>)'s <em>Dark Knight</em>. So, who's going to be the ultimate crime fighter?</p>
<p>I'll tell you which one prevails: Time Warner and its new Batman film, <em>The Dark Knight</em>, has the weekend all locked up. This is set in stone. The <em>Hulk </em>and<em> Iron Man </em>are pretty much done, <em>Hellboy</em> isn't a powerful enough brand name,<em> </em>and <em>Hancock </em>didn't deliver the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/sonys-hancock-wins-holiday-race/">big numbers</a> I thought it was capable of during its debut weekend (since then, however, the movie <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/ges-universal-gives-em-hellboy-at-the-box-office/">has held up well</a>, I have to admit). But you can bet that <em>Dark Knight </em>hits $100 million this weekend. Can you feel the buzz surrounding this blockbuster in the wings? I can. Several reviews I've read were full of cinematic worship for this new entry in the franchise, with special praise reserved for the late Heath Ledger and his portrayal of the fiendish nightmare known as The Joker. There's a decent marketing campaign behind the project, including promotion of the availability of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imax-corporation/imax/nas">IMAX</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imax-corporation/imax/nas">IMAX</a>) screenings. If there ever seemed a movie fit for Imax, this is it. Yeah, <em>Dark Knight</em> can't lose, it can only win big.</p>
<p>Of course, what about Time Warner's stock? It could certainly use a superhero right now, as it has been hovering in recent times not above Gotham City (although that would probably be treacherous enough) but above 52-week-low City. I can't say that a big opening weekend definitely won't move the stock a little just due to the excitement factor, but I wouldn't buy the company ahead of the film (I also wouldn't gamble with IMAX either). Time Warner simply is too large to be affected significantly by one movie. If you consider Time Warner at all, it would be for fundamentals and valuation (I think the company is cheap here, although with this market, I'd rather get it cheaper). Enjoy the movie first, think about the stock later...</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own GE and Marvel; positions can change at any time.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/">How big will Time Warner's 'Dark Knight' be?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1251064/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/how-big-will-time-warners-dark-knight-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Batman</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hancock</category><category>Hellboy</category><category>IMAX</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>superhero</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>The Joker</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>TheJoker</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/hulk.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) is all about making movie franchises these days. For instance, the success of <em>Iron Man </em>has led to plans for a sequel. Shareholders are, understandably, happy about this since a series of blockbuster films will rake in a lot of money for the company and have a positive effect on the shares.</p>
<p>But, Marvel's second movie out of the gate, <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, may not get the sequel treatment, according to the <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-07-09T051128Z_01_N09318115_RTRIDST_0_FILM-HULK.XML"><em>Hollywood Reporter</em></a>. The article implied that the financial performance of the film may not have been blockbuster enough to make a sequel inevitable. That doesn't mean that it won't eventually get one, but since there are, as of now, no plans for another <em>Hulk</em>, the speculation is out there. As aforementioned, we already know that there will be another <em>Iron Man</em>. </p>
<p>As a Marvel shareholder, I am disappointed by the box-office results for this latest iteration of the<em> Hulk </em>(even the first weekend <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/">seemed weak</a>). Back in 2003, when that year's movie version of the character was released, there was widespread disdain for the project (I myself couldn't stand the flick). Then came this summer's so-called reboot of the franchise. Unfortunately, as of now, 2008 <em>Hulk </em>hasn't done much better than 2003 <em>Hulk</em>. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/">Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-07-09T051128Z_01_N09318115_RTRIDST_0_FILM-HULK.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1250955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Hancock' will dominate the July 4th weekend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p>It's the Fourth of July weekend, and movie studios want to capture as much money for their films as possible, even if they've already been in the theaters for several weeks. No matter what, though, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>)'s <em>Hancock</em>, starring the always excellent Will Smith, is set to be the financial superhero of the weekend. Already, as of this writing, the film has taken in about $24 million through Wednesday, according to <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com">Boxofficemojo</a>. The movie had some showings on Tuesday before its official debut in the middle of the week. It was number one on Wednesday, followed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s <em>Wall-E.</em> The robot flick so far has a total tally of around $86 million. </p>
<p>Poor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) and its <em>The Incredible Hulk </em>project. Will anybody be interested in seeing the big green guy now that <em>Hancock</em> is in the marketplace? Indeed<em>, Hulk</em> took in less than a million bucks on Wednesday, and it ranked number seven for that day. Looks like the <em>Hulk</em> fever is winding down at the multiplex, and it looks like Marvel's stock has had its run for the time being. The stock closed on Thursday at $31.20, well away from the 52-week high of $37.41. I still hold Marvel shares, and although there are no big catalysts on the immediate horizon, I have a long-term outlook on the company. Still, the trader in me wishes that I had lightened up on the position back at the $37 level to book some gains. </p>
<p><em>Hancock</em> should do well north of $100 million once the Fourth of July holiday period has passed. The marketing, in my opinion, is very compelling, and from what I know about the story, it's a smart idea that provides a nice balance to the frivolous plots of <em>Iron Man</em> and <em>Hulk</em> (I'm using the term "frivolous" here with affection). Sony's scored a hit, maybe even a new franchise (I haven't seen the film, so I can't say if a sequel is feasible or not within the confines of the concept), but it won't do much to move the company's stock. Those looking to play the Hollywood game might want to wait for Marvel to pull back further from current levels.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own Disney and Marvel; positions can change at any time. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/">'Hancock' will dominate the July 4th weekend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1245444/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/04/hancock-will-dominate-the-july-4th-weekend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Hancock</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>movies</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>Wall-E</category><category>Will Smith</category><category>WillSmith</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A summer of success at the box office?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hollywood-sign.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />I love summer, not only for the weather, but also for all the movies making their way to the multiplexes. According to this article at <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/summer-season-pulls-ahead-last/story.aspx?guid=%7B1C262CDA%2D3652%2D4054%2D84CA%2D10336ACD7906%7D">Marketwatch</a>, for the first six weeks of the U.S. summer box-office season, the total gross for theatrical movies hit $1.46 billion, a statistic that represents about a 5% increase year-over-year in the comparable period. You can thank hits such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>Iron Man </em>and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull </em>for driving the nice results.</p>
<p>Now, I don't mean to rain on this parade, but I'm afraid I find myself in a similar frame of mind in terms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/is-the-movie-business-really-doing-that-well/">a piece I wrote</a> back in March about the 2007 movie-business statistics. You see, I always like to look at number of tickets sold as a barometer for the true health of Hollywood. The number of tickets sold increased 1.6% to 206.2 million. The average price of a movie ticket rose 2.9% to $7.08. Now, while I am glad to see an increase this time around in terms of number of tickets sold, I don't find a 1.6% increase terribly exciting. It tells me that the theater industry still needs to convince people that it's fun to get out of the house, away from the giant televisions and the snazzy home-theater systems, and chomp on overpriced popcorn in a dark auditorium. Going to movie theaters is something that, in my opinion, can't truly be replicated in the home. A lot of people don't share that opinion, however. </p>
<p>The challenge for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal is to make people feel that waiting for the DVD shouldn't be the norm. The shared experience of a movie screening is a unique part of culture, and studios need to communicate this fact through their marketing campaigns. I do think there is more work ahead for Hollywood. Focus on the number of tickets sold, that's the big metric. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own Disney and GE; positions can change at any time.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/">A summer of success at the box office?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/summer-season-pulls-ahead-last/story.aspx?guid=%7B1C262CDA%2D3652%2D4054%2D84CA%2D10336ACD7906%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1230065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/a-summer-of-success-at-the-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office industry</category><category>BoxOfficeIndustry</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>movie ticket prices</category><category>MovieTicketPrices</category><category>MVL</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Marvel need Jon Favreau?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" />Yesterday, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/">I wrote</a> about my nervousness over <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>. Today, I'd like to talk about how I wouldn't be so nervous if the <em>Iron Man</em> sequel ended up being directed by someone other than Jon Favreau. There are two excellent articles on <em>The Motley Fool</em> discussing this issue, one by <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/06/11/iron-man-deserves-a-raise.aspx">Nathan Alderman</a> and one by Marvel expert <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/06/12/does-marvel-understand-hollywood.aspx">Tim Beyers</a>. At the time those articles were published earlier in the week, it had seemed that Marvel was reticent about ponying up a higher compensation package for Mr. Favreau on the heels of the awesome success of the first movie starring Robert Downey, Jr. David Maisel, chairman of Marvel Studios, apparently wants to be very conservative about the company's above-the-line costs. Alderman thinks Marvel should give Favreau the requested raise, while Beyers understands the Hollywood dynamics going on and can see why both sides are doing what they are doing. </p>
<p>By the time my own piece is published, it's possible Favreau may be confirmed as the director of the second <em>Iron Man </em>(as I write this, there are rumors that a deal has been offered). Regardless of what happens, I'd like to offer my opinion on whether or not Favreau is an absolutely necessary component for an <em>Iron Man</em> sequel.</p>
<p>He isn't. And if shareholders think he is, then they had better rethink their investment in Marvel. What shareholders must ask themselves is this: Is it the director that is responsible for the ultimate success of a Marvel film, or is it Marvel management and the intangible value of the Marvel intellectual-property portfolio? Which element adds more equity? As far as I'm concerned as a shareholder, I'm investing in Marvel. I'm not investing in Jon Favreau. Any investor who believes that any one director is indispensable is going to be in for a stomach-churning ride, because when the day comes that a Jon Favreau or a Sam Raimi (he directed the<em> Spider-Man</em> flicks) decides that Marvel is no longer paying them what they're worth and jumps ship, the stock could easily see an overreaction sell-off. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Marvel need Jon Favreau?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/">Does Marvel need Jon Favreau?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/06/11/iron-man-deserves-a-raise.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/06/12/does-marvel-understand-hollywood.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1223899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/does-marvel-need-jon-favreau/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>David Maisel</category><category>DavidMaisel</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Jon Favreau</category><category>JonFavreau</category><category>Marvel</category><category>movie industry</category><category>MovieIndustry</category><category>MVL</category><category>Nathan Alderman</category><category>NathanAlderman</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Robert Downey Jr.</category><category>RobertDowneyJr.</category><category>Sam Raimi</category><category>SamRaimi</category><category>Spider-man</category><category>Tim Beyers</category><category>TimBeyers</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" alt="" />I have a confession to make: I'm getting nervous as the weekend approaches. A certain movie has me rather frightened. Is it that creepy picture about mass suicides from M. Night Shyamalan? Nope. It's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>. I'm a shareholder of Marvel, and I'm worried about its prospects. It opens on Friday the 13th. Yeah, that's a lucky omen.</p>
<p><em>Hulk</em>, which is being distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal (I own GE as well, but this won't move GE at all), represents a fresh start for the green, angry beast. If you'll recall, there was a Hulk movie back in summer 2003. It was horrible. In fact, I remember getting up and walking around the theater during a portion of the film so that I could do a bit of self-editing on it. This time around could be different. I just read a review from<em> The Hollywood Reporter</em> that was featured in this <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-06-12T010205Z_01_N11380984_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-HULK.XML">Reuters</a> link, and I have to say, I do feel a little calmer. According to the review, this new take on the Hulk character is an entertaining cinematic diversion wholly suitable for the dog days of summer. It apparently is a superior product.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/">I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-06-12T010205Z_01_N11380984_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-HULK.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1223136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>marvel</category><category>marvel movies</category><category>MarvelMovies</category><category>MVL</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Zohan is no match for the Panda]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dreamworkslogo.jpg"  alt="" />The weekend domestic box-office results weren't too shocking. I pretty much knew that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) <em>Kung Fu Panda </em>would kick its way to the top (I wonder how many writers will be using that phrase when covering the movie this week). But when I saw that <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a> estimated a $60 million gross for the cartoon, I actually was disappointed. These days, a $60 million haul in the summertime doesn't seem impressive. I thought <em>Panda </em>might have been worth a little more. But, after checking some of the historical openings for other DreamWorks pictures, I realized that <em>Panda </em>did all right. It actually was one of the bigger debuts for the studio. </p>
<p>Even though the cartoon seemed a lock for first place, I thought <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>You Don't Mess with the Zohan</em> project would be a close second. At a $40 million estimated gross, it wasn't. I don't know if you can mess with Zohan or not, but you apparently can mess with Adam Sandler and best his star power. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> is still going strong in third place. It has crossed the $250 million level, and it is headed for $300 million. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Sex and the City</em>, however, has lost a great deal of thunder, dropping from first to fourth place in its second weekend at the multiplexes. It is just shy of the $100 million mark. Is<em> Sex</em> nothing more than an opening-weekend phenomenon? It seems that way, but we'll have to see how steep the drops are in subsequent weekends. </p>
<p><em>The Strangers</em>, from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, dropped from third to fifth place in its second weekend, a rather predictable event for a horror movie. At a $37 million total gross so far, <em>The Strangers </em>won't go down as a huge triumph, but you've got to love the profit potential for this low-budget flick that succeeded in counterprogramming its way to summertime glory. Universal obviously thought the film's concept possessed a chance to score a $100 million total haul since it placed the movie against the big guns of this busy period, but that's okay, the try was worth it in this case. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Zohan is no match for the Panda</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/">The Zohan is no match for the Panda</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1218948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Kung Fu Panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>Sex and the City</category><category>SexAndTheCity</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>You dont mess with the Zohan</category><category>YouDontMessWithTheZohan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/sex-and-the-city.jpg" alt="" />The box-office estimates from <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a> for this past weekend surprised the heck out of me. Apparently, I'm out of touch with how popular this HBO show actually was because <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Sex and the City </em>captured first place at domestic multiplexes, hauling in over $55 million as of now (the numbers will change when they are finalized later on). Honestly, I thought I was going to be writing about the failure of Carrie and the gang. Kudos to Time Warner for opening this picture to great success. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull </em>continues to bring in the nostalgia crowd as well as generate new fans for the franchise. It came in second place with about $46 million for the weekend. Still, I'm amazed that "Sex and the City" topped it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/">Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1211640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>MVL</category><category>NWS</category><category>Prince Caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>Sex and the city</category><category>The Strangers</category><category>TheStrangers</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:56:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
