IrrationalExuberance posts

Feed

Robert Shiller's ideas for saving peoples' homes

Irrational Exuberance author Robert Shiller thinks housing is bad (Anyone disagree?) and also thinks that the government isn't doing enough to help people keep their homes: "We have to consider the possibility that the housing price downturn will eventually be as big as that of the last truly big decline, from 1925 to 1933, when prices fell by a total of 30 percent."

Few experts whose opinions are as highly valued as Shiller have suggested such a possibility, and it's worth thinking about the catastrophic consequences that could ensue. On average, homes are only down 5% from their peak -- Shiller is suggesting that we could only be 1/6th of the way through the crisis, in spite of all the hand wringing that has already taken place.

After referring to the broad initiatives that President Roosevelt and others initiated during the Depression, Shiller describes the public policy response to the current crisis as "anemic".

He may be right. But the other side to it is this: The subprime mortgages that are wreaking such havoc enabled a lot of people to acquire homes who had no business owning their own homes. Many had terrible credit, consumer debt, and didn't make substantial down payments. Mortgage fraud was a rampant means of getting homes for lower-income workers, often on the part of mortgage brokers.

Everyone talks about people losing homes like it's this horrible thing -- which it is. But during the housing bubble, homeownership became a reality for millions of people who never would have had that opportunity a few decades ago. An increased foreclosure rate is probably a natural and necessary part of increased homeownership among lower income people, and a broad public policy response may not be appropriate.

Buyout bubble: Getting there, but not yet

Defining periods of irrational exuberance can be difficult. However, one method to do so might simply be to look at the headlines. Here are this morning's:
The headlines are not too different from the 1980's LBO boom when virtually every headline was associated with a hostile buyout of some sort. Are we approaching the end of the buyout binge? Most likely not. These periods can last for years.

This buyout boom has been fueled by a number of factors. The most important factor has been undervalued stocks, which, in many cases, still remains. In the post tech-telecom bubble of the 1990s, investors went into a cocoon while U.S. company management continued to grow earnings and increase returns on investment.

What will end this buyout boom? My bet is a massive bull market which pushes valuations off the radar screen of private equity.

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-74.9212,454.83
NASDAQ-1.852,837.53
S&P 500-2.861,317.82

Last updated: May 27, 2012: 03:18 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.20-0.05(-0.26)

Alcoa

8.630.00(0.00)

Apple Inc

562.29-3.03(-0.54)

Google Inc 'A'

591.53-12.13(-2.01)

Bank of America

7.15+0.01(+0.14)

Wal-Mart Stores

65.31+0.24(+0.37)

Exxon Mobil Corp

82.08-0.53(-0.64)

Ford

10.60+0.01(+0.09)

Citigroup

26.47-0.19(-0.71)

IBM

194.30-1.79(-0.91)

Yahoo

15.36+0.01(+0.07)

Starbucks

54.56-0.20(-0.37)

Microsoft

29.06-0.01(-0.03)

Home Depot

49.44-0.27(-0.54)

DailyFinance Headlines

AOL Business News

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Sponsored Links

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

Page Loaded in 1338103113559 ms.