J.K. Rowling wins Harry Potter encyclopedia lawsuit originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

It's been three weeks since our Money Face-Off feature ran here at BloggingStocks and on AOL, offering you the opportunity to share who you though had the financial edge in a series of twenty head-to-head match-ups. So I thought I'd take another look and see how things have worked out.

It's hard to pick just one big winner. In terms of the largest lead over a rival, Ivanka Trump easily beats Paris Hilton with 89% of the vote. Others holding big leads over their opponents include Tiger Woods, Warren Buffett, Steven Spielberg, and Rupert Murdoch.

In terms of receiving the most votes, the clear leader is the Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart match-up, with just short of 150,000 votes. Other big vote getters were Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham, Rudy Giuliani vs. Michael Bloomberg, and Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs. In terms of the liveliest discussions in the comments, the winners are Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart, Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo, and Bono vs. Angelina Jolie. Also check out the comments for the J.K. Rowling vs. J.R.R Tolkien, Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham, and Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton posts.

As for the face-off posts here that got the most attention, the clear winner is Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo, with more than 13,000 hits. Lindsay Lohan vs. Britney Spears and Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart also attracted lots of readers.

Results for all the face-offs follow below, but keep in mind that the voting is still open. It's not too late to add your vote or let us know what you think.

Continue reading Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett

Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet

Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Spoiler alert - if you have not yet read the conclusion to the Harry Potter saga, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, you may want to skip this post, in which the ending is discussed.

For companies such as publisher Scholastic Corp. (NASDAQ:SCHL), the US publisher of the books, Time Warner (NYSE:TWX), whose Warner Brothers Studios produces the hugely profitable Harry Potter movies, and General Electric's (NYSE:GE) Universal Studios, which will open a Harry Potter theme park in 2009, the seventh and final Harry Potter book must have come as a great relief.

Despite rumors to the contrary, the title character did not die, and thereby cast a pall on the series and its offshoots. Rather, as I expected, Harry prevailed, and in general the core cast lived happily ever after. Even Snape, as I predicted, achieved redemption, but at a mortal cost.

In the coda to the novel, Harry Potter and his wife, the former Ginny Weasley, watch their children depart for Hogwarts. Also placing their children on the Hogworts train are Harry's best friends, the married couple Ron Weasley and Hermoine Granger.

This final scene, nineteen years after the climax of the book, will no doubt inspire a great deal of conversation, as it keeps open a couple of possibilities for future novels in the Potter universe. Harry is still young enough to have more adventures, perhaps as he takes on the role of the era's greatest wizard, much as Albus Dumbledore was in Potter's youth. Rowling could also, should she decide to continue the series, reboot the series with the next generation of Hogwarts students.

I don't expect her to return to the Potter storyline for a long time, if ever, but the lure will always be there; a huge, thirsty audience ready to demonstrate their devotion with their pocketbooks.

Gallery: Everybody loves Harry Potter

Rowling safeguards Potter empire originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Even with magic as strong as Harry Potter's, Publisher's Weekly reported today that bookstore sales continued to fall for the fifth consecutive month. According to the U.S. Census bureau, sales in May were down 4.3%, to $1.10 billion.

However, bookstore sales totaled $6.20 billion in the period between January and May. The retail segment in total saw sales up 5.6% in May, and were ahead 4.1% for the first five months of 2007.

How does that jibe with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, the latest (and last) Potter tome selling an unprecedented nine million copies in the U.S. and Britain in its first 24 hours of release? Well it's all good, everyone agrees, compelling millions of kids to lay aside their Nintendo for the week and venture into bookstores. But as Sara Nelson, editor-in-chief of Publishers Weekly recently wrote, there are still some problems in the numbers.

"Take, for example, the retailers, big and small. The former have made the dubious choice to discount HPATDH so drastically that even they admit their revenue - on the most popular book in history! - will be down this year. The latter can't begin to compete with the economies of scale and some may bypass their distributors and buy direct - at nearly the same discount - from Amazon or Costco."

A piece on Bloomberg offers a similarly dark assessment, suggesting that Big-box retailers like Costco Wholesale Corp. (NASDAQ: COST) and Sam's Club (A division of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT) discount the book so deeply as to use it as more a customer draw then a revenue-booster. In the meantime, independent bookstores that can't afford to discount this most popular literary offering in history must resort to any tactic they can to draw customers in, including hosting Potter parties, and other community-building schemes.

I have another idea for keeping small booksellers and their particular brand of magic alive. Maybe every wealthy best-selling author (and Oprah, who's responsible for creating a few) could each sponsor an independent bookstore. Surely it's not too much to ask from someone who probably spent the better part of their youths perusing the musty stacks. Besides, what's J.K. Rowling got to do these days?

Gallery: Everybody loves Harry Potter

Not even Harry can save bookstores from their fate originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by JK Rowling is scheduled to be published by Scholastic Press (NASDAQ: SCHL) on July 21, and some fans are speculating that Harry will die. I am quite confident in telling you that he won't, for several reasons.

1. The artistic.
Experienced authors will tell you that a satisfying ending is one that, after it happens, readers will see as inevitable, even if they didn't see it coming. For example, the ending of Sixth Sense, while a shocker to many (including me), worked because it neatly tied up loose threads we'd momentarily lost sight of. The ending completed the Bruce Willis' character arc.

Rowling has not established the need for someone to sacrifice his life so that Voldemort might die. In fact, she has already given Harry's parents and Dumbledore to the cause. Harry's death would be gratuitous, and, most importantly, inconsistent with the rest of the saga. Harry is the viewpoint character, and it is our vicarious enjoyment of his overcoming obstacles that gives the series such impact. It's hard to enjoy the denouement of a dead character.

Most importantly, though, Harry is not a flawed character seeking redemption through sacrifice. He is an innocent predestined to conquer the wicked AND LIVE HAPPILY EVER AFTER.

2. The practical.
If Rowling were to kill off her hero in the final book, it would not only diminish sales of this volume, but horribly impact the future sales of the series. Knowing that Harry was to die, (and who on Earth would not know of this plot twist?), would change the reader's experience, robbing each bit of conflict of its gravitas. Plus, fans would revolt. Arthur Conan Doyle learned this lesson when he tried to kill off Sherlock Holmes -- some plot reversals fans will simply not accept.

3. The financial.
With two more films on the planning board (including Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, due for release July 11th by Warner Brothers, a division of Time Warner, NYSE:TWX) and a theme park in development, I can't believe these companies would invest so much in a closed-end storyline. And while Rowling may have all the money she needs, keeping the tale open-ended is a much shrewder business decision.

So I'm not worried about Harry. My prediction -- he'll defeat Voldemort with Snape's help, assume Dumbledore's position as head of Hogworts, marry Jenny Ginny and stand as best man at Ron and Hermione's wedding.

Harry Potter can't die. Trust me.

Gallery: Everybody loves Harry Potter

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Will Rowling kill off Harry? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Bloomin' heck! Only 67 days until we learn Harry Potter's fate originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 15 May 2007 15:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Harry Potter casts a binding spell upon eBay originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Boy wizard to magically lift Scholastic shares again? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:36:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.