<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: J.M. Smucker December volatility flat into Q2 results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mnst/" rel="tag">Monster Worldwide (MNST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" />J.M. Smucker (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-j-m-smucker-company/sjm/nys/option-chains">SJM</a>) closed at $53.48. SJM report Q2 EPS of $1.22 and revenue of $1.2 billion. December option implied volatility of 27 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional movement after EPS.</p>
<p>ISE Sentiment Index-ISEE closed at 130 on 11/19/09. ISEE 10-day moving average is 136.</p>
<p>Two stocks with IV rise on November 19; E-Trade (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas/option-chains">ETFC</a>) +31%, Monster Worldwide (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mww/nys/option-chains">MWW</a>) +11%, according to IVolatility.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/">Options Update: J.M. Smucker December volatility flat into Q2 results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/options-update-j-m-smucker-december-volatility-flat-into-q2-re/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>E-Trade</category><category>J.M. Smucker</category><category>J.m.Smucker</category><category>Monster Worldwide</category><category>MonsterWorldwide</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.M. Smucker beats in Q3, but there are concerns about guidance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-smuckers-200cs112608.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-j-m-smucker-company/sjm/nys">J.M. Smucker</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-j-m-smucker-company/sjm/nys">SJM</a>) reported earnings for <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-j-m-smucker-company-announces-third/rfid188651577">Q3</a> on Wednesday. The company, which makes defensive-type products such as peanut butter, jelly, and biscuits, reported a net sales increase of 6%, once you strip away the effect of acquisitions -- most notably the Folgers purchase -- and the effect of foreign exchange. On an adjusted basis, J.M. Smucker increased its bottom line by 11% to $0.88 per share. This <a href="http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/17722/Peanut+Butter+Sours+J.M.+Smucker+-+Zacks+Tale+of+the+Tape">source</a> says that management beat estimates by two pennies, although other sources, such as <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=sjm">this one</a>, says the beat was by a single penny.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.M. Smucker beats in Q3, but there are concerns about guidance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/">J.M. Smucker beats in Q3, but there are concerns about guidance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-j-m-smucker-company-announces-third/rfid188651577>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=sjm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/j-m-smucker-beats-in-q3-but-there-are-concerns-about-guidance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>food</category><category>Hershey</category><category>HSY</category><category>inthenews</category><category>j.m. smucker</category><category>J.m.Smucker</category><category>K</category><category>Kellogg</category><category>peanut butter</category><category>PeanutButter</category><category>reeses peanut butter cup</category><category>ReesesPeanutButterCup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is J.M. Smucker worthy of its new Buy rating?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-smuckers-200cs112608.jpg" />As we all know, the market is a fickle mistress -- and I will be the first to admit, she has humiliated me with her indiscretion on many occasions. However, I'm happy to report that my pick of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-j-m-smucker-company/sjm/nys">The J.M. Smucker Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-j-m-smucker-company/sjm/nys">SJM</a>) as a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/cheap-stocks-the-j-m-smucker-company/">"Cheap Stock"</a> for 2009 has not completely blown up in my face (yet).</p>
<p>The peanut butter-based security jumped back on my radar today when I noticed that brokerage firm Janney Montgomery Scott started coverage of SJM with a <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/New+Coverage/Janney+Montgomery+Scott+Initiates+Coverage+on+The+J.M.+Smucker+Company+(SJM)+with+a+Buy/4332826.html">Buy rating</a>. Not too many analysts are currently following the shares; according to Zacks, the jam giant has garnered just two Strong Buys and one Hold. Any additional bullish initiations could help the stock extend its recent uptrend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is J.M. Smucker worthy of its new Buy rating?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/">Is J.M. Smucker worthy of its new Buy rating?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.streetinsider.com/New+Coverage/Janney+Montgomery+Scott+Initiates+Coverage+on+The+J.M.+Smucker+Company+(SJM)+with+a+Buy/4332826.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/is-j-m-smucker-worthy-of-its-new-buy-rating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst ratings</category><category>AnalystRatings</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>CheapStocks</category><category>contrarian</category><category>j.m. smucker</category><category>J.m.Smucker</category><category>options</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>the j.m. smucker company</category><category>TheJ.m.SmuckerCompany</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.M. Smucker's stock sells off on earnings -- I'm not buying either]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p><img height="95" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.smuckers.com/images/os/os_simplysmuckers.gif" width="170" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Well-known maker of peanut-butter and jelly products <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/smucker-j-m-co-united-states/sjm/nys">J.M. Smucker</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/smucker-j-m-co-united-states/sjm/nys">SJM</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-j-m-smucker-company-announces-fourth/rfid114124349">earnings</a> for Q4 and the full fiscal year on Thursday. The market didn't like the report in the least. The stock closed down well over 8% at the end of yesterday's session. </p>
<p>Here's what happened. For the fourth quarter, net sales increased 20%, but that was little consolation to the bottom line, which dropped 11%, as earnings per diluted share came in at $0.67 versus $0.75 in the year-ago period. The top line also was the beneficiary of some inorganic growth based on acquisitions. If you adjust for certain items, bringing the earnings up to $0.73 per diluted share, the decrease in the bottom line improves to 3%, but a decline in this case is still a decline. Plus, earnings expectations were not met. The company came in five pennies shy of Wall Street's wishes, according to estimates posted at <a href="http://www.earnings.com/earning.asp?date=20080619&amp;client=cb">earnings.com</a>. </p>
<p>For the fiscal year, J.M Smucker's top line increased 18%, also due in part to acquisitions. On both a reported and an adjusted basis, earnings per diluted share jumped 9% to $3.00. Margins really suffered during the quarter and the year. Input costs are inflating, and they're becoming difficult to manage. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.M. Smucker's stock sells off on earnings -- I'm not buying either</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/">J.M. Smucker's stock sells off on earnings -- I'm not buying either</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-j-m-smucker-company-announces-fourth/rfid114124349>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/earning.asp?date=20080619&amp;client=cb>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1231091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/j-m-smuckers-stock-sells-off-on-earnings-im-not-buying-eit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>Folgers</category><category>food industry</category><category>FoodIndustry</category><category>J.M. Smucker</category><category>J.m.Smucker</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>SJM</category><category>Tom Taulli</category><category>TomTaulli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Smucker gets some Folgers in its cup for $3 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/smuckers.jpg" />Folgers has created some great brand messages, including the classic, "The best part of waking up is Folgers in your cup."</p>
<p>Well, this morning, we got another message. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">P&amp;G</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) will <a href="http://www.smuckers.com/fc/investor/default.asp">merge</a> the Folgers unit into the operations of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/smucker-j-m-co-united-states/sjm/nys">The J. M. Smucker Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/smucker-j-m-co-united-states/sjm/nys">SJM</a>). The deal comes to about $3 billion.</p>
<p>P&amp;G, which has owned Folgers for more than 45 years, has been actively shopping the deal. All in all, the transaction looks smart. It's an all-stock arrangement and, as a result, is tax-free to all parties. Smucker will also issue a $5 per share special dividend. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Smucker gets some Folgers in its cup for $3 billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/">Smucker gets some Folgers in its cup for $3 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1215290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/the-j-m-smucker-family-gets-a-new-member-pandgs-folgers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>J.M. Smucker</category><category>J.m.Smucker</category><category>PG</category><category>SJM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:48:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
