<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Successful Stocks -- More Than Numbers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/managment.rollupsleeves.gettyrf.jpg" alt="" />If investing were only about numbers, then the math Ph.D.s would have all the money. But they don't. While numbers are very important and provide the majority of an investment decision, other elements come into play that are critical to any stock's success. They're hard to find sometimes but always worth the effort.</p>
<p>If you can discover these elements in a stock and great numbers, too, you've got all the odds for investing success in your favor.</p>
<p>The number one, most important piece of the investing puzzle is management. Management is everything. It's where all ideas begin and execution of them is implemented. Management can turn around a bad company and make it great. Management can take a good idea and turn it into a successful business.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Successful Stocks -- More Than Numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/">Comfort Zone Investing: Successful Stocks -- More Than Numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theonlineinvestor.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19361808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/comfort-zone-investing-successful-stocks-more-than-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>featured</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>management</category><category>Ted Allrich</category><category>TedAllrich</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: Smith &amp; Wesson, Ruger shares up, new PPI numbers, Jack Welch appeals for AIG calm, and activists hound CNBC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-explode/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/02-los-asesinos-del-zodiaco-200pd022708_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-explode/">Smith &amp; Wesson, Ruger shares explode</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/new-ppi-numbers-cost-of-doing-business-stays-low/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/dollar-stocks-200dr112007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/new-ppi-numbers-cost-of-doing-business-stays-low/">New PPI numbers: Cost of doing business stays low</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/jack-welch-appeals-for-calm-over-aig-bonuses/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/welch2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td> <a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/jack-welch-appeals-for-calm-over-aig-bonuses/">Jack Welch appeals for calm over AIG bonuses - good luck!</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right">
            <div align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/inspired-by-jon-stewart-activists-launch-site-to-fix-cnbc/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/rsz_1cnbc(2)_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></div>
            </td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/17/inspired-by-jon-stewart-activists-launch-site-to-fix-cnbc/">Inspired by Jon Stewart, activists hound CNBC</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/">DailyFinance today: Smith &amp; Wesson, Ruger shares up, new PPI numbers, Jack Welch appeals for AIG calm, and activists hound CNBC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1490986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/dailyfinance-today-smith-and-wesson-ruger-shares-up-new-ppi-num/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cnbc</category><category>dailyfinance</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>jon stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>ppi</category><category>ruger</category><category>smith wesson</category><category>SmithWesson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jack Welch is a big fat idiot]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/welch.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) hemorrhages value, its iconic former CEO Jack Welch is blasting the very notion of shareholder value as a valid goal.<br /><br />Because, ya know, public companies have much better things to focus on than making money for their owners.<br />
<p>"On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world," he <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/294ff1f2-0f27-11de-ba10-0000779fd2ac.html">told the <em>Financial Times</em></a>. "Shareholder value is a result, not a strategy . . . Your main constituencies are your employees, your customers and your products."</p>
<p>"It is a dumb idea," he said. "The idea that shareholder value is a strategy is insane. It is the product of your combined efforts - from the management to the employees."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jack Welch is a big fat idiot</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/">Jack Welch is a big fat idiot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/294ff1f2-0f27-11de-ba10-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1486848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/jack-welch-is-a-big-fat-idiot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE cuts earnings forecast, stops stock buyback ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/gelogo.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aw5khx35ho8M&amp;refer=home" /></em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>General Electric Company</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GE</font></a>) will <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aw5khx35ho8M&amp;refer=home">miss its earnings forecast</a> by 6%. GE now estimates that its third quarter profits will range between "43 cents to 48 cents a share, less than its previous forecast of 50 cents to 54 cents." GE cited "difficult conditions in the financial services markets" for its decision to stop its stock buyback program. </p>
<p>The good news -- if it can be compared -- is that this latest downward guidance would be less in percentage terms than its first quarter earnings miss of 14%. That was when GE reported 44 cents a share, compared with the 51 cents that analysts had expected. That unpleasant surprise spurred former CEO Jack Welch into a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/">homicidal rage</a>. With its stock trading 58% below its all time high of $58.50 back in September 2000 and down 41% from the $41 it traded at when Jeffrey Immelt took over as CEO, I am beginning to wonder how close GE is to going the way of Lehman Brothers.</p>
<p>The thing about GE is that it gets <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/ges-banking-business-comes-attack/">40%</a> of its pretax profit from financial services. But it also sells stuff like jet engines, power plants, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines and TV advertising. Unfortunately, many of these big-ticket items depend on healthy growth in infrastructure spending by countries like China, India and Middle Eastern oil producers. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE cuts earnings forecast, stops stock buyback </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/">GE cuts earnings forecast, stops stock buyback </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aw5khx35ho8M&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1324318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/ge-cuts-earnings-forecast-stops-stock-buyback/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>general electric</category><category>general electric ge</category><category>general electric glo...</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GeneralElectricGe</category><category>GeneralElectricGlo...</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>jeff immelt</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analysts expect huge increase in earnings next year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>Wall Street analysts are known for being too optimistic about earnings at the companies that they cover, but the problem may be getting out of control.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122230726736674001.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>Collectively, analysts expect S&amp;P 500 earnings to expand by 23.9% in 2009, according to Thomson Reuters. The index does include a number of banks."</p>
<p>The prediction may be why analysts do not have a very good reputation with many investors. Well-regarded experts from Warren Buffett to Jack Welch believe next year could be one of the worst economic periods in decades.</p>
<p>Part of the thinking among analysts is that spending for consumer durables will be good. Since gas and food prices are still fairly high and consumer spending is on life support, it is very difficult to see how that point of view could be justified.</p>
<p>Analysts cost big banks and brokerage firms a lot of money. If the financial trouble on Wall Street gets worse, they may be among the next wave of employees fired. If their forecasts are so ridiculous, that will make a lot of sense.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/">Analysts expect huge increase in earnings next year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122230726736674001.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1324155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/analysts-expect-huge-increase-in-earnings-next-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warren Buffett throws first pitch to Jack Welch at Red Sox game]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a></p><p>The world's wealthiest man threw a baseball to the most respected CEO of his generation. And it all happened last night in Boston, home of the 2007 World Champion Red Sox, according to <em><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26643250">CNBC.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>Who am I talking about? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Berkshire Hathaway Inc</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BRK.A</font></a>) CEO, Warren Buffett, was the pitcher, and retired <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company's</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GE</font></a>) Chairman and CEO, Jack Welch played catcher at Boston's Fenway Park.</p>
<p><em>CNBC</em> reports that the pitch "was 'a little high and outside,' but it certainly didn't bounce four or five times before reaching the plate, as [CNBC thought he predicted] when he first told [CNBC] he'd be making his Fenway debut."</p>
<p>No comment was available on Welch's catching skills.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the cohan="" letter=""></the></em></a><em>. He owns GE shares, is a lifelong Red Sox fan, and has no financial interest in Berkshire Hathaway.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/">Warren Buffett throws first pitch to Jack Welch at Red Sox game</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1310580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/warren-buffett-throws-first-pitch-to-jack-welch-at-red-sox-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brk.a</category><category>ge</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why haven't the Republicans said much about the economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/johnmccain.jpg" alt="" />Amidst all of the talk of hockey moms, jabs at Democrat Barack Obama, and media bashing, there was not much discussion of the weak economy at this week's Republican National Convention.<br /><br />In fact, the Republican gathering was notably short on talk of the main issue on the minds of voters. Sure, there was "drill baby drill," but is that really an economic policy? Can Americans drill their way out of the credit crisis? Can we drill our way out of the housing slump? Can we drill our way to prosperity?<br /><br />No less of a flaming liberal than <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26545524">CNBC's Larry Kudlow took note.</a><br /><br />"As we head into the closing night in St. Paul, there has so far been no reference to the weak economy," Kudlow said on the network's blog before John McCain's acceptance speech last night. "There has been no economic-recovery message and no growth message."<br /><br />Interestingly, the Republican platform contained language inserted by economic conservatives rejecting the Bush administration's rescue of Bear Stearns Cos., and possible bailouts of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"> Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>), according to<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMdtdOg3_lBY&amp;refer=home"></a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMdtdOg3_lBY&amp;refer=home"> Bloomberg </a>News. The document purposely did not mention the credit crunch because delegates were afraid that any solution that they would offer might make things worse, Bloomberg says. The GOP's embrace of free trade may sell well on Wall Street, but it won't win votes on Main Street where workers are fearful of their jobs being shipped to lower-cost countries overseas.<br /><br />No wonder the GOP did not say much on the economy.<br /><br />Most Americans are suffering because of high gas prices, a volatile stock market and plunging home prices. Though technically the economy may be strong and may not even be in a recession, most people and businesses believe they are worse off than they were a year ago.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why haven't the Republicans said much about the economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/">Why haven't the Republicans said much about the economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/26545524>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1304710/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/why-havent-the-republicans-said-much-about-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>CNBC</category><category>Democrats</category><category>economics</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>John MccAin</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>Larry Kudlow</category><category>LarryKudlow</category><category>Republicans</category><category>sarah palin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can GE beat its whisper number?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>) is scheduled to report second quarter earnings this Friday. Ten analysts that <em><a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Symbol=Ge">Zacks</a></em> surveys expect GE to make 53 cents a share, the same as it did in 2007. Given that 0% growth rate, GE's forward Price/Earnings ratio of 12.1 seems a bit on the high side. </p>
<p>But after the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/">spanking</a> that CEO Jeff Immelt took after missing in the first quarter by <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Page=EarningsSurprise&amp;Symbol=GE">13.7%</a>, he could be guiding analysts lower only to surprise them on the upside. This makes me wonder whether analysts have a higher, whisper number in mind. GE stock is down 32% since Immelt took over on <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/resources/executive-profiles/Jeffrey-R-Immelt-17359">September 7, 2001</a>, but with the exception of the first quarter, over the last five years GE has increased earnings at an <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Page=EarningsSurprise&amp;Symbol=GE">8.1%</a> annual rate.</p>
<p>If it got back on that track in the second quarter, then investors would expect GE to earn 57 cents a share, instead of the official 53 cents. In that case, GE stock would fall unless it exceeded 57 cents a share. I have not been able to determine whether there is such a whisper number floating around Wall Street, but there's no question in my mind that Immelt cannot afford to report a number less than 53 cents a share if he wants to keep his job.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can GE beat its whisper number?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/">Can GE beat its whisper number?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1248645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>immelt</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>reg jones</category><category>RegJones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: The most overexposed people in business media]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/cramer-buffett-2.jpg" />Ever wonder why conventional wisdom is so conventional? It's because it's the same people repeating it over and over.<br /><br />The reason why this happens is mostly laziness. Reporters and TV producers call on the same people to render their opinions because they are the ones who return calls and show up when they are needed. I have done it myself so I know the drill well. Yes, Woody Allen's claim that 80% of success is showing up continues to be proven right. These people can be summed up in several categories: wisemen -- they almost always are male -- whose every utterance is treated as if it was etched in stone tablets by the almighty, and insta-pundits -- who are able to give quotes on every topic imaginable. Finally, there are the personal finance gurus whose message is that by helping me make money, I can help you save money.<br /><br />Below are my choices for the most overexposed business pundits and media personalities. They are in no particular order.<br /><br /><strong>Wisemen</strong>: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_greenspan">Alan Greenspan</a> -- Don't you miss the days when no one understood what the former Fed Chairman was talking about? Now, his message is pretty clear: buy my book and the subprime mortgage crisis was not my fault. Honorable mentions: former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE)</a> Chief Executive <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Welch">Jack Welch</a>, billionaire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_soros">George Soros</a>, and oilman <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boone_Pickens">Boone Pickens</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: The most overexposed people in business media</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/">Media World: The most overexposed people in business media</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1209847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/media-world-the-most-overexposed-people-in-business-media/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>AlanGreenspan</category><category>Boone Pickens</category><category>BoonePickens</category><category>Charles Elson</category><category>CharlesElson</category><category>Darren Chervitz</category><category>DarrenChervitz</category><category>Fadel Gheit</category><category>FadelGheit</category><category>featured</category><category>George Soros</category><category>GeorgeSoros</category><category>JAck Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Jeffrey Sonnenfeld</category><category>JeffreySonnenfeld</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Rich Greenfield</category><category>RichGreenfield</category><category>robert kiyosaki</category><category>RobertKiyosaki</category><category>Suze Orman</category><category>SuzeOrman</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's Immelt reduced to whining after homicidal rant from Jack Welch]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/business/apge-web.html?ref=business"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/business/apge-web.html?ref=business">AP</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>) CEO Jeff Immelt did quite a bit of whining at today's shareholder meeting in Erie, PA. But he did announce one piece of news that might help GE's stock: GE will increase its planned cost cutting from $2 billion to $3 billion. Yet I think he's still smarting from Jack Welch's threat to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/">shoot Immelt</a> on GE's CNBC last week.</p>
<p>Immelt whined on two fronts: the tough economy and how his buying and selling of GE business units is not appreciated. Here's what he said about the economy: "We are in the toughest economy since 2001 and the worst housing crisis since the Depression. Banks have written off more than $250 billion. . . . Days of easy credit have turned into months of no credit at all. While I am confident about the economy long term, we could see even more difficult times ahead."</p>
<p>And on the matter of GE's portfolio, Immelt exuded self-pity as he assailed his audience: "I would ask people to keep something in mind. In the last five or six years I've sold 50 or $60 billion of business. I've acquired 70 or $80 billion of business. This has probably been the most active portfolio change in the history of the company and it would be hard to find another industrial company that's done anything close to what we've done."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's Immelt reduced to whining after homicidal rant from Jack Welch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/">GE's Immelt reduced to whining after homicidal rant from Jack Welch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Jeff Immelt is tarnishing Jack Welch's self-image]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/04/16/ap4898037.html">Forbes</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">General Electric Company</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GE</font></a>) ex-CEO Jack Welch is really angry with his successor Jeff Immelt. I don't know whether Welch still holds shares in GE but if he does, he can't be happy that they've fallen <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/">20%</a> since his hand-picked successor took over. But beyond the financial pain, Welch is suffering from a badly bruised ego -- that's because he prides himself on picking people. And he clearly blew it when he selected Immelt.</p>
<p>I saw Welch this morning sitting in the same spot I was in on GE's CNBC set last February during a stint on <em>Squawk Box</em>. And Welch had some choice words for Immelt. Forbes reports that Welch said "I'd be shocked beyond belief and I'd get a gun out and shoot him if he doesn't make what he promised now. Just deliver the earnings. Tell them you're going to grow 12 percent and deliver 12 percent."</p>
<p>I think the biggest problem for Welch is that it's become so obvious what a huge mistake he made in picking Immelt. As Welch said: "Here's the screw up: You made a promise that you'd deliver this and you missed three weeks later. Jeff has a credibility issue. He's getting his ass kicked. He apologized." <br /></p>
<p>I've written about Immelt's mediocre performance since <a href="http://gwmt.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/08/immelts-gentlemans-c/">2006</a>. Maybe now that Jack Welch is chiming in, things will start to happen to boost GE's share price.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. He owns GE shares.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/">How Jeff Immelt is tarnishing Jack Welch's self-image</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1169718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/how-jeff-immelt-is-tarnishing-jack-welchs-self-image/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>jeff immelt</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's Immelt should go now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"> GE</a>) was a darling of Wall Street for a couple of decades under the tutelage of legendary CEO Jack Welch. Mr. Welch retired in September 2001 turning the reins over to hand-picked successor Jeffrey Immelt. Give Immelt a break for the first 18 months as he had to guide the company through the 9-11 tragedy and of course the normal honeymoon period. Since that grace period expired in early 2003, GE has severely under performed the market and time has come for Mr. Immelt to hand the reigns over to someone else.</p>
<p> It is very difficult following a "legend" as Jack Welch. Many business schools model a course or two on management based on Welch's methods of letting an executive run a division creatively and freely--just return the expected numbers and all is well. Jack Welch "raised" Jeffrey Immelt in this style and picked him as the CEO to replace himself. The styles however were not transferable. Times and the global landscape have changed since Welch's departure.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's Immelt should go now</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/">GE's Immelt should go now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1165005/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-immelt-should-go-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>GE earnings</category><category>GeEarnings</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Jeff Immelt</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE brings bad things to Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/11/news/companies/ge_earnings/index.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" alt="" />CNNMoney</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">General Electric Company</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GE</font></a>) missed earnings expectations by a mile. Its net income fell 12% to $4.4 billion, or 44 cents per share, seven cents less than what Thomson Financial's polling of analysts had estimated.</p>
<p>In February I analyzed GE's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/is-ge-trading-above-its-breakup-value/">breakup value</a> and concluded that the stock was probably a bit overvalued. The big problem with today's earnings announcement was GE's financial services unit. Like Wall Street banks, GE suffered from "extraordinary disruption in the capital markets in March [which] affected our ability to complete asset sales and resulted in higher mark-to-market losses and impairments."</p>
<p>But that's not all. GE missed on revenues and lowered its guidance. Sales rose 8% to $42.2 billion, $1.5 billion below analysts' forecast of $43.7 billion. GE lowered its full year guidance to between $2.20 and $2.30 per share, reflecting flat to 5% growth. GE is down 11% in pre-market. </p>
<p><strong><em>Since its current CEO, Jeff Immelt took over in September 2001, GE stock has fallen 20% from $41 to $33. </em></strong>Remind me again of why the "great" Jack Welch chose Immelt to succeed him.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. He owns GE shares.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/">GE brings bad things to Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/11/news/companies/ge_earnings/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1164587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ge-brings-bad-things-to-wall-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerates</category><category>ge</category><category>ge industrial</category><category>ge money</category><category>GeIndustrial</category><category>GeMoney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Success of GE shares pushes down short interest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p>The September <a href="http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3030-shortint_hi_nyse-NYSE.html?mod=topnav_2_3000">short interest</a> in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) fell 7.6 million shares to 59.7 million. The move is unusual because GE now trades near a multi-year high. It should not take more than a bit of bad news to push it down. </p>
<p>But, after over five years of under-performing the market after Jack Welch retired, GE shares are up 20% in the last year.</p>
<p>What happened? GE has been slowly dumping the dogs in its portfolio of companies. It has parted company with its plastics unit. There is also a feeling that the company has disclosed any mortgage problems in its loan portfolio, and that they are modest.</p>
<p>More important, though, the company has been on a multi-month investor relations drive to try to convince Wall St. that the company is worthy of a better valuation. It would appear, at the very least, that the company is considered a good place to invest when the financial markets are troubled.</p>
<p>GE is unlikely to convince skeptics that it is not in too many businesses. Almost no one can divine why the conglomerate owns NBC Universal. But, the performance of its infrastructure and industrial businesses appear to make up for that concern.</p>
<p>The firm's shares still lag the S&amp;P by a bit on a five year measurement, and perhaps not as many investors are willing to gamble that the disparity will continue.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at </em><em>247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/">Success of GE shares pushes down short interest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/994982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/success-of-ge-shares-pushes-down-short-interest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>short interest</category><category>ShortInterest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[This is not Jack Welch's GE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>Reports started circulating yesterday that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/phh-corporation/phh/nys">PHH Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/phh-corporation/phh/nys">PHH</a>), an outsource provider of mortgage and fleet management services, which is in the process of being acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) and <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/the-blackstone-group/">The Blackstone Group</a>, is <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/s/debt-issues-snag-phh-takeout/newsanalysis/stockpickr/10379944.html??cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">having trouble getting financing</a> as the banks are balking. This is somewhat comical, since both GE and Blackstone have the resources to close this $1.8 billion deal if they really wanted to.<br /><br />As a reminder, GE Capital, the division acquiring PHH, was one of the great growth stories of the 1980s and early 1990s as Gary Wendt, a Welch lieutenant, built the company up by buying assets that were often left for dead by investors. However, today, GE's finance division is going after businesses that are peaking, not bottoming out.<br /><br />Another point worth mentioning is how difficult it is for GE to do deals that can have an impact on its performance. With a market capitalization of $411 billion, doing deals $1.8 billion in size is going to have little impact on the colossal company. Although a great company, GE is not a great stock. The PHH transaction shows how difficult it is for this huge company to grow by acquisition and the silliness of it saying it cannot close the transaction because of bank financing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/">This is not Jack Welch's GE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/s/debt-issues-snag-phh-takeout/newsanalysis/stockpickr/10379944.html??cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/992189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/this-is-not-jack-welchs-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>blackstone</category><category>buyout</category><category>Gary Wendt</category><category>GaryWendt</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>phh</category><category>phh corporation</category><category>PhhCorporation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bob Nardelli's appointment at Chrysler blessed by Jack Welch]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img alt="Jack Welch in New York at the SuccessFactors Global User Conference in May 2007." hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/welch.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Bob Nardelli's old boss Jack Welch seems to be one of the few people who think his appointment as the new Chrysler CEO is a good idea.</p>
<p>"This is an absolutely perfect fit,'' the former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) chief executive told <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a5aqPgIkoC_c&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a>. ``They've got to get cost, efficiency, service -- all those things in line. He's the best in the world at that."</p>
<p>Neutron Jack goes even further saying his relationship with GE's unions were fabulous and that Chrysler has "got to have straightforward, no-baloney, on-the-table relationships with the unions there. And Bob is perfect for that.'' </p>
<p>As I've argued <a href="http://bbby.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/nardelli-is-the-wrong-guy-for-chrysler/">before</a>, Nardelli was a success at General Electric. Then again, he wasn't the boss either. When he got to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Home Depot Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">HD</a>), he quickly became an imperial CEO who seemed to care little what shareholders, employees or the media thought of him.</p>
<p>Chrysler needs someone who isn't out to win any popularity contests. Tough decisions have to be made. But leaders also need to be good listeners and willing to compromise, two qualities that Nardelli just doesn't seem to have.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/">Bob Nardelli's appointment at Chrysler blessed by Jack Welch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a5aqPgIkoC_c&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/960338/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/bob-nardellis-appointment-at-chrysler-blessed-by-jack-welch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>BobNardelli</category><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler llc</category><category>ChryslerLlc</category><category>GE</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What questions should I ask GE's CFO?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>Next Tuesday I am scheduled to meet with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co</a>.  (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Chief Financial Officer Keith Sherin to discuss GE's performance and prospects. This meeting came at the company's initiation.</p>
<p>As a GE shareholder I have not been thrilled with the performance of the stock. Since September 7, 2001 when current CEO Jeff Immelt took over, the stock has risen 3% from $39.60, compared to a 40% increase in the S&amp;P 500. Moreover, on the basis of its Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 1.5 -- based on a P/E of 19.5 and earnings forecast to grow 13% to $2.50 in 2008 -- GE looks somewhat overvalued to me.</p>
<p>So here are some questions I plan to ask:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>Since the current GE CEO took over, GE stock is up 3%, compared to a 40% increase in the S&amp;P 500. Why has GE stock underperformed this average?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>GE stock has risen 23% in the last year, however, it trades at a PEG of 1.5 which makes it a bit expensive. Why should investors buy GE stock now?</div>
    </li>
    <li>Since the Healthcare, Industrial and NBC Universal segments all saw revenues fall in the first half with relatively weak profit performance, why doesn't GE sell these businesses and invest the proceeds to increase its market share in the more financially successful Infrastructure and Commercial Finance units? </li>
    <li>
    <div>If GE chooses to stay in Healthcare how will it offset the negative impact of the federal government's decision to cut reimbursements to nonhospital imaging centers?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>
    <div>Under Jack Welch, GE's philosophy was to only be in businesses in which it could be #1 or #2. Recently NBC was ranked the 4th most watched network. Will GE sell NBC? If not, why is GE keeping NBC? How does NBC's coordination with other GE divisions increase GE's overall revenues or lower its costs? </div>
    </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>How vulnerable is the GE Money unit to an increase in consumer loan defaults? Is GE Money likely to experience accelerated revenue and profit growth in 2008 or slower growth? Why?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>What impact would a 10% decline in the dollar have on GE's Earnings Per Share (EPS)?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>What other external factors -- such as an increase in interest rates or a rise in energy prices -- represent the biggest risks to GE's EPS? How do you quantify those risks?</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>Please let me know which ones you'd like to add to the list.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He owns General Electric stock.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/">What questions should I ask GE's CFO?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/What-questions-should-I-ask-GEs-CFO/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conglomerates</category><category>ge</category><category>GE Finance</category><category>GE Lighting</category><category>GE Money</category><category>GE Power Systems</category><category>GeFinance</category><category>GeLighting</category><category>GeMoney</category><category>GePowerSystems</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Jeffrey Immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>keith sherin</category><category>KeithSherin</category><category>nbc</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Contrarian Financiers: How to invest like they do]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>In recent months, we're seeing some of the most respected titans of finance making investments in industries that most individual investors wouldn't touch. While these investments might seem boring, the track records of these investors indicate that the returns could be anything but. Take a look:</p>
<p>On April 5th, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/carl-icahn-makes-the-case-for-real-estate/">I wrote about</a> Carl Icahn's bid for WCI Communities, a real estate developer with interests in Florida, a state that has seen a lot of carnage in the real estate market of late. Mr. Icahn explained the investment like this: "My investment philosophy, generally, with exceptions, is to buy something when no one wants it. We made a fairly large investment and took control of several energy companies seven or eight years ago when they were way down. Housing is somewhat analogous."</p>
<p>Just as Icahn buys stuff when no one wants, Warren Buffett says that the secret to good investing is to be "greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy." A willingness to go against the commonly-held investment wisdom is at the core of the philosophies of both of these investors. On April 8th, BloggingStocks writer <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/warren-buffett-hits-the-rails/">Jonathan Berr wrote that</a> Warren Buffett's<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-de-cl-a/brk.a/nys"> Berkshire Hathaway In</a>c. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-de-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.</a>A) had become the largest shareholder of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">BNI</a>). Very few investors that I know would even look at railroad stocks and, while no official reason has been given for Buffett's investment yet, this may be one of the factors that attracted him. </p>
<p>Media mogul Sam Zell recently purchased Tribune Media, which is one of the major players in the newspaper industry, a product that has been in decline for some years. Warren Buffett himself, also a holder of several newspapers has lamented that every time an elderly person dies, newspapers lose a reader they will never get back. Jack Welch has also expressed interest in acquiring the <em>Boston Globe</em>.</p>
<p>When we examine the philosophies of these great investors, we see a common theme: They are all willing to go against the consensus, and make investments that appear puzzling to most people. To learn about integrating elements of contrarian investing into your regimen, check out David Dreman's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Contrarian-Investment-Strategies-Next-Generation/dp/0684813505/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-2148776-0216641?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1176103362&amp;sr=8-1">Contrarian Investment Strategies</a>, one of my favorite books of all time. Also read his <a href="http://search.forbes.com/search/colArchiveSearch?aname=David+Dreman&amp;author=david+and+dreman">monthly column in Forbes</a>.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/">Contrarian Financiers: How to invest like they do</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117608392004163738.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/869968/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/contrarian-financiers-how-to-invest-like-they-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Investing</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Story You Didn't Read: Moguls go newspaper crazy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a></p><p><em>Ben Berkowitz is the business news editor for AOL. His weekly column looks at news stories with long-term significance that were initially overlooked.</em></p>
<p>The story you didn't read this week but should have is the almost off-handed way that super-billionaire Sam Zell said he'd perhaps <a target="_blank" href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/zell-said-potential-tribune-bidder/20070207114509990001">like to buy</a> Tribune Co. (NYSE: TRB). And if that wasn't enough, now everyone's favorite even-bigger billionaire Warren Buffett is said to be snapping up shares of the New York Times Co. (NYSE: NYT).</p>
<p>These titans of industry understand something that even the Internet has not changed: owning a newspaper is both a mark of prestige and an easy way to have a very loud voice. Anyone who thinks their motives are altruistic has perhaps been sniffing too much newsprint. </p>
<p>Sam Zell is a real-estate baron. What on earth would he do with a newspaper chain? (Yes, Trib also owns the Cubs, and some TV stations, and a few other properties, but the same question applies. There are easier ways to own a baseball team.)</p>
<iframe width="325" scrolling="no" height="330" frameborder="1" align="right" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/business/object.adp?frame=article&amp;type=photogalleries&amp;id=12038&amp;data=&amp;title=" border="1"></iframe>
<p>Keep asking: why does housing developer and art patron Eli Broad want the Los Angeles Times? Or supermarket magnate Ron Burkle? Why would insurance heavyweight Hank Greenberg want the New York Times? Why does Jack Welch want the Boston Globe? Hint: remember the rumors about Welch trying to steer election coverage in various NBC newsrooms in 2000. </p>
<p>Simple: they want to control mainstream media outlets to push their agendas. Broad has a vision for changing the future of Los Angeles. Burkle is a big Democratic supporter. Greenberg has been abused mercilessly in the press for the financial doings at AIG. Welch's wife is a journalist. <br /></p>
<p>The motives for Zell and Buffett are less clear; maybe Zell wants to take a crack at Trib for the sake of it? Great businessmen love challenges. And Buffett, well, just do what the man says. He buys it, you buy it. Really, he didn't get rich on his looks or fashion sense.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Story You Didn't Read: Moguls go newspaper crazy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/">The Story You Didn't Read: Moguls go newspaper crazy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/750522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/09/the-story-you-didnt-read-moguls-go-newspaper-crazy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eki Broad</category><category>EkiBroad</category><category>Hank Greenberg</category><category>HankGreenberg</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>Sam Zell</category><category>SamZell</category><category>Tribune Co.</category><category>TribuneCo.</category><category>Warren Buffet'Boston Globe</category><category>WarrenBuffet'bostonGlobe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Berkowitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p>Jeff Zucker <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/zuckers-rise-at-nbc-reflects-media/20070205064709990002">appears to have won</a> the race to succeed Robert Wright as CEO of General Electric Company's (NYSE: GE) NBC Universal. I'm not sure if this is good for GE shareholders.</p>
<p>Zucker, who famously produced the <em>Today Show</em> and extended <em>Friends's</em> popular run, has seen NBC's ratings stumble to fourth place. Although he has championed some shows that have done well -- such as <em>Sunday Night Football and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/02/19/8400166/index.htm?postversion=2007020507">Heroes</a></em> -- the reality remains that NBC used to be first and it's not anymore. A few weeks ago, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/16/news/companies/ge_nbc/index.htm">CNNMoney reported</a> that NBC was behind The Walt Disney Company's (NYSE: DIS) ABC and CBS Corporation's (NYSE: CBS) CBS in the Nielsen ratings for the coveted 18 to 49 year old demographic group.</p>
<p>In addition to the weak ratings, NBC's numbers are not too hot either. While its revenues grew 10% to $16.2 billion in 2006, its operating profit fell 6% to $2.9 billion. As a proportion of GE's total, NBC contributed to 10% of GE revenues in 2005 and 2006 during which time NBC's operating income contribution fell from 13% to 11% of GE's total. This performance is not bad, but it's not spectacular either.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/">Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/748025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>GE</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>Robert Wright</category><category>RobertWright</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
