JamieDimon posts
FeedPosted Aug 11th 2009 9:00AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Economic data, Personal finance, Recession, Financial Crisis
Consumer bankruptcies have already spiked more than 30% this year, and it looks like the trend shows no signs of flagging. The American Bankruptcy Institute predicts that the tally could hit 1.4 million by the end of the year. So, although there are some experts signaling that the economy is on the upswing, the downstream effects of bankruptcy on consumer spending and corporate balance sheets are going to make it difficult for the market to turn the corner.
In July, more than 126,000 people filed for bankruptcy protection, and the filing rate was up 36.5% for the first six months of 2009 relative to the same period in 2008. The problem is affecting every rung of the social ladder.
Continue reading Consumer bankruptcies set to surge
Posted Jun 2nd 2009 4:00PM by Jon Ogg (RSS feed)
Filed under: Ford Motor (F), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC)

Stocks felt choppy all day, although the late day move and afternoon stability allowed stocks to have another solid day. Housing starts added some strength, and the buyers are still deciding they need to be in rather than out of the market.
Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:
Dow 8,746.51 +25.07 (0.29%)
S&P 500 945.36 +2.49 (0.26%)
Nasdaq 1,836.89 +8.21 (0.45%)
Top Analyst UpgradesTop Analyst DowngradesContinue reading Closing Bell: When sloppy days look pretty (GMCR, F, NTAP, JPM, BAC)
Posted May 20th 2009 2:00PM by Connie Madon (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Annual meetings
JP Morgan Chase & Company (NYSE JPM) held its annual shareholder meeting with Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer holding court.
Among his jabs against the Administration he complained that the rules against hiring foreigners was a "complete and utter disgrace." We might ask Mr. Dimon if he plans to hire another Chinese mathematician such as David X Li, whom JP Morgan Chase hired in 2000. Mr. Li developed a formula that created a single number from which traders bet billions of dollars in the past decade in derivatives which eventually brought the country to its knees when the housing bubble burst. This may help to explain why JP Morgan Chase has $87.7 trillion of derivatives "off the books." We might ask Mr Dimon to disclose the exact position in derivatives that he holds "off the books." Wouldn't that make fascinating reading?
Continue reading JPM's Jamie Dimon rambles on at the annual shareholder meeting
Posted Feb 9th 2009 12:40PM by Elizabeth Harrow (RSS feed)
Filed under: Analyst reports, Management, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Options, DJIA, Financial Crisis
Following a meeting with CEO Jamie Dimon on Feb. 6, Citigroup analyst Keith Horowitz believes that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) could be among the first banks to repay its indebtedness under the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
"Clearly there is a risk of future government interference, which is why we believe management would like to get out," noted Horowitz. However, while Dimon thinks banking industry returns will be compressed during the intermediate term due to the government's involvement, he doesn't see any significant changes to JPMorgan's long-term outlook.
Continue reading Will JPMorgan Chase be the first to repay its TARP loan?
Posted Jan 6th 2009 10:46AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC)
Yesterday, business reporter Charlie Gasparino wrote in The Daily Beast that JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) and its CEO Jamie Dimon, would be the next big financial institution for fall apart. He wrote, "But Dimon is feeling that heat, nonetheless, from analysts, who believe his firm will post a loss this quarter, the first since he became CEO."
Well, maybe so, but throwing stones at the people who have done well in an industry that has not is easy, perhaps too easy. If JP Morgan does lose money, it will join a long line of other firms that have done so. If its loss is modest, it will still be better off than most if not all of its peers.
Banks may be the most heavily followed companies on Wall Street. Analysts and the press crawl over the PR and financial reports, looking for bad news. That means the market should be relatively efficient at putting values on them, especially after two years of humiliation in which they got those values wrong.
If the Street is right, JPM still has a brighter future than rivals Citigroup (NYSE: C) and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC). Over the last six months, JPM shares declined about 10%. BAC is down almost 40% and Citi is off almost 60%.
It may be a little early to write that JPM obit.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Posted Sep 26th 2008 10:05AM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, General Electric (GE), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), , Financial Crisis
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:
JPM) Chief Executive Jamie Dimon is the new king of Wall Street whose power rivals his company's namesake
John Pierpont Morgan.
Over the past year, Dimon managed to steer JPMorgan away from the subprime credit crisis while managing to keep his company's stock from cratering like his competitors'. First, he absorbed Bear Stearns after it went out of business. Now, Dimon has managed to pick up
Washington Mutual Inc. (NYSE:
WM) -- the good parts of it anyway -- for $1.9 billion. The deal is accretive in 2009.
Dimon is proving to be Wall Street's shrewdest manager. He did not get to be so successful by being a teddy bear. Indeed, reports abound about his abrasive personality. But unlike other Wall Street CEOs, Dimon knows his job is to work for the shareholders. Dimon's zeal for cost-cutting knows no bounds. He got rid of expensive technology outsourcing contracts, figuring the company could do the work cheaper itself.
Continue reading Is Jamie Dimon the reincarnation of J.P. Morgan?
Posted Jul 17th 2008 4:49PM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: JPMorgan Chase (JPM)
DealBook reports that JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon let out some bad news on JPMorgan's conference call today. Despite beating estimates, DealBook reported that JP Morgan's highest quality, so-called Prime mortgages, were, as Dimon said, "terrible, and we're sorry. We can say it eight times. It looks terrible."
Prime mortgages are not supposed to behave like subprime ones. But disappointment seems to be the big theme with the mortgage industry. Prime mortgages barely defaulted at all in the second quarter of 2007 -- JPMorgan wrote off 0.05% of them a year ago -- taking a $4 million charge. But in the same quarter of 2008, JPMorgan wrote off 0.91% -- and charged off $104 million.
And Dimon expects those Prime losses to triple -- to $300 million. If there's any good news, that $300 million is a mere 15% of the net income it earned this quarter. Still, it suggests the depth of the economic problems that lie ahead.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.
Posted Jun 3rd 2008 10:33AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), , Morgan Stanley (MS),
Bloomberg News reports that Lehman Brothers Holdings (NYSE: LEH) wants to sell $4 billion in equity. But it already raised $6 billion so why does it need more? It should be no surprise -- but thanks to a chorus of statements by financial leaders that "the worst is over" -- including Lehman's CEO Richard Fuld, Jamie Dimon, Hank Paulson, and Barton Biggs some are surprised that there are still problems.
Since the crisis began -- last August when the Fed began cutting rates from 5.25% to 2% -- banks have been trying to reduce their ratio of debt to equity below the hugely risky 32:1. But it's hard when they hold $500 billion worth of Level 3 assets -- which don't trade and therefore have no objectively set market value. To maintain or improve their capital ratios, banks have been writing down the value of the securities on their books -- $276 billion worth so far -- and simultaneously raising capital. Citigroup (NYSE: C) has raised the most -- $44 billion.
S&P downgraded Lehman, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) saying they may disclose more write-downs for devalued assets. And hedge fund manager David Einhorn -- who's short Lehman -- got into a verbal debate with Lehman CFO Erin Callan arguing that Lehman had failed to disclose $6 billion worth of such Level 3 assets -- known as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) and it needed to raise capital. Today's announcement suggests that Einhorn was right.
Just because executives act like cheerleaders, it doesn't mean investors should take them at their word.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup shares and has no financial interest in the other securities mentioned
Posted May 14th 2008 4:35PM by Michael Rainey (RSS feed)
Filed under: JPMorgan Chase (JPM), , Recession
JP Morgan (NYSE:
JPM)'s CEO Jamie Dimon recently stated that the recession in the American economy is "just starting."
As if to confirm Dimon's pessimistic view, the news is that JP Morgan will soon fire 4,000 employees, according to a Bloomberg
report. The layoffs are being driven by two major factors: the "slowing environment" (try 'snowballing recession') and the sudden acquisition of 14,000
Bear Stearns (NYSE:
BSC) employees.
Amazingly, Dimon reports that JP Morgan had found positions for 6,000 of the Bear employees. That seems like an awful lot of people to take on during a slowdown, but Dimon stated that Morgan was keeping only the very best Bear people and hoping to take on some of the firm's business as well.
Unfortunately for (some of) the people at JP Morgan, about 2,000 of the layoffs at JPM will be of Morgan people who are being replaced by Bear people. The other 2,000 will be Morgan employees who won't be able to blame Bear for their problems. (I'm not sure which is worse.)
Dimon did offer two bits of more optimistic news. He said that the integration of bear Stearns and Morgan is going smoothly -- although it's hard to know how much you can trust that statement, since what else is he going to say about that? And he said that in his view, the credit crunch is 75% over.
So that may offer a hint of brighter days ahead -- for his bank at least. For the broader economy, though, it still looks like dark days ahead.
Posted Mar 24th 2008 8:40AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Deals, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), , Federal Reserve
Last weekend JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) struck a deal to acquire -- or steal -- The Bear Stearns Companies (NYSE: BSC) for $2 a share (or $236 million) with the help of $30 billion in Fed financing. For the first time in my life, I was amazed to read in the New York Times that JPMorgan is now negotiating to raise its bid to $10 a share -- or $1.2 billion.
Why is this happening? Because some big shareholders plan to fight the deal. A third of Bear Stearns is owned by employees and British billionaire financier Joe Lewis, the firm's largest shareholder, who had invested $1.26 billion in Bear over the last year at an average price of about $104. JPMorgan needs 51% shareholder approval for the deal to go through. Last night, Bear's board was negotiating to sell JPMorgan 39.5% of the firm -- leaving it in a position to need only 10.5% of shareholder support to complete the transaction.
However, even that 39.5% deal may not go through as the Federal Reserve, which guaranteed $30 billion of Bear's most illiquid assets, is sensitive to criticism that it bailed out Bear. It's worried that allowing that deal will subject it to even more criticism. On Sunday JPMorgan was negotiating with the Fed to take some of the heat off the Fed by assuming at least the first $1 billion in losses on Bear assets before the $30 billion kicks in.
Continue reading Why JPMorgan wants to pay five times more for Bear Stearns
Next Page >