<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Leno/O'Brien Puzzle: What Should NBC Do?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/nbc_logo_240.jpg" alt="" />NBC Universal, which recently was the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/the-comcast-ge-deal-includes-nbc-local-stations-triggering-re/19260491">subject of a proposed transaction</a> between General Electric (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) and Comcast (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>), is having a serious problem with <em>The Jay Leno Show</em>. It's not performing well in the ratings. But wait, there's more, as a typical infomercial narrator might intone: <em>The Tonight Show</em> isn't faring any better under the aegis of Conan O'Brien. </p>
<p>Worse, the issues with the 10 PM Leno programming asset go beyond just his ratings. The show is exerting a negative halo effect over the local newscasts. If you don't have a strong lead-in, then the content that follows will suffer.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Leno/O'Brien Puzzle: What Should NBC Do?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/">The Leno/O'Brien Puzzle: What Should NBC Do?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/01/future-for-nbcs-the-jay-leno-show-is-up-in-the-air.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19308114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/the-leno-obrien-puzzle-what-should-nbc-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMCSA</category><category>comcast</category><category>conan obrien</category><category>ConanObrien</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Jay Leno</category><category>JayLeno</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should GE shareholders be happy about 'The Jay Leno Show'?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/ge_logo.gif" />Last year, I composed a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/">not-so-bullish appraisal</a> of NBC Universal's Jay Leno strategy. NBC Universal, which <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) has an 80% stake in, wanted to make sure that Leno's services did not wind up in the hands of a competing media entity when they handed <em>The Tonight Show</em> over to Conan O'Brien, so they bestowed upon him a talk program to be aired weeknights at 10 PM. It debuts tonight. I basically argued that NBC would survive without Leno, and that such an odd programming choice at 10 PM, when scripted intellectual assets are usually broadcast, might not be the optimal paradigm to engage.
<p>Well, I still feel this is a risky move, but I do have to say that an article by Scott Collins over at the <em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-leno14-2009sep14,0,7540213.story">Los Angeles Times</a></em> has piqued my interest in the expected economical benefit that Leno-at-10 might imply. Leno might not bring in a ton of eyeballs, but his profit margin could be acceptable given the lower capital necessary to fund his extravaganza.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should GE shareholders be happy about 'The Jay Leno Show'?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/">Should GE shareholders be happy about 'The Jay Leno Show'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-leno14-2009sep14,0,7540213.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19160762/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/should-ge-shareholders-be-happy-about-the-jay-leno-show/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>conan obrien</category><category>ConanObrien</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James Duff</category><category>JamesDuff</category><category>Jay Leno</category><category>JayLeno</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Scott Collins</category><category>ScottCollins</category><category>the tonight show</category><category>TheTonightShow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jon Stewart's CNBC attacks bashed by NBC chief]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nbc.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Jon Stewart has devoted a considerable amount of airtime to bashing CNBC and its pundits for not doing more to warn the public about the stupidity and incompetence that led to disasters for retirement portfolios.<br /><br />Now NBC Universal CEO <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-03-18-zucker-stewart-cramer_N.htm">Jeff Zucker is firing back</a>, calling Stewart's attacks "incredibly unfair" and "completely out of line." He said that "everyone wants to find a scapegoat" and believes that blaming the financial media for the meltdown is "absurd."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jon Stewart's CNBC attacks bashed by NBC chief</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/">Jon Stewart's CNBC attacks bashed by NBC chief</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-03-18-zucker-stewart-cramer_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1492208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/jon-stewarts-cnbc-attacks-bashed-by-nbc-chief/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>Daily Show</category><category>DailyShow</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Jon Stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>NBC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should NBC have let Leno go?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/nbculogo.jpg" />I found <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/">myself writing</a> about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC the other day, specifically about CEO Jeff Zucker's apparent flummoxed realization that radical changes may be needed to stanch the ratings erosion that have plagued the major broadcast networks in this brave new media world. Now, I have another, equally interesting subject to look at: Jay Leno will be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0926481820081210?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">given a talk show</a> after he hands <em>The Tonight Show</em> over to Conan O'Brien. The program will air on weeknights from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. </p>
<p>As we all probably know by now, NBC was intent on having O'Brien take over Leno's position as a way of ensuring that he would stay at the network. Leno, as one would imagine, reportedly hated giving the job up. NBC, however, did not want Leno to head over to another network. Supposedly, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC was perhaps interested in taking Leno on. So, the powers that be at the Peacock net have secured the services of Mr. Leno by offering him the chance to do something new: namely, distribute his schtick at an earlier time.</p>
<p>Okay, I'll tell you, I think this is a ridiculous idea. On many levels. Let's talk about level one: is this even going to work? Do people want to see Leno at 10 p.m.? Hey, maybe they will. But I get the feeling that this might be too much of a change for people used to seeing Leno at 11:30. Let's go to level two: why does NBC want to program what would essentially be two <em>Tonight Shows</em>? Won't there be some cannibalization going on here? You always hear media companies whining about cannibalization.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should NBC have let Leno go?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/">Should NBC have let Leno go?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0926481820081210?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1396583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>conan obrien</category><category>ConanObrien</category><category>David Letterman</category><category>DavidLetterman</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Jay Leno</category><category>JayLeno</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>Johnny Carson</category><category>JohnnyCarson</category><category>NBC</category><category>Pixar</category><category>talk shows</category><category>TalkShows</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is NBC panicking?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/nbculogo.jpg" alt="" />General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC is really feeling the heat of the recession. NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker thinks that <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i686368ba4cd6a88c1ba37d99bf187003">reducing the number of primetime hours</a> on the network should be considered a viable option for controlling costs and for adjusting to the current media landscape that seems to favor cable networks over traditional broadcasting entities like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>). He also speculates that reducing the actual number of <em>days</em> that the network programs may be necessary at some point. </p>
<p>I find all this very amusing. I think what Zucker is essentially saying is that NBC needs to think more like a cable network. I would agree, and have argued for this before. Let's face it, the broadcast networks are dinosaurs in many ways. They just can't compete in a world where cable channels are popular and are constantly repeating cheaply produced shows to keep costs at a sane level. Take <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) MTV as an example. How many times have there been marathons of <em>The Real World</em>? Likewise, if you come in late on an episode of <em>Celebrity Rehab</em>, you know you'll have other opportunities to catch the whole thing at another time. Not only is that time-shifting model convenient, it saves money, too. </p>
<p>This is how NBC should think. Sure, it'd be a culture shock, but what if hits like <em>Heroes</em> and <em>30 Rock</em> were repeated a few times in a single week? That presents a problem, of course. The talent and production companies behind those shows would demand extra compensation. Well, that's where Zucker should come in. He needs to go to the Hollywood community and tell them that things just aren't working out these days for the network. Zucker has to be staunch and let everyone know what a bind NBC is in and that, for everyone's sake, license fees should better reflect the current reality. The networks have experimented with repeating shows during the week, but not to the extent I'd like to see. I mean, really, does <em>Saturday Night Live</em> only have to be seen on Saturday Night? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is NBC panicking?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/">Is NBC panicking?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i686368ba4cd6a88c1ba37d99bf187003>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1395089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>30 Rock</category><category>30Rock</category><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Heroes</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Electric should not sell NBC Universal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p>Lately, I've been hearing a lot of chatter about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) and its NBC Universal asset (<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3id08e9f14f520f15d4aea981dd4bef759">here's one example</a>). Specifically, there's been talk about the future of the movie and television business and its role as a productive member of the GE portfolio. There are a lot of pundits out there who would like to see it sold off; probably a lot of investors would like that, too. Thankfully, CEO Jeffrey Immelt isn't one of them; he has consistently and steadfastly denied that NBC Universal will be offered to buyers in the near future. I hope he retains such opinion, because I definitely think GE needs NBC Universal.</p>
<p>Sure, GE needs to sell things from time to time, the latest example being the conglomerate's desire to dump its appliance division (Peter Cohan agreed with this logic and recently <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/ge-to-sell-its-appliance-business/">wrote a piece</a> about the subject). But it shouldn't get rid of NBC Universal. Ever. Well, maybe there <em>might</em> be some compelling event in the future that would justify a sale, but I really don't see that happening. Why? Because content is valuable, and GE needs to own a piece of it.</p>
<p>We live in exciting times. The media is changing. New distribution paradigms, driven by digital technologies, are forming all the time. Libraries of films and television shows are going to be valuable well into the future. Think about Universal and its film library<em>. The Mummy</em>, <em>Jurassic Park</em>, <em>E.T.</em>, <em>The Bourne Ultimatum</em>, <em>Jaws</em>...you get the picture. NBC Universal will be able to monetize all these franchises and many, many more from the library, as well as ones that have yet to be produced, via the new digital economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Electric should not sell NBC Universal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/">General Electric should not sell NBC Universal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 May 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1203863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/24/general-electric-should-not-sell-nbc-universal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NWS</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Weather Channel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's problem isn't just Bear - NBC underperforming, too]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>)is blaming its huge Q1 miss on the financial markets, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) specifically.<br /><br /> Two weeks before the end of the quarter, GE CEO Immelt did a webcast in which he said the quarter was great. Implication? Load up on the stock. And now everyone who did is hosed.<br /><br />What happened? Jeff Immelt wants us to blame those nasty market conditions, the ones that were apparently unforeseeable two days before they occurred. Please. Jeff and GE shouldn't compound this disaster by further damaging their already clobbered credibility. The credit crunch started last summer.<br /><br />But GE's problem isn't just the credit crunch and Bears' collapse. For example, NBC Universal was also a laggard. It posted revenue growth of 3% and profit growth of 3%; in January, GE had predicted 10% revenue growth and profit increases of 5-10%.<br /><br />NBC U isn't the most important part of GE's portfolio, so it's understandable that during the <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/live_ge_s_q1_conference_call">earnings call</a> this morning, analysts didn't demand an explanation of what happened with Jeff Zucker's unit. But we sure would love an answer. The best-case scenario for the NBC U division: Zucker and his lieutenants underestimated the effects of the writers strike. Worst-case scenario: It's reflective of a larger decline in the advertising business.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/live_ge_s_q1_conference_call">UPDATE FROM CONFERENCE CALL: Pathetic GE: Blame Bear Stearns For Our Mess</a>.<br /><br />See Also: <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/uh_oh_ge_blows_q1_nbc_u_misses_too">NBCU: Strike Has "No Noticeable Impact" On Q4</a><br /><br /><em>Peter Kafka is managing editor at <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/">Silicon Alley Insider</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/">GE's problem isn't just Bear - NBC underperforming, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1164818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/11/ges-problem-isnt-just-bear-nbc-underperforming-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>earnings</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Immelt</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>NBC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap up: Yahoo expected to reduce workforce by up to 5%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120103804575607643.html?mod=todays_us_page_one "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that a New York law firm that  was hired to probe into a bribes-for-business scandal at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys">Siemens AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys">SI</a>) has been  hindered by many obstacles including lawyers' missteps and lack of subpoena  powers, people familiar said.</span></font></li>
    <li><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is expected to  reduce its workforce by as much as 5%, according to sources in the company and  reported by the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1032eb40-c930-11dc-9807-000077b07658.html "><em>Financial Times</em></a>. The company is reportedly going to lay off some  500-700 of its employees as soon as next Tuesday.</span></font></li>
</ul>
<font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br /></span></font>
<ul>
    <li><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">In an effort  to save as much as $50M per year, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal head Jeff Zucker said the  broadcaster would reduce its reliance on pilot episodes of new series on its NBC  television station. Mr. Zucker cited the slowdown in the economy and the  Hollywood writers' strike as reasons for cutting costs, adding that "it's clear  we are in a recession in the United States," the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/business/media/23pilots.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media&amp;oref=slogin "><em>New York Times</em></a> reported.</span></font></li>
</ul>
<font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><strong>WEB SITES:</strong><br /></span></font>
<ul>
    <li><font size="2" face="Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2008/01/might_google_buy_the_new_york.html "><em>Real Clear Markets</em></a> says that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) would have the most to gain  from acquiring <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), a company that has declined in value by  70% over the last five years.<o:p></o:p></span></font></li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/">Newspaper wrap up: Yahoo expected to reduce workforce by up to 5%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1094147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/newspaper-wrap-up-yahoo-expected-to-reduce-workforce-by-up-to-5/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NYT</category><category>probe</category><category>SI</category><category>Siemens</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NBC is probably not for sale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img height="63" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nbc428.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /> NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2950920920071029">made it clear</a> at a conference yesterday that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) had no interest in selling the media business. Referring to GE CEO Jeff Immelt, Zucker said, "He has said numerous times that NBCU is not for sale. It is not for sale after the Olympics." Some press reports have indicated that GE would take the big money from the sports event and then dump the business on some sucker.</p>
<p>It is odd that the head of a GE division should have to make this kind of comment at all. The head of the locomotive division probably wouldn't make comments about the future of his business. Meanwhile, NBC Universal can go on operating as usual whether Wall Street thinks it is for sale or not.</p>
<p>The argument for selling NBC is that the unit does not fit with the conglomerate's industrial and financial operations. That is true, but owning a network does mean tickets to the Super Bowl and the Oscars.</p>
<p>NBC is a $15 billion business with operating income running about $2.5 billion, making it a modest part of GE's overall earnings. Still, the business is about the size of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), which has a market cap of $21 billion and debt of $7 billion. </p>
<p>For the $28 billion enterprise value of CBS, GE would sell NBC tomorrow.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor of </em><em>247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/">NBC is probably not for sale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2950920920071029>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1025143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entertainment</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>media</category><category>nbc tv</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcTv</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>universal studios</category><category>UniversalStudios</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE should replace NBC's  Zucker]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Chief Executive Jeff Immelt's has given Jeff Zucker plenty of chances to improve NBC Universal. Now, it's time for someone else to run the media conglomerate.</p>
<p>Though NBC's performance is showing signs of improvement, it continues to be one of the laggards in the GE portfolio. Investors are clamoring for the Fairfield, Conn.-based company to spin-off or sell the media conglomerate. NBC prime time ratings are stagnant and still overly dependent on the "Law and Order" franchise. While I am a huge fan of "Scrubs" and "My Name is Earl," I realize that the quirky humor of those sitcoms may not appeal to everyone.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Zucker reshuffled the top management at NBC, ousting programming head Kevin Reilly and replacing him with with Ben Silverman and Mark Graboff. Maybe Zucker thought Reilly, whose contract was recently extended, was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118046818792517516.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">working too hard</a>. I'm surprised that Zucker didn't escape the axe himself.</p>
<p>Indeed, anytime a company fills a job that one person did with two or more people, that's a bad sign. It's a recipe for instability and will guarantee turf battles between high-powered executives. However, this does allow Zucker the chance to spread blame around to more people when things go wrong or don't go right fast enough.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/">GE should replace NBC's  Zucker</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 12:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118046818792517516.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/906410/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/nbcs-jeff-zucker-is-on-the-hot-seat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben silverman</category><category>BenSilverman</category><category>ge</category><category>jeff immelt</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>kevin reilly</category><category>KevinReilly</category><category>mark graboff</category><category>MarkGraboff</category><category>nbc</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A new future for NBC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="170" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/nbc.jpg" alt="" />Today's <em>New York Post </em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/business/business.htm">Business Poll</a> asks readers to decide Jeff Zucker's main priority as the new president and CEO at NBC Universal, a media concern that is 80% owned by General Electric Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>). The overwhelming choice, with 64.3% of the votes, suggested improving the network's prime-time programming in an effort to boost ratings. <br /><br />As he settles into his new role, Zucker (who formerly served as NBC Entertainment president) is faced with an uphill battle, with his network parked in fourth place. Once the king of "Must See TV" and number-one hits such as <em>Cheers</em>, <em>Friends</em>, and <em>Frasier</em>, the peacock network has lost some of its plume of late and currently lags CBS, ABC, and FOX (respectively home to the <em>CSI, Grey's Anatomy, </em>and <em>American Idol </em>juggernauts) in terms of viewers. The 2006-2007 season has brought some ratings disappointments, but also some pleasant surprises in the form of <em>Heroes</em>, the <em>Deal or No Deal </em>game show, and <em>The Office</em>, which nabbed the Emmy Award for Outstanding Comedy Series. <br /><br />In a recent interview with <a href="http://www.ew.com"><em>Entertainment Weekly</em></a>, a division of Time Warner (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>), Zucker expressed excitement and confidence in his new role (as one should) and noted that one of the keys to the network's comeback is showing patience and having faith with quality shows (e.g. <em>The Office</em>, which initially lagged in ratings). <br /><br />Getting back to the poll, 11% of respondents are hoping Zucker breathes fresh life into the canceled <em>Fear Factor</em>. I refuse to comment on that -- the support behind that show always struck me almost as scary as most of its stunts.<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst with <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/">A new future for NBC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/business/business.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/752534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/12/a-new-future-for-nbc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anc</category><category>cbs</category><category>fox</category><category>ge</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>nbc</category><category>nws</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p>Jeff Zucker <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/zuckers-rise-at-nbc-reflects-media/20070205064709990002">appears to have won</a> the race to succeed Robert Wright as CEO of General Electric Company's (NYSE: GE) NBC Universal. I'm not sure if this is good for GE shareholders.</p>
<p>Zucker, who famously produced the <em>Today Show</em> and extended <em>Friends's</em> popular run, has seen NBC's ratings stumble to fourth place. Although he has championed some shows that have done well -- such as <em>Sunday Night Football and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/02/19/8400166/index.htm?postversion=2007020507">Heroes</a></em> -- the reality remains that NBC used to be first and it's not anymore. A few weeks ago, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/16/news/companies/ge_nbc/index.htm">CNNMoney reported</a> that NBC was behind The Walt Disney Company's (NYSE: DIS) ABC and CBS Corporation's (NYSE: CBS) CBS in the Nielsen ratings for the coveted 18 to 49 year old demographic group.</p>
<p>In addition to the weak ratings, NBC's numbers are not too hot either. While its revenues grew 10% to $16.2 billion in 2006, its operating profit fell 6% to $2.9 billion. As a proportion of GE's total, NBC contributed to 10% of GE revenues in 2005 and 2006 during which time NBC's operating income contribution fell from 13% to 11% of GE's total. This performance is not bad, but it's not spectacular either.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/">Is Zucker good for NBC Universal?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/748025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/05/is-zucker-good-for-nbc-universal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>GE</category><category>Jack Welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>Robert Wright</category><category>RobertWright</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 12:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
