<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: St. Patrick's Day Hat Tricks (GE, FUQI, SNV, HIG, BBI, PLCM, ERC, MEE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Overseas markets were up on St. Patrick's cheers, or up on continued FOMC promises of keeping rates low. Then a lower producer price index sealed in the day. We are basically back to where the markets are just not wanting to trade off. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,733.67 +47.69 (0.45%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,166.19 +6.73 (0.58%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,389.09 +11.08 (0.47%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/03/17/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-alu-ann-athn-adsk-bhp-brcm-ctxs-do-ghl-mrvl-eric/">Top Analyst Calls</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/03/17/todays-best-market-rumors-3172010/">Top Stock Market Rumors</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/03/17/biohealth-business-daily-abii-stem-xnpt-lxrx-mipi-lly-gtxi-shpgy-jazz/">BioHealth Daily</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: St. Patrick's Day Hat Tricks (GE, FUQI, SNV, HIG, BBI, PLCM, ERC, MEE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/">Closing Bell: St. Patrick's Day Hat Tricks (GE, FUQI, SNV, HIG, BBI, PLCM, ERC, MEE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19403902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/closing-bell-st-patricks-day-hat-tricks-ge-fuqi-snv-hig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apax partners</category><category>ApaxPartners</category><category>cumberland</category><category>fuqi</category><category>hartford financial</category><category>HartfordFinancial</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>LM Ericsson</category><category>LmEricsson</category><category>massey energy</category><category>MasseyEnergy</category><category>polycom</category><category>stern agee</category><category>synovus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: When the Market Can't Decide... (NFLX, PALM, T, LVLT, NICE, MOS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvlt/" rel="tag">Level 3 Communications (LVLT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" alt="" />About all the FOMC Minutes did today was agitate those hoping for a dollar rally on currencies because the FOMC members were still concerned about the economic risks. <a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/01/06/oil-inventory-gains-trump-weak-refining-oih-uso-oil-uco/">Stronger supplies of oil</a> were also ignored as weather related trading took oil higher from the post-report lows. The ISM non-Manufacturing data also came in just above the break-even point and the ADP data did not signal any major changes for Friday's jobs data. The DJIA and S&amp;P 500 went from negative to positive so many times today that this was mixed regardless of how the averages ended up. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,574.06 +2.04 (0.02%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,137.14 +0.62 (0.05%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,301.09 -7.62 (-0.33%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/01/06/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-aol-dt-dow-eca-fnsr-pm-swir-ten-mmm-wy-zbra/">Top Analyst Upgrades/Downgrades</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/01/06/top-day-trader-alerts-sonc-dptr-nlst-cien-nice-bzh/">Top Day Trader Alerts</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: When the Market Can't Decide... (NFLX, PALM, T, LVLT, NICE, MOS)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/">Closing Bell: When the Market Can't Decide... (NFLX, PALM, T, LVLT, NICE, MOS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19305851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/closing-bell-when-the-market-cant-decide-nflx-palm-t-lv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blu-ray</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>nice systems</category><category>NiceSystems</category><category>palm</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Looking Forward to the End of Stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10654094/1/top-5-wall-street-stories-of-2009.html?puc=aoljjc ">Top 5 Wall Street Stories of 2009 </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10654266/1/cramer-the-book-on-energy.html?puc=aoljjc ">Cramer: The Book on Energy</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says when it happens, you'll hear a lot of noise, but it will be a healthy sign. </em><br />
<br />
Get ready for the following: "The market's about to take a header because the Fed and Treasury are going to take away the stimulus." <br />
<br />
First, I don't even know if it is true. We have a Fed chairman who is incredibly independent and a great student of history who recognizes that if World War II had not started, we would have slipped right back into a depression.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Looking Forward to the End of Stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/">Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Looking Forward to the End of Stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19299261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/31/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-looking-forward-to-the-end-of-stimulu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The Big-Name Comeback Kids]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10653849/1/yrc-worldwide-trico-marine-early-volume-plays.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc ">Dollar Store: Early Volume Plays </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10652904/1/hey-fed-whats-going-on.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc ">Hey Fed, What's Going On? </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says Pepsi, McDonald's and Intel are set to bounce back with a bang.  </em><br />
<br />
You can always tell a benign market by the comeback the doghouse names manage to give you. <br />
<br />
Consider the errant cases of Pepsi (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=PEP">Cramer's Take</a>), McDonald's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=MCD">Cramer's Take</a>) and Intel (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=INTC">Cramer's Take</a>). All three allegedly "disappointed," with Pepsi failing to please on the alleged guide-down after its bottling purchase, McDonald's stuttering on a bad month and Intel on a so-called failed quarter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The Big-Name Comeback Kids</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The Big-Name Comeback Kids</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19297972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-big-name-comeback-kids/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>hpq</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mcd</category><category>msft</category><category>pep</category><category>pg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Real Estate Is Doing Better Than You Think]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10652469/1/mgm-mirage-gets-bets-from-call-buyers.html?puc=aoljjc ">MGM Mirage Gets Bets From Call-Buyers </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10652296/1/dr-horton-netflix-options-lure-bulls.html?puc=aoljjc ">D.R. Horton, Netflix Options Lure Bulls</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>The Street.com's Jim Cramer says that AvalonBay, a builder of luxury apartment complexes, is building more. <br />
</em><br />
If I were to be a short-seller, paying attention to the news flow, I think I would like to be a short-seller of higher-end residential real estate, because I would presume that people couldn't afford it. If they can't make their payments for their houses, they are going to hold out to fix their mortgage or they are going to abandon ship, but they are not going to go to a luxury apartment complex. They are going to go downscale, and the apartment complexes that cater to those who are well-off should be going begging. <br />
<br />
I think I would want to short AvalonBay Communities (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/avalonbay-communities-inc/avb/nys">AVB</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=AVB" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), which has 172 communities and 50,000 apartments in decimated areas such as Southern California, Northern California, the Midwest and the Pacific Northwest. It must be getting killed. How can it possibly pay those underlying mortgages and how can it grow, building new apartments? It must be a moribund, declining business.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Real Estate Is Doing Better Than You Think</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Real Estate Is Doing Better Than You Think</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19293456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-real-estate-is-doing-better-than-you-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avb</category><category>featured</category><category>housing</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Endless Caveats Don't Make You Any Money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbt/" rel="tag">BB and T (BBT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fo/" rel="tag">Fortune Brands (FO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/unp/" rel="tag">Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10650726/1/top-equity-etfs-of-2009.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc ">Top Equity ETFs of 2009 </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10651641/1/buffetts-legacy-shows-values-matter.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc ">Buffett's Legacy Shows Values Matter </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>The Street.com's Jim Cramer says that he's making it his mission in 2010 to call out people in the media who provide no value.  </em><br />
<br />
Have you ever noticed that with every good housing report there are endless caveats:  <br />
<br />
1. Prices are still down year over year.<br />
<br />
2. The home tax credit of $8,000 moved the house, and that will go away.<br />
<br />
3. Home mortgages are artificially low because of the Fed.<br />
<br />
4. Banks have more foreclosures on their balance sheets than before.<br />
<br />
5. Foreclosures continue to occur.<br />
<br />
6. Everything will slip back to imbalance when the credit goes away.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Endless Caveats Don't Make You Any Money</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Endless Caveats Don't Make You Any Money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-endless-caveats-dont-make-you-any-mon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bbt</category><category>featured</category><category>fo</category><category>goog</category><category>hd</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>ko</category><category>leg</category><category>low</category><category>mo</category><category>pep</category><category>shw</category><category>sti</category><category>unp</category><category>usb</category><category>wfc</category><category>whr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="#">How to Earn $1</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10650886/1/citigroup-denies-it-was-victim-of-hackers.html?puc=aoljjc ">Citigroup Denies It Was Victim of Hackers</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says three times a shakeout led to yet-higher prices -- and skittish investors have missed out. </em><br />
<br />
Three times this market eluded people. The first was what looks obvious in retrospect but was actually a perilous bottom, back in March. I wouldn't have recommended it here or on my show if Doug Kass hadn't pushed me and all others who read this site. It was a call of a lifetime. And we all know it, the generational call to get in. So many missed it because the moment was breathtakingly dangerous and could have been binary. I got lucky and backed into it, with Doug's help, simply by tallying all of the individual stocks in a worst-case basis, and you couldn't get much below Dow 6000, which at the time was only 300 points below, barely enough to worry about. That was the Nouriel Roubini heyday, and he managed to mark the bottom by slashing his price target for the Dow to 5000. He could have declared victory and been a hero, a la the now celebrated David Tepper. Instead, I think he's a bum who reiterates his sell at every turn. If you go back and look at all of the stocks that were at a buck and change at the moment, you can see exactly what I mean. Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C">Cramer's Take</a>), anyone?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19290742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Hold Citi for a Double]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10650057/1/goldman-catholic-nuns-discuss-compensation.html?puc=aoljjc ">Goldman, Catholic Nuns Discuss Compensation</a> </li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10649984/1/bulls-full-of-holiday-cheer.html?puc=aoljjc ">Bulls Full of Holiday Cheer </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the dilution here was expected, and this one is marching higher. </em><br /><br />What do you with Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/c/nys">C</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) if you bought it on the deal now that you are up so huge? I'd keep it. <br /><br />Remember, there were two variables to this deal -- how much raising the TARP return money would hurt the stock and how much the government's sale would hurt the stock. We saw the underwriting knock off about 60 cents from the stock, and we are getting the distinct view from Washington that there is no consensus between Treasury and the FDIC about what should be done with the government's stake beyond holding it for a while.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Hold Citi for a Double</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/">Cramer on BloggingStocks:  Hold Citi for a Double</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19289142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hold-citi-for-a-double/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: No Fretting Over Downgrades]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/jim_cramer_getty_alexwong_20061129_240.jpg"  alt="" />With the last of the big earnings out of the way, we won't see any major downgrades the rest of '09, TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says. </em><br />
<br />
We should be in research heaven starting today. We have unwritten rules at the end of the year in this game: no big downgrades. And with almost no earnings reports left for the year, there is little reason to expect any. <br />
<br />
Given that the last major earnings reports -- General Mills (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-mills-inc/gis/nys">GIS</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GIS" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), Research In Motion (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=RIMM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and Nike (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=NKE" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) -- were all worth praising it is hard to see why this year should be any different.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: No Fretting Over Downgrades</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: No Fretting Over Downgrades</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19286597/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-fretting-over-downgrades/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>amzn</category><category>featured</category><category>gis</category><category>goog</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>nke</category><category>nvda</category><category>rimm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: BofA Got It Right on Moynihan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10647926/1/bank-of-america-picks-moynihan-as-ceo.html?puc=aoljjc ">Bank of America Picks Moynihan as CEO </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/p/rmoney/jimcramerblog/10605669.html?puc=aoljjc ">Moynihan's the Man for BofA</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says his conservative approach is just what this bank needs. </em><br />
<br />
I like Brian Moynihan. I have wanted him from the get-go. Not because he is a lawyer -- that hasn't been much of a boost for others in banking (sorry Chuck Prince!). And not because he is an insider, although I think learning this story would be darned hard for an outsider.<br />
<br />
I've liked him because he is from Fleet, the part of Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=BAC" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) from New England; Fleet is the least risky, most conservative portion of the bank. Fleet was a bank I loved. It gave you an amazing return and did it in a simple, conservative way: good banking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: BofA Got It Right on Moynihan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: BofA Got It Right on Moynihan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19285039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/17/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-bofa-got-it-right-on-moynihan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Brian Moynihan</category><category>BrianMoynihan</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Remember the pattern of oil rallies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10646179/1/top-energy-and-oil-stocks-for-2010.html?puc=aoljjc ">Top Energy and Oil Stocks for 2010 </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/video/10646583/top-2010-stocks-oil-rigs.html#57650208001?puc=aoljjc">Top 2010 Stocks: Oil Rigs</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the stocks like to move higher along well-worn paths. </em><br />
<br />
With the usual suspects rallying -- gold and oil -- it's important to remember how the oil rallies have unfolded in the past. You have to be able to recall the oil pecking order of the petroleum complex ramp. <br />
<br />
First to move in the drilling complex is Transocean (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/transocean-ltd/rig/nys">RIG</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=RIG" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), the wildest trader in the group. Then it is National Oilwell Varco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/national-oilwell-varco-inc/nov/nys">NOV</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=NOV" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>). Forget that both of these are the least affected by the day-to-day price of oil. The market's real stupid on these oil moves, and that's what happens. On the oil side it is Occidental (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">OXY</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=OXY" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), which at least is closely correlated and can have a big move throughout the day.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Remember the pattern of oil rallies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Remember the pattern of oil rallies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19283377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-remember-the-pattern-of-oil-rallies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apa</category><category>apc</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>msft</category><category>nov</category><category>oih</category><category>oxy</category><category>rig</category><category>swn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good banks don't seem worth the risk]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10645611/1/cramer-monday-was-a-good-day-for-bulls.html?puc=aoljjc ">Cramer: Monday Was a Good Day for Bulls</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10645194/1/citigroup-financial-winners-and-losers.html?puc=aoljjc ">Citigroup: Financial Winners and Losers</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says Goldman and JPMorgan are acting terribly amid all the offerings and deals.  </em><br />
<br />
Why do Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GS">Cramer's Take</a>) and JPMorgan (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=JPM">Cramer's Take</a>), the good ones, go down all of the time or act terribly? I think because the equity offerings of the bad ones are just too compelling and the universe of buyers of this merchandise is severely limited.  <br />
<br />
These stocks are limited because they are not worth the headline risk trouble. If they weren't being bashed by the president or taken to the woodshed by Congress or dumped on by Meredith Whitney, the most powerful bank analyst on earth, then maybe they would be worth owning. But the more successful you are, the worse it looks. Is Goldman Sachs supposed to get into the home mortgage business? Is it supposed to write a check for $10 billion to the government as a thank you for AIG (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=AIG">Cramer's Take</a>)? Is JPMorgan supposed to start raising its dividend when it would be branded as a fat cat?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good banks don't seem worth the risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good banks don't seem worth the risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19281564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-banks-dont-seem-worth-the-ri/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>gs</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>jpm</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Exxon just changed the energy game]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10644845/1/exxon-mobil-to-buy-xto-energy-for-41b.html?puc=aoljjc">Exxon Mobil to Buy XTO Energy for $41B </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10644161/1/crude-oil-futures-extend-losing-streak.html?puc=aoljjc">Crude Oil Futures Extend Losing Streak </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says its buy of XTO is a clear signal that natural gas works. </span><br />
<br />
Do you think Exxon (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=XOM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) is going to buy XTO (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xto-energy-inc/xto/nys">XTO</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=XTO" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) -- the best of the best -- if it doesn't see the writing on the wall that it needs to have natural gas as part of its filling station repertoire? Do you think Exxon just wants to be in the home heating business? Do you think the most conservative company in the industry is all about just picking up some good domestic reserves when it has ignored doing so for years? <br />
<br />
This is the biggest game-changing transaction in the nat gas patch that I can recall, because Exxon just endorsed both its reliability and its cleanliness. Remember, you do not see Exxon bidding on the Iraq fields. While it is doing some exploration across the globe, you bring in XTO because you want to dominate in natural gas at home.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Exxon just changed the energy game</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Exxon just changed the energy game</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19277681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-exxon-just-changed-the-energy-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clne</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>xom</category><category>xto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: It is Ford's time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10643396/1/advertising-middle-man-under-the-radar.htmlpuc=aoljjc ">Advertising Middle-Man: Under the Radar </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10643734/1/oil-at-71-forecasts-call-for-more-demand.html?puc=aoljjc ">Oil at $71; Forecasts Call for More Demand </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says if only it could get to investment-grade because then it would see its financing costs drop. </em><br />
<br />
How big a stock can Ford (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=F">Cramer's Take</a>) be? Here's an odd one: It can be as big as the stock will let it be.  <br />
<br />
So much of this company's future is tied up in its stock appreciation because that will give its fantastic CEO, Alan Mulally, the flexibility to pay off the unions, pay down debt and get its credit rating to where its Ford Motor Credit business will make fortunes for the company.  <br />
<br />
Ford's performing fabulously, profitable in every market it sells in after having streamlined down to just a few big brands that can be supported both through advertising and through production at far lower costs than just about any other auto manufacturer, if not every auto manufacturer.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: It is Ford's time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: It is Ford's time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19274850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-it-is-fords-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan mulally</category><category>AlanMulally</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>ford</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Good news or bad news, the market was up for the day (AOL, SNSS, ENER, ALU, BSX, CIEN, F)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cien/" rel="tag">Ciena Corp (CIEN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/alu/" rel="tag">Alcatel-LucentADS (ALU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />The markets just wanted to close higher today. A slight gain in the weekly jobless claims had no real impact and a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/12/10/no-one-wants-treasury-long-bonds/">really poor 30-Year Treasury auction</a> that just hints at the demand for rates to rise had only a temporary effect against the stock market. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 	10,406.66 	+69.61 	(0.67%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 	1,102.35 	+6.40 	(0.58%) <br />
Nasdaq 	2,190.86 	+7.13 	(0.33%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/12/10/top-10-analyst-upgrades-downgrades-initiations-aol-cbs-ben-myl-nws-orcl-rimm-sfly-via-dis/">Top 10 Analyst Calls</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/12/10/short-interest-data-not-telling-the-whole-story-umc-m-c-snv-alu-wnr-liz-eee-mbi/">Key Short Interest Changes</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Good news or bad news, the market was up for the day (AOL, SNSS, ENER, ALU, BSX, CIEN, F)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/">Closing Bell: Good news or bad news, the market was up for the day (AOL, SNSS, ENER, ALU, BSX, CIEN, F)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19274074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/closing-bell-good-news-or-bad-news-the-market-was-up-for-the-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ALU</category><category>AOL</category><category>BSX</category><category>CIEN</category><category>ENER</category><category>energy conversion devices</category><category>EnergyConversionDevices</category><category>F</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>leukemia</category><category>SNSS</category><category>sunesis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Buy Citi on the deal ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10640354/1/should-citigroup-rush-to-repay-tarp.html?puc=aoljjc">Should Citigroup Rush to Repay TARP? </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10642442/1/citigroup-reportedly-prepping-equity-raise.html?puc=aoljjc">Citigroup Reportedly Prepping Equity Raise </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says this one'll make you a bundle by 2012. </span><br /><br />  Buy Citigroup (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C">Cramer's Take</a>). No, not in the open market, but on the deal or deals, depending upon how heavy-handed the government's going to be.  <br /><br />  I initially recommended this stock in the low $3s and saw it go to $5, where I begged the government nightly on my show to sell its 7 billion shares. But no, the government played the market and gave up a very big gain. But now here we are back again at $3 and change, and the government is going to price its stock, and the company might do an additional 6 billion shares or more to pay back TARP.  <br /><br />  So you are looking at about 14 billion shares hitting the market. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Buy Citi on the deal </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Buy Citi on the deal </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19273299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-buy-citi-on-the-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>tarp</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: People have finally seen the light on Disney ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10641178/1/who-really-wins-loses-in-ge-comcast-deal.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc">  Who Really Wins, Loses in GE-Comcast Deal?</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10641526/1/from-ammunition-to-diapers-under-the-radar.html?puc=aoljjc"> From Ammunition to Diapers: Under the Radar</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says this isn't a cyclical story -- the company's many drivers can pick up any slack in one division. </span><br /><br /> Disney's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=DIS" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) an odd animal. Until these last few months, it always seemed to be measured by what its worst division at the time was doing. If ESPN was going great but theme park attendance was going down, people would sell it. If theme parks were holding up but broadcast advertising had weakened, investors would jump ship. If the owned and operated stations did well and the company delivered a bunch of hit shows, but the movie lineup bombed, people would dump the stock down to 12 or 13 multiple status, instead of the premium multiple is used to trade to. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: People have finally seen the light on Disney </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: People have finally seen the light on Disney </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-people-have-finally-seen-the-light-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>Cedar Fair</category><category>CedarFair</category><category>dis</category><category>featured</category><category>fun</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mvl</category><category>pg</category><category>six flags</category><category>SixFlags</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Macy's has undone mistakes of the past ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jny/" rel="tag">Jones Apparel Group (JNY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10639975/1/five-cheap-stocks-with-room-to-grow.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc">Five Cheap Stocks With Room to Grow </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10633847/1/wal-mart-rivals-safety-of-us-government.html?puc=aoljjc">Wal-Mart Rivals Safety of U.S. Government </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says Macy's turnaround is evident in its stores and it will soon be evident in its numbers. </span><br /><br /> Why in heck is Macy's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=M" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) only a $6 billion company? Here's a department store chain that's getting growth back, that's aspirational as all get out, that has a management that understands that it needs to be regional in product but not in duplicative management, and it gets no respect whatsoever. <br /><br /> Yet we love the strip mall guys like Kohl's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">KSS</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=KSS" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and Target (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=TGT" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) because they are still throwing stores up all over the place and have perceived growth characteristics. We are willing to pay twice Nordstrom's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">JWN</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=JWN" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) growth rate for a company that's not that much better than Macy's, if at all. Twenty-three times Nordstrom's 12% growth vs. 15 times Macy's 10% growth makes no sense to me when I expect Macy's' growth to accelerate because of the My Macy's localizing initiative.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Macy's has undone mistakes of the past </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Macy's has undone mistakes of the past </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19269718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-macys-has-undone-mistakes-of-the-past/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>jny</category><category>jwn</category><category>kss</category><category>m</category><category>tgt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama's pro-coal stance makes Copenhagen a charade ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chk/" rel="tag">Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/p/_search/rmoney/energy/10639109.html?puc=aoljjc">Quality Energy Picks Ahead of the Summit </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/p/_search/rmoney/energy/10638385.html?puc=aoljjc">Invest in Energy Realities </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the biggest companies can lobby their way to huge profits. </span><br /><br />  Anyone serious about climate change knows that coal is the worst enemy of the environment. We can have all of the electric cars we want, if they are hooked into a coal-based utility system then the gains are irrelevant. We can also be sure that while all sorts of companies, like the General Electrics (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GE">Cramer's Take</a>) and Cokes (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=KO">Cramer's Take</a>) and Nikes (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=NKE">Cramer's Take</a>) and Nestles, support climate control, they are not equal to one Southern Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southern-company-the/so/nys">SO</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=SO">Cramer's Take</a>), which is an important coal-burning company and a huge lobbyist for the coal industry.  <br /><br />  Our nation has a two-pronged climate philosophy: pushes on conservation and on renewables. Neither is enough to get us through the next 10 years; we can't produce enough renewable energy at a cheap price and we can't caulk our way out of the jam. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama's pro-coal stance makes Copenhagen a charade </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama's pro-coal stance makes Copenhagen a charade </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19268041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obamas-pro-coal-stance-makes-copenhag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apa</category><category>apc</category><category>chk</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>coal</category><category>copenhagen</category><category>dvn</category><category>energy</category><category>environment</category><category>eqt</category><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>ko</category><category>nke</category><category>obama</category><category>rrc</category><category>so</category><category>xto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Mixed feelings on the BofA capital raise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10638478/1/bank-of-america-raises-19b-for-tarp-exit.html?kval=dontmiss?puc=aoljjc">Bank of America Raises $19B for TARP Exit </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10638545/1/goldman-likely-to-issue-stock-as-bonus.html?puc=aoljjc">Goldman Likely To Issue Stock as Bonus </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says it's good they could raise $19 billion so fast, but there are lots of reasons to be tentative here. </span><br />
<br />
You have to have mixed emotions about this Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=BAC">Cramer's Take</a>) deal. It's terrific that in 24 hours, a company that has no CEO and no history of making money during this tough period can raise $19 billion. But it is not terrific that $19 billion in buying power disappeared like that in a market where $19 billion actually matters, and is a precursor to maybe triple that figure that has to be raised within a short period of time. <br />
<br />
Remember when we first did the TARP raises, the initial guys did pretty well but as we went down the path it got tougher and the stocks got hammered more, and you wanted to be short all of the financials even though the early ones popped.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Mixed feelings on the BofA capital raise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Mixed feelings on the BofA capital raise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19265473/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-mixed-feelings-on-the-bofa-capital-rai/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
