<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate hits 9.8%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/labor.jpg" /> Unemployment is at its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">highest level since 1983, hitting 9.8% last month</a>. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofLabor/">Department of Labor</a> announced that 263,000 jobs were lost. This follows a revised loss of 201,000 jobs in August (lower than first reported). Nobody expected the August unemployment reprieve to last, and the increase suggests that the forecasted 10.3% unemployment rate for early next year will be realized. </p>
<p>Originally, the forecasted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> drop for September was 175,000, according to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">Bloomberg News</a></em>, with individual economists surveyed reporting in a range of 100,000 to 260,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/">Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job loss</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLoss</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What are the effects of long term unemployment?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-transcripts/" rel="tag">Earnings Transcripts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />Economists are scrambling to make sense of the drastic rise in unemployment and what it means for our long term economy. Former Federal Reserve Chairman, Paul Volker is saying that the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aOhkusQ9LifQ&amp;refer=home">"natural rate" of unemployment may rise above previous levels</a>. The "natural rate" of unemployment is the rate at which it neither creates acceleration or deceleration in inflation. The previous high for "natural employment" was 5.5%. Now, in current conditions it may rise to 6.5% of even 7%. <br /><br />This creates several added problems. First, it will cause a general decline in federal revenues which, in turn, will drive up the federal deficit to over $1 trillion. Next, the government will need to decide if they leave the rate of "natural employment" alone of try and stimulate more job growth, thus increasing the chance for higher inflation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What are the effects of long term unemployment?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/">What are the effects of long term unemployment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aOhkusQ9LifQ&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1535982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/what-are-the-effects-of-long-term-unemployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>job loss</category><category>JobLoss</category><category>long term effects</category><category>LongTermEffects</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
