<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[WWE's 'Legendary': An Odd Choice for a Movie Strategy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img alt="Legendary poster" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/legendary-postercrop.jpg" />I have to admit, I didn't notice until late this week that World Wrestling Entertainment's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) <em>Legendary</em> film, which opened yesterday, was some sort of drama. Maybe I was aware of it, somewhere in the back of my mind, but honestly, I've suddenly been hit by the notion that WWE's celluloid division made one heck of a strange business decision in green lighting the project.</p>
<p>Let me say upfront that I have not seen the movie. But I've read several reviews, such as the one in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-capsules-20100910,0,1276348.story"><em>Los Angeles Times</em></a>. They don't make me want to see the flick.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WWE's 'Legendary': An Odd Choice for a Movie Strategy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/">WWE's 'Legendary': An Odd Choice for a Movie Strategy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19629176/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/wwe-legendary-strategy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john cena</category><category>legendary</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment Is Serious About Movies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wwe-logo-240.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) hasn't fully succeeded with its film model. The company's slate has yet to produce a bona fide hit yet. Because of this, management <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/new-film-strategy-for-wweand-x00ae/rfid290699701?channel=pf">has decided</a> to change the strategy governing the operations of the WWE Studios asset.</p>
<p>WWE has elected to take over the marketing/distribution chores for its movies, ditching previous partners Lions Gate Entertainment (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) and News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) in the process, as this article at <em><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118013953.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+variety%2Fheadlines+%28Variety+-+Latest+News%29">Variety</a></em> indicates. However, there's an even bigger change that all shareholders should focus on.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment Is Serious About Movies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/">World Wrestling Entertainment Is Serious About Movies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118013953.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+variety%2Fheadlines+%28Variety+-+Latest+News%29>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19329322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/25/world-wrestling-entertainment-is-serious-about-movies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas"><img hspace="4" height="297" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/200px-monsters-vs-aliens-poster.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) has done it again. The studio's new computer cartoon, <em>Monsters Vs. Aliens</em>, which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), debuted in the top slot over the weekend at domestic multiplexes. According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo estimates</a> at the time of this writing, the film earned around $58 million. I think we all expected the performance in terms of rank, but I have to say that I thought the film would have taken in north of $60 million. <br /></p>
<p>If you look at this very useful <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm">reference</a>, you'll see that the opening for <em>Monsters</em> is relatively decent when compared to other DreamWorks Animation openings. But since both <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> and <em>Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa</em> had both hit the $60 million mark, I thought <em>Monsters</em> could do the same. An element to keep in mind is the timing. This is the first time that the studio opened one of its animated projects in March since <em>The Road to El Dorado</em>, and that one doesn't really count since it wasn't a CGI affair. So from that standpoint, perhaps this is a big victory.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/">'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/wwe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Don't tell me you haven't noticed the rise in value of shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). The recent rally in the stock is supremely impressive. The shares closed on Thursday at $12.08. The 52-week low of $8.76 was made back in November of last year. If you look at a one-month chart, you'll see that it's been nothing but straight-up action. </p>
<p>Yes, my friends, the stock is Hulking up! (I love it when Hulk Hogan does that routine.) Of course, by the time this is published, maybe the shares will have experienced a sell-off, but for now, the shares are hot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/">World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1499787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Hulk Hogan</category><category>HulkHogan</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>See No Evil</category><category>SeeNoEvil</category><category>stone cold steve austin</category><category>StoneColdSteveAustin</category><category>the condemned</category><category>TheCondemned</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wrestlemania is always an opportunity for WWE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wwe-logo.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) is going to be one busy company this weekend. And don't tell me you don't know why. Well, okay, I suppose a few of you may be in the dark -- you see, Wrestlemania 24 is scheduled for this Sunday. It promises to be a big affair. In fact, I caught Triple H, John Cena, Chris Jericho, The Big Show, Floyd "Money" Mayweather, and Vincent Kennedy McMahon on Larry King's CNN program yesterday -- they were in full promotion mode, and even Donald Trump called in to wish the gang well (you may recall that Trump won last year's hair-match battle with McMahon, a feat that left the latter with a bald head). Oh, and Vince even mentioned the stock. </p>
<p>It was an interesting interview, and it highlighted the fact for shareholders that the data from Wrestlemania should help to tell what kind of state the company is in. Will the buy rates be lower or higher than last year? Tough to tell, but I have to say that there doesn't seem to be, for me at least, that one match that's sure to drive even the most casual of wrestling fans to order up the show on their pay-per-view menu. A lot of the fallen fans will probably come back into the fold this weekend, however, to view the Ric Flair contest, in what is being billed as perhaps his last match. Thing of it is, though, Wrestlemania should still do well, even if it isn't necessarily the best roster they've ever had (I say this subjectively, of course) -- remember, Wrestlemania is not just an event, it's a brand, and a lot of people will order it up regardless. And the event is an excellent opportunity to bring more mindshare into the WWE product. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQ </a>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKKS Pacific</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKK</a>), for instance, will certainly be <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wrestlemaniar-24-weekend-commences/rfid86019792">hyping the heck</a> out of their WWE videogames this weekend with their annual superstar challenge. </p>
<span style="font-style: italic;"> </span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wrestlemania is always an opportunity for WWE</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/">Wrestlemania is always an opportunity for WWE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150864/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/wrestlemania-is-always-an-opportunity-for-wwe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Floyd Mayweather</category><category>FloydMayweather</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>THQ</category><category>Triple H</category><category>TripleH</category><category>Vincent Kennedy McMahon</category><category>VincentKennedyMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
