<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[McCain to GM: Go bankrupt!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/john_mccain_mark_wilson_20080211.jpg" />Republican Senator John McCain is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aO9XkeRhiFLo">joining the growing ranks</a> of "Let <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) file for bankruptcy" advocates.<br /><br />"The best thing that could probably happen to General Motors, in my view, is they go into Chapter 11," he told Fox News yesterday. A bankruptcy filing, he explained, would allow the company to more quickly restructure itself to become "stronger, better, leaner."<br /><br />Speaking on ABC, Senator Richard Shelby echoed his sentiments, saying that "subsidization of anything for very long never works. . . I've suggested they go into Chapter 11. That's where they belong. And they could reorganize."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McCain to GM: Go bankrupt!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/">McCain to GM: Go bankrupt!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aO9XkeRhiFLo>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1482061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/mccain-to-gm-go-bankrupt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bankruptcy</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>Richard Shelby</category><category>RichardShelby</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money losers of 2008: Mitt Romney ran for president and all he got was ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-22-mitt-romney-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-losers">Money Losers of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney">Willard Mitt Romney</a>, governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007, was the wealthiest of all the 2008 presidential candidates. When he formally announced <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitt_Romney_presidential_campaign,_2008">his candidacy for the Republican nomination</a> for president on February 13, 2007, the former venture capitalist was believed to have amassed a fortune worth as much as $250 million.</p>
<p>After the first fundraiser for his presidential campaign committee on January 9, 2007, Romney had already brought in $6.5 million, more than the amounts raised by any other Republican contender. Meg Whitman, CEO of eBay and a former colleague of Romney, signed on as a financial co-chair of his presidential campaign. And first quarter 2007 fund-raising information showed Romney leading the Republican field with more than $23 million, though that was less than funds raised by Democratic contenders Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in the same period. Fund-raising results for the second quarter revealed that Romney had lent $8.9 million to his campaign from his personal funds, as well as that he had spent $20.7 million, more than any other Republican candidate. <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.php?id=N00000286&amp;cycle=2008">By the end of 2007</a>, he had raised $88.5 million, but $35.4 million of that came from his own pocket. </p>
<p>Winning the money race, strategically outspending other candidates on advertising in the early primary states, and promising to <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/264281/mitt_romney_would_donate_salary_if.html?cat=62">donate his salary as president to charity</a> (as he had done as governor) wasn't enough to secure Romney the nomination. He dropped out of the race after disappointing Super Tuesday results in February 2008, when opponent John McCain solidified his position as the party's frontrunner. Romney won only 11 state primaries and caucuses, 4.7 million votes, and 291 delegates. According to Federal Election Commission filings, all told, the campaign <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80003353">spent $113.6 million</a>, $44.6 of which came from Romney himself.<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money losers of 2008: Mitt Romney ran for president and all he got was ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/">Money losers of 2008: Mitt Romney ran for president and all he got was ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/money-losers-of-2008-mitt-romney-ran-for-president-and-all-he-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential election</category><category>2012 presidential election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>campaign finance</category><category>featured</category><category>fundraising</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>John McCain</category><category>Meg Whitman</category><category>Mitt Romney</category><category>Money Losers 2008</category><category>persidential nomination</category><category>presidential campaigns</category><category>presidential election</category><category>Republican Party</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-sarah-palin-200x267.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-winners">Money Winners of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>They called her <a href="http://www.cariboubarbie.com/">Caribou Barbie</a>. <em>Saturday Night Live</em> lampooned her mercilessly during the presidential election. The media elite denounced her as an idiot and a right-wing loony tune. But Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is not going to fade into the snow of the beautiful state she governs. In fact, she is coming to a book store near you.<br /><br />Media reports indicate that the former vice presidential nominee is<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27755392/"> expected to earn $7 million </a>to tell her life story to a ghost writer. That's not too shabby considering that former president Bill Clinton got about $11 million for his life story and he actually was the leader of the free world. Barack Obama and his former rival John McCain both have earned big money from their books, so why shouldn't Palin.<br /><br />There was also some talk during the campaign about a talk show or reality show starring the woman responsible for giving Tina Fey's career a boost -- as if it really needed one -- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/25/236com-name-sarah-palins_n_137813.html">but that seems to have gone nowhere</a>.<br /><br />Palin, though, will have the last laugh on her naysayers, including me. During her brief time in the spotlight, Palin transformed herself from an obscure politician to a cultural icon. Along the way, she infuriated many voters and charmed more than a few. The power of Palin's celebrity will entice people who may not agree with her politically to buy her book. Her devoted fans will line up at the bookstores to buy it as well. Palin's tome has the makings of a best-seller.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/">Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alaska governor</category><category>barack obama</category><category>books</category><category>Caribou Barbie</category><category>featured</category><category>GOP</category><category>john mccain</category><category>Money Winners 2008</category><category>publishing</category><category>sarah palin</category><category>Tina Fey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Hottest in entertainment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/bw-2008-hottest-entertainment-200cm112608.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>Well, 2008 has come and gone. If you were looking to be entertained over the past 12 months, you had a lot of choices. From Batman's battle with the maniacal Joker to Hannah Montana singing her little heart out in 3-D, there was something for everyone. Let's look at five of the hottest properties that made their way into the heart of the cultural mindshare in '08.</p>
<p>Up first is <em>The Dark Knight</em>, the second iteration of director Christopher Nolan's new vision of the Caped Crusader. That movie killed at the box office, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) could not have been happier. <em>Knight</em> scored <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=darkknight.htm">almost $1 billion</a> at the global box office. More than half that number was captured in the domestic marketplace. There's no question that the movie mesmerized the collective intellect of the audience. There's also no question that Heath Ledger, who tragically passed away earlier in the year, impressed everyone with his portrayal of the chaotic and cruel Joker villain. I, however, <em>do</em> have a question. Is it just me, or was <em>Knight</em> not as awesome a film as the hype makes it out to be? I saw it, thought it was okay. I don't know, I'm just not sure that this new entry in the cinematic Batman mythos would have brought in as many bucks if the notoriety of Ledger's death wasn't attached to these particular reels of celluloid. To be honest, I didn't think Ledger did that unique of a job. And I thought The Joker's voice was annoying, almost sounding like Sam Raimi -- did anyone else happen to think that? Maybe it's just me. Nevertheless, I salute the success of <em>Knight </em>and respect the project for the impact it had on theaters 'round the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Hottest in entertainment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Hottest in entertainment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-hottest-in-entertainment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>Batman</category><category>beijing olympics</category><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>Bill OReilly</category><category>Camp Rock</category><category>christopher nolan</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>hannah montana</category><category>heath ledger</category><category>High School Musical</category><category>iCarly</category><category>Joe Biden</category><category>john mccain</category><category>Jon Stewart</category><category>jonas brothers</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>Nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>obama girl</category><category>Ozzy Osbourne</category><category>sam raimi</category><category>sarah palin</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Dark Knight</category><category>The Joker</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>Tina Fey</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>William Shatner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Charles Keating]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><em>
<div class="tmbholder"><img id="img1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-charles-keating.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>This post is part of a feature in which he wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial felons. <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">See all 17</a>.</p>
</em>
<p>I thought we'd have heard more about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Keating">Charles Keating</a> over the last few weeks of the 2008 presidential election, but much to my surprise the Obama campaign refrained from mentioning him. Keating was once the chairman of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, the infamous bank at the center of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_scandal">S&amp;L scandal of the 1980s</a>; that scandal featured none other than John McCain, one of the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five">Keating Five</a>" group of disgraced senators and more recently the Republican Party's nominee for president. But McCain's connection to Keating didn't seem to play a role in the 2008 election, and McCain lost the race for reasons other than being connected to one of the great financial crooks in recent memory.</p>
<p>To be fair, Keating was not a big fan of John McCain. He reportedly called him a "wimp" behind his back, accusing him of lacking the courage to fight the regulators who sought to reign in Keating's bank. McCain, along with John Glenn, were cleared by the Senate Ethics Committee of impropriety in their relationship with Keating, though they were publicly criticized for exercising "poor judgment." McCain later said that trying to help Keating was "the worst mistake of my life," though he didn't seem too upset about riding around the Caribbean on Keating's private jet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Felons: Charles Keating</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/">Financial Felons: Charles Keating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1370550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/22/financial-felons-charles-keating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>American Continental</category><category>Charles Keating</category><category>featured</category><category>financial felons</category><category>Gary Hall Jr.</category><category>John Glenn</category><category>John McCain</category><category>junk bonds</category><category>Keating Five</category><category>Lincoln Savings</category><category>savings and loan scandal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The market already expects Barack Obama to win]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/obamapic.jpg" alt="" />Investors may not support Barack Obama, but they do expect him to be the next president of the United States. The smart ones do anyway.<br /><br />If the polls are to be believed, Obama should <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azGjkLZ7JKdc&amp;refer=home">easily defeat John McCain</a>. Even the ultra-conservative talking heads on CNBC seem to have accepted this reality. Carl Quintinilla recently asked Pennyslvania Senator Bob Casey whether Obama will be "pulled to the left" if the Democrats win in a landslide. Why not ask Casey, who is pretty conservative as Democrats go, about Obama's five-year plan? I guess it's no surprise that the business network has Steve Forbes as a guest host on "Squawk Box." The Arizona senator needs all of the help he can get.<br /><br /> The market already -- wrongly in my view -- views Obama as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/us/politics/03cong.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">a tax-and-spend liberal</a> ready to suck away their capital gains and wrap America in bubble wrap to protect it from the ravages of world trade. The truth is more complex than these stereotypes. Obama plans to cut taxes for most Americans and favors fair trade policies. Markets, however, anticipate the future and people are scared. That explains why the Dow Jones industrial average is down more than 29%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The market already expects Barack Obama to win</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/">The market already expects Barack Obama to win</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azGjkLZ7JKdc&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1360463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/the-market-already-expects-barack-obama-to-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>John MCCAin</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>president 2008</category><category>president2008</category><category>presidential election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>Most major polls have <a href="https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/imfrontrow?source=sem-reg-google-obamaterms-nsw-x5&amp;gclid=CNXymLGK1JYCFQVxFQod3nso2g">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois</a>, leading <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/landing/glc1.htm?sid=google&amp;t=gelac">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona</a>, in the contest for U.S. president. And, if the election were held today, instead of on <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections">Tuesday, November 4, Election Day</a>, Obama would register a decisive victory in the all-important electoral college, as well as in the popular vote. </p>
<p>As of late Friday, <a href="http://www.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/2008-election-map.html#/president-nprOvM/">NPR.org's survey of polls</a> had the electoral vote at Obama, 291, McCain 163. Four battleground states are still in play: Ohio, where Obama lead by 5%; Florida, Obama by 3.5%; Indiana, McCain by 1.7%; and Missouri, McCain by about 0.5%. Concerning the national vote, on Friday, <a href="http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx">Gallup.com's daily tracking poll</a> had Obama leading McCain, 52% to 41%. </p>
<p>Still, as most political aides will tell you, "the only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4." In other words, polls can err; that's why they have a margin of error, typically +/- 2%.</p>
<p>Polls only recently have become more accurate. Some notable poll mistakes include the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_U.S._Presidential_election">1980 U.S. presidential election</a>, when some polls had incumbent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter">President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat</a> slightly ahead of the challenger, then <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan">Gov. Ronald Reagan, a Republican</a>. Reagan, of course won the 1980 election in a landslide.</p>
<p><strong>Pres. Truman had the last laugh on pollers</strong></p>
<p>But the biggest polling error in a presidential election has to be the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_U.S._Presidential_election">1948 election</a> between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_S._Truman">President Harry S. Truman, a Democrat</a>, and challenger <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Dewey">Gov. Thomas E. Dewey, a Republican</a>.</p>
<p>The polls predicted that Dewey would win by a large margin. They were wrong: Truman won a decisive victory, 303-189, in the electoral college.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/">The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1359375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>polling</category><category>polls</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[John McCain pledges to cut taxes and will still lose big]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/irs.jpg" />John McCain went on <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/27470739">CNBC </a>this morning to argue -- once again -- that the key to reviving the economies lies with keeping taxes under control, especially the capital gains tax. The Arizona Republican yet again accused Democrat Barack Obama of being a tax-and-spend liberal, the type of boogeyman that would send shivers down the spine of most CNBC viewers.<br /><br />And you know what? These tactics are failing miserably. Polls indicate that baring any huge cataclysmic event, Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States. According to<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aKdJ6LX7iqsQ&amp;refer=home"> Bloomberg News,</a> McCain "goes into the campaign's final weekend a bigger underdog than any victorious candidate in a modern election."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>John McCain pledges to cut taxes and will still lose big</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/">John McCain pledges to cut taxes and will still lose big</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=alheimWDWyJk&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1358727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/john-mccain-pledges-to-cut-taxes-and-will-still-lose-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>capital gains tax</category><category>CapitalGainsTax</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John mccAin</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>sarah palin</category><category>SarahPalin</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Currency traders: Obama wins, buy the dollar; McCain wins, short the dollar ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/obama-mccain.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />What's the post-2008 U.S. Presidential Election dollar outlook and the dollar strategy?<br /><br />Well, more than likely, the <a href="http://www.forex.com">dollar's</a> fate will be largely determined by macroeconomic factors, as well as by fiscal and monetary policy, along with the overall risk appetite/risk aversion climate that hinges on the status of the global financial crisis. <br /><br />As any economist or currency trader will tell you, that's a full plate of variables, which only underscores the complexity (and difficulty) in determining the direction of currencies. <br /><br /><strong>Nov. 4 election will help determine dollar's fate</strong><br /><br />Still, fiscal policy plays an important role, and with the aforementioned in mind, look for the following dollar pattern depending on the <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections/article/cover-this-inside-nastiest-08-rumors/233521?icid=100214839x1212041503x1200749390">Tuesday, November 4 Election Day</a> outcome: If <a href="https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/altsplashcampaignshirt">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois,</a> wins, the dollar is likely to strengthen, long-term. If <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/splash32615.htm">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona,</a> wins, the dollar is likely to weaken, long-term. <br /><br />Currency Trader Eric Simpkins outlined the Obama scenario. Although U.S. budget deficits will initially be high as an Obama presidency begins, an Obama win implies a Democratic Party majority in the U.S. Congress, which will make it easier for Obama to raise taxes on upper income groups, basically those Americans earning more than $250,000 per year.<br /><br />"Obama's tax increase will cut the U.S. budget deficit and get the revenue and spending lines heading in the right direction, together, which will cause the dollar to rise," Simpkins said. "The U.S. recession will mitigate this somewhat, but that economic negative will be offset by the fact that Europe and other regions will be in recession, too, and will likely recover later, putting pressure on those currencies."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Currency traders: Obama wins, buy the dollar; McCain wins, short the dollar </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/">Currency traders: Obama wins, buy the dollar; McCain wins, short the dollar </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1358046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/31/currency-traders-obama-wins-buy-the-dollar-mccain-wins-short/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>Democrats</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[InTrade's electoral college vote predictor sees: Obama, 364, McCain, 174 ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p>Stock, oil and related futures provide valuable clues for investors/readers concerning where these market / commodities are headed. <br /><br />With the above as background, Intrade.com's futures for the 2008 U.S. presidential election currently predict a decisive victory for <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois</a>, over <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/splash32615.htm">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona</a>. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.intrade.com/">InTrade's Realtime Electoral Vote Predictor</a> is projecting an electoral college vote total of: Obama 364, McCain, 174. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency. <br /><strong><br />Futures for Obama win are high</strong><br /><br />Futures on an Obama win are at 86.4. The 86.4 level means that the market predicts there is an 86.4% chance of this event happening. All Intrade markets trade between 0 and 100. <br /><br />Futures on a McCain win are at 14.4, signaling that the market believes there's a 14.4% of McCain winning the election.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>InTrade's electoral college vote predictor sees: Obama, 364, McCain, 174 </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/">InTrade's electoral college vote predictor sees: Obama, 364, McCain, 174 </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1350915/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/intrades-electoral-college-vote-predictor-sees-obama-364-mcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>intenews</category><category>Intrade</category><category>Intrade.com</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are you ready for the last two weeks of presidential campaign pain?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p>Have you decided who to vote for in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election? <br /><br />If you're like most Americans, you have. By this date, two weeks or so before the election, at least 90% and in some elections 95% of you know who you're going to vote for, political science research tells us. <br /><br />Historically, at this stage of the campaign, the only people who have not determined which candidate they'll vote for are those adults who tend to not vote regularly: they'll often even pass up voting in a presidential election.<br /><br /><strong>2008 campaign: most negative ever?</strong><br /><br />One benefit, if you've decided who to vote for <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois</a>, or <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/splash32615.htm">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona</a>, is that you don't have to watch any more campaign coverage or campaign ads (if you can avoid them).<br /><br />True, it must seem like this presidential campaign has been the most negative ever, but if the truth be told, it's no more negative than the one in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004">2004</a>, or in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1960">1960</a>, and certainly not more negative than the one in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1928">1928</a>. In <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1928">1928</a>, the insults and smear tactics used against Democratic Party nominee <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Smith">N.Y. Governor Al Smith</a>, would set the standard for gross and outrageous campaign tactics.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are you ready for the last two weeks of presidential campaign pain?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/">Are you ready for the last two weeks of presidential campaign pain?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1349904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/are-you-ready-for-the-last-two-weeks-of-presidential-campaign-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1928</category><category>1960</category><category>2004</category><category>2008 election</category><category>Al Smith</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Herbert Hoover</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>presidential election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google this: CEO Eric Schmidt wants to join the Obama cabinet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/ericschmidtobama.jpg" />Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"> GOOG</a>) Chief Executive Eric Schmidt appears interested in joining Barack Obama's cabinet. He's not campaigning for the job, telling the Wall Street Journal that he was "too busy" running the world's largest search engine company. <br /><br /> Of course, anyone who wants a cabinet position never admits it. It's considered a faux pas. Schmidt, though, seems to be interested in making a difference beyond Google. He does not want to sit back on some deserted island counting his billions as he downs exotic frozen drinks.<br /><br />The Journal, citing unnamed tech and media executives, speculated that Schmidt "might desire a role in an Obama administration, possibly the chief technology officer post Sen. Obama has said he would create." Exactly what that job would entail is not clear. It sounds like the type of job where Schmidt would sit in an office somewhere in the White House thinking grand thoughts and writing grand reports that would gather dust almost as soon as they were published.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google this: CEO Eric Schmidt wants to join the Obama cabinet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/">Google this: CEO Eric Schmidt wants to join the Obama cabinet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122446734650049199.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1347385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/google-this-ceo-eric-schmidt-wants-to-join-the-obama-cabinent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BARack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>CSCO</category><category>EBAY</category><category>eric schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>featured</category><category>Goog</category><category>HPQ</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JOhn MCCAin</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is a second stimulus check up ahead?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/moneyroll.jpg" alt="" />With unemployment rising and the signs of slowdown all around, is a second tax rebate or second stimulus check from Congress up ahead?<br /><br />The U.S. economy continues to slow. More than 800,000 jobs have been lost since the slowdown began about a year ago, and many economists say the lay-offs are likely to continue or even increase. <br /><br />Meanwhile, the world's major industrialized nations are striving <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081013a.htm">to stabilize the global financial system</a> and end a credit crunch that could further damage economies around the world.<br /><br />Well, the answer to the question about a second stimulus check may very well rest on the answer to this one: Who are you voting for on <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections">Election Day, November 4?</a><br /><br /><strong>Key factor: 2008 Election</strong><br /><br />Congressional Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, have vowed to push for a second stimulus package totaling up to $150 billion to help jump-start the anemic U.S. economy, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/13/MNBJ13G887.DTL&amp;type=politics"><span style="font-style: italic;">The San Francisco Chronicle</span> reports</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is a second stimulus check up ahead?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/">Is a second stimulus check up ahead?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1343035/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Bush</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>income tax</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>Pelosi</category><category>President Bush</category><category>Republicans</category><category>second stimulus check</category><category>stimulus check</category><category>tax cut</category><category>tax rebate</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/wallstreetbankers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The financial crisis is not over. If things were back to normal, banks would be lending to each other and to businesses and individuals. But measures of bank lending risk suggest fear is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/government-actions-to-improve-credit-markets-could-weaken-dollar/">12 times</a> as high as it would be in normal times. The reason? Banks know more than you do about what's wrong. And they're not talking about it because they don't want you to withdraw your deposits and sell your stock. What they know is that on October 21st, some of the biggest players on Wall Street could be required to come up with <strong><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/99619-lehman-s-cds-mess-who-s-on-the-hook">$400 billion</a> that some may not be able to pay</strong>.</p>
<p>Last month, the White House decided that we could afford to let Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy. That proved to be an enormous mistake. It triggered a run on money market funds because one of the oldest such funds, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-moneyfund17-2008sep17,0,3171047.story">Reserve Primary</a>, broke the buck since it held Lehman Brothers paper. The U.S. responded with a <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/hp1147.htm">$50 billion</a> guarantee of money market funds. But the biggest consequence of that mistake is in the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a966RcwJ.aik&amp;refer=home">$54.6 trillion</a> market for Credit Default Swaps (CDSs).</p>
<p><strong>A CDS is like selling insurance on your car to hundreds of people who don't own it -- yet if your car goes up in flames each of those people collects the full value of your car. </strong>More specifically, CDSs are insurance against a bond or loan default. Why are CDSs so dangerous? Three reasons: a CDS seller does not need to put any capital aside to cover losses if the security defaults, the buyer doesn't need to own the asset it wants to protect, and there is no central place where information about all these CDS deals is collected and updated.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/">Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>CreditDefaultSwaps</category><category>featured</category><category>john mccain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>phil gramm</category><category>PhilGramm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Invest in the high-tech value chain Molex]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"A McCain victory would allow for a first year expensing of new equipment and technology; as such, we would recommend <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/molex-incorporated/molx/nas">Molex</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/molex-incorporated/molx/nas">MOLX</a>), which is positioned in the technology value chain," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2451">Thomas Vass</a> in <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2451">The Technology Stock Advisor</a>.</p>
<p>"To provide an immediate boost to capital expenditures and reward investments in cutting edge technologies, John McCain would allow companies to expense the costs of new equipment or technology in the first year.</p>
<p>"High technology value chains -- such as computer and electronic equipment and information services -- are likely to benefit by this economic policy. </p>
<p>"Molex has an international value chain that will benefit greatly from the new policy because its customers will be able to buy technology goods at a much lower cost as a result of the new accelerated tax write-off.</p>
<p>"MOLX meets the Technology Stock Advisor screening criteria and has been in the TSA active portfolio since July of 2006. Standard &amp; Poor's gives MOLX a B rating for quality. Our buy price target is $26. The target sell price is $40."</p>
<p><em>Steven Halpern's </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/">McCain stock: Invest in the high-tech value chain Molex</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318101/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-invest-in-the-high-tech-value-chain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Molex</category><category>MOLX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Pro-growth strategy for CenturyTel (CTL)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"A President McCain will be pro-growth but should be more aggressive in oversight as it pertains to mergers and acquisitions; with that being said, we like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/centurytel-inc/ctl/nys">CenturyTel Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/centurytel-inc/ctl/nys">CTL</a>)," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2450">Kelley Wright</a>, editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2450">Investment Quality Trends</a>.</p>
<p>"CTL provides a variety of communications services to 25 states in primarily rural area and small to mid-size cities. </p>
<p>"The company offers local and long distance services, as well as enhanced voice services, as well as high-speed and dial-up Internet.</p>
<p>"In June the company increased its annual dividend to $2.80 from $0.27, reflecting its confidence in their growth model and as a deterrent to possible suitors. </p>
<p>"The blue-chip stocks that we recommend, including CTL, show exemplary long-term dividend growth, a P/E ratio of 15 or less, a payout ratio of 50% or less, debt of 50% or less, and technical characteristics on the daily and weekly charts that suggests the potential for imminent capital appreciation. </p>
<p>"Currently yielding almost 7.0%, CTL offers tremendous value in both dividend yield and the potential for long-term capital appreciation."</p>
<p><em>Steven Halpern's </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/">McCain stock: Pro-growth strategy for CenturyTel (CTL)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1319432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/mccain-stock-pro-growth-strategy-for-centurytel-ctl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CenturyTel Inc.</category><category>CenturytelInc.</category><category>communications stocks</category><category>CommunicationsStocks</category><category>CTL</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>McCain</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Memo to McCain: Replace Palin with Romney]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/romneymitt.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>John McCain has made several unexpected moves during his campaign. For instance, he picked Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his vice president. After an initial surge of support, her charming personality has given way to revelations about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbQwAFobQxQ">her lack of familiarity with the issues</a> and Troopergate -- which led a bipartisan committee to conclude that she <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/552393.html">violated an Alaskan law</a> prohibiting abuse of power. Now McCain may be questioning whether this maverick move hurt him more than it helped.</p>
<p>McCain also decided <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/if-john-mccain-is-afraid-to-debate-the-economy-how-can-he-run-i/">to suspend his campaign</a> last month to deal with the financial crisis. Coincidentally, this decision came just a few days before McCain was to debate his opponent during a week when he was down in the polls. As it turns out, McCain resumed his campaign in time for the debate but without fixing the crisis. Did this maverick move strengthen McCain's image as a strong, effective leader? </p>
<p>At the end of a week in which the S&amp;P 500 fell <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-us-financial3.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">over 18%</a>, more than it ever has in any previous week in history, some in the Republican party are questioning whether McCain's campaign is functioning as well as it could. Former Massachusetts governor, Mitt Romney, has suggested that what McCain needs is a "broad vision of how he would lead the country through the economic crisis," according to the <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27138361/page/2/">New York Times</a></em>. This comment suggests a maverick move that McCain could take to revive his chances: replace Palin with Romney.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Memo to McCain: Replace Palin with Romney</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/">Memo to McCain: Replace Palin with Romney</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1339801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/12/memo-to-mccain-replace-palin-with-romney/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>john mccain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Mitt Romney</category><category>Palin</category><category>sara</category><category>sarah palin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Shaw Group (SGR) goes nuclear]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"John McCain has said that nuclear power must be part of a plan to address climate change and reduce our dependence on foreign oil; to benefit from this plan, buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">Shaw Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-shaw-group-inc/sgr/nys">SGR</a>), which constructs and maintains nuclear power plants," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2449">Paul Tracy</a> in his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2449">Street Authority Market Advisor</a>.</p>
<p>"Today, nearly half of U.S. electricity is created via conventional coal-fired plants. This made sense for us for decades -- coal is so cheap and plentiful here that the United States is often referred to as the Saudi Arabia of coal.</p>
<p>"However, in the past few years, the tide of public sentiment has shifted against the energy source. Primarily this is due to the emissions created by burning coal for electricity. </p>
<p>"In addition to the well known release of carbon dioxide, coal emissions also contain traces of mercury. On top of that, the rise of China and other emerging markets has led to higher costs for coal.</p>
<p>"So with a public that is increasingly interested in alternative sources of electricity and a president who is committed to increasing nuclear power usage, the companies that build and maintain nuclear plants sit in the perfect position to benefit.</p>
<p>"In particular, I think Louisiana-based Shaw Group is a stock to watch. SGR's largest end market is the construction and maintenance of power plants, including both plants fired by fossil fuels and nuclear facilities.</p>
<p>"The company also owns a 20% stake in Westinghouse Electric, one of the world's leading designers and builders of nuclear power plants.</p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McCain stock: Shaw Group (SGR) goes nuclear</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/">McCain stock: Shaw Group (SGR) goes nuclear</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1319049/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/11/mccain-stock-shaw-group-sgr-goes-nuclear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>AlternativeEnergy</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>McCain</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>NuclearPower</category><category>SGR</category><category>Shaw Group</category><category>ShawGroup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Mining gains with uranium miner USEC (USU)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"If McCain is elected, we would suggest <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usec-incorporated/usu/nys">USEC</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usec-incorporated/usu/nys">USU</a>); after slumbering for over 20 years, nuclear power is quickly emerging from hibernation and will be satisfying a much larger percentage of the nation's energy-hungry appetite during McCain administration," says value investor <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2448">Nathan Slaughter</a>, editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2448">Half-Priced Stocks</a>.</p>
<p>"Currently, there are 104 nuclear plants in operation nationwide, which combined, account for 20% of the country's electricity. But both of those totals are set to rise markedly. Current forecasts suggest nuclear facilities could double their share and ultimately account for 40% of power in the U.S.</p>
<p>"There are several factors underpinning this resurgence in nuclear energy, not the least of which is $100 per barrel oil and elevated prices for natural gas and coal. </p>
<p>"Believe it or not, one kilogram of uranium-235 has the stored energy equivalent of 1,500 tons of coal. And while up-front construction expenses can be high, ongoing operating costs for nuclear reactors are running just $15-20 per megawatt hour, far cheaper than traditional plants.</p>
<p>"John McCain is an outspoken champion for the nuclear power movement, outlining ambitious plans to commit $315 billion towards the construction of 45 new reactors over the next two decades. </p>
<p>"Beyond that, he has a clear goal of achieving energy independence by building '100 new plants to power the homes and factories and cities of America.' </p>
<p>"All of this spells plenty of opportunity for USEC, owner of the nation's only uranium enrichment facility. The company is in the business of supplying fuel for commercial reactors around the world -- and competition is sparse. </p>
<p>"The firm also benefits from a longstanding nuclear non-proliferation treaty with Russia. Specifically, USEC participates in the salvaging of old Soviet nuclear warheads under the 'Megatons to Megawatts' program. </p>
<p>"The company has carved out a dominant market share and now supplies about half of the nation's enriched uranium (most of the rest comes from Russia). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McCain stock: Mining gains with uranium miner USEC (USU)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/">McCain stock: Mining gains with uranium miner USEC (USU)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1319016/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-mining-gains-with-uranium-miner-usec-usu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>AlternativeEnergy</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>McCain</category><category>nuclear plants</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>NuclearPlants</category><category>NuclearPower</category><category>uranium enrichment facility</category><category>uranium stocks</category><category>UraniumEnrichmentFacility</category><category>UraniumStocks</category><category>USEC</category><category>USU</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain stock: Defense play with General Dynamics (GD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gd/" rel="tag">General Dynamics Corp (GD)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/election-bets-advisors-vote-on-mccain-and-obama-stocks/"><em>series</em></a><em> in which TheStockAdvisors.com asked financial experts to name their top stock pick if McCain or if Obama wins the election.</em> </p>
<p>"The GOP is traditionally known as the party that spends more on defense; thus, if McCain wins the election, one stock to benefit would be defense firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">General Dynamics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-dynamics-corporation/gd/nys">GD</a>)," says <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2447">John Reese</a>, editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2447">Validea</a>, which follows the strategies of "legendary" investors such as Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch.</p>
<p>"While McCain has talked tough about reforming the defense budget, he has also pledged to increase the size of the military, modernize the armed services, and push hard for strong missile defense systems -- all of which require serious spending. </p>
<p>"As a major producer of battle tanks and assault vehicles, armaments and munitions, battleships and nuclear submarines, and military information technology systems, this Virginia-based firm is thus likely to have quite a bit of work on its hands during a McCain presidency. </p>
<p>"Just as importantly, General Dynamics' finances and fundamentals are very strong, earning approval from both my Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett-based Guru Strategies -- computer models that are each based on the approach of a different investing great. </p>
<p>"Because of its moderate 18.14% long-term growth rate and huge annual sales of $28.7 billion, General Dynamics is considered a 'stalwart' by my Lynch strategy, the type of large, steady firm that Lynch found offered protection during downturns or recessions. </p>
<p>"Two big reasons my Lynch model is high on this stalwart: its yield-adjusted P/E/Growth ratio of 0.75, which signals that the stock is a bargain right now, and its 18.79% debt/equity ratio, a sign that GD has the conservative financing Lynch liked to see."</p>
<p>My Buffett-based model, meanwhile, likes General Dynamics' consistency. Over the past decade, its EPS have declined just once, rising from $1.46 to $5.10 in that time.</p>
<p>"The company's annual return on equity -- a figure Buffett used to find firms with the 'durable competitive advantage' he famously prizes -- has been at least 16.4% every year. </p>
<p>"GD has also retained $22.30 in per-share earnings in the past decade while increasing EPS by $3.64, showing it can earn investors a 16.3% return on the earnings it keeps. That's a sign of the strong management Buffett is also known to look for."</p>
<p><em>Steven Halpern's </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/">McCain stock: Defense play with General Dynamics (GD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/mccain-stock-defense-play-with-general-dynamics-gd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>GD</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>PeterLynch</category><category>Waren Buffett</category><category>WarenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
