<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kmb/" rel="tag">Kimberly-Clark (KMB)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/kmb-kimberly-clark-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">Kimberly-Clark Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">KMB</a>), a consumer products entity whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), is up today on third-quarter results. At the time of this writing, my screen was showing shares of Kimberly-Clark higher by a little under 6%. </p>
<p>According to the corporate <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kimberly-clark-announces-record-eps-for-third-quarter-2009-and-significantly-improved-outlook-for-full-year/rfid263228604?channel=pf">press release</a>, sales declined 1.7%. Not a great start, but Kimberly-Clark highlighted a better metric: organic sales increased 3%, helped along by price increases. Luckily, sales volume didn't fare too badly; they were essentially flat. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/">Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kimberly-clark-announces-record-eps-for-third-quarter-2009-and-significantly-improved-outlook-for-full-year/rfid263228604?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19206100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>h1n1</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>kimberly-clark</category><category>KMB</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street didn't want to play with Hasbro after Q3 results ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/hasbro-has-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys">Hasbro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys">HAS</a>) isn't doing too well today. Shares of the toy entity are down 3.5% at the time of this writing in early afternoon trading. <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/hasbro-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid262078483?channel=pf">Third-quarter results</a> are the catalyst, apparently. Management must hate this, because on Friday, rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nas">Mattel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nas">MAT</a>) saw a bid after <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/mattel-gets-a-bid-on-third-quarter-news/">its own earnings release</a>.
<p> </p>
<p>Hasbro's top line contracted 2%, and earnings per share, even with some dilution from a joint venture with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discovery-communications-inc-series-a-common-stock/disca/nas">Discovery Communications</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discovery-communications-inc-series-a-common-stock/disca/nas">DISCA</a>) and investments in Hasbro's virtual-studio initiative, increased 11% to 99 cents. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/hasbro-earnings-preview-mild-growth-expected-in-q3/">Expectations</a> were beat by six pennies. Gee, that was better than Mattel's performance. The maker of Barbie actually saw a per-share earnings decline and came in line with forecasts. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street didn't want to play with Hasbro after Q3 results </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/">Wall Street didn't want to play with Hasbro after Q3 results </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/hasbro-reports-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid262078483?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/mattel-gets-a-bid-on-third-quarter-news/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/hasbro-earnings-preview-mild-growth-expected-in-q3/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/hasbro-a-high-risk-play-that-s-not-for-the-squeamish/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/wall-street-didnt-want-to-play-with-hasbro-after-q3-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>disca</category><category>discovery communications</category><category>DiscoveryCommunications</category><category>featured</category><category>g.i. joe</category><category>G.i.Joe</category><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>toys</category><category>transformers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM grows profits and expands margins in second quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-ibm-200cs112608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">International Business Machines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) posted an excellent <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ibm-reports-2009-second-quarter-results/rfid232683960?channel=pf">earnings report</a> on Thursday. Yes, the bottom-line results did beat analysts' projections. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=ibm">Earnings.com</a>, IBM was supposed to do only $2.02 per share for the second quarter. Big Blue actually did much more than that: try $2.32 per share. </p>
<p>Okay, beating analysts is always great, but it's even better when there's legitimate earnings growth behind the beat. Often during the recession we've witnessed companies go beyond estimates but actually post year-over-year declines in profit. That's always a mixed bag, and you have to dig through the release to figure out exactly what's going on. Well, the cool thing with IBM is that the $2.32 per-share figure represents double-digit growth of 18%. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IBM grows profits and expands margins in second quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/">IBM grows profits and expands margins in second quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/ibm-reports-2009-second-quarter-results/rfid232683960?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=ibm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/think-ibm-think-big-blue-think-big-profits/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19102587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/18/ibm-grows-profits-and-expands-margins-in-second-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>featured</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HPQ</category><category>IBM</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/jnj-johnson--johnson-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), a company that counts <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) as colleagues, will report results for the second quarter on Tuesday, July 14. JNJ is expected to post a bit of a profit decline. Last year's Q2, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=jnj">Earnings.com</a>, saw the health-care business earn $1.18 per share. This time around, analysts are thinking that JNJ will do somewhere around $1.11 per share.</p>
<p>Will JNJ beat the analysts? It's quite possible, since the company has a good record on this count. As a matter of fact, JNJ beat predictions by four cents <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-better-than-expected-earnings/">back in April</a>. Sales, however, came in a little weak. Interestingly enough, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">the market </a>didn't really care too much about the earnings performance on that day. Shares had rallied a bit in pre-market trading, but they closed slightly down by the end of the regular session. I found a similar situation <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/johnson-and-johnson-solid-quarter-but-could-there-be-more-downsi/">back in January</a>. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/">Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=jnj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-better-than-expected-earnings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/johnson-and-johnson-a-stock-for-your-childs-college-fund/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/johnson-and-johnson-solid-quarter-but-could-there-be-more-downsi/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>PFE</category><category>pfizer</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Adobe's Q2 profit comes in as expected -- should investors be bullish on stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/adobe-adbe-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">Adobe Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">ADBE</a>) said it earned 35 cents per share on an adjusted basis in the second quarter in a <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/adobe-reports-second-quarter-fiscal-2009-results/rfid223552658?channel=pf">press release</a> issued after the bell on Tuesday. Was it enough? Well, not exactly. According to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/adobes-q2-profit-expected-to-fall-on-weaker-sales/">earnings preview</a>, the market was betting on Adobe to make just that amount. Yep, it's that whole confusing Wall Street thing. Meet expectations, and you don't really pass the test. </p>
<p>Meeting expectations in this climate should be considered cool, though. And let's not forget that the software company did okay on the revenue side. Sales came in at roughly $705 million. The market was expecting about $10 million less. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Adobe's Q2 profit comes in as expected -- should investors be bullish on stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/">Adobe's Q2 profit comes in as expected -- should investors be bullish on stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/adobe-reports-second-quarter-fiscal-2009-results/rfid223552658?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/investors-know-theres-more-to-adobe-than-the-acrobat-reader/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069247/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/adobes-q2-profit-comes-in-as-expected-should-investors-be-bu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADBE</category><category>Adobe</category><category>filmmaking</category><category>inthenews</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>software</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Verizon beats in Q1, brings in the cash]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><img width="230" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="176" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/prada_phone_lluisgene_afp_450.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon Communications, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) reported <a href="http://investor.verizon.com/news/view.aspx?NewsID=983">Q1 earnings</a> on Monday, and they didn't disappoint. The telecommunication entity said it earned $0.63 per share on an adjusted basis. Okay, the growth wasn't so great. The company earned an adjusted $0.61 per share in the year-ago period. But you know the game: it's all about expectations. So, on that count, Verizon was ahead by four pennies, according to this <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=vz">database</a>. </p>
<p>But the Verizon story isn't just about earnings. It's also about cash flow. Net cash from operations increased 19% to $6.4 billion. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow">Free cash flow</a> more than doubled to $2.7 billion. Verizon is a well-known dividend-paying stock, so shareholders definitely want to see good cash flows. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Verizon beats in Q1, brings in the cash</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/">Verizon beats in Q1, brings in the cash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://investor.verizon.com/news/view.aspx?NewsID=983>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/verizon-beats-in-q1-brings-in-the-cash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>alltel wireless</category><category>AlltelWireless</category><category>Apple</category><category>ATT</category><category>brian white</category><category>BrianWhite</category><category>dividend inves</category><category>dividend s</category><category>DividendInves</category><category>dividends</category><category>FiOS</category><category>iPhone</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>t</category><category>Verizon</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Factory orders fall for a fifth straight month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/factory.jpg" alt="" />Factory orders <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/business/economy/06econ.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">fell in December</a> for a record fifth month in a row. With December's numbers now in the books, it is official that last year was the worst year for manufacturers since 2002.<br /><br />Going into today's announcement, everyone agreed that factory orders had probably dropped in December, but analysts were not expecting the decline to be as steep as the actual figures revealed. Analysts had estimated that we would see a 3% dip in factory orders for the month, but the actual numbers indicate a deeper 3.9% reduction during December.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Factory orders fall for a fifth straight month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/">Factory orders fall for a fifth straight month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451543/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/factory-orders-fall-for-a-fifth-straight-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>computers</category><category>factory orders</category><category>FactoryOrders</category><category>featured</category><category>heavy machinery</category><category>HeavyMachinery</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>JoblessClaims</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The job market's thriving at Apple, even as iPhone concerns multiply]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><p>While my colleague Joseph Lazzaro noted earlier that continuing jobless claims are at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/jobless-claims-dip-but-continuing-claims-hit-25-year-high/">a jaw-dropping 25-year high</a>, we certainly can't blame the gadget-masters at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) for this weakness in the job market. According to an SEC filing on Wednesday, the tech-sector heavyweight <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/jobs/_a/bbdp/apple-boosts-payroll-by-48-percent/239399">ramped up its payroll by 48%</a> in fiscal 2008.</p>
<p>The Cupertino, California-based company reported 32,000 full-time and 3,100 temporary and contract employees as of September 27. That's up from 21,600 full-time workers and 2,100 temporary or contract staffers in fiscal 2007. Of those new hires, it seems that 8,000 went to work at Apple's retail outlets -- 50 new Apple stores were opened during the course of fiscal 2008.</p>
<p>In its first full quarter on the market, Apple reported that it sold 6.9 million iPhone 3Gs. However, it seems unlikely that sales of the smartphone will be so impressive in the future. Analysts at Friedman Billings Ramsey &amp; Co. have already warned that their checks indicate <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/observations.aspx?id=88884">a significant slip in iPhone production</a>, and that sentiment was echoed Wednesday by UBS. Analyst Maynard Um warned that "recent data points may suggest unit volumes <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/11/05/apple-another-report-on-iphone-production-cuts/">weaker than our current estimate</a> of 5 million" for the December quarter. The production slip could reduce Apple's earnings per share by 5 cents.</p>
<p>At last check, AAPL is down about 3% to hover near the century mark.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/">The job market's thriving at Apple, even as iPhone concerns multiply</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/jobs/_a/bbdp/apple-boosts-payroll-by-48-percent/239399>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364197/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/the-job-markets-thriving-at-apple-even-as-iphone-concerns-mult/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPhone</category><category>job market</category><category>JobMarket</category><category>Joseph Lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The BRIC economies can kiss my -- standard of living]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="chess" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/chess-at-244-by-dlkinney.jpg" />An interesting post <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/an-american-economic-lull-before-an-even-more-perfect-union/">written by Joseph Lazzaro</a> on Tuesday indicated that many economists think that the economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, known as the BRIC economies, will supplant the United States and European nations in terms of world power and economic strength. While this may be true to a degree, I have a message for those emerging economic powerhouses: they had better be careful. </p>
<p>Dear Brazil, you have resources you can't yet even contemplate. However, you have been whacking through your opportunities at a very rapid pace. You have no idea about what political powers you should align yourself with. Can you reign in your pirates, your poachers, your drug lords? Can you effectively protect even just one of your trees? </p>
<p>Dear Russia, you scare me. The world knows more of your organized crime than it knows of your present government. You move more capital through your black markets than through your own ports. You turn your backs on true enterprise in exchange for quick profit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The BRIC economies can kiss my -- standard of living</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/">The BRIC economies can kiss my -- standard of living</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_34/b3948401.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1228742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/the-bric-economies-can-kiss-my-standard-of-living/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BRIC economies</category><category>BricEconomies</category><category>economy</category><category>Joseph Lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hormel Foods had a cool quarter, but it might not be a buy just yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cag/" rel="tag">ConAgra Foods (CAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>), a foodstuffs processor whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conagra-foods-inc/cag/nys">ConAgra Foods</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conagra-foods-inc/cag/nys">CAG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>), issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hormel-foods-reports-second-quarter/rfid105605494">Q2 numbers</a> on Thursday. Revenues jumped 6% to $1.6 billion, although the growth rate was only 4% if you look at just the amount credited to organic appreciation. Net earnings per diluted share rose 14% to $0.56 per share. Volume jumped 5% altogether, and 3% based on, once again, organic growth.</p>
<p>This wasn't a bad earnings report for a major supermarket brand, although it certainly wasn't overly stimulating, either. So, you wanna take a guess as to by how much Hormel beat earnings expectations? If you said "by the proverbial penny," then you just might be a Wall Street junkie! Seems like so many companies got the penny-thing down pat. Anyway, Briefing.com not only said that earnings were better by a penny, but that revenues came in pretty much as expected. <br /></p>
<p>Basically, Hormel is trying to navigate this inflationary environment as best it can. As we all know, it's pretty competitive out there in the grocery aisles even during prosperous periods. But take a look at the cash-flow statement and you'll see that the company did pretty well in terms of net cash from operations. That metric soared almost 30% over the six-month period. Only problem is, not too much was left over after capital expenditures and dividend payments were taken into account. Still, Hormel seems reasonably fine for now on the cash-flow front.</p>
<p>I'm not necessarily interested in Hormel's stock at this time. If I wanted to get in, I certainly would look to pick up shares at a higher yield; there are better opportunities out there for dividend yield, in my opinion. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/31/hormel-foods-is-a-pantry-freezer-based-defensive/">Joseph Lazzaro</a> observed a couple months back, Hormel is definitely an interesting defensive name during challenging economic times, and I did enjoy the double-digit bottom-line growth. I just think investors would be better off if this one came down a bit in terms of share price.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own shares in any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/">Hormel Foods had a cool quarter, but it might not be a buy just yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 May 2008 08:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hormel-foods-reports-second-quarter/rfid105605494>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1203659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/hormel-foods-had-a-cool-quarter-but-it-might-not-be-a-buy-just/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAG</category><category>ConAgra Foods</category><category>ConagraFoods</category><category>Hormel</category><category>HRL</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><category>supermarket brands</category><category>SupermarketBrands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 08:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Another Fed rate cut could spell disaster]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Question mark" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/question-mark.jpg" />There's much speculation today about the possibility of yet another interest rate reduction by the Federal Reserve. Some people indicate they think another rate cut would be a good thing. Pardon me while I ask: Are they nuts?<br /><br />The dollar is already devalued to the point that our trading partners are getting edgy about their export values, and you can forget about foreign investors sticking their money into American companies to help spur development. Low level municipal bond issues could soon become a thing of the past, and that concept of placing money into conventional savings accounts? Yeah okay, I'll get right on that.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-no-rate-cut-no-relief/">Jim Cramer sings a gloom and doom song</a> about 7 million home owners becoming renters, and declares that the nation will be required to swallow $500 billion in losses. He alludes to a wholesale crumbling of major banks. I see no mention in his blog about possible alternate solutions to the trouble that sloppy bankers have caused themselves. Personally, I don't think that ruining the dollar with yet another round of artificially created economic stimulation based on cheap credit is a good long-term solution for our country, although it might allow some of those sloppy bankers another breather before they have to face the music. The thinking that cheap bank credit will help the economy by infusing borrowed money into the stock market and loosening up spending habits is nothing short of a sucker's bet.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Another Fed rate cut could spell disaster</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/">Another Fed rate cut could spell disaster</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1025455/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/another-fed-rate-cut-could-spell-disaster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>borrowing</category><category>Central Bank</category><category>CentralBank</category><category>crisis</category><category>dollar</category><category>export</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal-Reserve</category><category>interest</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Joseph Lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>liquidity</category><category>mortgage</category><category>rates</category><category>secondary market</category><category>SecondaryMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
