<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="private sector hiring"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/rszbas009gettydailyfinance.jpg" />This past week's data point of significance for investors has to be the February nonfarm payroll report by the U.S. Department of Labor, which indicated that the U.S. economy created <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">192,000 jobs</a> last month -- roughly in-line with the consensus estimate.</p>
<p>The good news was complemented by the fact that January's job gain was revised up to 63,000 from 36,000 and December's to 152,000 from 121,000. January's low job tally was probably skewed lower by the winter blizzards and storms that hit the Northeast and Midwest; hence, it's safe to say that the economy is creating jobs. What it needs now is sustained demand to drive GDP growth, which will lead to stronger job growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/">Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19869255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>John Maynard Keynes</category><category>Keynes</category><category>QE2</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Class Is in Session -- Where to Start]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/wateringcanmoney.jpg" alt="investing for growth" />Having accepted a speaking engagement at a university school of business recently, I had to think about what introductory information I could impart to the students about <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/investing/">investing</a> that would be practical, immediately useful and establish a foundation for whatever direction their paths might lead. This was supposed to be the first in a series. However, since I pull no punches and can be a little edgy in my candor and presentation, who knew if I would be invited back?</p>
<p>My outline had five basic elements. The first thing I told them was to <em>start now!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Class Is in Session -- Where to Start</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/">Chasing Value: Class Is in Session -- Where to Start</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19619936/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/13/chasing-value-where-to-start/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A Random Walk Down Wall Street</category><category>Barrons</category><category>benjamin graham</category><category>Buffett</category><category>Burton Malkiel</category><category>business school</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>contrarian investing</category><category>Contrarian Investment Stategy</category><category>David Dreman</category><category>featured</category><category>Grantham</category><category>icahn</category><category>investing</category><category>Kerkorian</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Lynch</category><category>recommended reading</category><category>teaching business</category><category>Templeton</category><category>value investing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/fridge_ericas_kitchen.jpg" width="220" height="357" alt="" />The much-maligned federal government's <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/the-top-cash-for-clunkers-vehicles/607200">"cash-for-clunkers" program</a>, is, nevertheless, stimulating the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>True, it may take new cars sales that would normally occur in 2010 and bring them forward to 2009, but that fact, combined with the extra customer traffic the program has created in the nation's auto showrooms, has bumped up auto sales -- providing a slight tailwind for the U.S. economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/">How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>cash for clunkers</category><category>durable goods</category><category>Keynes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A recession bottom does not guarantee a recovery ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />One aspect of the economic cycle investors need to keep at the forefront is the nature of economic change and economic recovery, as promulgated by economist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynes">John Maynard Keynes</a>. <br /><br />  <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/A_recession_bottom_does_not_guarantee_a_recovery_Great'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  First, toss out any notions that market forces, left to their own devices, will always bring about a quick economic recovery.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A recession bottom does not guarantee a recovery </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/">A recession bottom does not guarantee a recovery </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19102375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/a-recession-bottom-does-not-guarantee-a-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Keynes</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimulus spending</category><category>StimulusSpending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">
<div style="display: block;" id="imageResults"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></div>
<p>New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/opinion/06krugman.html">Paul Krugman</a> knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.</p>
</span> columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">Krugman outlined</a>: The housing sector has collapsed. Consumers have sharply decreased their spending, due to a declining stock market, home prices, and stagnant wages. Businesses are cutting investment. Exports, the formerly one strength of the economy, are plunging, as the recession grips emerging markets. The Fed has already cut short-term interest rates to zero. And there are signs of deflation. In sum, the U.S. economy is very close to the dreaded negative spiral that tends to feed on itself, and that could continue for a long, long time without fiscal stimulus.</p>
<p>Hence, the nation needs to pass the fiscal stimulus package, and if anything, the current package is too small, he argued.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/">NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1453377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fisal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Keynes: An economy at rest can (unfortunately) remain at rest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>It is a Newtonian law of physics. A body in motion tends to stay in motion. A body at rest tends to stay at rest.</p>
<p>Further, as followers of business activity know, it's also a law of economics, and that's yet another argument for a large fiscal stimulus package.</p>
<p>Moreover, it's also a rejoinder to the <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/at-start-stimulus-vehicle-for-obamas/310123">fiscal stimulus plan</a>'s critics. Market absolutists and economic conservatives will frequently state that the stimulus plan isn't needed; all the nation needs to do is "let the business cycle play out, and the recovery will automatically follow the recession" or "let the market take care of things and a recovery will appear, naturally."</p>
<p>Not so, according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynes">John Maynard Keynes</a>. Keynes demonstrated that business cycles <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">sometimes don't cycle.</span> In fact, Keynes demonstrated that, absent key stimulus, commercial activity can be down -- and remain down -- for years. A classic example would be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover#Great_Depression">President Herbert Hoover's response</a> to the 1929 stock market and the gargantuan economic slump that followed: the Great Depression. Hoover did very little, from a fiscal policy standpoint, to stimulate the economy in 1929, 1930, 1931, and 1932, and the U.S. economy collapsed in 1929, and remained in contraction in 1930, 1931, and 1932. By 1932, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_depression">the Great Depression</a> had spread across the globe.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Keynes: An economy at rest can (unfortunately) remain at rest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/">Keynes: An economy at rest can (unfortunately) remain at rest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1432631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/18/keynes-an-economy-at-rest-can-unfortunately-remain-at-rest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>Herbert Hoover</category><category>Keynes</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Right now, it's all about breaking the cycle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>This is one cycle the United States, and the world, really, must strive to break, and soon.<br /><br />The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_2000s_recession">U.S. recession</a> has gone well beyond a correction in the formerly bubble-laden housing sector. The recession is now forcing reductions in commercial operations not because of some flaw in a business model, but simply because demand around companies (their clients and customers) is declining -- the so-called 'vicious cycle' that economists so adamantly and forcefully warn policy makers, executives, and investors about.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Recession: a thief</span><br /><br />True, during times like these you'll hear some talk about the 'benefits' of a recession: a review of business models, increased efficiency, the elimination of needless expenses, and enhanced adaptability/resiliency are frequently cited, but keep in mind that these things can occur just as regularly when the economy is expanding, as when it's contracting. In that sense, recessions never offer 'unique' benefits.<br /><br />What's more, the reality is that recessions end businesses, disrupt the production process, and rob revenue from otherwise perfectly fine operations. They result in lost potential and underutilized capacity. They also cause the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs, disrupt lives, and of course increase a host of other social costs and ills. In that sense, recessions are never 'good.'<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Right now, it's all about breaking the cycle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/">Right now, it's all about breaking the cycle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430763/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/right-now-it-s-all-about-breaking-the-cycle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gdp</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesian</category><category>negative feedback loop</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: Wanted! Economic pragmatists with bold ideas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-barack-obama-200x267.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">Financial Times</span> columnist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be2dbf2c-d113-11dd-8cc3-000077b07658.html ">Martin Wolf</a> argues that the current financial crisis and global recession is best viewed through a Keynesian lens, and it's the lens of a pragmatist. <br /><br />Wolf sees three Keynesian themes, or lessons, that policy makers would be wise to heed. <br /><br /><strong>Keynes: Markets are essential, but not perfect</strong><br /><br />The first: if you expect markets to be self-correcting and self-policing, there's trouble up ahead. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be2dbf2c-d113-11dd-8cc3-000077b07658.html ">Wolf</a>: Mistakes occur, even among those who were following standard operating procedure. A market filled with bankers -- or other participants -- following standard operating procedures that were flawed leads to ... what we have today, pretty much -- a global recession and constrained credit.<br /><br />The second: It's o.k. for a corporation to become more efficient, but it's not necessarily a good thing if a society or nation (or world) does so all at once. This reinforces one of Keynes's tenets: It's a good thing to have consumers amass savings, but if everyone saves everything all the time it would be a disaster. <br /><br />Or, for the globalization version of the above, economist Richard Felson told BloggingStocks: "We need people in the United States to save more money, but if people in Europe, China, India, Japan, Brazil and Russia do the same thing simultaneously, the global economy will remain in a recession for a very long time."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martin Wolf: Wanted! Economic pragmatists with bold ideas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/">Martin Wolf: Wanted! Economic pragmatists with bold ideas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be2dbf2c-d113-11dd-8cc3-000077b07658.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1415727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/martin-wolf-wanted-economic-pragmatists-with-bold-ideas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>gdp</category><category>globalization</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesian</category><category>markets</category><category>Martin Wolf</category><category>mixed capitalism</category><category>mixed economy</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Paul Krugman argues,</a> in so many words, that, indeed, the United States must go back, to get to the future.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Krugman's advice</a> for President-elect Barack Obama? Think big. Contrary to selected, conservative arguments about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fdr">President Franklin D. Roosevelt's</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal">New Deal,</a> the reason the New Deal had limited, short-term success was the fact that FDR's economic policies were too cautious, he said. <br /><br /><strong>The New Deal: new life</strong><br /><br />The New Deal's long-term success and achievements, including the structural changes to the U.S. economy (including Social Security and bank deposit insurance), have proved to be both durable and essential, most economists, including Krugman, agree. <br /><br />Hence, President-elect Obama should think big from the get-go, Krugman says, and avoid the mistaken belief that 'government spending made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States">the Great Depression</a> worse,' and Obama should move forward with a large fiscal stimulus to put people back to work, for work that needs to be done in these United States.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/">NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1368796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1920s</category><category>1930s</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Democrats</category><category>FDR</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Franklin D. Roosevelt</category><category>gdp</category><category>Great Depression</category><category>Hoover</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesians</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>pump priming</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Roaring 20s</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>World War II</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Once again, Keynes holds the keys to economic recovery ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/keynes.jpg" alt="" />These days, investors have to search far and wide to find positive data points, let alone a positive outlook, for the U.S. and global economies. <br /><br />And, without question, the financial crisis and slowing global growth, combined with previously weak economic fundamentals in the U.S., are indeed formidable obstacles to any investor's hope for optimism.<br /><br />Still, perhaps the real the danger lies in not where we are but in denying where we can be, and that's where <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes">John Maynard Keynes</a> comes in. <br /><br />For those unfamiliar, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynes">Keynes,</a> along with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman">Milton Friedman</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx">Karl Marx,</a> are the three major philosophers of modern economics. <br /><br />In the United States, policy markers since 1981 have favored market absolutism, Friedman's view, peppered by government intervention, Keynes' view, when needed. <br /><br />More recently, during the current decade, market absolutists appeared to have had free rein. Some of these market absolutists are now arguing that 'the market should run its course' and 'recessions, even deep recessions, are an essential part of the business cycle,' etc. Don't believe any of it for a moment, Keynes would say. <br /><br /><strong>Expansion is the normal condition</strong><br /><br />It was part of the genius of Keynes that he revealed to us that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynes#Economic_thought">the natural state of the economy is expansion</a> and that a downturn is "extraordinary imbecility." Further, Keynes also reminds us that recessions, or economic downturns, are not necessarily self-correcting. <br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynes#Economic_thought">Keynes also believed</a> that the market economy, in the form of mixed capitalism, could survive only if it earned the support of the public by raising living standards.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Once again, Keynes holds the keys to economic recovery </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/">Once again, Keynes holds the keys to economic recovery </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1356377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/do-americans-have-a-right-to-an-economic-expansion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FDR</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>John Maynard Keynes</category><category>Karl Marx</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesian</category><category>Milton Friedman</category><category>mixed capitalism</category><category>monetarism</category><category>New Deal</category><category>President Roosevelt</category><category>pump priming</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.s.Economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What IS Google worth?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>Google closed down yesterday finishing at $367.23 per share on a day when the rest of the market moved notably upward. Although I have been very vocal about the stock price being overvalued in my Blogging Stocks posts, (see: <a title="View 10 Reasons I think Google is going down on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/21/10-reasons-i-think-google-is-going-down/" target="_blank">10 Reasons I think Google is going down</a>), Google remains a very good company with a growing brand providing valuable services. So this begs the question: <em>What is GOOG stock worth?</em></p>
<p>I'm not in the prediction business, I am in the investment business. Is there a price I would pay? Certainly. That price is unquestionably less than most other investors would pay because I always look for deep value. But is there a "fair market value?"</p>
<p>That's a very difficult question because the price is determined by what the last trader feels the stock is worth -- not everyone, not a consensus. For example, if you own a stock that you bought at $20 and it's now trading at $40, and you are holding on long term, then you are not a factor during the day when traders are moving the price up or down a few bucks. Your opinion on the value that day is silent and has no bearing on the price.</p>
<p>In trying to assess what the potential appreciation of the stock might be next year I had to make an assumption about the P/E ratio. This is based on what I envision is the level most traders will be willing to pay. If you use a P/E ratio of 40 and look twelve months out and assume Google's earnings continue to grow on a slower but still strong trajectory, you are looking at a lot of potential upside from here. GOOG's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?exch=USA&amp;sym=GOOG&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">trailing twelve month EPS is $6.82</a>.<strong> If it hits EPS of $12 then</strong> <strong>you might arrive at a value of $480</strong>. These are figures commonly discussed in the business pages and by analysts. Some of the thoughtful comments I have received to my posts suggest the same thing. Of course we have read higher estimates by Piper Jaffrey analysts who reached a $600 valuation. But to get there you must allow for EPS of $15 or a P/E of 50. That I am not willing to do, are you?</p>
<p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What IS Google worth?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/">What IS Google worth?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?exch=USA&amp;sym=GOOG&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/647076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/what-is-google-worth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>John Maynard Keynes</category><category>JohnMaynardKeynes</category><category>Keynes</category><category>P/E</category><category>PE</category><category>Price to earnings</category><category>PriceToEarnings</category><category>Risk</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Valuation</category><category>Value</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
