<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[eBay: The Web2.0 Killing Fields]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img height="157" alt="kiko" src="http://static.flickr.com/84/220637966_cc4a43fa5b_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>Web2.0 was supposed to be the next big thing on the Net. And, yes, there were some cool technologies, like <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr.com</a>, <a href="http://www.writely.com">Writely</a>, <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icio.us</a>, and <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>. Biggies like <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo!</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>, and <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> even snapped some of these up.</p>
<p>But there's a problem: while these sites are definitely cool, the business model is often hazy. After all, when you give something away, you need either a premium product to upsell or a lot of users to monetize things with advertising. </p>
<p>Well, we are finally seeing signs of trouble in the Web2.0 world. For example, <a href="http://www.pubsub.com">PubSub</a> recently closed shop.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, some of these failed companies are finding some liquidation value on <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a> (yes, despite a terrible stock performance, this company definitely has a killer business model). I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/sell-your-company-on-ebay/">wrote</a> about one for BloggingStocks recently, in which a community search engine decided to sell out.</p>
<p>The most recent to hit eBay is <a href="http://www.kiko.com">Kiko</a>, an online calendar site. In fact, the company's investor wrote a blog <a href="http://paulgraham.infogami.com/blog/">post</a> on the demise, blaming the "do no evil" Google.</p>
<p>As for the eBay <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=120021374185">listing</a>, there is currently one bid - for $49,999.99.</p>
<p>I talked to Gordon Gould, who recently raised venture capital for his Web2.0 startup, <a href="http://www.thisnext.com/">ThisNext</a>. According to him: "We looked long/hard at whether to raise institutional money or not for ThisNext . We decided in the end it made sense to do so. The 'build it for no money' opportunity is highly problematic, particularly if you are in a crowded marketplace (and the web services marketplace is currently very crowded). More broadly, taking VC money can help a company weather macro and company-specific economic downturns. I started Upoc in 1999 and raised an $18mm round in early 2001. If we had not raised that round, Upoc would have been crushed by 9/11. Our VC's basically gave us the working capital to survive the downturn. VC can also help companies not make every product decision to be a 'bet the company' type of scenario where you can afford to experiment a bit. Taking no money usually means if you make a mistake, you die." </p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, such as the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/">eBay: The Web2.0 Killing Fields</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/656812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/21/ebay-the-web2-0-killing-fields/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Digg</category><category>eBay</category><category>Google</category><category>Kiko</category><category>ThisNext</category><category>Web2.0</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:27:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
