<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why LDK Solar (LDK) is not a buy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ldk-solar-co-ltd/ldk/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/ldk.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ldk-solar-co-ltd/ldk/nys">LDK Solar Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ldk-solar-co-ltd/ldk/nys">LDK</a>) is one strange solar stock. Yesterday, on a day when other solar companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/solarfun-power-holdings-co-ltd/solf/nas ">Solarfun Power Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/solarfun-power-holdings-co-ltd/solf/nas ">SOLF</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canadian-solar-inc-common-shares/csiq/nas">Canadian Solar Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canadian-solar-inc-common-shares/csiq/nas">CSIQ</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/first-solar-inc/fslr/nas ">First Solar Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/first-solar-inc/fslr/nas ">FSLR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ja-solar-holdings-co-ltd-ads/jaso/nas">JA Solar Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ja-solar-holdings-co-ltd-ads/jaso/nas">JASO</a>) were all strong and despite earnings coming in at the high end of expectations and <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ldk-solar-1q-profit-nudges-higher-as-sales-rise/rfid102480171 ">guidance solidly ahead of estimates</a>, their stock was down. Not only was it down, but it also tried rebounding, only to fail. Not good at all for the bull case. </p>
<p>Experience has taught me to respect the price action the day after earnings. So when I see LDK trying to break out of a now 5-month old range, pretty much between $30 and $40 -- yes it was up to $50 in January and $20 in March, but those are outliers -- this is a very bearish sign. It's so bearish that I suspect that unless solar plays really heat up again, this stock will need many more weeks or months to break $40, and even then, it's got a ton of resistance all over the place due to bitter buyers in at much higher prices who will be looking to cut their losses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why LDK Solar (LDK) is not a buy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/">Why LDK Solar (LDK) is not a buy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1194903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/why-ldk-solar-ldk-is-not-a-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CSIQ</category><category>featured</category><category>FSLR</category><category>JASO</category><category>LDK</category><category>LDK Solar Co.</category><category>LdkSolarCo.</category><category>solar stocks</category><category>SolarStocks</category><category>SOLF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Sykes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
