<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Should Little Leaguers be paid?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/media/2007/08/llws.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Before you get mad at me and leave nasty comments, this isn't my idea. Yahoo! Sports writer Dan Wetzel has actually <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news?slug=dw-littleleague082207&amp;prov=yhoo&amp;type=lgns">suggested</a> that kids who play in the nationally-televised Little League World Series should be paid $1,000 per game. I'm not kidding. Here's a quick summary of his reasoning:</p>
<ol>
    <li>Advertisers and the networks (and the non-profit Little League Inc.) make a lot of money from the event -- and the kids are the ones who play. </li>
    <li>Many of these young athletes come from developing countries, and a few thousand dollars could go a long way toward providing educational opportunities that they might otherwise miss out on. </li>
    <li>The event has already been corrupted: "There has long been cheating in Little League, from doctoring birth certificates to playing out-of-district ringers." </li>
</ol>
<p>Here's the problem with these arguments:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Little Leaguers be paid?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/">Should Little Leaguers be paid?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news?slug=dw-littleleague082207&amp;prov=yhoo&amp;type=lgns>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/972851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/24/should-little-leaguers-be-paid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>featured</category><category>LIttle League</category><category>LittleLeague</category><category>sports</category><category>youth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
