<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate Falls to Two-Year Low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg" alt="Department of Labort" />Some good news for everyone out there looking for a job: <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/careers/unemployment-rate-falls-to-8-8-pct-two-year-low-see-full-artic/19899891/">unemployment fell to a two-year low</a> in March, down to 8.8%.</p>
<p>While an 8.8% percent unemployment rate is still nothing to celebrate, it is a clear indication that we are headed in the right direction. Companies hired new employees at the fastest two-month pace since before the recession began.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment Rate Falls to Two-Year Low</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/">Unemployment Rate Falls to Two-Year Low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19900036/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/01/unemployment-rate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hiring</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Surprise! Payrolls Jump By 192,000 as Unemployment Rate Drops]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="" />Most of us did not expect a sharp turnaround on the employment front in February. For the better part of two years, we've had painfully slow growth in employment. Then, in February, with many people snowed in for most of the time, things changed dramatically: Nonfarm payrolls increased by a whopping 192,000 and the unemployment rate dropped to 8.9%, as reported in <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/04/us-usa-economy-idUSTRE71R3OO20110304">Reuters</a>.<br />
<br />
The numbers were impressive. Private sector jobs increased to 222,000, up from 68,000 in January. Private service sector jobs increased to 152,000 from 33,000 in January. Government employment fell by 30,000. The average work week was steady. Hourly earnings rose one penny.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Big Surprise! Payrolls Jump By 192,000 as Unemployment Rate Drops</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/">Big Surprise! Payrolls Jump By 192,000 as Unemployment Rate Drops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19868111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/big-surprise-payrolls-jump-by-192-000-as-unemployment-rate-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>average work week</category><category>hourly earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>private sector payrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The Labor Department threw the market a curve today when it reported nonfarm payrolls data for November. Employers added only 39,000 jobs in November, far below the 144,000 job growth economist had anticipated. The unemployment rate, too, rose to a seven-month high of 9.8%, up from 9.6% in October.<br />
<br />
Markets reacted instantly. The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell 54 point to 11,310, and the S&amp;P futures slid 7 points, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989004575652371594667484.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported. Treasuries moved up, with the yield on the 10-year note declining to 2.94%. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/">Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989004575652371594667484.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19743353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="job losses" />The Labor Department reported this morning that the nation's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/economy-loses-95k-jobs-due-to-government/1252302/">payrolls contracted by a net total of 95,000</a> in September. The latest rounds of layoffs from the government trumped what hiring was done in the private sector, leading to the rather nasty number.</p>
<p>According to the Labor Department, local governments jettisoned 76,000 jobs last month -- most of them in education. This cut was the largest by local governments in 28 years. Also, 77,000 temporary census jobs ended in September. Offsetting these two figures somewhat was the private sector, which added 64,000 last month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/">Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19666399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>labor department</category><category>payrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil Trades Higher as Inventories Shrink]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="rising oil prices" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" />Oil prices have been steadily falling over the past 3 weeks, but broke through the psychological $75 barrier today as the Energy Department announced a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-08/crude-oil-rises-as-u-s-stockpiles-tumble-jobless-claims-drop.html">drop in inventories last week</a>.<br />
<br />
Going into today's inventory report, analysts had been expecting to see oil inventories drop by 2 million barrels, but the impact that Hurricane Alex on operations in the Gulf was greater than expected and supplies actually shrank by 4.96 million barrels.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil Trades Higher as Inventories Shrink</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/">Oil Trades Higher as Inventories Shrink</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19547074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/oil-trades-higher-as-inventories-shrink/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>oil</category><category>oil inventory</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment Held Steady in February]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="" />For the 25th time in the past 26 months, <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/unemployment-rate-unchanged-as-36k-jobs/719129" target="_blank">U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell during February</a>. The Labor Department announced that 36,000 jobs were lost during February, lower than the expected figure of 50,000. The unemployment rate remained at 9.7%, which was better than expectations the rate would rise to 9.8%. <br />
<br />
Perhaps all of the government's pre-report hand wringing over the impact of the snowstorms was unwarranted. Some economists believed that the storms could have inflated job losses by 100,000 or more. If the storms indeed caused such losses, it would mean there was a net gain of jobs last month. An increase would have been the second increase since the recession started back in December 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment Held Steady in February</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/">Unemployment Held Steady in February</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19384708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blizard</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>snowstorm</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2009 Unemployment Ends with Double Digits, Consequences Still to Come]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/joblessfairbig.jpg" />More than 20 million people <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34641146/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">received unemployment benefits last year</a>, a new record. While they didn't all do it at the same time, the activity was enough to run the unemployment rate up to 10%, leaving everyone with the <strike>belief</strike> hope that 2010 just has to be better.</p>
<p>The severity that has characterized the job market since the woes of American International Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys" target="_blank">AIG</a>) and Lehman Brothers made headlines in September 2008 eased up a bit as 2009 marched toward its conclusion. The layoffs slowed down a bit, but a dearth of hiring means that we aren't seeing a pickup for the 5.8 million who've been out of work for more than six months ... let alone everyone else.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2009 Unemployment Ends with Double Digits, Consequences Still to Come</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/">2009 Unemployment Ends with Double Digits, Consequences Still to Come</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19300135/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/02/2009-unemployment-ends-with-double-digits-consequences-still-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>Department of Labor</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>employment</category><category>hiring</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/gas_types.jpg" alt="" />The price at the cash register ticked higher in October, though <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34012335/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">it was driven by the cost at the pump and on the lot</a>. </p>
<p>Energy prices and new car sales (the highest in 28 years) pushed consumer prices upward in October, they're still cheaper than they were a year earlier. The Labor Department reports that consumer prices edged up 0.3% last month, a tad higher than the 0.2% anticipated. Take food and energy out of the equation, and inflation rose 0.2%, again ahead of the 0.1% that analysts expected.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/">Energy, auto sales push consumer prices higher in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246140/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/consumer-prices-inch-higher-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christmas shopping</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>cost</category><category>costco</category><category>energy prices</category><category>holiday sales</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>Target Corp.</category><category>TGT</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer spending falls victim to debt repayment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/shopping_carts_240.jpg" width="200" height="146" />Consumer borrowing fell for the eighth straight month in September. This record-setting streak is due largely to tightening by lenders, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> and the conservative preference to pay down debt rather than spend. This <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33731038/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">widespread fit of fiscal responsibility, economists fret, could prevent a recovery from taking root</a>, since <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/consumerspending/">consumer spending</a> is responsible for 70% of the U.S. economy. This conventional thinking, of course, overlooks the fact that an eventual increase in spending that isn't fueled by consumer spending will yield a recovery that's more likely to last. </p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/FederalReserve/">Federal Reserve</a>, borrowing fell at an annual rate of $14.8 billion in September -- it's biggest drop since July and much larger than the $10 billion predicted by economists. The behavior is exactly what you'd find in people worried about losing their jobs or focused on rebuilding safety funds and investment portfolios. Those who want to borrow are finding banks won't be complicit this time, as they clamp down on lending practices.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer spending falls victim to debt repayment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/">Consumer spending falls victim to debt repayment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/consumer-spending-falls-victim-to-debt-repayment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto loans</category><category>cash for clunkers</category><category>consumer credit</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>cost</category><category>costco wholesale</category><category>credit cards</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>debt repayment</category><category>department of labor</category><category>economy</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>gap</category><category>gps</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jwn</category><category>labor department</category><category>nordstrom</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>revolving credit</category><category>saks fifth avenue</category><category>sks</category><category>tjx</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[September job cuts steeper than expected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="september job losses" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/not_hiring_sign.jpg" />Job losses continued to mount in September. Unfortunately, the numbers are even <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/30/adp-report-shows-worse-than-expected-job-losses-in-september/">worse than expected</a>.</p>
<p>According to the ADP National Employment Report, employers shed 254,000 jobs in September. Analysts had been expecting to see the number of job losses at 200,000 in the month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>September job cuts steeper than expected</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/">September job cuts steeper than expected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19179409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>jobs</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales hint at jobless recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mall-stores-200a060308.jpg" />Retail sales gained a seasonally-adjusted 2.7% in August, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32855201/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">according to the U.S. Department of Commerce</a>. This follows a 0.2% decline in July. The August results beat analyst expectations soundly, lending support to talk of a recovery. The Cash for Clunkers program is cited as contributing to August sales.</p>
<p>Without autos, sales increased 1.1%, still ahead of the anticipated 0.4% gain. Take gas out of the measure, as well, and retail sales grew 0.6%.</p>
<p>Inventories fell in July, for the twelfth month in a row, with the 1% decline a tad higher than the 0.9% anticipated by many economists.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales hint at jobless recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/">Retail sales hint at jobless recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19163260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>department of commerce</category><category>department of labor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor department</category><category>labor markets</category><category>retail sales</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wholesale prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job market expected to recover in 2014]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/labor.jpg" />The rate at which jobs were cut slowed in August, but <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32694985/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">the gap to be filled will be with us for a while</a>. With 14.9 million people looking for jobs according to Moody's <a href="http://www.economy.com" target="_blank">Economy.com</a>, the unemployment rate won't hit 5% -- considered "normal" -- until 2014. To put this in perspective, we still have one presidential election and two mid-term contests between now and a full employment recovery.</p>
<p>Data published by the Department of Labor Friday puts the unemployment rate at 9.7%. In December 2007, it was only 4.7%. And, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/" target="_blank">BloggingStocks reported on Friday</a>, it could pass 10% by the end of 2009. For teenagers, the unemployment rate has reached 26%. The number of job-seekers who have given up completely is above 750,000 -- the highest level since the Department of Labor started keeping score in 1994.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job market expected to recover in 2014</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/">Job market expected to recover in 2014</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19151983/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>labor department</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="220" height="160" alt="" />As we saw this morning, companies <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">cut 298,000 jobs in August</a>, according to ADP. The forecast was for 250,000 jobs lost. The report also revised last month's decline to 360,000.</p>
<p>Well, the Labor Department's report is due out in two days, and it <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4yuz57GLJQA">may show a loss of 225,000 jobs</a>, according to a Bloomberg News survey.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/">Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>layoffs</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economic concerns push oil prices to a five-week low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/fallingoil.gif" alt="" />Over the past couple of months we have seen oil prices move steadily higher, but the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090706-711056.html">precious crude sold off </a>Monday as economic concerns returned to the market.<br /><br />What a difference a week makes. This time last week we were seeing increased optimism that the current recession was nearing its end, but those hopes were wiped out late last week by disappointing consumer confidence and employment data.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economic concerns push oil prices to a five-week low</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/">Economic concerns push oil prices to a five-week low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19088189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/07/economic-concerns-push-oil-prices-to-a-5-week-low/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>employment</category><category>energy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>LaborDepartment</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Initial jobless claims fall, but continuing claims hit 26-year high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Jobless claims closed out 2008 basically the way they came in: abysmally. <br /><br />U.S. weekly jobless claims fell 94,000 to 492,000 for the week ending December 27, the <a href="http://ows.doleta.gov/press/2008/123108.asp">U.S. Labor Department announced Wednesday</a>, but the weekly total nevertheless remained 45% higher than a year ago. <br /><br />Even worse, continuing claims rocketed 140,000 higher to 4.51 million -- the highest continuing claims total since December 1982. Economists note that the high continuing claims level reflects labor market stress, and the long time it takes for those downsized to find comparable employment. Few companies are filling vacancies, and even temporary work assignments are declining, another negative sign for the labor market.<br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected this week's initial jobless claims to total 550,000.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Initial jobless claims fall, but continuing claims hit 26-year high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/">Initial jobless claims fall, but continuing claims hit 26-year high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1415619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/initial-jobless-claims-fall-but-continuing-claims-hit-26-year-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>continuing claims</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. initial jobless claims hit 26-year high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Yet another ignominious data point for the job market, and by extension, for the U.S. economy and the stock market.<br /><br />U.S. initial jobless claims surged 30,000 to 586,000 for the week ending December 20, <a href="http://ows.doleta.gov/press/2008/122408.asp">the U.S. Labor Department announced Wednesday</a> -- the highest initial weekly jobless claims total since 1982.<br /><br />"Any level above 500,000 is high, but now we're soaring toward 600,000. This has to be reversed soon, or the unemployment rate is going to sail over 8% by the time the recovery starts," economist Peter Dawson said. <br /><br />The U.S. unemployment rate currently is 6.7%. An 8% unemployment rate "would be very bad news for corporate revenue and earnings, and the stock market, in addition to increasing social service costs of the states," Dawson said.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. initial jobless claims hit 26-year high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/">U.S. initial jobless claims hit 26-year high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-hit-26-year-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobs</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is unemployment really above 10%?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="339" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />If people don't know this, it is worth pointing out. If they do, it is worth repeating. Unemployment in the U.S. is well above 10%. The government numbers do not include those people who are "no longer looking for work" or those who are not receiving unemployment payments.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/business/economy/06idle.html?ref=business">According to <em>The New York Times</em></a>, "The Labor Department does publish an alternate measure of unemployment, which counts part-time workers who want full-time work, as well as anyone who has looked for work in the last year."</p>
<p>That would put the total "unemployment" rate closer to 13%.</p>
<p>It raises the issue of how close the U.S. is to the much higher rates of joblessness in the Great Depression. The number of people without work rose to 25%. The government did not make the distinctions then by subtracting people who were part-time.</p>
<p>If, using the government's yard stick, unemployment in the U.S. gets to the double digits next year, the economy is closer to a depression than it might appear.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/">Is unemployment really above 10%?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-unemployment-really-above-10/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>depression</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil prices move back higher today]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="5" hspace="5" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" alt="" />After a brief selloff yesterday, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-rises-on-economic-news-supply-woes/n20071102114509990010" target="_blank">oil prices have been moving higher</a> in today's action. Buyers have come back into the market today and pushed prices up as high as $95.00 earlier in the session, Prices nd are now up $1.20 to $94.69.<br /><br />The main reason why prices have turned higher today is optimism about the economy created by this morning's <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jsanM66tszKz1zFq0LOG4XvWS7zAD8SLK3R00" target="_blank">better than expected October payroll</a> report. According to the U.S. Labor Department, October saw a 166,000 increase in payrolls, which was more than twice the 80,000 increase that analysts expected. <br /><br />The better-than-expected payroll report was enough to create some optimism of the overall economy, and put some recession fears to rest. According to Michael Lynch, who is president of <a href="http://www.energyseer.com/" target="_blank">Strategic Energy and Economic Research Inc.</a>, "It suggests that concerns about the economy ... are overblown a little bit."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil prices move back higher today</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/">Oil prices move back higher today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-rises-on-economic-news-supply-woes/n20071102114509990010>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1028240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/oil-prices-move-back-higher-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$100 oil</category><category>$100Oil</category><category>Condoleezza Rice</category><category>CondoleezzaRice</category><category>crude prices</category><category>CrudePrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>LaborDepartment</category><category>Michael Lynch</category><category>MichaelLynch</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>payrolls</category><category>recession</category><category>Turkey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[October job growth strong, but only in the lower-paying service industries]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rogerjones/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/waiters.jpg" alt="Waitstaff" /></a>Everyone's cheering today the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/october-job-growth-strongest-since/story.aspx?guid=%7bB61446FA-7F8A-4901-B503-7ED679C3FB45%7d&amp;print=true&amp;dist=printTop">strong payroll report</a> released by the Labor Department, but if you take a closer look at the numbers you'll understand why so many middle class folks do not think the labor market offers them any good news. While the government reported that unemployment held steady at 4.7% and 166,000 jobs were created, you must look at where those jobs were created and where jobs were lost to get the true picture.</p>
<p>Job growth was created in the service sector, which added 190,000 jobs - led by food services (37,000 jobs - primarily at restaurants), employment services (34,000 jobs) and health care (34,000 jobs). Job losses were seen in the higher paying manufacturing sector where 21,000 jobs were lost in October and 203,000 jobs have been lost in the last year. Employment at banks and mortgage brokers dropped 5,000 where 56,000 people lost jobs since February and more layoffs are expected as the mortgage mess continues to grow.</p>
<p>Richard Moody, Chief Economist for Mission Residential, also found that 21,500 jobs were lost in retail trade during October, which he said is the third consecutive monthly decline. In his October NonFarm Report, he wrote, this "is a sign that retailers are not expecting great things in the coming months."</p>
<p>Earnings also were flat. Just a 0.2 cent gain in average hourly wage to $17.58 an hour with no gain in the average workweek of 33.8 hours. </p>
<p>If you're in the top executive ranks you're pay may look good, but for the middle class these numbers don't show much hope of earning a better paycheck.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.litaepstein.com">Lita Epstein</a> has written more than 20 books including the Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score due out in December.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/">October job growth strong, but only in the lower-paying service industries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/october-job-growth-strongest-since/story.aspx?guid=%7bB61446FA-7F8A-4901-B503-7ED679C3FB45%7d&amp;print=true&amp;dist=printTop>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1028032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>LaborDepartment</category><category>payroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears Holdings (SHLD) slides on jobless data]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.searsholdings.com/invest/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Sears logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/shld-sears-holdings-logo1.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) -- as well as most other retail outlets -- is taking a dive this morning after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/jobless-claims-rise-sharply/n20071018084009990008">the Labor Department reported the biggest increase in the number of jobless claims since February</a>. Worries of a weak consumer environment going into the holiday season have weighed heavily on retail, with several stocks across the sector trading at new 52-week lows today. Sears is hit particularly hard by reports like these because the company does not report its interim data between earnings releases. All investors in SHLD have to go on in the quarterly report, similar companies' performances and broad economic data. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on SHLD.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $195.18 in April, the stock slipped to a 52-week low of $123.39 in September. This morning, SHLD opened at $134.66. So far today the stock has hit a low of $132.12 and a high of $134.75. As of 11:05, SHLD is trading at $132.61, down $2.61 (-1.9%). The chart for SHLD looks bullish and steady, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings"><strong></strong></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sears Holdings (SHLD) slides on jobless data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/">Sears Holdings (SHLD) slides on jobless data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1016277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/sears-holdings-shld-slides-on-jobless-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>jobless</category><category>Kmart</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>LaborDepartment</category><category>options</category><category>retail</category><category>Sears Holdings</category><category>SearsHoldings</category><category>SHLD</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
