<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://ir.unitedcontinentalholdings.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=83680&amp;p=irol-IRHome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="United Continental (UAL) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/new-ual-logo.jpg" /></a>United Continental Holdings (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/united-continental-holdings-inc/ual/nys">UAL</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/united-continental-holdings-inc/ual/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/airlines-gain-at-open-led-by-united-continental-2010-12-30">Continental Airlines announced its fleet service employees ratified their collective bargaining agreement with the company</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on UAL.</p>
<p>UAL opened this morning at $23.60. So far today the stock has hit a low of $23.50 and a high of $23.99. As of 12:15, UAL is trading at $23.86 up 0.40 (1.7%). The chart for UAL looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives UAL a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/">United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19781819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deal</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>labor</category><category>options</category><category>UAL</category><category>union</category><category>United Continental Holdings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Stocks Flat Going into the Holiday (GE, BAC, CSCO, INTC, AAPL)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" />Total nonfarm payroll employment fell by 125,000 in June as the number of temporary census workers dropped by 225,000, according to the Labor Department. Most analysts expected the June unemployment numbers to be better. The market did sell of substantially until about 1 PM. That is about the time that traders who are still around begin to leave for the 4th or July holiday. The small band that was left bid the market back up to near even. Volume was so light, it was hard to detect a trend.<br />
<br />
The closing bell numbers:<br />
<br />
Dow 9,686.48 -46.05 (-0.47%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,022.58 -4.79 (-0.47%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,091.79 -9.57 (-0.46%)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Stocks Flat Going into the Holiday (GE, BAC, CSCO, INTC, AAPL)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/">Closing Bell: Stocks Flat Going into the Holiday (GE, BAC, CSCO, INTC, AAPL)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19540675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/closing-bell-stocks-flat-going-into-the-holiday-ge-bac-csco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>labor</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Alcoa Extends Contract Deadline, Reaches Tentative Agreement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://www.alcoa.com/global/en/investment/overview.asp" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/alcoa.jpg" alt="AA logo" /></a>Alcoa (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">AA</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after the company looks like it has missed a deadline for a new labor deal. for the second time today. <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ALCOA_CONTRACT_TALKS?SITE=DCUSN&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" target="_blank">AA announced earlier today that it had extended the deadline</a> to negotiate a new labor deal with the United Steelworkers Union, its largest union covering 5,400 employees at 10 plants. The union's contract was to expire at 1 AM this morning, but was extended 11 hours until noon and just before noon, <a target="_blank" href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ALCOA_CONTRACT_TALKS?SITE=DCUSN&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">the company announced a tentative agreement</a>. No terms have been released and the union still needs to ratify it as well. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on AA.<br />
<br />
This morning, AA opened at $11.43. So far today the stock has hit a high of $11.68 and a low of $11.35. As of 12:15, AA is trading at $11.45, down $0.19 (-1.6%). The chart for AA looks bullish and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives AA a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Alcoa Extends Contract Deadline, Reaches Tentative Agreement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/">Alcoa Extends Contract Deadline, Reaches Tentative Agreement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19498890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/alcoa-extends-contract-deadline-reaches-tentative-agreement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AA</category><category>Alcoa</category><category>deadline</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>labor</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Labor Costs Rise 0.6% in Q1, but Still Up Just 1.7% in a Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg" />Once again, a few morsels for the inflation hawks in the latest employment cost report, but little more: the Employment Cost Index rose 0.6% in the first quarter, the U.S. Labor Department <a href="http:// http://www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.nr0.htm">announced Friday</a>.<br />
<br />
Further, although the stat was above the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">0.4%</a> first quarter Bloomberg News consensus estimate, employment costs are still up just 1.7% for the 12-month period ending March 2010. The 1.7% total represents a decline from the 2.1% stat for the 12-month period ending a year ago, in March 2009.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Labor Costs Rise 0.6% in Q1, but Still Up Just 1.7% in a Year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/">U.S. Labor Costs Rise 0.6% in Q1, but Still Up Just 1.7% in a Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19460669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/30/u-s-labor-costs-rise-0-6-in-q1-but-still-up-just-1-7-in-a-ye/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment cost index</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A U.S. Employee Shortage in 10 Years?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/computer-worker.jpg" />Most Americans know that the U.S. is currently experiencing a job shortage - and in a big way: the U.S. Labor Department put the number of unemployed persons at <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">15.0 million</a> as of the end of March 2010. Even assuming that some those who've been laid off will not be seeking new positions - - some may choose to retire, for example -- the U.S. economy needs to create better than 11 million jobs to meet the need those seeking work. <br />
<br />
According to <a href="http:// http://www.encore.org/files/research/JobsBluestonePaper3-5-10.pdf">a new study</a> published by the MetLife Foundation and Civic Ventures, a San Francisco-based think tank on baby boomers, work, and social purpose, the U.S. economy is going to meet that need, and then some, by 2018.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A U.S. Employee Shortage in 10 Years?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/">A U.S. Employee Shortage in 10 Years?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19426737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/a-u-s-employee-shortage-in-10-years/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barry Bluestone</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job shortage</category><category>JobShortage</category><category>labor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Manufacturing Experiences Largest Gain Since 2004]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/factory-smoke-240.jpg" />Manufacturing expanded in March at the fastest pace since 2004. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aB9QAAqICBFE">The Supply Management's factory index rose to 59.6. </a>This exceed forecasts by Bloomberg News survey of 77 economists. Readings above 50 indicate expansion.</p>
<p>"Manufacturing is on a tear" said Chris Rupkey of bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. "Manufacturing driven growth and export driven growth are getting us out of the recession and turning the recovery into a more sustainable one. As production increases, it means job gains are going to spread."</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Manufacturing Experiences Largest Gain Since 2004</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/">U.S. Manufacturing Experiences Largest Gain Since 2004</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aB9QAAqICBFE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19423134/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/us-manufacturing-expands-by-most-since-2004/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>exports</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil Closes Above $80]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" alt="rising oil prices" />Over the past week, oil prices have been flirting with the psychological $80 barrier, and they were finally able to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703862704575099150382162356.html?mod=WSJ_Stocks_RIGHTMoreInMarkets">settle above $80 Wednesday</a>. Oil traded up $1.26 a barrel to $80.94.<br />
<br />
Earlier today, we got the weekly inventory report from the Department of Energy, which showed a greater-than-expected jump in reserves last week. The report showed that oil inventories grew by four million barrels, which was well above the one-million-barrel increase that analysts had forecast.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil Closes Above $80</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/">Oil Closes Above $80</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>80 oil</category><category>80Oil</category><category>Automatic Data Processing</category><category>AutomaticDataProcessing</category><category>currencies</category><category>currency</category><category>dollar</category><category>employment</category><category>euro</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Power and Glory of Labor Unions Fades]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/unions_-1262118209.jpg" />According to a recent nationwide survey conducted by Pew Research Center for the People &amp; the Press, the glory days of <a href="http://people-press.org/report/591/">America's labor unions are fading</a>. At least they're fading in the eyes of the general populace.</p>
<p>Speculation varies widely about the reasons for the tarnishing of organized labor's luster. However, the decline of union favor is quite real. The approval of labor unions has decreased across a very wide demographic cross section of America, including in union-oriented households.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Power and Glory of Labor Unions Fades</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/">The Power and Glory of Labor Unions Fades</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19378776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/the-power-and-glory-of-labor-unions-fades/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>labor</category><category>labor unions</category><category>organized labor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Market rising in spite of high unemployment ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="307" border="1" align="right" width="220" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/not-hiring.jpg" />Since the stock market bottomed in March of this year, it has been firing on all cylinders -- except for those in the auto industry who manufacture the most cylinders of course. This year has not been kind to them. </p>
<p>For months, many have been surprised at the rapid rise, given the level of unemployment. During this same period, Wall Streeters have been dancing up and down, looking forward to more bonuses.</p>
<p>As the number of unemployed has climbed and the period of same has lengthened, many have wondered how business could be improving during a time when the consumer (those still left) has transformed from spender to saver.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Market rising in spite of high unemployment </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/">Sunday Funnies: Market rising in spite of high unemployment </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19199951/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/18/sunday-funnies-market-rising-in-spite-of-high-unemployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>consumption</category><category>employment</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>IBM</category><category>JNJ</category><category>jobs</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>KO</category><category>labor</category><category>market rally</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>sunday funnies</category><category>unemployment</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New jobless claims drop last week]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="jobless claims" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" />We got a bit of surprising news today, hearing that <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/new-jobless-claims-drop-unexpectedly-to/670400">new jobless claims fell to 530,000</a> last week.<br /><br />Going into today's announcement from the Department of Labor, analysts had been expecting to see an increase of 5,000 new jobless claims last week. This marks the third week in a row that we have seen new jobless claims fall.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New jobless claims drop last week</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/">New jobless claims drop last week</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19173029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" />There are 200 workers sitting-in at a Chicago factory that they claim has stiffed them. And President-elect Obama supports their goals. This raises many questions: Is the sit-in illegal? If so, is Obama supporting an illegal action? More importantly, is Obama inadvertently encouraging workers around the country to pursue similar tactics?</p>
<p>At issue here is <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80">Republic Windows and Doors</a>, a Chicago manufacturer that laid off its 200 workers last week and has failed to assure them that it will pay them the severance and vacation money they earned. The workers have responded by sitting-in on the factory floor. Obama said, "The workers who are asking for the benefits and payments that they have earned, I think they're absolutely right and understand that what's happening to them is reflective of what's happening across this economy," according to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80"><em>AP</em></a>.</p>
<p>I have no legal training, however, it looks to me like a sit-in is a form of trespassing -- assuming that the workers are no longer employees of the company. (A <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80">VP of the worker's union</a> said "We expected to go to jail.") My reading of Obama's comment suggests that he supports the workers' goals -- which is to get the money to which they're legally entitled -- while taking no position on the legality of their sit-in. The question is whether other aggrieved workers will miss this subtlety and view Obama's statement as an implicit endorsement of the workers' tactics.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/">Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1394259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>obama</category><category>republic windows and doors</category><category>RepublicWindowsAndDoors</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing (BA): Labor trouble, again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) made a major tactical mistake by letting its machinists go on strike for weeks. It ended up giving the workers a good contract and, in the meantime, it shut down the company when its back orders for aircraft were at record levels. Of course, that upset a large number of the firm's customers who are waiting for the new fuel-efficient Dreamliner, which will be the new flagship of Boeing's fleet.</p>
<p>Management at Boeing does not seem to have learned a single thing from the last work stoppage and is risking another one that could further undermine its stock price and earnings.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122664297481927943.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>In an effort to ratchet up pressure on Boeing Co. negotiators, leaders of the union that represents about 21,000 of the company's white-collar engineers and technical workers said they will ask their members to authorize a strike in the event that the two sides are unable to agree on a new labor contract." Current contracts expire on December 1, so there is not much time.</p>
<p>Investors would think that, with such huge revenue coming in from the delivery of new planes over the next several years, that the company would do as much as possible to keep its earnings and credibility up with its largest customers intact. Management would rather get a few extra bucks in labor expense savings.</p>
<p>Maybe that is why Boeing's shares, at $43, are less than 50% of its 52-week high.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">24/7 Wall St.</a> </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/">Boeing (BA): Labor trouble, again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.247wallst.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122664297481927943.html?mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1371959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-ba-labor-trouble-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>787 dreamliner</category><category>787Dreamliner</category><category>aircraft</category><category>BA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LABor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p>After a 52-day strike, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Boeing Co.</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BA</font></a>) has reached a tentative deal with its <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49R0IL20081028?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true">27,000</a> member machinists union. <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/385222_boeingstrike28.html">Tentative details</a> suggest that workers will get a 15% wage increase over three years, an $8,000 bonus over four years, and a freeze of medical costs at 2005 levels. Furthermore, the new contract limits the amount of work that can be outsourced and will last a year longer than the previous pact. But even though the contract has not been ratified, this is good news for Boeing and its workers. </p>
<p>Limiting outsourcing could be good for Boeing and the workers depending on how it's accomplished. One of the reasons for the delay in delivering its very popular 787 aircraft was that Boeing outsourced the majority of the design and manufacture of the components and later discovered that it was not doing enough to manage those subcontractors. As a result, Boeing suffered unpleasant surprises in its delivery schedule.</p>
<p>If Boeing and its machinists agreed to give the union a chance to bid on work under consideration to be outsourced, then both parties might be better off. That's because if the union offered a competitive price and excellent quality, Boeing would likely find it easier to manage its union workers than those of a subcontractor located half way around the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/">Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49R0IL20081028?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1354851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing 787</category><category>Boeing787</category><category>iinthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What do labor unions have against private equity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="206" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/seiustronger.gif" alt="" />I'm not normally one for union-bashing, but I'm puzzled by organized labor's record of private equity-bashing. <em>The New York Post </em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/08252008/business/union_foe_raises_buyout_banker_warning_126009.htm?dbk">reports</a> that the two million member Service Employees International Union wants increased government oversight of the private equity industry, with a special emphasis on the various banks that are in desperate need of cash.<br /><br />"The biggest buyout firms are used to gaming the system to turn a profit -- it's no surprise they want special rules now to take over another sector of our economy," SEIU president Andy Stern told the <em>Post</em>.<br /><br />KKR and other buyout shops counter that the SEIU is trying to unionize employees at companies acquired by private equity, and is grasping at straws to drum up support.<br /><br />That may be the case, but I can't imagine one has to do with the other. Employees should join unions (or not) because they feel (or don't feel) that their pay, job security and working conditions will benefit from membership. Bashing buyout firms would seem to be an irrelevant sideshow and a counterproductive one at that. Many union pension plans are large shareholders in banks and other firms that stand to benefit from private equity involvement, and they may be shooting their members in the foot by fighting macro issues like banking regulations that have absolutely nothing to do with their members' interests.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/">What do labor unions have against private equity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/08252008/business/union_foe_raises_buyout_banker_warning_126009.htm?dbk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1295052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/26/what-do-labor-unions-have-against-private-equity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Labor</category><category>Private Equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>Service Employees International Union</category><category>ServiceEmployeesInternationalUnion</category><category>Unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney faces costumed employees in labor dispute]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><img width="292" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="77" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/disneyland_logo.jpg" />It was a publicity nightmare for the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>): Tinkerbell, Snow White, Pinocchio, and Minnie Mouse being handcuffed and hauled away from Disneyland in a police van.<br /><br />32 costumed protesters were arrested for failing to obey a police order and traffic violations on Thursday. The protest was part of a labor dispute involving 2,300 workers at Disney's hotels: the Paradise Pier, the Grand Californian and the Disneyland Hotel.<br /><br />The union's contract expired in February, and workers complain that the new offer from Disney management would make health care unaffordable and, according to the president of Unite Here Local 681, workers are comparable local hotels make $2-3 an hour more. You can <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2008-08-15-disney-arrests_N.htm">read the details of the dispute here</a>.<br /><br />I can't imagine that stuff like this is good for traffic at Disneyland: imagine showing up for a day of fun rides with your family, only to have your 4-year old ask why Mickey and Goofy are being hauled off in handcuffs!<br /><br />A Disney spokesman told the <em>USA Today</em> that "Publicity stunts are not productive and are extremely disruptive to the resort district."<br /><br />But won't disrupting the resort district "encourage" Disney to meet its workers' demands? If so, that sounds productive to me!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/">Disney faces costumed employees in labor dispute</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2008-08-15-disney-arrests_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1286918/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/disney-faces-costumed-employees-in-labor-dispute/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Labor</category><category>Unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GDP posts gains, jobless claims hits high, housing sales rise -- what a mix!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/trader_stephenchernin_getty_240.jpg" />The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 150 points (at 10:15 a.m.). I guess that it was to be expected as we <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/before-the-bell-futures-lower-on-financials-tech-concerns/">woke up to news</a> that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) downgraded investment banks. Wall Street is also worried about the outlook for tech stocks after both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIM</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) reported quarterly results Wednesday, giving a tepid outlook.<br /><br />Then, final revision of first quarter GDP were released an hour before the open, and while growth was <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/25386095">revised upward to 1%</a> from an anemic 0.6% original estimate, the components weren't very encouraging. Consumer spending, which accounts for 70% of GDP, grew by 1.1%, the smallest gain since the second quarter of 2001, which was during the last recession. Also, corporate profits after taxes fell 7.8%, a higher decline than previously estimated. Housing, as measured by residential fixed investment plunged by 24.6%.<br /><br />Also, looking at inflation, the price index for gross domestic purchases, a closely watched measure of inflation, rose at a 3.6% rate, up 0.1 percentage point from the preliminary estimate. Excluding food and energy, the price index was up 2.3%, which is above the Fed's preferred range of around 1.5% to 2% for that index.<br /><br />One bright spot, as it has been awhile now, is that exports rose 5.4%, which was much better than the estimate of 2.8 percent in May.<br /><br />Moving to the labor markets, weekly initial claims, which were also reported at the same time, were unchanged. But -- and a big But it is -- the better indicator, four-week average of new jobless claims, was at the highest level since October 2005 in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GDP posts gains, jobless claims hits high, housing sales rise -- what a mix!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/">GDP posts gains, jobless claims hits high, housing sales rise -- what a mix!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/us-economy-logs-1-percent-growth/20080626092709990002>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1237446/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/gdp-posts-gains-jobless-claims-hits-high-housing-sales-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>Oracle</category><category>RIM</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When the big company leaves the small town]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/cemetary-by-dwq.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />This post opens our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/small-towns-big-companies">Big Company, Small Town</a></strong> series, featuring large companies and the small towns in which they are headquartered. Watch for more Big Company, Small Town posts coming soon.</em></p>
<p>All across this great country of ours, small cities, towns, and villages have been built in the shadows of major companies that supply work for their local populations. It can be a wonderful situation that cultivates a special kind of community and a deep-seated local pride. However, it can also be a recipe for civic disaster, if the major supplier of a wage base in a locality goes out of business or leaves town. Such was the near disastrous fate of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Falls,_Wisconsin">Park Falls, Wisconsin</a>, not so long ago.</p>
<p>The city of Park Falls, which is Wisconsin's most geographically isolated city, was built around its paper mill. At its height, the mill helped to bring the population of the city to nearly 4,000 inhabitants. However, in 2006 the paper mill, which was operating at reduced capacity under ownership from out of state, was shut down almost without any prior notice. The result was immediate and deeply wrenching turmoil. Not only had the paper mill workers lost an excellent source of income, but the collateral damage was jarringly significant also. Loggers had no local market for their pulp wood. Dozens of family-feeding log trucks were idled. Private contractors who did various types of work for the mill were left with thousands of dollars worth of unpaid invoices. Local vendors, retailers, and support businesses almost immediately went slack.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When the big company leaves the small town</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/">When the big company leaves the small town</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1230120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/when-the-big-company-leaves-the-small-town/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>factory closures</category><category>factory towns</category><category>featured</category><category>Flambeau River Papers</category><category>Fraser Papers</category><category>labor</category><category>Park Falls</category><category>small town</category><category>Wisconsin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadian auto pact with Ford called 'qualified win' for both sides]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p>What's good for Ford may also be good for General Motors and Chrysler, Canada-wise. <br /><br />The Canadian Auto Workers have voted to ratify a three-year contract with Ford, a pact the union expects <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler to match, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/canadian-auto-workers-ratify-3-year-ford/n20080505010009990015">The Associated Press reported Monday</a>. <br /><br />The deal, which freezes wages and reduces vacation pay but avoids changes to base wages, was approved by 78% of the membership.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>)'s shares fell 2 cents to $8.23 on the news during Monday morning trading. <br /><br />Economist Richard Felson told BloggingStocks Monday the deal, in his interpretation, represents "a qualified win for both sides. The Canadian workers got most of what they wanted, which mainly was an avoidance of the two-tier wage system that Ford is implementing in the United States," Felson said. "But Ford also got the wage freeze and vacation changes critical to bringing Canadian labor costs down."<br /><br />Further, while both GM and Chrysler, which are set to begin talks with the CAW, may initially view the Ford deal less-favorably, Felson said he expects both to negotiate similar deals with the CAW. <br />                             <br />"The downside is GM and Chrysler accepting a deal that's slightly more generous than they'd want to offer," Felson said. "But the upside is avoiding a major production shut-down during a critical transition period for the automakers, as they adjust their fleets to compete better with more-efficient foreign vehicles."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/">Canadian auto pact with Ford called 'qualified win' for both sides</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 May 2008 11:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1186577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/canadian-auto-pact-with-ford-called-qualified-win-for-both-sid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Candian Auto Workers</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>labor relations</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An Ohio senator opines on free trade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img alt="welder" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/factory.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In the April 23, <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, Senator Sherrod Brown, (D) Ohio, made a realistic assessment of <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120891223498936727.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">current government trade policy</a> and how it is diluting the strength of our country. I think that Senator Brown was just a bit gentle with his words, and understandably so when given his position. Suffice it to say that I agree with him for the most part, but he should have just cut to the chase. The American working class has been sold out. He also failed to make one critical point about NAFTA. It was his party and the guidance of Bill Clinton that navigated that document into law.</p>
<p>Partisan politics aside, I believe that current American trade standards are something we need to be ashamed of. As a free market capitalist, I have nothing against the survival of the fittest in the worlds of manufacturing and business. However, we're beholden to good sense to provide a level playing field and to maintain benchmark standards. In that regard, American workers have been shorted. Our trade deficit is a testament to the decline of the American Dream. It's a dream, while not referred to by that name, that resides in the hearts of workers the world over. Every parent wants their children to have a greater degree of opportunity and safety than they had.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An Ohio senator opines on free trade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/">An Ohio senator opines on free trade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1178372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/an-ohio-senator-opines-on-free-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>labor</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>manufacturing jobs</category><category>ohio</category><category>senator</category><category>Sherrod Brown</category><category>standard of living</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. initial jobless claims drop 21,000 -- below estimate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>Initial jobless claims <a href="http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/eta20080001.htm">fell by 21,000</a> to 336,000 for the week ended Dec. 29, below the 349,000 consensus estimate, the U.S. Labor Department announced Thursday. Initial claims totaled 326,000 for the same period a year ago.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the previous week's jobless claims were revised upward to 357,000, the highest weekly level since October 2005, from the 349,000 statistic announced last week.<br /><br />Also, the four-week moving average dropped to 343,750 from 344,500. Economists view the four-week average as a better indicator of unemployment conditions, as it smooths-out anomalies for strikes, holidays, or other idiosyncratic events. <br /><br />The number of continuing claims increased by 46,000 to 2.76 million for the week ended Dec. 22, the latest period for which figures were available. <br /><strong><br />Economic Analysis:</strong> This is a mixed bag of news; the current weekly jobless statistic dropped, but last week's statistic was revised higher. Meanwhile, the four-week moving average -- the average economists and analysts concentrate on -- remains at elevated levels and is a 'data point of concern' for the U.S. economy. The U.S. Federal Reserve will keep an eye on that four-week average: if it drifts above 350,000 and remains there, that would suggest a substantial softening of labor market conditions, and most likely, a slowing U.S. economy.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/">U.S. initial jobless claims drop 21,000 -- below estimate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/eta20080001.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1076199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/u-s-initial-jobless-claims-drop-21-000-below-estimate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>U.S. Department of Labor</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
