LehmanBrothers posts
FeedPosted Sep 16th 2009 9:30AM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Barclays plc ADS (BCS)

Late Tuesday -- on the one-year anniversary of its bankruptcy filing -- Lehman Brothers accused
Barclays Capital (NYSE:
BCS) of taking
$8.2 billion more than it should have when it purchased some of its key assets a year ago. Less than a week after Lehman filed for bankruptcy, the court approved of the sale to Barclays. Now Lehman is asking a judge to force Barclays to return some of the money taken as part of the deal, including $5 billion it says was given as extra collateral, which was not disclosed to the court.
Interesting timing and an interesting claim, don't you think? The timing is interesting because it is a year after the bankruptcy filing, which sounds like more than just a coincidence. But what is truly interesting is the fact that Lehman is trying to get quite a bit of money back by making a claim that
was not disclosed to the court.
Continue reading Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays
Posted Sep 14th 2009 10:00AM by Jim Cramer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market matters, Citigroup Inc. (C), Regions Financial (RF), Bank of America (BAC), Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Wells Fargo (WFC), Cramer on BloggingStocks, Financial Crisis
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says everyone in the trenches knows we're better off now -- only the academics disagree. Am I nuts, or am I missing something? One year after the financial system was brought to its knees, we are back in the mid-9000s and we have taken off the table massive bank risk and are well on our way to recovery.
I keep listening to people like Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz say the banking system is worse off now and I say to myself, "That's just stupid and wrong and anti-empirical and actually just silly." Anyone who knows what's really going on has to feel this way. And where was Stiglitz when some of us were running around trying to save things?
Continue reading Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worse after Lehman? Are you kidding me?
Posted Mar 23rd 2009 3:25PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Comic Relief

O, how the mighty have fallen.
A year ago, Lehman Bros. was one of the top investment banks in the country, near the head of the list of dream companies among graduates from the best business schools, paying out billions in bonuses and sending employees on lavish vacations.
Now Lehman has been reduced to litigating over the knickknacks it used to give away at conferences. Bloomberg
reports that "Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has negotiated the return of thousands of Lehman-logoed knickknacks that were mistakenly transferred to Barclays Plc through the sale of the bankrupt securities firm's brokerage unit. Tote bags, umbrellas, stress balls, Tiffany paperweights and other items now stored in closets and warehouses from New York to Chicago will be returned to Lehman and sold to pay creditors, according to a court filing on March 19."
Items currently being stored include:
- 1,630 green canvas duffle bags with Lehman ribbon
- 353 green compact golf umbrellas
- 75 Waterford Marquis Treviso crystal clocks
- 682 white Lehman coffee mugs
- 130 Swiss Army pens
- English beechwood-lined sterling silver box from 1902
- 200 Lehman conference pens
- 12 pairs of Links of London cufflinks
- 24 Screwpull wine openers inscribed "LB"
- 24 Titleist PRO VI golf balls inscribed "LB"
- 30 girl Teddy Bears
- 18 large, ivory womens' F&G stretch snap shirts
- 1 Tiffany shooting star
In limited quantities, the items probably have marginal value as collectibles on eBay -- Enron memorabilia is still regularly available on eBay, generally at prices very comparable to what the same item would cost without the logo. But given the large quantities, the merchandise would probably have to be sold at a discount to its replacement value.
I say we offer this pile of crap to AIG executives in lieu of cash bonuses.
Posted Feb 24th 2009 1:30PM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: Private equity
It's a massive undertaking – that is, the liquidation of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Over a hundred years, the company has assembled a wide assortment of global assets and investments. Although, as the firm tries to unload these – in a harsh environment – there are likely to be some lucky buyers.
And, according to a piece in the Wall Street Journal (subscription only), it looks like Lehman is in the process of spinning off its VC arm, which has about $750 million in assets.
Continue reading Lehman to dump VC arm
Posted Jan 19th 2009 4:30PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Economic data, Politics, Housing

Like all good marriages, the union of Barack Obama and the American people will start tomorrow with the best of intentions. The problem is that it won't last, particularly when it comes to the economy.
The president-elect already is at odds with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over whether to repeal the Bush tax cuts before they expire in 2010, according to the
Wall Street Journal. The economic stimulus package is expected to top
$850 billion as part of Obama's pledge to create jobs and reducing taxes. Meanwhile, the housing market continues to stink and the stock market continues to be dreadful.
Improving the economy is going to be a long, painful process. Think turning around a super-tanker and you get the idea. Good news is going to be hard to come by over the next 12 months. Bad news will be plentiful. Here are some predictions of the troubles that lie ahead for the economy no matter despite Obama's best intentions.
- Corporate bankruptcies -- Experts are predicting one of the biggest waves of corporate bankruptcies and restructurings in years. Already, Circuit City Stores Inc. (OTC: CCTYQ) has bitten the dust and the year is just getting started. Loads of retailers who are already operating on the razor's edge of profitability may be pushed over the edge. I doubt that enough credit will be unlocked by government fiat to address this problem.
Continue reading My predictions for Obama's first year
Posted Dec 15th 2008 3:53PM by Bruce Watson (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, , Financial Crisis
At their base level, Ponzi schemes are incredibly simple: the schemer promises a consistent, impressive return on an investment, which he funds by soliciting new investors and using their money to pay off earlier investors. If the schemer can successfully project an air of reliability, he can often convince his investors to keep their principal in the fund, which means that he only has to pay dividends, improving his profit margin and extending the longevity of his scam.
Any intelligent person recognizes that a Ponzi scheme is, essentially, suicidal. Even in a consistently strong market, there will come a day when people will withdraw from the fund, investigators will shut it down, or the financial house of cards will fall apart. The best that a Ponzi schemer can hope for is that he will die before he is caught or will somehow be able to pull out all funds and make a run for it. In the case of Bernard Madoff, it's pretty clear that he was counting on the former. While this didn't work out, one could make a strong argument that Madoff's life currently isn't worth a plugged nickel: even if he somehow survives the next few months without suffering a massive coronary, chances are that a former investor or fellow inmate (or both!) will soon introduce him to the business end of a shank.
Continue reading Madoff, Lehman, and suicidal stupidity
Posted Dec 1st 2008 6:00PM by Bruce Watson (RSS feed)
Filed under: Columns, Recession, Financial Crisis

I still remember when I realized that a real estate crisis was on its way. My wife and I were contemplating buying a home in Roanoke, Virginia, and began talking to a mortgage broker. When we saw the final offer, we realized that, if the real estate market continued on a stable path, and if the (then marginal) neighborhood continued to have a declining crime rate, and if the price of gas didn't go up, and if neither my wife nor I became seriously ill, then we would be great. In five years, when the rate went variable, we would refinance and everything would work out beautifully.
That was in 2004.
Thinking about it, my wife and I soon realized that those were a lot of ifs; while we wanted the house, we knew that we couldn't base our financial future on a deck of cards. After turning down the offer, I thought more and more about it and began to get worried. If a lot of people were buying into the kind of mortgage that my wife and I had declined, and if they had similar expectations about refinancing when their rates went variable, then it seemed likely that the mortgage industry was sitting on a major time bomb.
Continue reading Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis
Posted Nov 18th 2008 12:12PM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Politics
Thanks to what former Enron CEO, Jeff Skilling, called bad "optics", some top Wall Street executives announced that they're foregoing their normal seven figure bonuses. But I think I am being generous in estimating that those potentially symbolic gestures will only shave a few billion off the Wall Street bonus pool for 2008. We could still be paying $20 billion in bonuses this year.
How so? After buying $159 billion worth of preferred stock in 24 banks, I have not seen any evidence that the Treasury required the banks to lend it out. There is nothing stopping the banks from using the money for paying bonuses. And while the original estimate of 2008 bonuses was down 20% from 2007 -- to $26.6 billion -- I am thinking that eliminating executive bonuses could lead to at least a $6 billion lower figure -- particularly if this cut provides bank CEOs leverage to reduce the amount of bonuses paid to lower level people.
So far, top executives from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), UBS AG (NYSE: UBS), Deutsche Bank, and Barclays have said they will skip their bonuses for 2008. Ironically, the ethically challenged UBS has the most interesting idea -- starting in 2009, it will be able to claw back bonuses in the years after their award with a third paid immediately, while the remainder will be put into a participant's account and can be reduced if there is a loss at the division or the whole bank. I started proposing an escrow account along these lines in October 2007.
Continue reading Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses?
Posted Oct 29th 2008 4:00PM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS)
In light of the failures like Lehman Brothers, the talk is that the investment-banking model is essentially broken. As a result, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) are now crusty-old bank holding companies.
But, there are still some investment banks left -- such as Lazard Ltd. (NYSE: LAZ). For the most part, the firm has weathered the financial storm pretty well. However, Q3 was still rough for Lazard; there was a net loss of $77 million or $1.17 per share (which compares to a profit of $40.3 million or $0.73 per share in the same period last year). Yes, you can blame the market instability as well as some purchases of the asset management business. Keep in mind that Lazard was a prime broker with Lehman.
For the most part, Lazard remains focused on advisory services, especially in M&A. And, the firm keeps snagging marquee deals, like the transactions for Gaz de France and Fortis NV. Unfortunately, with the credit crunch, it's becoming extremely difficult to finance acquisitions. It looks like Lazard may show continued weakness for awhile.
Although, one bright spot is M&A in the financial services industry. With the injection of billions in federal investments, it looks like we will see a pick-up in dealmaking in the sector.
Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook
and The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market
. He is also the founder of BizEquity, a valuation website.
Posted Oct 22nd 2008 9:39AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Financial Crisis
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) -- those fiendishly complex securities that slice bonds into different groups based on risk -- are a $1.3 trillion pile of toxic waste likely to be written down 90% from financial institutions' (FIs) books. That's a shame because so far FIs have written off $660 billion worth of subprime mortgages and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and that total is expected to top $2 trillion before it's all over. That is way more than the $340 billion in capital that resides on FIs books.
Since there is very little information about CDOs available, it is difficult to both put a value on them and to know how bad the damage is. One firm estimates that $254 billion of CDOs tied to subprime mortgages have defaulted. But corporate CDOs are privately traded, so the damage from writing down this toxic waste is difficult to quantify. These corporate CDOs were called synthetic -- they consisted of bundles of Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) on corporate bonds.
The $54 trillion CDS market -- famously deregulated by John McCain's chief economic advisor Phil "Americans are Whiners" Gramm -- is now causing shudders for owners of synthetic CDOs since they are tied to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers along with Iceland's biggest banks. Fitch downgraded 422 classes of CDOs on October 13 after seven financial companies defaulted or were bailed out since September. And Barclays estimates that 70% of synthetic CDOs were tied to Lehman Brothers.
Continue reading With CDOs slashed 90% will toxic waste's toll top $2 trillion?
Posted Oct 15th 2008 10:20AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Financial Crisis
The financial crisis is not over. If things were back to normal, banks would be lending to each other and to businesses and individuals. But measures of bank lending risk suggest fear is 12 times as high as it would be in normal times. The reason? Banks know more than you do about what's wrong. And they're not talking about it because they don't want you to withdraw your deposits and sell your stock. What they know is that on October 21st, some of the biggest players on Wall Street could be required to come up with $400 billion that some may not be able to pay.
Last month, the White House decided that we could afford to let Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy. That proved to be an enormous mistake. It triggered a run on money market funds because one of the oldest such funds, Reserve Primary, broke the buck since it held Lehman Brothers paper. The U.S. responded with a $50 billion guarantee of money market funds. But the biggest consequence of that mistake is in the $54.6 trillion market for Credit Default Swaps (CDSs).
A CDS is like selling insurance on your car to hundreds of people who don't own it -- yet if your car goes up in flames each of those people collects the full value of your car. More specifically, CDSs are insurance against a bond or loan default. Why are CDSs so dangerous? Three reasons: a CDS seller does not need to put any capital aside to cover losses if the security defaults, the buyer doesn't need to own the asset it wants to protect, and there is no central place where information about all these CDS deals is collected and updated.
Continue reading Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?
Posted Oct 7th 2008 1:25PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Employees, Scandals, Barclays plc ADS (BCS), , Financial Crisis

Much as I find it hard to muster sympathy for thousands of overpaid investment bankers forced to walk to the unemployment office in their designer shoes, the news that
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE:
LEMQ) won't be paying them severance made me feel a little sorry for them.
According to
Bloomberg News, the New York-based firm recently notified employees that they will not receive a payment on October 3 or after. The company reneged on a promise to the fired workers to pay them severance until August 2009. Workers who want the rest of their compensation will have to file a claim with the bankruptcy court. It will take years for the former employees to get paid through Chapter 11 and even then they might only get a fraction of what they are owed.
Bloomberg reports that it is not clear how many former Lehman employees have been affected. You can bet that members of Congress and the Department of Justice will be interested to know if Chief Executive Richard Fuld will receive a golden parachute once
Barclay's PLC (NYSE:
BCS) completes its takeover of the once-storied New York investment bank.
Continue reading Lehman screws workers out of severance payments
Posted Sep 24th 2008 1:15PM by Sheldon Liber (RSS feed)
Filed under: Other issues, Rumors, Rants and raves, Scandals, Money and Finance Today, Politics, Headline news, , Federal Reserve, Recession
How many billions are Paulson and Bernanke asking for? Seven hundred billion dollars. Now that's real money! And the administration is touting this new program as if they knew what they were talking about.
We have heard folks wondering how and why Treasury Secretary Paulson should be given the power and discretion to do as he sees fit with this bailout money.
We have heard people speaking about the pain and the injustice, along with the doubts and reservations about the concept of giving away so much money.
Actually giving this handout to companies that have demonstrated such corrupt thinking and irresponsibility (see SEC opens the gates and the world drowns) is a supreme injustice given that their decisions led to the collapse of once-mighty financial industry titans. See Lehman Bros 158-year sad ending for just one example.
Has anyone asked how the Treasury came up with that number? Can someone explain the difference between $700 billion and a blank check?
Continue reading $700 billion is real money!
Next Page >