<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" />The following story is overflowing with irony. The reason is partly because of one man's lack of irony: Hugh "Skip" McGee, the former head of investment banking at Lehman Brothers, sent a five-page screed to the board of trustees at his son's private Texas high school after a teacher referred to bankers as "sleazeballs". <em>DealBreaker</em> has <a href="http://dealbreaker.com/images/thumbs/Skip%20McGee%20Letter.pdf">published the letter in its entirety</a>. If you have a lot of time on your hands, read and look for Skip's complaints about the lack of cross-dressing at the pep rally, among other things.<br />
<br />
His demands? The teacher, the upper school principal, and the headmaster should all resign over the injustice. That's right: a former executive at Lehman Bros. is demanding accountability.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/">Former Lehman Executive Calls for Ouster of High School Teacher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19339250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/former-lehman-executive-calls-for-ouster-of-high-school-teacher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hugh McGee</category><category>HughMcgee</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" />Late Tuesday -- on the one-year anniversary of its bankruptcy filing -- Lehman Brothers accused <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">Barclays Capital</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) of taking <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/lehman-wants-82b-back-from-barclays/671863">$8.2 billion more than it should have</a> when it purchased some of its key assets a year ago. Less than a week after Lehman filed for bankruptcy, the court approved of the sale to Barclays. Now Lehman is asking a judge to force Barclays to return some of the money taken as part of the deal,  including $5 billion it says was given as extra collateral, which was not disclosed to the court.<br /><br />Interesting timing and an interesting claim, don't you think? The timing is interesting because it is a year after the bankruptcy filing, which sounds like  more than just a coincidence. But what is truly interesting is the fact that Lehman is trying to get quite a bit of money back by making a claim that <strong>was not disclosed to the court</strong>. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/">Lehman Brothers wants money back from Barclays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19163246/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/lehman-brothers-wants-money-back-from-barclays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barclays</category><category>bcs</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial meltdown</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>FinancialMeltdown</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>money grabbing</category><category>MoneyGrabbing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worse after Lehman? Are you kidding me? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rf/" rel="tag">Regions Financial (RF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10597712/1/fannie-freddie-fates-still-up-in-the-air-one-year-later.html?puc=aoljjc">Fannie, Freddie Fates Still Up in the Air </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10597908/1/obama-presses-reform-on-wary-wall-street.html?puc=aoljjc">Obama Presses Reform on Wary Wall Street </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says everyone in the trenches knows we're better off now -- only the academics disagree. </span><br /><br />   Am I nuts, or am I missing something? One year after the financial system was brought to its knees, we are back in the mid-9000s and we have taken off the table massive bank risk and are well on our way to recovery.  <br /><br />  I keep listening to people like Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz say the banking system is worse off now and I say to myself, "That's just stupid and wrong and anti-empirical and actually just silly." Anyone who knows what's really going on has to feel this way. And where was Stiglitz when some of us were running around trying to save things? <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worse after Lehman? Are you kidding me? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Worse after Lehman? Are you kidding me? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19160409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-worse-after-lehman-are-you-kidding-me/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cors</category><category>featured</category><category>fitb</category><category>fre</category><category>hban</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>zion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lehman corpse squabbles over pens and golf balls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comic-relief/" rel="tag">Comic Relief</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/lehman_logo.jpg" />O, how the mighty have fallen.<br /><br />A year ago, Lehman Bros. was one of the top investment banks in the country, near the head of the list of dream companies among graduates from the best business schools, paying out billions in bonuses and sending employees on lavish vacations.<br /><br />Now Lehman has been reduced to litigating over the knickknacks it used to give away at conferences. Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aqjUaiC4.BJQ&amp;refer=news">reports that </a>"Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has negotiated the return of thousands of Lehman-logoed knickknacks that were mistakenly transferred to Barclays Plc through the sale of the bankrupt securities firm's brokerage unit. Tote bags, umbrellas, stress balls, Tiffany paperweights and other items now stored in closets and warehouses from New York to Chicago will be returned to Lehman and sold to pay creditors, according to a court filing on March 19."<br /><br />Items currently being stored include:<br />
<ul>
    <li>1,630 green canvas duffle bags with Lehman ribbon </li>
    <li>353 green compact golf umbrellas </li>
    <li>75 Waterford Marquis Treviso crystal clocks </li>
    <li>682 white Lehman coffee mugs </li>
    <li>130 Swiss Army pens </li>
    <li>English beechwood-lined sterling silver box from 1902 </li>
    <li>200 Lehman conference pens </li>
    <li>12 pairs of Links of London cufflinks </li>
    <li>24 Screwpull wine openers inscribed "LB" </li>
    <li>24 Titleist PRO VI golf balls inscribed "LB" </li>
    <li>30 girl Teddy Bears </li>
    <li>18 large, ivory womens' F&amp;G stretch snap shirts </li>
    <li>1 Tiffany shooting star <br /></li>
</ul>
In limited quantities, the items probably have marginal value as collectibles on eBay -- Enron memorabilia is still regularly available on eBay, generally at prices very comparable to what the same item would cost without the logo. But given the large quantities, the merchandise would probably have to be sold at a discount to its replacement value.<br /><br />I say we offer this pile of crap to AIG executives in lieu of cash bonuses.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/">Lehman corpse squabbles over pens and golf balls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aqjUaiC4.BJQ&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1494804/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/lehman-corpse-squabbles-over-pens-and-golf-balls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lehman to dump VC arm]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/leh.jpg" alt="" />It's a massive undertaking - that is, the liquidation of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Over a hundred years, the company has assembled a wide assortment of global assets and investments. Although, as the firm tries to unload these - in a harsh environment - there are likely to be some lucky buyers.<br /><br />And, according to a piece in the <a href="http://www.wsj.com/"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription only), it looks like Lehman is in the process of spinning off its VC arm, which has about $750 million in assets. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lehman to dump VC arm</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/">Lehman to dump VC arm</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/lehman-to-dump-vc-arm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>liquidation</category><category>Venture Capital</category><category>VentureCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/madoffpicture.jpg" />Leave it to <a href="http://money.aol.com/madoff">some aspiring comedian</a> to come up with the <a href="http://www.bernard-madoff-scam.blogspot.com/">"official" blog of accused fraudster Bernard Madoff</a>.<br /><br />That's right someone writing under the pen name "Not the Devil" offers readers Madoff's "opinions" on the a variety of issues and Wall Street personalities. The results can be amusing, particularly if you did not lose money in Madoff's immense Ponzi scheme.<br /><br />The blog takes aim at the media's fascination with Madoff. "To whoever it was that managed to get yourself a bi-line in today's Sunday business section: You need to get more credible people to comment; a former FBI agent portrays me as a 'psychopath," the fake Madoff argues.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/">Bernard Madoff finally speaks his mind -- sort of</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bernard-madoff-scam.blogspot.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441167/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/bernard-madoff-finally-speaks-his-mind-sort-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernard Madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>john thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>madoff</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>PonziScheme</category><category>richard fuld</category><category>richard nixon</category><category>RichardFuld</category><category>RichardNixon</category><category>rod blagojevich</category><category>RodBlagojevich</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[My predictions for Obama's first year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/theobamas.jpg" />Like all good marriages, the union of Barack Obama and the American people will start tomorrow with the best of intentions. The problem is that it won't last, particularly when it comes to the economy.<br /><br />The president-elect already is at odds with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over whether to repeal the Bush tax cuts before they expire in 2010, according to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123229863849393891.html">Wall Street Journal</a></em>. The economic stimulus package is expected to top <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-14-stimulus_N.htm">$850 billion</a> as part of Obama's pledge to create jobs and reducing taxes. Meanwhile, the housing market continues to stink and the stock market continues to be dreadful. <br /><br />Improving the economy is going to be a long, painful process. Think turning around a super-tanker and you get the idea. Good news is going to be hard to come by over the next 12 months. Bad news will be plentiful. Here are some predictions of the troubles that lie ahead for the economy no matter despite Obama's best intentions.<br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc04/idUSTRE50B6FI20090113">Corporate bankruptcies</a> -- Experts are predicting<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc04/idUSTRE50B6FI20090113"> </a>one of the biggest waves of corporate bankruptcies and restructurings in years. Already, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/who-on-earth-would-want-to-buy-circuit-city/">Circuit City Stores Inc.</a> (OTC: CCTYQ) has bitten the dust and the year is just getting started. Loads of retailers who are already operating on the razor's edge of profitability may be pushed over the edge. I doubt that enough credit will be unlocked by government fiat to address this problem.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>My predictions for Obama's first year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/">My predictions for Obama's first year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aiMJvmhZY.7g&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1434182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/my-predictions-for-obamas-first-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>banks</category><category>CCTYQ</category><category>Circuit CIty</category><category>CircuitCity</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>Larry Summers</category><category>LarrySummers</category><category>Lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>Nancy PElosi</category><category>NancyPelosi</category><category>trade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Madoff, Lehman, and suicidal stupidity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>At their base level, Ponzi schemes are incredibly simple: the schemer promises a consistent, impressive return on an investment, which he funds by soliciting new investors and using their money to pay off earlier investors. If the schemer can successfully project an air of reliability, he can often convince his investors to keep their principal in the fund, which means that he only has to pay dividends, improving his profit margin and extending the longevity of his scam.<br /><br />Any intelligent person recognizes that a Ponzi scheme is, essentially, suicidal. Even in a consistently strong market, there will come a day when people will withdraw from the fund, investigators will shut it down, or the financial house of cards will fall apart. The best that a Ponzi schemer can hope for is that he will die before he is caught or will somehow be able to pull out all funds and make a run for it. In the case of Bernard Madoff, it's pretty clear that he was counting on the former. While this didn't work out, one could make a strong argument that Madoff's life currently isn't worth a plugged nickel: even if he somehow survives the next few months without suffering a massive coronary, chances are that a former investor or fellow inmate (or both!) will soon introduce him to the business end of a shank.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Madoff, Lehman, and suicidal stupidity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/">Madoff, Lehman, and suicidal stupidity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1400808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/madoff-lehman-and-suicidal-stupidity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernard madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>john thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>madoff</category><category>mark dreier</category><category>MarkDreier</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>PonziScheme</category><category>richard fuld</category><category>RichardFuld</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />I still remember when I realized that a real estate crisis was on its way. My wife and I were contemplating buying a home in Roanoke, Virginia, and began talking to a mortgage broker. When we saw the final offer, we realized that, if the real estate market continued on a stable path, and if the (then marginal) neighborhood continued to have a declining crime rate, and if the price of gas didn't go up, and if neither my wife nor I became seriously ill, then we would be great. In five years, when the rate went variable, we would refinance and everything would work out beautifully.<br /><br />That was in 2004.<br /><br />Thinking about it, my wife and I soon realized that those were a lot of ifs; while we wanted the house, we knew that we couldn't base our financial future on a deck of cards. After turning down the offer, I thought more and more about it and began to get worried. If a lot of people were buying into the kind of mortgage that my wife and I had declined, and if they had similar expectations about refinancing when their rates went variable, then it seemed likely that the mortgage industry was sitting on a major time bomb. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/">Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://executivesuite.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/the-worst-is-yet-to-come-anonymous-banker-weighs-in-on-the-coming-credit-card-debacle/?em>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1387822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/waiting-for-the-other-shoe-to-drop-the-looming-credit-crisis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>Credit cards</category><category>CreditCards</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/wallstreetgraphic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Thanks to what former Enron CEO, Jeff Skilling, called bad <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0DE6D6163CF934A35751C0A9649C8B63">"optics",</a> some top Wall Street executives announced that they're foregoing their normal seven figure bonuses. But I think I am being generous in estimating that those potentially symbolic gestures will only shave a few billion off the Wall Street bonus pool for 2008. We could still be paying $20 billion in bonuses this year.</p>
<p>How so? After buying <a href="http://Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.">$159 billion worth of preferred stock in 24 banks</a>, I have not seen any evidence that the Treasury required the banks to lend it out. There is nothing stopping the banks from using the money for paying bonuses. And while the original estimate of 2008 bonuses was down 20% from 2007 -- to <a href="http://Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.">$26.6 billion</a> -- I am thinking that eliminating executive bonuses could lead to at least a $6 billion lower figure -- particularly if this cut provides bank CEOs leverage to reduce the amount of bonuses paid to lower level people.</p>
<p>So far, top executives from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">Goldman Sachs</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">GS</font></strong></a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>UBS AG</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys"><font color="#0072bc">UBS</font></a>), Deutsche Bank, and Barclays have said they will <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;sid=aHyb3RyvQaUE&amp;refer=europe">skip their bonuses for 2008</a>. Ironically, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/using-our-money-to-bail-out-ubs-bad-idea/">ethically challenged</a> UBS has the most interesting idea -- starting in 2009, it will be able to claw back bonuses in the years after their award with a third paid immediately, while the remainder will be put into a participant's account and can be reduced if there is a loss at the division or the whole bank. I started proposing an escrow account along these lines in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/paulson-and-bernanke-subprime-is-not-contained/">October 2007</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/">Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/will-our-tax-dollars-pay-20-billion-in-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barclays</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>deutsche bank</category><category>DeutscheBank</category><category>enron</category><category>featured</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>UBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lazard trips up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/laz.jpg" alt="" />In light of the failures like Lehman Brothers, the talk is that the investment-banking model is essentially broken. As a result, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) are now crusty-old bank holding companies.</p>
<p>But, there are still some investment banks left -- such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys">Lazard Ltd.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys">LAZ</a>). For the most part, the firm has weathered the financial storm pretty well. However, Q3 was still <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aJle.DWOZcxA&amp;refer=home">rough</a> for Lazard; there was a net loss of $77 million or $1.17 per share (which compares to a profit of $40.3 million or $0.73 per share in the same period last year). Yes, you can blame the market instability as well as some purchases of the asset management business. Keep in mind that Lazard was a prime broker with Lehman. </p>
<p>For the most part, Lazard remains focused on advisory services, especially in M&amp;A. And, the firm keeps snagging marquee deals, like the transactions for Gaz de France and Fortis NV. Unfortunately, with the credit crunch, it's becoming extremely difficult to finance acquisitions. It looks like Lazard may show continued weakness for awhile.</p>
<p>Although, one bright spot is M&amp;A in the financial services industry. With the injection of billions in federal investments, it looks like we will see a pick-up in dealmaking in the sector.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli">Tom Taulli</a> is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0071393943?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0071393943">The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0071393943" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He is also the founder of <a href="http://www.bizequity.com">BizEquity</a></em>, <em>a valuation website.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/">Lazard trips up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1356601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/lazard-trips-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gaz de france</category><category>GazDeFrance</category><category>Lazard</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>ma</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With CDOs slashed 90% will toxic waste's toll top $2 trillion?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/wallstreets.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) -- those fiendishly complex securities that slice bonds into different groups based on risk -- are a $1.3 trillion pile of toxic waste <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;refer=home&amp;sid=a5x0jMKZf4yc">likely to be written down 90%</a> from financial institutions' (FIs) books. That's a shame because so far FIs have written off $660 billion worth of subprime mortgages and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and that total is expected to top $2 trillion before it's all over. That is way more than the $340 billion in capital that resides on FIs books.</p>
<p>Since there is very little information about CDOs available, it is difficult to both put a value on them and to know how bad the damage is. One firm estimates that $254 billion of CDOs tied to subprime mortgages have defaulted. But corporate CDOs are privately traded, so the damage from writing down this toxic waste is difficult to quantify. These corporate CDOs were called synthetic -- they consisted of bundles of Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) on corporate bonds. </p>
<p>The $54 trillion CDS market -- famously deregulated by John McCain's chief economic advisor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/15/100-year-crash-mccain-advisor-spurred-62-trillion-derivatives/">Phil "Americans are Whiners" Gramm</a> -- is now causing shudders for owners of synthetic CDOs since they are tied to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers along with Iceland's biggest banks. Fitch downgraded 422 classes of CDOs on October 13 after seven financial companies defaulted or were bailed out since September. And Barclays estimates that 70% of synthetic CDOs were tied to Lehman Brothers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>With CDOs slashed 90% will toxic waste's toll top $2 trillion?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/">With CDOs slashed 90% will toxic waste's toll top $2 trillion?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1349465/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/with-cdos-slashed-90-will-toxic-wastes-toll-top-2-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAnks</category><category>CDOs</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>Lehman BRothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/wallstreetbankers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The financial crisis is not over. If things were back to normal, banks would be lending to each other and to businesses and individuals. But measures of bank lending risk suggest fear is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/government-actions-to-improve-credit-markets-could-weaken-dollar/">12 times</a> as high as it would be in normal times. The reason? Banks know more than you do about what's wrong. And they're not talking about it because they don't want you to withdraw your deposits and sell your stock. What they know is that on October 21st, some of the biggest players on Wall Street could be required to come up with <strong><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/99619-lehman-s-cds-mess-who-s-on-the-hook">$400 billion</a> that some may not be able to pay</strong>.</p>
<p>Last month, the White House decided that we could afford to let Lehman Brothers file for bankruptcy. That proved to be an enormous mistake. It triggered a run on money market funds because one of the oldest such funds, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-moneyfund17-2008sep17,0,3171047.story">Reserve Primary</a>, broke the buck since it held Lehman Brothers paper. The U.S. responded with a <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/hp1147.htm">$50 billion</a> guarantee of money market funds. But the biggest consequence of that mistake is in the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a966RcwJ.aik&amp;refer=home">$54.6 trillion</a> market for Credit Default Swaps (CDSs).</p>
<p><strong>A CDS is like selling insurance on your car to hundreds of people who don't own it -- yet if your car goes up in flames each of those people collects the full value of your car. </strong>More specifically, CDSs are insurance against a bond or loan default. Why are CDSs so dangerous? Three reasons: a CDS seller does not need to put any capital aside to cover losses if the security defaults, the buyer doesn't need to own the asset it wants to protect, and there is no central place where information about all these CDS deals is collected and updated.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/">Will Lehman bankruptcy drop a $400 billion shoe on October 21st?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/will-lehman-bankruptcy-drop-400-billion-shoe-on-october-21st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc.</category><category>CitigroupInc.</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>CreditDefaultSwaps</category><category>featured</category><category>john mccain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>phil gramm</category><category>PhilGramm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lehman screws workers out of severance payments]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/lehmanlogo.jpg" alt="" />Much as I find it hard to muster sympathy for thousands of overpaid investment bankers forced to walk to the unemployment office in their designer shoes, the news that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">LEMQ</a>) won't be paying them severance made me feel a little sorry for them.<br /><br />According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=arKer97AQU8E&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg </a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=arKer97AQU8E&amp;refer=home">News</a>, the New York-based firm recently notified employees that they will not receive a payment on October 3 or after. The company reneged on a promise to the fired workers to pay them severance until August 2009. Workers who want the rest of their compensation will have to file a claim with the bankruptcy court. It will take years for the former employees to get paid through Chapter 11 and even then they might only get a fraction of what they are owed.<br /><br />Bloomberg reports that it is not clear how many former Lehman employees have been affected. You can bet that members of Congress and the Department of Justice will be interested to know if Chief Executive Richard Fuld will receive a golden parachute once <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">Barclay's</a> PLC (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) completes its takeover of the once-storied New York investment bank.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lehman screws workers out of severance payments</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/">Lehman screws workers out of severance payments</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=arKer97AQU8E&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1335281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/lehman-screws-workers-out-of-severance-payments/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAR</category><category>featured</category><category>Henry Waxman</category><category>HenryWaxman</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>Richard Fuld</category><category>RichardFuld</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial foundation crumbles: First banks, now insurance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" />The banking system has been crumbling for over a year, but last month's collapse of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>American International Group</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>AIG</strong></a>) -- which prompted an $85 billion government takeover -- suggests that insurance is not immune from the problems. As a reminder, AIG got snared in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/85-billion-in-taxpayer-money-to-bailout-aig-thank-you-phil-gr/print/">$62 trillion Credit Default Swap (CDS)</a> market whose growth was spurred by McCain advisor, Phil "Americans are Whiners" Gramm. </p>
<p>And as insurance crumbles, banks keep suffering. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/national-city-corporation/ncc/nys">National City Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/national-city-corporation/ncc/nys">NCC</a>) are both hurting. How much?</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Bank of America's</strong> <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/oct2008/pi2008106_846441_page_4.htm">earnings plunged 68%</a> to $1.18 billion, or $0.15/share -- missing by 60% analysts' forecast of 62 cents. Bank of America will raise capital by selling $10 billion of common stock and slashing its dividend in half from 64 cents to 32 cents. One analyst <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-bank-of-america/rfid146568843">cut the bank's 2009 earnings estimate</a> to $2.50 per share from $3 per share -- this is well below the $3.12 per share from a Thomson Reuters analyst poll -- and lowered his price target by $2 to $26. </li>
    <li>
    <p><strong>National City Corp. and its National City Bank </strong>both suffered debt downgrades from Fitch. For instance, Fitch slashed the bank subsidiary's long and short-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) to A- from A. And it lowered the bank and holding company's Individual rating to C from B. </p>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial foundation crumbles: First banks, now insurance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/">Financial foundation crumbles: First banks, now insurance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/oct2008/pi2008106_846441_page_4.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1335030/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/financial-foundation-crumbles-first-banks-now-insurance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>allianz</category><category>allianzinsurance</category><category>american international</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternational</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>fannie mac</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>fannie maefreddie mac</category><category>FannieMac</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>FannieMaefreddieMac</category><category>featured</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>hartfordfinancial</category><category>hig</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>national city</category><category>national city bank</category><category>national city corporation</category><category>NationalCity</category><category>NationalCityBank</category><category>NationalCityCorporation</category><category>ncc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$700 billion is real money! ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" alt="" />How many billions are Paulson and Bernanke asking for? Seven hundred billion dollars. <span style="font-style: italic;">N</span><em>ow that's real money!</em> And the administration is touting this new program as if they knew what they were talking about.</p>
<p>We have heard folks wondering how and why Treasury Secretary Paulson should be given the power and discretion to do as he sees fit with this bailout money.</p>
<p>We have heard people speaking about the pain and the injustice, along with the doubts and reservations about the concept of giving away so much money. <br /></p>
<p>Actually giving this handout to companies that have demonstrated such corrupt thinking and irresponsibility (see <a title="View SEC opens the gates and the world drowns on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/sec-opens-the-gates-and-the-world-drowns/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">SEC opens the gates and the world drowns)</font></a> is a supreme injustice given that their decisions led to the collapse of once-mighty financial industry titans. See <a title="View Lehman Bros 158-year sad ending on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/23/lehman-bros-158-year-sad-ending/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Lehman Bros 158-year sad ending</font></a> for just one example.</p>
<p>Has anyone asked how the Treasury came up with that number? Can someone explain the difference between $700 billion and <em>a blank check?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$700 billion is real money! </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/">$700 billion is real money! </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323031/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/the-truth-700-billion-is-real-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bankers</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>Dirksen</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Federal Spending</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>LEHMQ</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Financial devastation? Still up but less]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gkk/" rel="tag">Gramercy Capital (GKK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ewbc/" rel="tag">East West Bancorp (EWBC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="" />Almost two months have passed since I posted <a title="View Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/serious-money-tempting-fate-with-10-financials/" target="_blank">Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials</a> - the results of buying into the following pool of financial stocks at a time when the "hate 'em" factor was at a peak, or so I thought. Now things are even worse, much worse, and a new market bottom was reached only last week.</p>
<p>Trying to predict where this market will go is not possible, but there are many ways to play it. I chose to buy into a pool of financial stocks, believing the survivors would post gains that would overshadow the losers.</p>
<p>When I last updated this story, the pool of stocks was up 26%. Things have gotten worse, but the group is still up 13.89% plus the dividends. This is better than any of the indices, although it is much more speculative.</p>
<p>There was plenty of big news since the last report. While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">Lehman Brothers Holdings</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">LEHMQ</a>) went bankrupt, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) made up for it by more than doubling. Meanwhile, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) is in survival mode supported by a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) buyout offer. Seven stocks are up, two are down and one is gone (returns from July 29 prices):</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Financial devastation? Still up but less</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/">Chasing Value: Financial devastation? Still up but less</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1316539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/chasing-value-financial-devastation-still-up-but-less/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>C</category><category>chasing value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>citigroup</category><category>ETFC</category><category>etrade</category><category>EWBC</category><category>GKK</category><category>LEH</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>MBI</category><category>mbia inc</category><category>MbiaInc</category><category>MER</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>NCT</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>wachovia</category><category>WaMu</category><category>WB</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here we go again: Is the Federal Reserve solvent?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ben-bernanke.jpg" alt="" />The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/18fed.html?ref=business">New York Times</a></em> reports that the Federal Reserve has less reserves. Specifically, a year ago it had $800 billion in reserves and that number is down 63% to $300 billion. The other $500 billion is "encumbered" -- that's a nice way of saying that instead of being invested in "safe" Treasury bills, the Fed owns the assets of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong><font color="#888888">American International Group</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><font color="#888888">AIG</font></a>), $29 billion worth of grubby former Bear Stearns collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and the like through a little something it calls "Maiden Lane LLC", and tens of billions worth of the same from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys?"><font color="#0072bc">LEH</font></a>) and other banks.</p>
<p>I raised the question of Fed solvency in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/">July</a>. Whether it was solvent then, it is less so now. But is there a limit to how much money the Fed can create to fund itself? With demand for Treasury Bills skyrocketing (albeit at interest rock bottom interest rates of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN1735472520080917">0.14% for the 1-month bill</a>), it looks like now would be a great time for the Fed to replenish its coffers by issuing a trillion dollars worth to shore up its balance sheet. If it can indeed do that, the downside is that these low rates will pay it very little income. </p>
<p>And assuming that the Fed does not want to be in the business of owning half a trillion worth of encumbered assets, it will eventually need to get rid of them. And in so doing, it could find itself in competition with the ever- dwindling portion of the investment banking and insurance industry which the government does not own. How so? Because the Fed will be competing to get the best price for the assets it is trying to sell. </p>
<p>Will it use its power to put those publicly traded companies in a pickle? Or will it forgo the advantage to the taxpayer so its competitors can profit? Beats me.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the cohan="" letter=""></the></em></a><em>. He owns AIG shares and has no financial interest in the other securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/">Here we go again: Is the Federal Reserve solvent?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/18fed.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1317627/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/here-we-go-again-is-the-federal-reserve-solvent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>ben bernancke</category><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernancke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>federal reserve board</category><category>FederalReserveBoard</category><category>inthenews</category><category>leh</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: I'm waiting for the other shoes to drop ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says all that can really help us now is time. </span><br />  <br />Yeah, I trust it. Sure.  <br /><br />  That's what everyone is saying today. They see the futures and they are now conditioned to "fade" it, to go against it and just be glad to get minuscule higher prices than you could get yesterday.  <br /><br />  I am no different. Last year when the Fed started injecting funds like crazy with the rest of the world, we had a real lift.  <br /><br />  But there is so little confidence now that we can't possibly be comforted this time around. <br /><br />  The fright of yesterday, where people trusted only T-bills because anyone who had money with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=LEH" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) international or owned their debt was just killed -- thanks to Dick Fuld for not taking that Korean bid -- won't go away in one day.  <br /><br />  The notion of opportunity, of actually buying something and watching it go up, seemed to vanish. I don't think the SEC's decision to enforce an old law will cut it, and I am now repulsed by the chorus calling for the uptick rule -- even though that's my position -- because they all sound like sore losers. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: I'm waiting for the other shoes to drop </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: I'm waiting for the other shoes to drop </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1317658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/18/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-im-waiting-for-the-other-shoes-to-dro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cds</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>leh</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/evergreen-solar-eslr.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/evergreen-solar-inc/eslr/nas">Evergreen Solar, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/evergreen-solar-inc/eslr/nas">ESLR</a>) plunged to an all-time low of $3.30 on Tuesday, thanks to the widespread ripple effect caused by Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy filing. As Evergreen confessed to a potentially substantial <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx?c=bytefeed&amp;byteID=87764&amp;single=true">Lehman-related loss</a>, analysts rushed yesterday to hand out price-target cuts. Today, Citigroup bucked the trend by upgrading ESLR from "sell" to "hold."</p>
<p>The bullish note seems primarily based on increased transparency regarding the Lehman situation, as well as a sharp decline in the stock's valuation. In a <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Citi+Upgrades+Evergreen+Solar+%28ESLR%29+to+Hold/3996052.html">note to clients</a>, Citigroup clarified, "With ESLR more clearly defining its exposure to a Lehman Bros. bankruptcy, the worst-case scenario is now well-defined . . . these issues appear much better discounted at current levels."</p>
<p>In response to the upgrade, ESLR has added more than 13% today. The shares are trading around the $5 mark, though, which puts them in territory not previously explored since May 2005. The stock's year-to-date loss now totals 75% -- a stomach-churning plunge, for sure, but the stubbornly bullish sentiment among investors suggests that more downside may be in store for Evergreen Solar.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/">Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1316561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>ESLR</category><category>evergreen solar</category><category>EvergreenSolar</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
