<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: A Wishy-Washy Trading Day (AAPL, YHOO, GILD, CYBS, V, VITC, GS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" alt="" />With yet another day of little economic news, strong Apple earnings could not drive the market in any single direction throughout the trading day. International news took a backseat to US earnings reports and to intra-day headlines. Whether these markets were going to close in the red or black was not clear until today's final minutes of trading. <br />
<br />
Here were the unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 11,124.85 +7.79 (0.07%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,205.88 -1.29 (-0.11%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,504.61 +4.30 (0.17%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/04/21/top-10-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-aapl-csiq-cien-schw-exc-gg-gild-rig-vmw-vitc/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: A Wishy-Washy Trading Day (AAPL, YHOO, GILD, CYBS, V, VITC, GS)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/">Closing Bell: A Wishy-Washy Trading Day (AAPL, YHOO, GILD, CYBS, V, VITC, GS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19449098/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/21/closing-bell-wishy-washy-trading-aapl-yhoo-gild-cybs-v-vi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cybersource</category><category>gilead sciences</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>vitacost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs sued over expected bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />The Security Police and Fire Professionals of America Retirement Fund has filed a lawsuit with the New York Supreme Court, naming Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gs/nas">GS</a>), CEO Lloyd Blankfein, and the company's board of directors as defendants. <br /><br />The company's crime? Planning to pay $22 billion in bonuses "for corporate performance that has absolutely nothing to do with the skill of the company's employees." Goldman spokesman Lucas van Praag <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34426576">told Reuters</a> that the lawsuit is without merit.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs sued over expected bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/">Goldman Sachs sued over expected bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19282479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/goldman-sachs-sued-over-expected-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>lucas van praag</category><category>LucasVanPraag</category><category>retirement funds</category><category>RetirementFunds</category><category>shareholders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein pulls a Jeff Skilling in an interview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" alt="" />Goldman Sachs's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) normally reclusive CEO and noted theologian Lloyd Blankfein has been conducting an unprecedented number of interviewers of late to try to bolster the company's image.<br /><br />Maybe they'd be better off if he crawled back into his shell.<br /><br />In an interview with <em><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6907681.ece">London's Sunday Times</a></em>, Mr. Blankfein explained that Goldman Sachs is "doing God's work."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein pulls a Jeff Skilling in an interview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/">Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein pulls a Jeff Skilling in an interview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6907681.ece>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-lloyd-blankfein-pulls-a-jeff-skilling-in-an-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why does Geithner always take calls from the big three bankers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" />Who does our Treasury Secretary speak to most of the time? Yup. You guessed it. It's the big three bankers.
<p>Who are they? First, we have Lloyd Blankenstein, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). Then we have Jamie Dimon, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Company</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and then CEO, Vikam Pandt of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>).</p>
<p>You are probably also wondering how do we know this? The Associated Press did <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9B6TLJO1.htm">a review of Geithner's calendar</a> under the Freedom of Information Act.</p>
<p>In his first seven months on the job, Geithner made at least 80 contacts with the "big three." Not only that Geithner jumps to the phone when they call. They are the dominant players on Wall Street who can move markets and even economies.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why does Geithner always take calls from the big three bankers?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/">Why does Geithner always take calls from the big three bankers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9B6TLJO1.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19188926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/08/why-does-geithner-always-take-calls-from-the-big-three-bankers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>geithner</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jamie Dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>jpm</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs CEO blasts excessive compensation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/blankfein.jpg" width="220" height="296" alt="" />In the wake of widespread populist outcry over his company's ability to profiteer off of government bailout money, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) CEO Lloyd Blankfein is joining the chorus of people lashing out over excessive bonuses.<br /><br />The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Speaking at a banking conference in Frankfurt, Blankfein said that guaranteed multi-year contracts for bankers should be banned. <br /><br />"Compensation continues to generate controversy and anger," Blankfein said, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=akr.TIKN_vOE">according to Bloomberg</a>. "And, in many respects, much of it is understandable and appropriate. There is little justification for the payment of outsized discretionary compensation when a financial institution lost money for the year."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs CEO blasts excessive compensation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/">Goldman Sachs CEO blasts excessive compensation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=akr.TIKN_vOE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19155239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/goldman-sachs-ceo-blasts-excessive-compensation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman CEO swings for saner pay system -- and misses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/blankfein.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Yesterday, in his speech to the Council on Institutional Investors, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Goldman Sachs</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GS</font></a>) CEO Lloyd Blankfein spoke about Wall Street pay. As a fellow who made <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/business/08goldman.html?ref=business">$43 million in 2008</a> -- to be fair, Goldman actually made a $2.3 billion profit in 2008 -- Blankfein obviously knows a thing or two about the Wall Street pay envelope. </p>
<p>And he gets points for trying to balance Goldman's interests with those of the public -- but he still missed the mark. I think Wall Street needs its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/why-bankers-pay-needs-to-change/">pay in escrow</a> -- if its deals pay off after three years, bankers get the escrow cash; if not, that escrow pays the deals' investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman CEO swings for saner pay system -- and misses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/">Goldman CEO swings for saner pay system -- and misses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1511385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/goldman-ceos-swings-for-saner-pay-system-and-misses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo pay</category><category>CeoPay</category><category>featured</category><category>gs</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Masters of the universe take a pay cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg"  alt="" />An era of greed that began with the election of Ronald Reagan has come to an abrupt end. That means that the seething emotions of greed and envy that come along with bonus time at investment banks will have fewer dollars attached to them. And talent will flow to government and academia rather than Wall Street. This could be good for the U.S.</p>
<p>Some of those masters of the universe in the investment banking industry have seen the value of their stock tumble (and many of them are going without bonuses this year). Here are some of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/business/27sorkin.html?ref=business">"casualties":</a></p>
<ul />
    <p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Masters of the universe take a pay cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/">Masters of the universe take a pay cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/masters-of-the-universe-take-a-pay-cut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>b</category><category>BAC</category><category>bailout</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>GS</category><category>john thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[As the sordid tale of Bernard Madoff continues to unspool, it has become increasingly clear that somebody -- in fact, a lot of somebodies -- were asleep at the switch. Beyond the standard warning <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/secs_madoff_probe_how_much_bla.php">signs</a>, like Madoff's incredible secrecy, his surprisingly consistent rate of return, and the clubby nature of his selling staff, there were far more obvious portents. For example, Madoff's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123005903944830699.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">chief compliance officer</a> was his brother Peter, and one of the compliance attorneys was his niece. For that matter, the fact that Harry Markopolos, a Boston accountant, has been <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/madoff-was-wall-streets-regulator-asleep-at-the-wheel-1202338.html">urging</a> the SEC to investigate Madoff for the last nine years should have been a hint. The same, of course, goes for the 2006 SEC investigation that found violations, but didn't feel obliged to take any substantive action.<br /><br />As the SEC attempts to assign blame in finest Three Stooges form, it's worth noting that this is hardly the first time that a lack of serious governmental regulation has reared its ugly head this year. At the moment, mobs are currently clamoring for Dick Fuld's head, with a healthy side order of Hank Greenberg, John Thain, John Mack, Lloyd Blankfein, Jimmy Cain, and pretty much everyone who works in New York's financial district. The general perspective seems to be that these men engaged in business practices that ran the gamut from risky to actionable and now should be forced to pay for the economy that they have ruined.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/">Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/madoff-airlines-wall-street-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-regulat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernard Madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>Dick Fuld</category><category>DickFuld</category><category>Hank Greenberg</category><category>HankGreenberg</category><category>Harry Markopolos</category><category>HarryMarkopolos</category><category>Jet Blue</category><category>JetBlue</category><category>Jimmy Cain</category><category>JimmyCain</category><category>John Mack</category><category>John Thain</category><category>JohnMack</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>madoff</category><category>New York magazine</category><category>NewYorkMagazine</category><category>Peter Madoff</category><category>PeterMadoff</category><category>Tarmac Task Force</category><category>TarmacTaskForce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Defiance from Goldman Sachs (GS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p>Even with its stock off by an enormous amount, it is business as usual at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>). Its CEO sees no reason to change course even with its new status as a commercial bank. Perhaps, all the money from Warren Buffett and the Treasury have made it feel secure even in these dangerous markets. Rumors that it would have to raise more money have pressured the stock in recent days.</p>
<p>Goldman Chief Executive Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein was almost defiant in a presentation yesterday. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122644127834618607.html">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, </em>he said <em> "</em>We're going to consider everything," but won't be provoked into "doing something rash" that the company will spend years reversing,"</p>
<p>Taken at face value, the comments could call a bottom to the financial crisis among the more healthy firms in the financial sector. The weak sisters in the industry may not be saved, but, with federal money moving into the market and hope that plans by the government may make housing prices more stable, Goldman and strong banks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) may be in a position as dominant and relatively healthy companies to expand their franchises as competitors simply hope to survive.</p>
<p>Of course, if the recession gets substantially worse and lasts well over a year, optimistic predictions won't be worth a dime.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">24/7 Wall St.</a> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/">Defiance from Goldman Sachs (GS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122644127834618607.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1369464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/defiance-from-goldman-sachs-gs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman's 10% layoffs reflect debt's dangers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/gs-goldman-sachs-logo.jpg" /><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">The Goldman Sachs Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) plans to can <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a2aYoY4B6EU0&amp;refer=us">10%</a> of its 32,500 person staff. Despite its glorious reputation, Goldman is not that different from other financial institutions (FIs). It earned high returns by borrowing too much and now that over-borrowing is causing a painful implosion. As I pointed out last night at <a href="http://www.whartonboston.com/article.html?aid=330">The Wharton Club of Boston</a>, the current debt-led bubble has cost $37 trillion so far -- six times more than the equity-led dot-com bubble.</p>
<p>The cost of debt is clear from a quick examination of Goldman's financial statements under current CEO Lloyd Blankfein. When he took over from current Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Goldman's ratio of assets to shareholder equity was 18.7 but by the end of 2007, the ratio peaked at <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aA_lSAQLywYs&amp;refer=home">26.2</a> as assets more than doubled to $1.1 trillion and its return on equity (ROE) climbed to 32%. </p>
<p>Much of the increase in Goldman's ROE was due to debt. In particular, 65% of the increase in Goldman's ROE from 2003 to 2006 was a result of its industry-leading use of borrowed money to increase its assets. While high leverage amplifies returns when asset values climb, it causes even more offsetting pain when asset values decline. For example, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/17/will-our-125-billion-bank-capital-injection-pay-bankers-2008-b/">$305 billion</a> in profits earned by the top nine investment banks over the last three years has been wiped out by $323 billion in write-downs in the last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman's 10% layoffs reflect debt's dangers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/">Goldman's 10% layoffs reflect debt's dangers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a2aYoY4B6EU0&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1350692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/goldmans-10-layoffs-reflect-debts-dangers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GS</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs employees blocked from Facebook, Dealbreaker]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is cracking down on how its employees can waste their time while they are at work.<br /><br />According to <a href="http://dealbreaker.com/2008/08/earlier_goldman_sachs_silences.php">Dealbreaker</a>, the top investment bank has blocked Facebook and prohibits workers from posting comments on the snarky Web site. The incident is so noteworthy that the gossip blog has a flashing siren graphic above its post on the topic.<br /><br />"I'm sure the lot of you are going to argue that the vast majority of financial firms have long blocked access to the social networking site, but Goldman's supposed to be <em>above</em> such pedestrian measures," the blog says, adding that Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein used to not care about such things as "as long as you're kicking ass (by lying about level three assets)."<br /><br />Fair enough but times are tough on Wall Street. Investment bankers are scrambling to hold onto their jobs as the credit crunch shows no signs of easing. Nannies who used to care for the children of Wall Streeters are finding t<a href="http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/49292/">hemselves unemployed.</a> I am sure the strippers at New York's "gentlemen's clubs" are hurting too.<br /><br />Even Goldman, the best run of any Wall Street bank, is not immune. Its shares are down more than 25 percent this year. Maybe Blankfein needs to remind Goldman's employees that they should be grateful to have jobs at a time when banks are laying off tens of thousands. They are plenty of eager people who could live without recreational Internet surfing who would love to take their place.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/">Goldman Sachs employees blocked from Facebook, Dealbreaker</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dealbreaker.com/2008/08/earlier_goldman_sachs_silences.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1292518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/goldman-sachs-employees-blocked-from-facebook-dealbreaker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dealbreaker</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banks</category><category>InvestmentBanks</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Lazard's Bruce Wasserstein one of Wall Street's biggest losers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><p>Bruce Wasserstein's <em><a href="http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/43343/">New York Magazine</a></em> published a list of Wall Street titans who have seen their personal net worth decline in the last year. One name was conspicuously absent from that list: Bruce Wasserstein, who would rank second on the list of biggest losers if he not decided to exclude himself from his own publication. This type of omission has a proud history, as I have never seen Steve Forbes's name on his magazine's rich list.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, here are the top three biggest losers when Wasserstein's name is added accompanied by the amount they have lost:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">The Bear Stearns Companies</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) former CEO James Cayne saw his net worth plummet <strong>$467 million</strong> </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lazard Ltd.'s</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LAZ</a>) CEO Bruce Wasserstein's net worth has fallen <strong>fallen $260 million.</strong> (This is calculated by multiplying Wasserstein's 11,394,504 shares by Lazard's stock tumble -- from its May 2007 high of $56.90 to January 24, 2008's $34.09)<strong>; </strong>and </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">The Goldman Sachs Group's</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GS</a>) CEO Lloyd Blankfein has <strong>suffered a $100 million decline</strong>. </li>
</ul>
<p>It's nice to own the means of production over at <em>New York</em> <em>Magazine</em> -- and that ownership clearly influences what it chooses not to publish.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/">Is Lazard's Bruce Wasserstein one of Wall Street's biggest losers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1104097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/is-lazards-bruce-wasserstein-one-of-wall-streets-biggest-loser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>Bruce Wasserstein</category><category>BruceWasserstein</category><category>BSC</category><category>GOldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James Cayne</category><category>JamesCayne</category><category>LAZ</category><category>Lazard</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>New York Magazine</category><category>NewYorkMagazine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs posts solid results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gs-goldman-sachs-logo.jpg" alt="" />Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS)</a> today <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/18/news/companies/goldman_sachs/index.htm?source=aol_quote">posted solid fourth quarter results</a> which were particularly impressive given the turmoil on Wall Street.<br /><br />Profit after paying preferred dividends was $3.17 billion, or $7.01 per share, compared with $3.10 billion, or $6.59 per share in the year-ago period. Revenue rose 14% to $10.74 billion. Wall Street analysts were expecting profit of $6.87 per share on revenue of $10.16 billion, according to Thomson Financial.<br /><br />Investment Banking net revenue rose 47% to $1.97 billion, while Trading and Investments jumped 4% to $6.93 billion and Asset Management and Security Services increased 29% to $1.84 billion.<br /> <br /> In the <a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our_firm/investor_relations/financial_reports/docs/earnings/4Q07_Earnings_Release_-_EXTERNAL_No_password.pdf">press release</a>, Chief Executive Lloyd Blankfein said the New York-based investment bank continues to "see significant growth opportunities across the global economy." <br /><br />Ralph Cole of Ferguson Wellman Inc., a Goldman shareholder, summed up the situation well to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=acR3sDqJvfbM&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a>:<br />"They continued to perform as every one of their competitors had troubles..They've been able to establish that they're the best investment bank out there.''<br /><br />Goldman seems to be profiting at the expense of its rivals. As Bloomberg notes, analysts expect<a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"> Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns Cos</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) to both report their first ever quarterly loss because of bad bets on mortgage securities.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/">Goldman Sachs posts solid results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/18/news/companies/goldman_sachs/index.htm?source=aol_quote>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1065641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/goldman-sachs-posts-solid-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bsc</category><category>earnings</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>ms</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182007/business/poll__jobs_is_tops_in_ceo_world_80788.htm">New York Post</a></em> reports on <em>Corporate Leader</em> magazine's poll of the top CEOs based on a survey of analysts and investors. Here's my assessment of the top five:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Steve Jobs</strong>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"> AAPL</a>). With its stock up 94.4% in the last year -- though 13% below its 52-week high -- Apple's new products this year have been outstanding. But it's a pretty pricey stock; it trades at a Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 1.56 on a P/E ratio of 42.3 and Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth of 27.2% to $6.26 in fiscal 2009. </li>
    <li><strong>Eric Schmidt</strong>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc. </a></strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>). With its stock up 27.8% in the last year -- though 15% below its 52-week high -- Google continues to take share from traditional advertisers while struggling somewhat to profit from all its innovations. But it's a somewhat pricey stock; it trades at a PEG ratio of 1.39 on a P/E ratio of 49.6 and EPS growth of 35.8% to $18.19 in 2008. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/">Top five CEOs: Jobs (Apple), Schmidt (Google), Blankfein (Goldman), McNerney (Boeing), and Smith (FedEx)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/top-five-ceos-jobs-apple-schmidt-google-blankfein-goldma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>BA</category><category>Boeing Inc.</category><category>BoeingInc.</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>FDX</category><category>FedEx</category><category>Frederick Smith</category><category>FrederickSmith</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James McNerney</category><category>JamesMcnerney</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>The New York Post</category><category>TheNewYorkPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Goldman's risk managers mined mortgage gold]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nfi/" rel="tag">NovaStar Financial (NFI)</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/business/19goldman.html?ref=business">New York Times</a></em> provides some useful clues on how <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) was able to profit while its peers took enormous write-downs on holdings of Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS). Its culture encourages a healthy paranoia, which gives unusual power and pay to Goldman's risk managers -- and a willingness to act in conflict with clients' interests if it helps Goldman make more money.</p>
<p>The critical moment came late last year -- coincidentally around the time of my <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novastar-financial-inc/nfi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NovaStar Financial</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novastar-financial-inc/nfi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NFI</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/18/short-stories-profiting-from-the-subprime-mortgage-bust/">short call</a> -- when Goldman's CFO called a "mortgage risk" meeting which concluded that Goldman should reduce its MBS holdings and buy expensive insurance as protection against further losses. Despite this strategy shift, Goldman continued to package risky mortgages to sell to investors. Many of these clients took losses while Goldman made money. (I think if it was truly concerned about its clients' well-being, it would have warned them of the dangers it saw.)</p>
<p>Goldman has a relatively flat management hierarchy which allows people closest to the markets to get their views heard. And one of the keys to adapting to risk at Goldman is the unusual power and pay of its risk managers. Its controller's office, the group responsible for valuing Goldman's huge positions, has 1,100 people, including 20 PhDs. If there is a dispute, the controller is always deemed right unless the trading desk can make a convincing case for an alternate valuation. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How Goldman's risk managers mined mortgage gold</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/">How Goldman's risk managers mined mortgage gold</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/business/19goldman.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/how-goldmans-risk-managers-mined-mortgage-gold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gs</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>nfi</category><category>riisk management</category><category>RiiskManagement</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[File under pathetic: Goldman CEO apologizes for sell rating]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>I've heard about analysts having conflicts of interest, but this one takes the cake. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) CEO Lloyd Blankfein actually <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3dYqaSFo2mc&amp;refer=home">called</a> VTB Group CEO Andrei Kostin to apologize for an analyst's sell rating on the company's stock. Why would he do that? <em>Bloomberg</em> sums it up:</p>
<p><em>The situation highlights the tension U.S. investment banks face wooing clients in developing markets while complying with regulations at home that compel them to publish independent research. Goldman, which lags behind competitors in Russia, is adding 25 bankers in Moscow this year to tap what it considers the country's ``huge potential.''</em> </p>
<p>Goldman worked on the bank's May IPO. While it's tempting to decry this as a sign of a lack of analyst independence, I think it's actually the opposite: This has all been done out in the open, and the analyst's report on the company was allowed to be published. That's a far cry from what might have happened a few years ago.</p>
<p>So while Blankfein's pandering is pathetic, we can take some encouragement from the fact that report is still available.</p>
<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Read about the exit of Goldman Sachs' star <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/goldman-sachs-gs-and-the-fed-how-peer-pressure-moves-markets/">Mark McGoldrick</a></strong></li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/">File under pathetic: Goldman CEO apologizes for sell rating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3dYqaSFo2mc&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/965392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/file-under-pathetic-goldman-ceo-apologizes-for-sell-rating/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>VTB</category><category>VTB Group</category><category>VtbGroup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs CEO jumps behind Clinton]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>A top-tier investment bank like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) might seem like it would logically be a supporter of the traditionally more pro-business GOP. But the company's CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, is casting his lot behind Senator Hillary Clinton. According to a PR put out by her campaign, Blankfein said that "As a New Yorker, I have seen firsthand the outstanding work Hillary Clinton has done as a senator, proving herself to be a strong and experienced leader." </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MS</a>) CEO John Mack, a formerly vocal supporter of the current President's candidacy, is also supporting Ms. Clinton. So what gives?</p>
<p>While it would be cynical to assume that these men cast their votes solely based on the interests of their employers, that could be one factor. The Democrats have been, by and large, vocal supporters of leveling the tax playing field between large private equity firms and the investment banks with which they compete. Having a firm like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Blackstone</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BX</a>) paying less in taxes puts Mack and Blankfein at a competitive disadvantage: If two firms are bidding for a deal and one has to pay twice as much in taxes, guess who's going to be able to bid the most on the deal? As a Senator from New York, Clinton is the logical choice for these executives.</p>
<p>Of course John Edwards was quick to attack Clinton for being supported by an investment bank. Wait, didn't he work for a hedge fund and receive compensation in the high six-figures? Oh yeah, he did that to learn about poverty. In a related story, Barry Bonds claims he used steroids to learn about how hard it is to compete as a drug-free athlete.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/">Goldman Sachs CEO jumps behind Clinton</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/another-wall-st-chief-aligns-with-clinton/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/962295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/goldman-sachs-ceo-jumps-behind-clinton/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>politics</category><category>President</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blackstone's billionaire baldie battles for booty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p>Wow! That was my initial reaction when I read the <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aj4pYLxJPSjg&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a></em> story about the pay accruing to <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/the-blackstone-group/">Blackstone Group's</a> top executives. And yet, compared to hedge funds, these guys are lightweights. When you look at their photos, though, you can only come to one conclusion -- it pays to be bald!</p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/steve-schwarzman.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Blackstone Group LP co-founders Stephen Schwarzman and Peter G. Peterson will get $2.33 billion and keep 28% of the company after its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/blackstone-ipo-looking-for-the-greater-fool/">planned initial public offering</a>. That was interesting but what really got my attention is their pay -- Schwarzman made $398.3 million last year and will own Blackstone shares worth $7.7 billion while Peterson took in $212.9 million in 2006 and will own $1.31 billion worth of stock after the deal is done.</p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/lloyd-105.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />This seems like a nice payday but it depends on whose you compare it to. Schwarzman's pay is about <strong>7.4 times</strong> that of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) CEO Lloyd Blankfein -- who made only $54 million in 2006 and <strong>6,638 times</strong> that of the average U.S. family which pulled in $60,000 last year.</p>
<p><img style="WIDTH: 178px; HEIGHT: 114px" height="150" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/james-simons.jpg" width="235" align="right" vspace="4" />Yet Schwarzman's $398 million is <strong>less than a quarter</strong> of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/24/leading-hedge-fund-manager-makes-28-333-times-the-median-family/">$1.7 billion</a> that top hedge fund manager, James Simons, pulled in last year. Do you feel sorry for Schwarzman now?</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Goldman Sachs.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/">Blackstone's billionaire baldie battles for booty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aj4pYLxJPSjg&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/915311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/blackstones-billionaire-baldie-battles-for-booty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blackstone group</category><category>BlackstoneGroup</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>gs</category><category>ipo</category><category>James Simons</category><category>JamesSimons</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Steve Schwarzman</category><category>SteveSchwarzman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The 2007 WSJ Deals and Deal Makers Conference: What's going to go on in there?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a></p><p>It's not news that on June 27, 2007, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> shall be host to some of the world's most powerful and influential business and financial professionals at their first annual Deals &amp; Deal Makers Conference to be held at The New York Stock Exchange. With speakers including the likes of Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gs/nys">GS</a>), Steven A. Schwarzman of The Blackstone Group, and Carl Icahn of Icahn Associates, there shall be a tremendous concentration of economic high fliers playing poker, chewing on buffalo wings and tossing back mugs of light beer.</p>
<p>All kidding aside though, this conference represents an extremely noteworthy gathering of power brokers. I'd give one year's wages to get a transcript of their full discussions. The event is by invitation only and you can see by this <a href="http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news_releases.mhtml?ref=rss&amp;d=117000">Primewire news announcement</a> that it is extremely exclusive. They're not letting just any old straw boss in there and I assume that reporters won't be allowed near the place. I also assume that the event shall be a resounding success but shall any of us regular folks even know that?</p>
<p>Will they discuss the price of oil and how that is affecting their operations around the globe? Will they discuss the many ethical disruptions and legal misdeeds among the members of their peer group and what they can do to reduce that? Will they formulate a plan to persuade Hugo Chavez to disappear into the Venezuelan rain forest? Will they decide who's to be the next American president or will they just pity the one we have?</p>
<p>I probably won't hear one peep about what those fine people truly discuss and probably neither shall you. It is for certain though that we all shall be affected by those discussions. They're not calling it a deal makers conference for nothing you know. The question for me is what deals will they be making and just how much will we all be affected by them?</p>
<p>By the way, you can request an <a href="http://www.conferenceguru.com/index.html">invitation to the conference via this link.</a> Good luck!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/">The 2007 WSJ Deals and Deal Makers Conference: What's going to go on in there?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/904829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/the-2007-wsj-deals-and-deal-makers-conference-whats-going-to-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BlackstoneGroup</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Deal Makers Conference</category><category>DealMakersConference</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>Icahn Associates</category><category>IcahnAssociates</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>Primewire</category><category>Steven A. Schwarzman</category><category>StevenA.Schwarzman</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[At Goldman, bald pate == big bucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img width="107" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="149" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/blankfein_gs.03.jpg" alt="" style="width: 107px; height: 149px;" />Wondering how to make the big bucks at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)? Besides hard work, talent, meeting your goals, and organizational savvy, it helps to be bald.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a30_qUD6ANXk&amp;refer=home"><em>Bloomberg</em></a>, GS paid its CEO Lloyd Blankfein $54 million for his work in 2006.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/garycohn.jpg" alt="" /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/winkelried_100x110.jpg" alt="" />It also paid $53 million to both first year co-presidents Gary Cohn (on the right) and John Winkelreid (left).</p>
<p>One of my Wharton classmates is a Goldman Managing Director who also happens to have a shiny pate.</p>
<p>I'm not the first to notice this trend. Fellow BloggingStocks blogger <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/do-goldman-sachs-senior-partners-discriminate-against-candidates/">Rick Rickertsen wrote about the same trend back in October</a>. </p>
<p>Could Goldman face a class action lawsuit from its non-follically DisAbled staffers who aren't cracking through Goldman's gold-plated executive ceiling? I doubt Lloyd Blankfein will be pulling out his hair worrying about it.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm, He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Goldman Sachs.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/">At Goldman, bald pate == big bucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a30_qUD6ANXk&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/837028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/at-goldman-bald-pate-big-bucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>gs</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein, CEO. GS.COM</category><category>LloydBlankfein</category><category>LloydBlankfein,Ceo.Gs.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
