<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix Gains Ground on Cramer Recommendation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Netflix (NFLX) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/netflixlogob.jpg" />Shares of Netflix (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) started Tuesday on a high note, with the shares gaining more than 1% out of the gate. Traders appear to be responding to new comments from Jim Cramer, after the host of CNBC's <em>Mad Money </em><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/40752228">offered an upbeat opinion</a> on the stock Monday.</p>
<p>Specifically, Cramer is enthusiastic about Netflix's push into streaming content, and he has high expectations for future subscriber growth. The analyst also argued that the stock's valuation is actually quite reasonable, when measured against the company's long-term growth rate. For traders looking to take part in continued gains by NFLX, Cramer suggested in-the-money call options.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix Gains Ground on Cramer Recommendation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/">Netflix Gains Ground on Cramer Recommendation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19771851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/netflix-rises-on-cramer-recommendation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calls</category><category>CNBC</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MGM Resorts Catches a Lift from Cramer Endorsement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/mgm-grand.jpg" />Despite a lackluster day for the broader equities market, MGM Resorts International (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mgm-mirage/mgm/nys">MGM</a>) has racked up a healthy gain of about 4% so far. Scanning the headlines, it seems that traders are responding to a bullish endorsement for the gaming guru from CNBC analyst Jim Cramer.<br />
<p class="textBodyBlack">"Las Vegas is coming back," <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/40027819">declared Jim Cramer</a> on Friday's episode of <em>Mad Money</em>. He went on to add, "MGM's the best way to speculate on the turn, especially considering that they helped get Senate majority leader Harry Reid re-elected."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MGM Resorts Catches a Lift from Cramer Endorsement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/">MGM Resorts Catches a Lift from Cramer Endorsement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19707534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/mgm-resorts-catches-a-lift-from-cramer-endorsement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MGM</category><category>MGM Resorts International</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MEMC Electronic Materials Catches a Cramer Lift]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="MEMC (WFR) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/memc-logo-240.jpg" />Shares of MEMC Electronic Materials (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/memc-electronic-materials-inc/wfr/nys">WFR</a>) turned higher right out of the gate Thursday morning, surging roughly 4% with the sound of the opening bell. For the catalyst behind this bullish gap, we need look no further than peripatetic CNBC analyst Jim Cramer.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, the <em>Mad Money</em> host cited MEMC as <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/39537221">his top pick</a> within the solar sector. To back up his bullish opinion, Cramer cited three key factors: the recent $380 million sale of subsidiary SunEdison's Italian property, lowball <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> estimates from analysts, and heavy insider buying by company execs in recent months.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MEMC Electronic Materials Catches a Cramer Lift</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/">MEMC Electronic Materials Catches a Cramer Lift</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19664745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/07/memc-electronic-materials-rises/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MEMC Electronic Materials</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>solar</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>WFR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Cramer Sees a 'Very Negative' Trend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/madmoneywithjimcramerlogo.jpg" alt="" />I didn't find this <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/38816453">recap of Jim Cramer's CNBC show</a> interesting because of his recommendations. I found it interesting because he talks of an overall "bearishness of the market." Cramer noted that this bearishness began in the tech sector, spread to retail, and is now creeping into the food sector.</p>
<p>He notes that it is "remarkable to see how little enthusiasm there is ... even for companies that are doing well." An example of this lack of enthusiasm for good performers is that analysts will cut price targets on a stock, but will raise the company's earnings estimate at the same time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jim Cramer Sees a 'Very Negative' Trend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/">Jim Cramer Sees a 'Very Negative' Trend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19605786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/jim-cramer-sees-a-very-negative-trend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cramer</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>market mood</category><category>market sentiment</category><category>sentiment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's slams Jim Cramer again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><img width="269" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="183" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/mad_money.jpg" alt="" />Back in August of 2007, <em>Barron's</em> Bill Alpert slammed Jim Cramer's stock-picking abilities in a <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118681265755995100.html">cover story </a>(subscription required). At the time, Alpert reported that "Over the past two years, viewers holding Cramer's stocks would be up 12% while the Dow rose 22% and the S&amp;P 500 16%, according to a record of 1,300 of the CNBC star's Buy recommendations compiled by YourMoneyWatch.com, a Website run by a retired stock analyst and loyal Cramer-watcher."<br /><br />Now Alpert is back for more. In the latest issue of Barron's, he <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123397107399659271.html?page=2">writes</a> (subscription required) that "Cramer's recommendations underperform the market by most measures. From May to December of last year, for example, the market lost about 30%. Heeding Cramer's Buys and Sells would have added another five percentage points to that loss, according to our latest tally."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barron's slams Jim Cramer again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/">Barron's slams Jim Cramer again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123397107399659271.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1453576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/barrons-slams-jim-cramer-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barrons</category><category>CNBC</category><category>cramer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good news from emergency gas taxes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yrcw/" rel="tag">YRC Worldwide (YRCW)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />With gasoline prices plummeting, I see that every major state has enacted some form of an emergency gas tax to help fill the diminishing coffers and patch up gaping holes in budgets. It may be one of those rare bits of good news stemming from the radical deflation of commodities. I am surprised that California doesn't have one, and I figure that New Jersey, one of the states with horrible finances (perhaps among the worst, although not rivaling California or Michigan), will put one in place shortly. <br /><br />I think we continually underestimate the impact of still lower gasoline prices on a host of industries. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=F" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) could get a windfall because it still has a big line of heavy duty gas guzzlers that are immensely popular. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) is a hard call because of its ownership structure, although I am sure it will pop with the GMAC deal. I'd sell it. <br /><br />If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys">United Parcel Service </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys">UPS</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=UPS" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) had any traffic, it has a huge fuel surcharge that it can slowly diminish to help the margins<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yrc-worldwide-inc/yrcw/nas">. YRC Worldwide </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yrc-worldwide-inc/yrcw/nas">YRCW</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=YRCW" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) had a great one, but I think that company is now a goner. Obviously, I have already discussed the retail benefit, but it looks like that didn't matter much.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good news from emergency gas taxes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The good news from emergency gas taxes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1411876/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-good-news-from-emergency-gas-taxes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>GM</category><category>GMAC</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>UPS</category><category>YRCW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hedges in the Sand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/jimcramer-profile.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /> </p>
<p><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says that it should have been obvious to many more hedge fund managers that things were going totally awry.</span></p>
<p>Something better go up besides job losses and Treasuries. The central theme of everything post the Lehman Brothers imbroglio is that everything goes down: corporate and municipal debt, M&amp;A, stocks, commodities (particularly oil and copper), industrial production, retail sales, car sales, home sales, you name it. </p>
<p>In that world, no one can make money, except people who are short everything, and, judging from most hedge fund returns, that ain't working either. I mean, where is it written that hedge funds should be taking losses in this environment and gating themselves? I would suspect that cautious or negative hedge funds should be up huge in this environment. That's what they are paid to do. </p>
<p>If they aren't up huge, maybe the managers should come up with another calling. </p>
<p>I look at this because when I examine the newspapers and web sites this morning, I realize that there are instruments to short pretty much everything that's out there, from bank debt and commercial mortgages to residential mortgages and commodities. Yet, day after day, I read about these hedge funds that have to gate people, and I wonder why they all had such a long-side bias.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hedges in the Sand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Hedges in the Sand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-hedges-in-the-sand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cramer</category><category>featured</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: You're nothing if you're not a bank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvs/" rel="tag">Las Vegas Sands (LVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/jimcramer-profile.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><br /><em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says that CIT's approval as a bank holding company means anyone with a lending business can make it</em>.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cit-group-inc-new/cit/nys">CIT Group </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cit-group-inc-new/cit/nys">CIT</a>) made it to the finish line. They became a bank. After a sickening and seemingly endless slide for this lender, to $4 from $30, the whole way down with nothing but rosy projections, the company made it to bank holding company status and now it will be able to survive. Who knows, the company might even thrive, which makes that last stock offering seem pretty delectable. <br /><br />The issue for me now is you are nothing if you are not a bank. You can see the ramifications of making this reckless lender -- it can say otherwise, but aren't we tired of all the say "otherwises" at this point; it's just better to admit it -- a bank. It means that anyone, no matter how profligate, no matter how wasted, can make it, if it has some sort of lending business. <br /><br />I ask, why? What is the government's interest in saving<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"> Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>)? Why bother? Should we look for other companies that lend and give them protection? <br /><br />How about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">Las Vegas Sands</a> (NYSE<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">: LVS</a>) )? When you go there you can borrow money. Prime candidate for it, I believe. <br /><br />I know I was thrilled when all of those life insurers got around the law by buying little banks. That was good judgment in action. <br /><br />The real worry, of course, is that without bank status, like the status of the utilities, how can you finance your way through this period? Can we make troubled retailers banks? If someone has a retail charge card, like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">Macy's </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>) ), isn't that the same as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express </a>(NYSE<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">:AXP</a>). Tons of retailers have charge cards and they are all candidates for bank status as they get in trouble. Neiman Marcus should have bank status.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: You're nothing if you're not a bank</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: You're nothing if you're not a bank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1409741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-youre-nothinig-if-youre-not-a-bank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AXP</category><category>C</category><category>CIT</category><category>Cramer</category><category>featured</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>LVS</category><category>M</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: takeovers will resume as long as banks are serious about lending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fcx/" rel="tag">Freep't McMoRan Copper (FCX)</a></p><br /><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />How will we know when things have thawed? Everyone's looking at LIBOR and I can't blame them as that indicator of lending from one bank to another bank is crucial for the way the system is supposed to work. It's a good thermometer for certain, but I don't want it to overstay its welcome, because there are other "true" indicators out there besides just LIBOR. <br /><br />I am looking at something else: takeovers. On Monday, we saw <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waste-management-inc-de/wmi/nys">Waste Management</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waste-management-inc-de/wmi/nys">WMI</a>) pull its bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/republic-services-inc-cl-a/rsg/nys">Republic Services </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/republic-services-inc-cl-a/rsg/nys">RSG</a>) , a smart idea as WMI had dropped so precipitously despite reporting better-than-expected earnings that one had to question if it was worth doing it. More important, though, getting the money was proving to be possible, but difficult. This situation also prevailed in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys">Altria's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys">MO</a>) buy of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ust-incorporated/ust/nys">UST</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ust-incorporated/ust/nys">UST</a>) where Goldman Sachs said, "Don't bother, wait," even though the integration of the two is crucial for Altria's growth. <br /><br />Now I expect deals to be done if the banks are for real about lending. <br /><br />Further, the endless margin selling has created tremendous bargains for well-capitalized companies to buy other companies that have brimming order books but are being kept down because of hedge fund redemptions. How can some company not want to buy a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trinity-industries-inc/trn/nys">Trinity</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trinity-industries-inc/trn/nys">TRN</a>), for example, which has been virtually cut in half even though both presidential candidates are pro-wind? Or how about a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foster-wheeler-ltd/fwlt/nas">Foster Wheeler</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/foster-wheeler-ltd/fwlt/nas">FWLT</a>) or a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/joy-global-inc/joyg/nas">Joy Global </a>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/joy-global-inc/joyg/nas">JOYG</a>) or a<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/terex-corporation/tex/nys"> Terex</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/terex-corporation/tex/nys">TEX</a>) betting that if there is credit there will eventually be a revival?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: takeovers will resume as long as banks are serious about lending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: takeovers will resume as long as banks are serious about lending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-takeovers-will-resume-as-long-as-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>freeport mcmoran</category><category>FreeportMcmoran</category><category>JIm cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>JOY Global</category><category>JOYG</category><category>JoyGlobal</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>MO</category><category>Trinitiy</category><category>UST</category><category>waste management</category><category>WasteManagement</category><category>WMI</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yale's top investor bashes Jim Cramer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>David Swensen has led Yale's endowment to phenomenal results since taking charge in 1988. According to the <em>New York Times</em>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/business/17swensen.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">his advice for individual investors</a> is simple: "use index funds, exchange-traded funds and other low-cost instruments, and stick to your long-term asset allocation -- even when the markets are in tumult."</p>
<p>What's interesting about the <em>Times</em> interview is that Mr. Swensen decided to use it as an opportunity to take some shots at <em>Mad Money</em> host Jim Cramer: "There is nothing that Cramer says that can help people make intelligent decisions. He takes something that is very serious and turns it into a game. If you want to have fun, go to Disney World."<br /><br />Mr. Swensen sure did manage to come across as an aristocratic snob. But I'm actually inclined to agree with him to a certain extent: I would never follow Cramer's stock picks. I think he gives way, way too many tips. But I do watch <em>Mad Money</em> regularly because Jim Cramer is a really smart guy and has been down in the trenches of money management. Some of his broader ideas are useful, and let's face it: his is one of the few really entertaining shows on CNBC.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/">Yale's top investor bashes Jim Cramer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1117112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/yales-top-investor-bashes-jim-cramer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>David Swensen</category><category>investment advice</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>stock picks</category><category>Swensen</category><category>Yale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Jim Cramer should defend his Mad Money stock picks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><p>On yesterday's <em>Mad Money</em>, Jim Cramer offered his "Mad Money Manual" -- a guide to how to watch the show inspired by the criticism of his stock-picking track record leveled by the press.</p>
<p>The show is actually a recap of an episode from May, but I missed that one so I'll opine on it now. According to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/s/cramers-mad-money-recap-how-to-get-the-most-out-of-the-show/funds/madmoneywrap/10390934.html?puc=_tscs">TheStreet.com's recap</a> of the show:</p>
<p><em>In a given week Cramer said he might recommend a dozen stocks, excluding the ones in the "Lightning Round." But just because Cramer says he likes a stock,</em><em> doesn't mean that viewers should go out and buy it. </em></p>
<p><em>Nor does it mean that if people buy that stock they will absolutely, positively make lots of money, Cramer said. "That's not how this game works."</em></p>
<p>Cramer stresses the importance of doing your own homework, but here's the problem with that advice: Can the Average Joe with a 10-inch TV and Yahoo! Finance really expect to uncover something that hedge fund legend Jim Cramer has missed?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How Jim Cramer should defend his Mad Money stock picks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/">How Jim Cramer should defend his Mad Money stock picks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1046871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/how-jim-cramer-should-defend-his-mad-money-stock-picks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>research</category><category>stock picking</category><category>stock picks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looking at Cramer's favorite green stocks (WFR, CPST, PBW)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p>On last night's MAD MONEY on CNBC, Jim Cramer made a review of "alternative energy stocks" he recommended <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/04/cramers_alterna.html">earlier this year</a> since his coverage of the green-tech picks back in April based upon a Massachusetts <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/04/cramer_clean_po.html">court ruling </a>that was going to be a homerun for the sector. He gave a pretty large list that was in reality just a review of many stocks that benefit either directly or indirectly from "greener" movements. Here is the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/11/cramers-alterna.html">"full list" of his eight stocks</a> he reviewed tonight, and there are several more from call-ins.<br /><br />His Top Pick in the group is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/memc-electronic-materials-inc/wfr/nys">MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/memc-electronic-materials-inc/wfr/nys">WFR</a>) as it has an arms merchant business model for the solar market. It makes wafers for solar panels and is too good to pass up. He said it's cheap and he thinks out of all green stocks that this one is still bargain. <br /><br />You might want to know that MEMC already has a $16 billion market cap, but the forward growth rates in this part of its business are hard to argue against. This movement in "green" strategy has just recently helped the stock get back above levels seen in the late 1990's. Keep in mind that this one also produces wafers for the global semiconductor industry, so it isn't a pure-play in the sector. This one closed up big with the sector today at $74.74, but shares traded up 3% in after-hours after-hours trading to what will be a new high.<br /><br />A couple of 24/7 Wall St. comments in the alternative energy area:<br />
<ul>
    <li>An even more <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/11/lazard-calls-fo.html">interesting analyst call</a> in alternative energy today was where Lazard Capital called <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capstone-turbine-corporation/cpst/nas">Capstone Turbine Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capstone-turbine-corporation/cpst/nas">CPST</a>) as a potential double to $2.50 per share. This one has been around forever and used to be considerably higher.<br /></li>
    <li>If you want a more diversified play, you can always look at the best ETF in the sector: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-wilderhill-clean-energy-portfolio/pbw/ase">PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-wilderhill-clean-energy-portfolio/pbw/ase">PBW</a>). </li>
</ul>
Jon Ogg produces the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html">Special Situation Investing Newsletter</a>; he does not own individual stocks he covers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/">Looking at Cramer's favorite green stocks (WFR, CPST, PBW)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/looking-at-cramers-favorite-green-stock-wfr-cpst-pbw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alternative Energy</category><category>CNBC</category><category>Cramer</category><category>ESLR</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>MEMC</category><category>Solar power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pay attention to Jim Cramer when he talks about small-caps]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p>Two UC Santa Barbara Grad students analyzed Jim Cramer's picks on his show Mad Money and reached an unsurprising conclusion. From the <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/odd-numbers/2007/09/28/how-to-watch-mad-money">Economics Blog</a> on Portfolio.com: "Mid- and large-cap post-pick excess returns are generally of the correct sign, though the magnitude of these returns is relatively small. <strong>Where Cramer displays the most ability is with small-cap stocks, in both his caller and non-caller picks"<br /><br /></strong>This is consistent with the overall trend of money managers being most able to create alpha when investing in small-caps. Given Cramer's limited time for researching any one stock, and the vast quantity of research already done on almost every large-cap, how can anyone expect him to identify ideas that aren't already conventional wisdom and priced into the stock? Markets are just too efficient at that level for superficial analysis to yield much in the way of results.<br /><br />But in small-caps, research is much more likely to yield an edge.<br /><br />Perhaps most interesting, the students found that Cramer's picks generated the most excess returns when he made small-cap sell calls.<br /><br />So perhaps the strategy for people looking to profit from watching <em>Mad Money</em> is to short small-caps where Cramer's pounding the "Don't buy it!" button.<br /><strong></strong><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/">Pay attention to Jim Cramer when he talks about small-caps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/odd-numbers/2007/09/28/how-to-watch-mad-money>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1007478/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/pay-attention-to-jim-cramer-when-he-talks-about-small-caps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>small caps</category><category>SmallCaps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Leave Jim Cramer alone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p><em>Barron's</em> <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118681265755995100.html">cover story</a> on Jim Cramer this week is a perfect August cover: beach reading about whether Cramer is a good stock picker.</p>
<p>Cramer and I went to college together and I was a board member at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>), so I am not unfamiliar with Jim's career.</p>
<p>The <em>Barron's</em> piece starts out by saying the viewer of Cramer's show <em>Mad Money</em> would only have made 12% on Cramer's picks over the last two years. The magazine uses a firm called YourMoneyWatch to determine that. It tracks Cramer's stocks from when he tells viewers to buy them up until he says that they are "sells." In a chart, <em>Barron's</em> shows Cramer's performance against the two year advances of the Dow at 22% and the S&amp;P at 16%.</p>
<p>Cramer has a wide following. His <em>Mad Money</em> show has 138,000 viewing homes according to Nielsen. Several hundred thousand more people read him through products at TheStreet. He is written about in the press several times a month, so Cramer is almost certainly the most widely followed stock guru in the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Leave Jim Cramer alone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/">Leave Jim Cramer alone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968586/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/leave-cramer-alone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron's</category><category>gurus</category><category>investing advice</category><category>InvestingAdvice</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>stock picking</category><category>TheStreet.com</category><category>TSCM</category><category>YourMoneyWatch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Cramer: Too much Lightning Round, not enough sound advice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a></p><p>The <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118681265755995100.html">cover story</a> on this week's <em>Barron's</em> is likely to get attention for a long time, and may even serve to drive down the price of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>), Jim Cramer's company. Journalist Bill Alpert takes a look at the track record for Cramer's picks on his show <em>Mad Money</em>.</p>
<p>According to Alpert, "a comprehensive and careful review of his stock picks by <em>Barron's</em> finds that his picks haven't beaten the market. Over the past two years, viewers holding Cramer's stocks would be up 12% while the Dow rose 22% and the S&amp;P 500 16%, according to a record of 1,300 of the CNBC star's Buy recommendations compiled by YourMoneyWatch.com, a Website run by a retired stock analyst and loyal Cramer-watcher."</p>
<p>I would never dream of buying any stock based on Cramer's recommendation, and here's why: Warren Buffett, one of the greatest investors in the world ever, has often said that he can only find a few good investment ideas per year. All you need is a few in your life to do well. How about Jim Cramer? He gives a few stock picks per show, five days a week, and then gives dozens more buy and sell calls on the <em>Lightning Round</em> each week.</p>
<p>This flies in the face of what most people understand about the markets. We can argue about the extent of their efficiency (Burton Malkiel would argue that nearly every stock is perfectly priced all the time) but the idea that anyone, even a guy who bites heads off of bears, could find so many market inefficiencies each day is absurd. If Cramer can do that, how come almost no one can beat the market? Cramer makes it too easy -- except, according to the <em>Barron's</em> report, he doesn't really. He just pretends to on TV.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jim Cramer: Too much Lightning Round, not enough sound advice</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/">Jim Cramer: Too much Lightning Round, not enough sound advice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968574/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/jim-cramer-too-much-lightning-round-not-enough-sound-advice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Alpert</category><category>Burton Malkiel</category><category>CNBC</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Lightning Round</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>stock picking</category><category>TheStreet</category><category>TheStreet.com</category><category>TSCM</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Chair Cramer's stock pix lag the market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p>"<a href="http://ge.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/">Fed Chair</a>" James Cramer <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a6vM.YOJHOVA">enjoyed taking credit</a> for yesterday's announcement that the Fed had eased its Discount Rate. But today's <em><a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118681265755995100.html?mod=b_hpp_9_0002_b_this_weeks_magazine_home_top">Barron's</a></em> takes him to task for trying to keep <em>Mad Money</em> viewers from measuring the extent to which his stock picks underperform the market indices.</p>
<p>Cramer has accomplished many things. He managed a hedge fund, started <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>) which survived the dot-com bust, he writes columns for <em>New York</em> magazine, and he provides a unique blend of entertainment and stock touting on CNBC. </p>
<p>But <em>Barron's</em> analysis of his stock picks over the last two years suggests that you would have been better off buying a low-cost stock index fund. Barron's cites an analysis by <a href="http://yourmoneywatch.com/">YourMoneyWatch.com</a> that analyzed his stock picks between 7/28/05 and 8/17/07 -- finding that Cramer's picks lagged the general market averages. Specifically, his picks were up 12%, the Dow Jones Industrials Average rose 22%, the S&amp;P 500 gained 16% and the NASDAQ was up 14%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Chair Cramer's stock pix lag the market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/">Fed Chair Cramer's stock pix lag the market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/fed-chair-cramers-stock-pix-lag-the-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>discount rates</category><category>index funds</category><category>James Cramer</category><category>JamesCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>stock picking</category><category>TheStreet.com</category><category>TSCM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Chair James Cramer cuts rates 50 basis points]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/jim_cramer_getty_alexwong_20061129_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Fed Chair James Cramer -- or was that Ben Bernanke? -- announced that the Fed was cutting its discount rate 50 basis points this morning.</p>
<p>If you have not watched James Cramer's tantrum about interest rate cuts, view <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOVXh4xM-Ww">this clip</a>. I heard about this rate cut as I was driving this morning at 8:30 -- NPR reported the Fed had cut the rate by half a percent to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/17/news/economy/fed_rates/index.htm?postversion=2007081708">5.75%</a>. The important thing here is that the Fed cut the <strong><em>Discount Rate</em></strong> -- which is largely symbolic since it is a rate charged only to qualified banks -- not the one that Cramer was ranting about. That rate, the <strong><em>Fed Funds</em></strong> rate -- which affects rates that consumers pay on various types of loans -- remains at 5.25%.</p>
<p>Cramer sounded ecstatic on CNBC this morning. He predicted that today would be the biggest point move in history. Now, he said he "loves" Bernanke. Yesterday's goat is today's hero.</p>
<p>Markets have responded with jubilation this morning. But it remains to be seen how much of that jubilation is traders covering the short positions they put on after watching Asian markets tumble. The bigger issue is that the Fed obviously is scared of something big that we don't know about. It decided that the negatives of the rate cut -- bailing out Wall Street for its risky bets and taking the pressure off persistent inflation -- are dwarfed by something much worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Chair James Cramer cuts rates 50 basis points</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/">Fed Chair James Cramer cuts rates 50 basis points</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/17/news/economy/fed_rates/index.htm?postversion=2007081708>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/967688/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/fed-chair-james-cramer-cuts-rates-50-basis-points/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>banks</category><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>cnbc</category><category>cramer</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer gets defensive with Reynolds American (RAI), Altria (MO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>.Tonight on CNBC's MAD MONEY, Jim Cramer tauted <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys">Reynolds American</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys">RAI</a>) as a high dividend stock with a safe yield that out pays US treasury yields. Even with the 5.5% yield he thinks this dividend is not at risk like some other high yield stocks. He sounded like he even likes it better than <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Altria</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MO</a>) as the smokeless tobacco is doing well.<br /><br />I have noted before about defensive stocks being the way to go and those companies' products are the ones you eat, drink, smoke, and use for critical personal hygiene (toilet paper, tooth paste, deodorant... you get the idea). We noted the sector back on our own list we titled <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/08/defensive-stock.html">"Defensive Stocks For A Crummy Market"</a> recently, although we had others. Defensive investing is what investors will flock to when they have to own stocks but want to be a bit more conservative than chasing the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/06/cramers_new_fou.html">"New Four Horsemen of Tech"</a> or want to go for less aggressive picks than say his <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/01/cramers_top_3x3.html">TOP NINE STOCKS for 2007</a>.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner at 24/7 Wall St. and publisher of <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html">Special Situation Investing Newsletter</a>. He does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/">Cramer gets defensive with Reynolds American (RAI), Altria (MO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/967284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/cramer-gets-defensive-with-reynolds-american-rai-altria-mo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altria</category><category>cnbc</category><category>defensive stocks</category><category>DefensiveStocks</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>mo</category><category>rai</category><category>reynolds american</category><category>ReynoldsAmerican</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer goes for a new technology pick]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p>Tonight on CNBC's MAD MONEY, Jim Cramer said that tech is currently not in the "you gotta sell" boat during a crummy market. He said these are awash in cash and buying back stock left and right, Also, they have no mortgage and CDO exposure. He thinks that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) is the one to own now with August usually the bottom of the chip cycle and heading into the fourth quarter. The stock is down over $2.00 from recent highs, is cheaper than and killing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>), and sells at 21-times next year's earnings with a 12% growth rate that is accelerating. He thinks you should buy it this month.<br /><br />I could argue this either way, but frankly I am not ready to kill the whole market. In a boxing match between Paul Otellini and Hector Ruiz, I'd bet on Otellini any day. If you believe that the PC-cycle is real then this one will work. Frankly, it is still the safer bet in chip and processor land. It is holding up pretty well for a crummy market and I think AMD has gotten itself into a <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/08/weighing-amds-r.html">borrowing pickle</a> that it won't get out of until it can change its entire business model. Intel shares fell 3% with the broad market today to $23.92 and shares are up 0.2% after the Cramer tout here. Oddly enough, Jim Cramer didn't once mention any of his <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/06/cramers_new_fou.html">"New Four Horsemen of Tech"</a> in this. This is one of the "Old Horsemen," but old horses know the tricks that young studs haven't learned yet.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/">Cramer goes for a new technology pick</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/962061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/cramer-goes-for-a-new-technology-pick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>cramer</category><category>intel</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Cramer's meltdown was juvenile]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><div align="left"> Jim Cramer made a complete fool of himself on television yesterday. Erin Burnett of CNBC was trying to have a civil and informative conversation with him when he lost it. She wanted to discuss the already fragile credit markets when Cramer let loose a tirade that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was playing "academic games."<br /><br />
<div>Wake up Cramer. The <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer; height: 1em;" id="lw_1186488690_0">Federal Reserve</span> rarely reacts to a couple of lousy weeks of trading in the markets. The Fed reacts to economic conditions and not volatile market conditions. Cramer shilled for some of his <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer; height: 1em;" id="lw_1186488690_1">Wall Street</span> buddies that are facing tough times. " I speak to them all day" he said. No kidding Jim. I am sure Fed boss Bernanke speaks to a few people too.<br /></div>
<div>I speak to portfolio managers and trading desks all over the world on a daily basis. Yes, those that trade fixed-income paper may have a really crummy year and -- as is the <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer; height: 1em;" id="lw_1186488690_2">Wall Street</span> way -- jobs may be lost. We don't hear Cramer screaming and yelling when <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer; height: 1em;" id="lw_1186488690_3">Wall Street</span> is hiring en masse, just when it lays off people. Traders know how the game works: feast or famine. Traders prefer this, as the feast is quite often seven-figure bonuses. The famines can last a year and then they land with another firm as the feast is perceived to be arriving.<br /><br />Cramer has passion, but in this case it was misguided. He allowed the rants of his trading-desk buddies to get to him. Cramer hurt his supposed objectivity, especially when he threw out the term "Armageddon." The word Armageddon was the trading-desk world mantra this past Thursday and Friday. </div>
<div><br /><em>Georges Yared is the CIO of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.georgesyared.com/"><span id="lw_1186488690_4">Yared Investment Research.</span></a><br /></em></div>
</div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/">Jim Cramer's meltdown was juvenile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/959663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/jim-cramers-meltdown-was-juvenile/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:17:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
