<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: AIG Takeover by Fairholme Capital?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aig-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Perusing through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schedule_13d">13D filings</a> in Barron's November 29 issue I came across news reported by InsiderScore.com regarding American International Group, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>). It was noted that<em> "Fairholme Capital raised its holdings to 39,990,099 shares (29%), by buying 1,765,900 shares from Nov. 5 to Nov. 16 at prices ranging from $41.72 to $43.59."</em><br />
<br />
I do not usually make mention of such things but owning 29% of a company capitalized at $5.6 billion dollars is a lot. I would even go as far as to say that in some circumstances that might equate to controlling interest. Prior to "my pal Warren" (Buffett) making an offer to acquire the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad for Berkshire Hathaway (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) it only owned 23% of the outstanding shares.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: AIG Takeover by Fairholme Capital?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/">Serious Money: AIG Takeover by Fairholme Capital?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19735761/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/30/serious-money-aig-takeover-by-fairholme-capital/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway BRK.A</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Are GameStop's Days Numbered?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gme/" rel="tag">GameStop Corp (GME)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/gamestop-logo-240.jpg" alt="GameStop (GME) logo" />Bookstores disappearing, music stores almost gone, video stores all but done -- and GameStop Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/gamestop-corp-new/gme/nys">GME</a>) is next. Yes, it's days are numbered, we just don't know what that number is yet.</p>
<p>I have been pondering this for a while, off and on, and did a very limited survey of two teenage boys -- mine -- asking them their thoughts about GameStop. The 17-year-old was playing a game on his Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) MacBook Pro at the time. He said he downloads free games or buys them, but all from the Web. He knew he could buy used games inexpensively at GameStop but had never done so and thought this business activity would fade.</p>
<p>The 14-year-old was also on his Mac, using FaceBook and YouTube. He said he had been to GameStop with friends in the past but never bought anything. Both boys use their cell phones to play games in the car.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Are GameStop's Days Numbered?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/">Chasing Value: Are GameStop's Days Numbered?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19653111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/chasing-value-are-gamestops-days-numbered/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Apple</category><category>BBY</category><category>best buy</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>computer games</category><category>eBay</category><category>featured</category><category>gamers</category><category>games</category><category>gamestop</category><category>GME</category><category>ipad</category><category>macbook</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>video games</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 5 -- ROE, ROIC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chl/" rel="tag">China Mobile Limited (CHL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/microsoft-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />The market continues to be very volatile and trending down. When the seas are this turbulent you want to be on the biggest ships and thus I continue my review of the super cap stocks. This time, I'm going to examine return-on-equity (ROE) and return on-invested-capital (ROIC).</p>
<p>I started with the 12 highest valued companies but remained with 10 after running them through several screens. Among those 10 super, caps the company that is producing the highest returns is Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 5 -- ROE, ROIC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/">Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 5 -- ROE, ROIC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 May 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19481686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/24/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-5-roe-roic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>big caps</category><category>China Mobile</category><category>CHL</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>PetroChina</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>PTR</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>stock picks</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WFC</category><category>WMT</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 4 -- the Dividend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chl/" rel="tag">China Mobile Limited (CHL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="China Mobil CHL logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chinamobile-logo.jpg" />It's a clich&eacute; but it rings so true: just show me the money! In the case of stocks that's profits and distributions, or dividends.</p>
<p>The super cap review, in which I examine large cap stocks through different valuation methods, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/serious-money-buying-super-caps/">started with the 12 stocks</a> with the highest capitalization and through several stock screens has been trimmed to just 10 stocks.</p>
<p>It has been widely reported that dividends contribute as much as 40% of the market stock appreciation on long term holdings. All things being equal, a diversified basket of dividend paying stocks should outperform a similarly diversified portfolio that does not.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 4 -- the Dividend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/">Serious Money: Buying the Super Caps, Part 4 -- the Dividend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19481438/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/serious-money-buying-the-super-caps-part-4-the-dividend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ankle</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>China Mobile</category><category>chloe</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>Dividends</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>PetroChina</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ptr-3.1</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WFC</category><category>wmt</category><category>XoMove</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! makes another Twitter move, market yawns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/twitter-logo-200x150.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It really didn't take Yahoo! (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) long to pull the trigger. Only a few weeks ago, the perpetual also-ran in the search engine market announced that, like Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) and Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34370804/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/" target="_blank">it would integrate Twitter data into its search capabilities</a>, part of a race among the three companies toward "real-time search." Unlike its competitors, though, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/yahoo-wants-in-on-twitter-no-money-involved/" target="_blank">Yahoo! didn't shell out a dime for its access</a> to the microblogging service's data, instead using existing developer tools to get what it needs.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/microsoft-wont-chase-google-into-real-time-search/" target="_blank">Microsoft announced that it wasn't in a rush to win in real-time search</a> ... while indicating that it wasn't exactly lagging Google. Both companies have yet to demonstrate a fully integrated <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> capability. While Yahoo! still has a long way to go, its announcement on Thursday suggests that it has an early lead, despite not having licensed any data from Twitter.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! makes another Twitter move, market yawns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/">Yahoo! makes another Twitter move, market yawns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34370804/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19274458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/yahoo-makes-another-twitter-move-market-yawns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microblog</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microblogs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>twitter</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/iaci-iac-interactive-logo.jpg" />Unless you already have a major foothold in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> market - or an amazing, disruptive technology that can make the world take notice - there isn't much point in staying. Competing with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is hard enough, even when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) ... and, apparently, when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IAC/InterActive Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IACI</a>). <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BarryDiller/">Barry Diller</a> is ready to give up Jeeves, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO" target="_blank">but only if asked nicely</a>. </p>
<p>Diller's presence in the search space is <a href="http://www.ask.com" target="_blank">Ask.com</a>, ranked #4 behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a>. With a substantial gap between first and second, fourth barely registers at all. Ask.com has only a 2% U.S. market share, according to Hitwise, more than 60 percentage points behind the industry leader.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/">Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>bing</category><category>diller</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>iacinteractive</category><category>iacinteractivecorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft bing</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftBing</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stars aligned for increase in IT spending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/intel-logo-blue.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Windows7/">Windows 7</a>, the latest operating system from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), is expected to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSDEL44362820091027">help jumpstart some IT spending</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) also sees this happening. A new operating system often means a chance to upgrade from dated equipment that isn't worth upgrading, especially with favorable pricing for technology right now. Everything's coming together for a strong 2010 for the high-tech sector, so it's also worth watching <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett Packard</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a>). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stars aligned for increase in IT spending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/">Stars aligned for increase in IT spending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSDEL44362820091027>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19211391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>hpq</category><category>inc.</category><category>information technology</category><category>information technology stocks</category><category>InformationTechnology</category><category>InformationTechnologyStocks</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>it spending</category><category>ItSpending</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Icahn bails from Yahoo! board of directors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33455101/ns/business-us_business/">Carl Icahn, the famous activist investor, resigned</a> from the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) board of directors Friday.</p>
<p>This comes just over a year after he scored the position, following the seemingly endless talks the company had with <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) over the possibility of a takeover. Icahn told Yahoo that he was resigning effective immediately because Yahoo! didn't need an activist investor on the board at this time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Icahn bails from Yahoo! board of directors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/">Icahn bails from Yahoo! board of directors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19208279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/icahn-bails-from-yahoo-board-of-directors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carl icahn</category><category>carol bartz</category><category>icahn</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>msft-yhoo</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><category>yhoo-msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft unveiling "upgraded" Xbox 360 to appease the Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p>With a decent dose of publicity coming to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) these days from the gaming console universe, the world's largest software company has decided to <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/gaming/56565.html">release an upgrade</a> to its vaunted Xbox 360 gaming platform, probably to slap the face of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Sony</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SNE</a>). Sony's current struggle with the PlayStation 3, no matter how its presented, is most likely causing strain to the company and will continue to do so for at least a few quarters.<br /><br />The new system from Ole' Softie, called the "Xbox 360 Elite," will sell for about $480 and should be in stores by the end of April, according to Microsoft. <a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/gaming/56565.html">What has changed?</a> Well, the largest upgrade will be the hard drive inside the new unit, which will come in at 120GB instead of 20GB from the standard Xbox 360. Some gaming fans were wishing for WiFi wireless connectivity and a newer HD DVD player, but no go this time. Microsoft's not putting this new Xbox 360 Elite feature-for-feature against Sony's PlayStation 3 it seems here -- but is that 100% important? Probably not.<br /><br />More storage for games and faster game access is the priority apparently, which is the direction Microsoft is heading with the new gaming console. Also, with Microsoft under pressure to show a profit from the xbox (and gaming) division, some believe the new "Elite" system is more about appeasing Wall Street than customers. Such is life -- customers get the shaft (but don't they buy the products?) while those market makers get their wishes. In this case, though, ensuring Microsoft does not continue losing money on these consoles is probably a top priority instead of adding top-of-the-line features --- and possibly losing even more money on each system sold.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/">Microsoft unveiling "upgraded" Xbox 360 to appease the Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.technewsworld.com/story/gaming/56565.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/863079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/30/microsoft-unveiling-upgraded-xbox-360-to-appease-the-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>xbox 360 Elite</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Xbox360Elite</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/ngc300.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />We continue to hear about how Google could face stiff competition in the Internet search arena from the likes of a re-energized Yahoo! and Microsoft. Both competitors have been&nbsp;reinventing their search businesses in an attempt to get in on the lucrative paid-search advertising business that Google now essentially owns. </p>
<p>But Google has an advantage: The core competency of the company is search. That is Google's<em> brand identity</em> and therefore, the one core service that customers turn to it for.<br /><br />I mention this because try as it might, Yahoo! won't be able to compete to the point of causing Google lost sleep in the Internet search business -- <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/256748_yahoo24.html">and strangely it has even admitted this</a>. It plans instead to focus&nbsp;on building content relationships with its customers and offering distinguishing services that are compelling. </p>
<p>Microsoft, arguably the toughest competitor in the computing age, also will not be able to take much share away from Google regarding search. It may be able to beef up search relevance under the new Windows Live moniker. But branding is all important&nbsp;in the consumer mind (just ask <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Nike</span> or <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Apple</span> about this). And, try as it might, &nbsp;Microsoft's brand will never stand for search.<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/">Why Microsoft and Yahoo! won't threaten Google's search dominance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4367/53/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/why-microsoft-and-yahoo-wont-threaten-googles-search-dominanc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>MSFT Microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>Windows Live</category><category>WindowsLive</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
