<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mnst/" rel="tag">Monster Worldwide (MNST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" alt="" /><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/investor.jpg" alt="" />Newspaper websites seem to be the preferred source of local news for <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Newspapers_Claim_to_be_Classified_Leaders'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>consumers, according to the Newspaper Association of America and comScore (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas">SCOR</a>). Fifty-seven percent of respondents are drawn to local <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> websites. But take this with a grain of salt: 54% chose online portals and 53% selected local <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/television/">television</a> websites. In terms of what consumers consider the most trusted local news source to be, newspapers have the lead, but the gap is narrowing. Now, only 33% choose the newspaper for this reason, with local television sites pulling in 32%.<br /> <br /> "While newspaper Web sites often face dozens of competitors touting their own local offerings in any given market, they have been able to thrive by leveraging trusted brands and strong local content to appeal to consumers and advertisers alike," <a target="_blank" href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1004070834">John Sturm, president and CEO of the NAA, said in a statement</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/">Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1004070834>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19374771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Careerbuilder</category><category>comscore</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>HotJobs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>monster</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msn</category><category>MWW</category><category>naa</category><category>new york times</category><category>news corp</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper association of america</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>SCOR</category><category>television</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Grows as a Source for News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />How are readers finding the news? Well, increasingly, <a target="_blank" href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/02/03/is-facebook-becoming-a-portal/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=twitter-publisher-main&amp;utm_campaign=twitter">the answer is Facebook</a>. The social networking site, which boasts well over 350 million registered users, is now the fourth largest referral source of traffic to online news destinations. Almost a year ago, only 0.5% of traffic to news and media sites came from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>. Today, that level is 3.5%, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/02/facebook_largest_news_reader_1.html">data from Web analytics firm Experian Hitwise</a>.</p>
<p>Only Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Yahoo! (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and MSN (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) send more traffic to news sites. <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a>, a subset of the search engine giant, failed to keep pace with Facebook, despite the fact that it exists specifically to send Internet users to media outlets. Only 1.39% of referrals came from this source.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Grows as a Source for News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/">Facebook Grows as a Source for News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19347948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>experian</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hitwise</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msn</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times company</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>wall street journal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks for 2010: Emerson Radio (MSN)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-2010/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2010</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a special report, Top Picks for 2010, the 27th annual survey in which </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> asks the nation's leading advisors for their single favorite stock for the new year. </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/24/top-stock-picks-for-2010-from-80-advisors/"><em>See all 80 stocks listed here</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><img height="82" alt="" hspace="4" width="70" align="left" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/matthews.jpg" />"Emerson Radio (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/emerson-radio-corp/msn/ase">MSN</a>) is an attractive, low-priced stock," says <a href="http://www.thecheapinvestor.com/">Bill Matthews</a>, a specialist in lower-priced issues.</p>
<p>The advisor, who has been publishing <a href="http://www.thecheapinvestor.com/">The Cheap Investor</a> for nearly three decades, suggests, "The stock has the potential for significant appreciation in 2010."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Picks for 2010: Emerson Radio (MSN)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/">Top Picks for 2010: Emerson Radio (MSN)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19286824/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/top-picks-for-2010-emerson-radio-msn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill matthews</category><category>cheap investor</category><category>Emerson Radio</category><category>HH Scott</category><category>MSN</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[YouTube was costly -- has it become RubeTube?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/youtube-goog.gif" />This past holiday weekend my colleague Doug McIntyre gave support to a blog I wrote in May 2007 when he posted <a onmouseover="javascript:showPop(event,this,'By Google\'s (GOOG) standards, YouTube was not a terribly expensive acquisition. The search company\'s market cap is about $170. It paid less than 1% of...')" onclick="doFMClick(this,'','')" onmouseout="javascript:hidePop()" href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/google-goog-the.html">Google (GOOG): The Failure Of YouTube</a>. In my rant I gave a detailed analysis outlining how Google had overpaid for YouTube by a fantastic amount.<br /><br />In the story Doug quotes projections that 2008 revenue generated by Google might gross $200 million from YouTube. <em>That's revenue, not profit. </em>A 20% profit would be $40 million if that was possible. In the article I wrote: <a title="View How can I say Google overpaid for YouTube? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/how-can-i-say-google-overpaid-for-youtube/" target="_blank">How can I say Google overpaid for YouTube?</a> I stated the case in plain English why the YouTube investment would have to earn $300 million (net, not gross) minimum, in its first year not to be dillutive.<br /><br />They missed the target by a mile. They will continue to miss the target and I do not expect it to ever justify the cost. Just because Google has lots of cash slushing around does not mean they have money to waste.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>YouTube was costly -- has it become RubeTube?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/">YouTube was costly -- has it become RubeTube?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1246671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/youtube-was-costly-has-it-become-rubetube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Craigslist</category><category>earnings</category><category>facebook</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSN</category><category>myspace</category><category>Profits</category><category>rube goldberg</category><category>RubeGoldberg</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Wikipedia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo faces lawsuits over rejection of Microsoft offer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-02-22T203739Z_01_N22600440_RTRIDST_0_YAHOO-LAWSUIT.XML"><br /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-02-22T203739Z_01_N22600440_RTRIDST_0_YAHOO-LAWSUIT.XML"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/yhoo-yahoo%21-logo.jpg" />News</a> over the weekend of two Detroit pension funds suing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) for rejecting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) $41.2 billion offer, is the first bit of sanity that has come out of this whole story.</p>
<p>The proposed class action, filed by veteran shareholder litigation firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger &amp; Grossman, takes Yahoo directors to task for spurning the Feb. 1 offer and "pursuing all manner of value-destructive third-party deals."</p>
<p>These pension funds are the only party who have the investor interests at heart. Regarding both Yahoo and Microsoft, it's hard to understand what they are thinking. Why would Microsoft pay a 60% premium for the much troubled search engine company? I understand that Microsoft basically wants to replace its own troubled MSN with Yahoo, but why overpay? I am sure that if it invested a fraction of this amount of money to generate more MSN traffic, things would improve.</p>
<p>As for Yahoo, hello? You are being offered such a huge premium, and just because you despise the suitor you reject the deal without presenting it to shareholders. "Yahoo said at the time the bid substantially undervalues the company, failing to take into account its 500 million users worldwide, investments in its advertising platform and lucrative overseas holdings." Well, no offense but if your 500 million users are so lucrative why has your stock fallen by more than 45% pre-offer? Why are you cutting 7% of your workforce because you "forecast a tough 2008?"</p>
<p>Thank you pension funds for finally trying to actually represent your investors. At least someone cares about the investor.</p>
<p> <em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no positions in any stock mentioned as of 2/25/08.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/">Yahoo faces lawsuits over rejection of Microsoft offer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-02-22T203739Z_01_N22600440_RTRIDST_0_YAHOO-LAWSUIT.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124191/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/yahoo-faces-lawsuits-over-rejection-of-microsoft-offer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>class action</category><category>ClassAction</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSN</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox and NBC launch odd website Hulu]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="77" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/hulu_logo-(2).jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Fox <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119362351061374491.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_mm">have launched</a> [subscription required] their video site Hulu. Fox will offer a number of its shows on the website and NBC will put up programming from its cable networks and some of its feature-length films.
<p> </p>
<p>All of this premium content will be wrapped into a video site, Hulu, and be offered through distribution partners including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and MySpace. The issue of whether the content will be available on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) YouTube is still open for negotiation.</p>
<p>The new venture appears to be a perfect example of large companies managing a problem to death. It is not clear why Fox and NBC could not have cut their own content distribution deals without having to band together. It is equally unclear why anyone would go to the Hulu site if the content can be seen at larger web properties</p>
<p>Perhaps some of the online media executives at the two networks wanted to make sure that it appeared they were making progress on getting their programming onto the web. It might be a good way to keep a job, at least for now.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/">Fox and NBC launch odd website Hulu</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119362351061374491.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_mm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1024157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/fox-and-nbc-launch-odd-website-hulu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fox</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>hulu</category><category>HULU.COM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSN</category><category>MYSPACE</category><category>NBC UNIVERSAL</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>YAHOO</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why I jumped off the Yahoo bandwagon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo-260a071806.jpg" />Ever since I was a kid, I've always rooted for the underdog. As a Philadelphia sports fan, you have to be that way or else you will go insane. That's why I've always had a soft spot for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). <br /><br /> When others argued that the portal was doomed, I took the contrary position figuring that as more advertising dollars shifted online, the company would get more than its fair share. I figured that Project Panama would make Yahoo's search business at least marginally competitive with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>). Boy, was I wrong. The company's search business continues to suck wind as it loses audience to social networking sites such as <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>. <em><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2007/tc20071015_144425.htm?campaign_id=twxa">BusinessWeek</a></em> points out that Yahoo is trying to go back to its geeky roots. While an admirable goal, it may be too little too late.<br /><br /> That thumping sound you just heard was me along with countless others jumping off the Yahoo bandwagon. For the past few months, Yahoo has been sputtering along aimlessly trying to yet again reinvent itself through <a href="http://yhoo.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/">its 100-day review</a>. Judging from the market's reaction, investors don't have much faith that Jerry Yang and Sue Decker are going to come up with anything groundbreaking. Shares are down $1.01. or 3.6%, to $26.85 ahead of the release of earnings after the close of trading today. They have plunged about 15% over the past six months.<br /><br /> About the only thing that might move the stock is an announcement that it outsourced its search business to Google or that it's considering strategic alternatives including a sale of the company. Yahoo continues to provide good content and knows how to engage users, which would make it a good fit with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN.<br /><br /> Today's earnings conference call will be lively.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/">Why I jumped off the Yahoo bandwagon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2007/tc20071015_144425.htm?campaign_id=twxa>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1014488/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/why-i-jumped-off-the-yahoo-bandwagon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>msft</category><category>MSN</category><category>project panama</category><category>ProjectPanama</category><category>search</category><category>search advertising</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>sue decker</category><category>SueDecker</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Short interest in Microsoft (MSFT) falls ahead of Halo 3 release]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/majornelson/1438933381/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Halo's Master Chief visits Nasdaq floor."  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/halo-3-master-chief-at-nasdaq.jpg" /></a>Shares <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/09/september-nasda.html">sold short</a> in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) fell 14.1 million shares in September to 83 million. It seems that the shorts knew enough to get out ahead of good news. </p>
<p>So far this year, Microsoft's stock has been flat, but over the last three days it has moved up more than 3% on news that it had released its Halo 3 video game and that it is in talks to buy part of social network Facebook.</p>
<p>The enthusiasm about Halo may be well-placed. In the company's last fiscal year, its devices business lost $1.9 billion on $6.1 billion in revenue. The previous year was not any better. The world's largest software company needs a catalyst to drive sales of its Xbox 360, and Halo 3 may well do that.</p>
<p>The Facebook deal has also drawn a great deal of attention. Rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is building a large advertising platform using its own search inventory combined with impressions that it gets from its AdSense network. To expand that business, it is buying DoubleClick and has a deal to sell ads on social network leader MySpace. AOL is making moves in the same business. It owns Advertising.com, the largest ad network, and has just bought behavior targeting company Tacoda.</p>
<p>That leaves Microsoft sitting well behind its rivals. A deal with Facebook could help expand a network around its portal, MSN. Online services lost $732 million last year. </p>
<p>It may be that the company is facing up to its online and devices problems. That could be good news.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/">Short interest in Microsoft (MSFT) falls ahead of Halo 3 release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.247wallst.com/2007/09/september-nasda.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/998530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/short-interest-in-microsoft-msft-falls-ahead-of-halo-3-release/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adsense</category><category>advertising.com</category><category>aol</category><category>doubleclick</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>halo 3</category><category>Halo3</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>myspace</category><category>tacoda</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner (TWX) gets a thumbs up from Lehman Brothers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is seeing a small gain today because of bullish comments in a research note from Lehman Brothers, which <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/time-warner-restarted-overweight-lehman/story.aspx?guid={5CD38770-963A-47E2-8E62-66FADEC5E1A7}&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1">reinitiated coverage</a> of the stock with an Overweight rating. </p>
<p>Lehman Brothers sees numerous catalysts that could raise the stock beyond its current valuation. It also addresses Time Warner's potential break-up value. Lehman thinks that the logical moves could include complete separation of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">TWC</a>), or a tax free sale or spinoff of its publishing assets. Another option is to publicly float a minority stake in AOL, or perhaps the internet unit may merge with another leading Internet player like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) or even <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft'</a>s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN, Lehman says. <br /><br />Anyone who has read much on Time Warner in BloggingStocks, is quite familiar with analysts call to set AOL as its own public company, or have a minority interest to be traded, like the old 'tracking stock' model. TWX shares are up 14 cents, or 0.77%, to $18.14 in early afternon trading.<br /><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/">Time Warner (TWX) gets a thumbs up from Lehman Brothers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/time-warner-restarted-overweight-lehman/story.aspx?guid={5CD38770-963A-47E2-8E62-66FADEC5E1A7}&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/987624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/time-warner-twx-gets-a-thumbs-up-from-lehman-brothers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>cable</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lehman</category><category>MSN</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo!</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nielsen's new internet ratings draw debate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>Nielsen/NetRatings has decided that the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/10/AR2007071001763.html">total amount of time that consumers spend on a website</a> is more important than the number of page views or unique visitors that the site has. </p>
<p>According to <em>The Washington Post</em>, the new rankings favor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) AOL, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN to some extent because they have substantial e-mail and instant messaging traffic. AOL moves to the head of the list because it had 25 billion minutes spent on its sites in the U.S. during May. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is poor at 7 billion minutes.</p>
<p>But the new ratings system is substantially flawed if what you really care about is how much revenue a site generates. Time spent on instant messaging is not like time spent on search, which is also not like time spent on watching a video. AOL may have more time spent than Google, but the search engine's advertising model is based on targeted text ads attached to search results. It is hard to argue with the AdSense model since it generates more revenue than any competing system.</p>
<p>AOL's "minutes" were 3.5 times Google's minutes during May, but a metric that has nothing to do with revenue creation is not much of a metric at all.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/">Nielsen's new internet ratings draw debate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/10/AR2007071001763.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/937828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/nielsens-new-internet-ratings-draw-debate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adsense</category><category>AOL</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>MSN</category><category>Nielsen NetRatings</category><category>NielsenNetratings</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay throws fit, then crawls back to Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>Every time you look at your children and wish they would grow up and stop being so immature, remember that the two are not synonomous. Case in point -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). The market-leading auction website left <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) AdWords advertising system because it was miffed that Google planned a party the same day as eBay's annual user celebration in Boston.<br /><br />Well after crying at its party, eBay came crawling back, apparently realizing that although it has other options -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActiveCorp's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) Ask.com, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN.com -- none are nearly as good as AdWords. EBay's inability to stay away serves as an example of Google's strength in the Internet advertising market.<br /><br />Of course, this is not what eBay is claiming. EBay spokesman Hani Durzy said, "Overall the takeaway for us was that we weren't as dependent on AdWords as some out there may have thought... Other partners -- Yahoo and AOL and MSN -- really stepped up and provided a lot of value. And natural search continues to drive a lot of valuable traffic to the site."<br /><br />Empty words, since the actions don't coincide.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/">eBay throws fit, then crawls back to Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/925959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/ebay-throws-fit-then-crawls-back-to-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertise</category><category>advertising</category><category>adwords</category><category>aol</category><category>ask.com</category><category>ebay</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>interactive corp</category><category>InteractiveCorp</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>online</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay goes back to Google, sort of]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) has decided to move its advertising back to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). But the auction site said it does not really need the search engine. </p>
<p>During the 10-day period that eBay pulled its ads, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118254733827045213.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">company claims</a> that its audience and auction results did just fine. According to eBay management, it got help from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>)'s MSN, AOL, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) to keep leads coming to its websites.</p>
<p>eBay pulled its ads from Google when the search engine tried to throw a party for its CheckOut business during a gathering of clients that use eBay's PayPal. eBay saw the move as a way for Google to take customers in broad daylight.</p>
<p>The whole incident creates a mystery that may remain in place for some time. If eBay does not need Google, why go back? The firm says that its ad commitment going forward will be more modest than in the past, but if MSN, AOL, and Yahoo! deliver such good results and do not compete in the online payment business, why not stay away from Google for good?</p>
<p>There could be two answers. The first is that eBay is being disingenuous about the effectiveness of Google's AdWord program and can't do without it. The other is that eBay may be getting ready to announce a large deal with the three other portals, perhaps one that would involve them using PayPal. In essence, they would be creating an alliance to compete with the largest search engine.</p>
<p>Maybe.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/">eBay goes back to Google, sort of</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/ebay-goes-back-to-google-sort-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>AOL</category><category>CheckOut</category><category>eBay</category><category>Google</category><category>marketing</category><category>MSN</category><category>PayPal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom Digital + Fox Interactive + Yahoo! = YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p>There has been a great deal of talk about how the mainstream media companies can compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) YouTube. It is so much larger than any other video site that avoiding it as an online distribution mechanism may mean missing a large portion of internet multimedia users. But, companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) are not happy with users stealing their content and posting it on the huge video-sharing site. Nor are they able, apparently, to come to terms with Google for placing content there at a commercially reasonable rate.</p>
<p>A look at the <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1460">new comScore figures</a> on the top online video properties shows Google video sites, which includes YouTube, with a huge lead. These web properties originated almost 1.2 billion streams in May. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) was second with 434 million streams initiated. Fox Interactive and Viacom Digital were in third and fourth place.</p>
<p>The road that most major media companies have taken is to syndicate their video properties to all of the large portals, sending content to Yahoo!, MSN, and AOL. But that may be a mistake. Merging their own video properties into one large platform could create a site with more video streams than YouTube, and the media companies could control the price, placing, and visibility of their own assets.</p>
<p>Negotiating the terms for creating one large site with the video assets of major media firms would be extremely difficult because the companies compete with one another. But stranger things have happened -- and indeed will have to happen if old media is to compete.<br /></p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/">Viacom Digital + Fox Interactive + Yahoo! = YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/911156/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/viacom-digital-fox-interactive-yahoo-youtube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Fox Interactive</category><category>FoxInteractive</category><category>GOOG</category><category>merger</category><category>MSN</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>YHOO</category><category>Youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast balks at Google deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p>Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) is unhappy with the search advertising deal it has with Google Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) for its broadband portal and is chatting up Microsoft Corp.'s (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) MSN service, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117409563515840282.html?mod=home_whats_news_us"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required).</p>
<p>The no. 1 cable company is unhappy with the terms of its current deal with Google and wants a larger share of the advertising revenue, the paper said, adding that Comcast.net is one of the biggest sources of Google search queries from outside the company. </p>
<p>There's isn't anything unusual about the Comcast-Google situation. I'm sure Google is involved in lots of contract negotiations like it. What's weird is that the Comcast dispute got publicized. Why Comcast trying to send Google a message via the <em>Journal</em>? </p>
<p>Though this deal isn't significant for the bottom line of any of these huge companies, it's worth monitoring. My colleague <a href="http://cmcsa.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/17/comcast-shows-the-online-search-is-really-a-commodity/">Tom Taulli</a> correctly points out that Google is starting to show vulnerabilities and that search has the potential to become a commodity.</p>
<p>Google doesn't want to give up traffic to any competitor, especially MSN. Microsoft is probably the only company that can break the zen-like calm of Google's management.</p>
<p>The Philadelphia-based company wants to boost its Web presence, which includes sites like <a href="http://www.eonline.com/">Eonline.com</a>, as competition for television and broadband internet services heats up. Microsoft wants to establish credibility in search to rebut critics who claim the company is pouring billions into a foolish quest to catch up to Google.</p>
<p>So there's lots of pride and ego at stake here. It will be interesting to see how things work out.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/">Comcast balks at Google deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/854986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/comcast-balks-at-google-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>broadband</category><category>cable television</category><category>CableTelevision</category><category>FIOS</category><category>msn</category><category>search</category><category>search advertising</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T's New Year's gift to Yahoo!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bls/" rel="tag">BellSouth Corp (BLS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>'Tis the season. While AT&amp;T Inc.(NYSE:T) got its massive merger with BellSouth cleared by the FCC, it had to promise "net neutrality" for a time. In other words, it cannot <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/att-purchase-bellsouth-approved/story.aspx?guid=%7B5DEC0929%2D7429%2D4E52%2D8CC3%2D77F1A6E87F79%7D">charge websites</a> that are bandwidth hogs because of their large numbers of users and the nature of their content more than some plain vanilla website in Akron.</p>
<p>The net neutrality provision is good for two years. What happens then is anyone guess.</p>
<p>But what might have happened? AT&amp;T may well have tried to get tens of millions of dollars from big websites with rich content. High on the list would be Microsoft's (NASDAQ:MSFT) MSN, Time Warner's NYSE:TWX) AOL, Yahoo! Inc.'s(NASDAQ:YHOO) and Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG).  News Corp's (NYSE:NWS) MySpace would also have potentially faced tolls for its use of AT&amp;T Internet pipes as a conduit to consumers.</p>
<p>With its operating profit running about $200 million a quarter, the decision by AT&amp;T to pass on charging big websites for traffic could actually save Yahoo! some real cake. With current Wall Street estimates of $.13 for the next quarter and the same for Q1 07, could the waiver of charging fees be worth a penny a quarter? Maybe.</p>
<p>If so, Yahoo! got a gift. And, if it helps the market's perceptions of its future cost base, that might be worth a little on the old stock price.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at </em><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/"><em>24/7 Wall St.</em></a><em> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/">AT&amp;T's New Year's gift to Yahoo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/726765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/atandts-new-years-gift-to-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>BellSouth</category><category>FCC</category><category>Google</category><category>MSN</category><category>MySpace</category><category>net neutraility</category><category>News Corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>Yahoo!</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft short interest spikes up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shortstories/" rel="tag">Short Stories</a></p><p>Someone on Wall St. must have thought the Zune would not sell well. Or that Vista could be delayed again. Short interest in Microsoft <a href="http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/asp/short_interest_resp.asp?searchby=Detail&amp;IssueID=10539">rose a breathtaking 43%</a> to 144.3 million shares. That is on top of a 30% increase in October. The trading days needed to cover the position based on the stock's average volume is now 2.5. That is substantial position for a stock with Microsoft's market cap and volume.</p>
<p>Microsoft's stock recently hit $30. It has not been that high since late 2004. With Vista around the corner, there is an impression that Microsoft's core desktop franchise will help. Although early sales of the company's multimedia <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/11/18/1558213.shtml">Zune player have been slow</a>, Microsoft has said that it is in the business to stay and is willing to invest hundreds of millions of dollars on the product. </p>
<p>And Microsoft's statements about its Zune commitment seem true. It chased Sony's Playstation for years, and now there are rumors that the company's Xbox game console is <a href="http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=149919">outselling its Sony counterpart.</a> </p>
<p>Investors are still left with enough worries. A run-up of 40% over the last year may be too much for a company with a market cap of over $290 billion. While it is likely that Vista will generate tremendous cash flow and that the Xbox is a formidable competitor in the gaming business, the future of Microsoft's online Live software initiative, MSN, and Xune costs are still in doubt.</p>
<p>And, those worries may be enough to cap the stock's rise and bring in the shorts.</p>
<p><em>Douglas McIntyre is a partner at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">24/7 Wall St.</a></em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/">Microsoft short interest spikes up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/708484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/microsoft-short-interest-spikes-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>microsoft live</category><category>MicrosoftLive</category><category>msn</category><category>xbox</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft still has an edge on the Web, for now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>New global audience statistics from <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1049">comScore</a> shows that Microsoft Crop. (NASDAQ:MSFT) still has an edge in total unique visitors to its web sites each month based on September 2006 figures. But that may not last long.</p>
<p>Worldwide, the Web had 726.7 million visitors in the age group over 15. Microsoft sites had 505.5 million unique visitors, followed by Yahoo!, Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) Sites at 480.6 million and Google, Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) Sites at 457.5 million. But, new Google acquisition YouTube had 81 million visitors, a jump of 12% from the previous month. Google may be in the lead when October worldwide numbers hit.</p>
<p>It is somewhat stunning how far other major companies lag. The Time Warner, Inc. (NYSE:TWX) Network had 217.8 million visitors in September, less than half of what the leaders boast. New Corp.'s (NYSE:NWS,NWS.A) Fox, which includes MySpace, sits at 117.8 million visitors.</p>
<p>The new numbers do point out one important thing, especially for Microsoft and Yahoo!. While Google dominates many things on the internet, it does not dominate everything.</p>
<p>If MSN and Yahoo! could build features that allow them to be more competitive than Google, or if they could do an M&amp;A transaction to get a set of properties like Barry Diller's IAC/Interactive Corp.'s (NASDAQ:IACI) <a href="http://www.iac.com/index.html">Ask.com Network</a>, they could stay in the race. Ask had 112.8 million unique visitors worldwide in September.</p>
<p><em>Douglas McIntyre is a partner at <a href="http://247wallst.blogspot.com/">24/7 Wall St.</a></em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/">Microsoft still has an edge on the Web, for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1049>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/691232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/microsoft-still-has-an-edge-on-the-web-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ask.com</category><category>Fox Interactive</category><category>FoxInteractive</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>IAC</category><category>microsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo!'s market share in the top U.S. categories]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>comScore Media Metrix recently <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1030">released</a> its September analysis of U.S. consumer activity at top online properties and categories. What sites do American consumers like? Not surprisingly, Americans like television, sports, and news Web sites.
<p> </p>
<p>Actually, Americans like first and foremost gambling. Online Gambling was the top gaining category in September, with a 17% gain vs. August. However, since that will change in October as the Congress legislation outlawing online gambling comes into effect -- alas, the house doesn't always win -- let's focus on the other categories and pay special attention to the very exciting company of late... Yahoo!</p>
<p>As I mentioned above, Americans like sports and while the category itself grew 7% over August, Yahoo! Sports posted a significant 27% growth, catching up to number 1 site, ESPN, quickly. Fox Sports on MSN also grew impressively by 25%, going from 4th place in August to 3rd place in September. What's really interesting, is that MLB.com lost market share in September, a decline of 16%, despite playoff season approaching.</p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" id="vimage_2" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/sports-sites1.gif" alt="" /> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo!'s market share in the top U.S. categories</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/">Yahoo!'s market share in the top U.S. categories</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1030>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/yahoo-s-market-share-in-the-top-u-s-categories/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>msnbc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Remember Google, thou art mortal!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>After an important triumph against an enemy of Rome, a general would parade through the streets of the capital. Someone was assigned the task of standing behind the victor in his chariot to hold the crown of laurel and oak above the conqueror's head. The companion had another role; he was to repeat the words, "Remember, thou art mortal." Not even a Roman general could live to conquer forever.</p>
<p>Google, Inc.'s (NASDAQ: GOOG) third quarter results were extraordinary. Profits almost doubled to $733 million and revenue rose 70%. By contrast, Yahoo! Inc.'s (NASDAQ: YHOO) <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B8FA0D2DF%2DB971%2D4287%2D9EBE%2DFA6EA022F3F3%7D&amp;">reported</a> Q3 net was only $159 million, and revenue rose only 20%. Of course, there was a time when Yahoo! was Google, at least in the market's view. Of course, that was back when Yahoo!'s stock traded at $108, and not at the $23, where it changes hands now.</p>
<p>Over the next few days, it is not a bad bet to think that Google will pierce the all-time high of $475 that it posted in January. That would give the company a market cap of about$150 billion. That would put it within spitting distance of Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s (NYSE: WMT) cap.</p>
<p>Of course, Google now has 45% of the search market in the US according to <a href="http://www.comscore.com/">Comscore</a>. Yahoo! has fallen to 28% and MSN to 12%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Remember Google, thou art mortal!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/">Remember Google, thou art mortal!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B8FA0D2DF%2DB971%2D4287%2D9EBE%2DFA6EA022F3F3%7D&amp;>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688084/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/remember-google-thou-art-mortal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google and Fox gaining fastest in Internet audience race]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p>According to figures released recently by <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1030">ComScore</a>, audience growth at Google Inc.(NASDAQ:GOOG) and Fox Interactive (which includes MySpace) was well ahead of other major web properties.</p>
<p>Overall Internet unique visitors grew 2% in September 2006 compared to the same month a year earlier hitting 173.4 million in the US.</p>
<p>The Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) sites were still the largest property, but that may not last much longer. Yahoo! sites grew 5% to 129.7 million unique users. Right behind was the Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) network of sites which includes AOL. TWX sites grew just 1% to 120.3 million. In third place was the Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) network, which includes MSN. They were up 4% over last September to 119.4 million.</p>
<p>Google has impressive growth of 23% year-over-year to 107.4 million. It will pick up over 20 million new unique visitors with YouTube. EBay was next, but well behind Google, with 79 million unique visitors, up 13%.</p>
<p>Fox/MySpace grew by far the most of any of the other major network properties, rising 342%, with MySpace as the primary engine, to 70.9 million unique users.</p>
<p>If the current trend continues, Google may be in first place within a few months. Fox could quite easily top the 100 million unique visitor threshold. And, Microsoft and Time Warner will battle for third place.</p>
<p>It is a case where the traffic race may go to the swiftest.</p>
<p><em>Douglas McIntyre is a partner at </em><a href="http://247wallst.blogspot.com/"><em>24/7 Wall St.</em></a> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/">Google and Fox gaining fastest in Internet audience race</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/686764/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/google-and-fox-gaining-fastest-in-internet-audience-race/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>audience</category><category>ebay</category><category>google</category><category>Internet</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSN</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>traffic</category><category>unique visitors</category><category>UniqueVisitors</category><category>Web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
