<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Will Obama beat McCain with 52.2% of the vote?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/obama-mccain.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><em><a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/marketsNewsUS/idINN0138628820080801?sp=true">Reuters</a></em> reports that Ray Fair, a Yale University economist who has been predicting elections with remarkable accuracy over the last several decades, is calling for an Obama victory on November 4. How so? The economy is in the tank. And his model predicts that a strong economy benefits the party of the incumbent and a weak one is great for the challenger.</p>
<p>Fair's model predicts Obama will win 52.2% of the vote to McCain's 47.8%, according to <em>Reuters</em>. And that's based on a relatively optimistic set of economic assumptions. In April, Fair ran the numbers assuming U.S. economic growth of 1.5% and a 3% rate of inflation. But in the fourth quarter of 2007, GDP growth was revised to a negative 0.2%. And despite 0.9% growth in the first quarter and 1.9% growth in the second quarter, it would not surprise me to see those numbers revised into negative territory. Meanwhile, inflation, most recently roaring ahead at <a href="http://www.scnow.com/scp/business/local/pee_dee/article/index_inflation_hurts_south/11897/">5%</a>, is way above Fair's prediction.</p>
<p>Another similar model developed by Macroeconomic Advisers -- which <em>Reuters</em> reports has correctly predicted the winning party 12 out of 14 times -- uses more recent data to suggest that in light of the dismal economic conditions McCain will get 45% of the vote in November. Who knows whether these models will work for this election? In the meantime, they suggest that the worse the economy gets, the better it is for Obama.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/">Will Obama beat McCain with 52.2% of the vote?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1274212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/will-obama-beat-mccain-with-52-2-of-the-vote/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>hillar...</category><category>john mccain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>macroeconomic advisors</category><category>MacroeconomicAdvisors</category><category>ray fair</category><category>RayFair</category><category>yale</category><category>yale university</category><category>YaleUniversity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
