<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why isn't anyone watching baseball?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/kevindooley.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The 2008 Major League Baseball World Series achieved the event's lowest television ratings in history, and the league is off to a similarly lousy start to the 2009 season. </p>
<p>Ratings for Fox Saturday Baseball have slipped 9% since last season and 23% since 2000. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329732181152867.html#mod=todays_us_personal_journal">reports</a> (subscription required) that Fox executives will be meeting with MLB Commissioner Bud Selig next week to try to come up with ways to boost ratings. </p>
<p>Executives are not panicking yet -- the real test will be the All-Star Game and the Playoffs, which account for 90% of the revenue under licensing deals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why isn't anyone watching baseball?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/">Why isn't anyone watching baseball?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329732181152867.html#mod=todays_us_personal_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1562709/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MLB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A salary cap in baseball?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/baseballpic.jpg" alt="" />Let's take a trip to the "yeah right" files with this entry. Boston Red Sox owner John Henry has again picked up the torch crying for a salary cap yet again. Pot, this is the kettle. The Red Sox payroll is the fourth-highest in Major League Baseball at $133,390,035. Henry's problem is that he was outspent by his arch rival: the New York Yankees. In fact, Henry said that the Yankees spent like Congress.<br /><br />For history's sake, Henry presented a salary cap five years ago (which was sour grapes in the wake of losing A-Roid to the Yankees) -- obviously this proposal never took hold. I just find it humorous that the owner of the Red Sox is calling for a salary cap. This is a team that is spending a veritable ton of money, and is succeeding. Let's take a look at the Pittsburgh Pirates, the Cincinnati Reds, the Oakland A's. All of these teams are considered "small market" teams. One would think that one of their owners would be yelling for a cap -- and that isn't the case.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A salary cap in baseball?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/">A salary cap in baseball?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boston Red Sox</category><category>BostonRedSox</category><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>sports</category><category>sports business</category><category>SportsBusiness</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/sidney-crosby.jpg" alt="" />No, we aren't talking about a great deal of cross promotion between my Cincinnati Reds and my Columbus Blue Jackets or anything (although the thought of my right-handed doppelganger, <a href="http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/AaronHarang2226011_Reds_v_Giants.jpg">Aaron Harang</a> on skates should intimidate even the toughest hockey player), but Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLBAM) and the National Hockey League (NHL) are teaming up. <br /><br />The two are going to start co-selling an online video package where out-of-market game subscriptions for both leagues will be marketed in tandem. According to <a href="http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61479"><em>The Sports Business Journal</em></a> (SBJ), this deal "marks a rare level of cooperation between sports entities with limited common ownership."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/">MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business</category><category>business partnership</category><category>BusinessPartnership</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>national hockey league</category><category>NationalHockeyLeague</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/another_citigroup_logo.jpg" />The New York Mets, whose September collapses have delighted us Philadelphia Phillies fans, have screwed up even bigger with their $400 million stadium naming rights deal with<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"> Citigroup Inc. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C)</a>.<br /><br />Baseball's premier choke artists are now <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/02/03/2009-02-03_report_citigroup_eyeing_bailout_from_nam.html">denying an earlier report</a> that the troubled New York-based bank was trying to back out of its commitment to the team. <a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/ny-spciti036022315feb03,0,749462.story">New York Newsday</a> is quoting a team official "We're committed to our agreement with Citi, and Citi has indicated it is committed to users." He went on to defend Citi, saying that the bank "needs to advertise."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/">The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/02/03/2009-02-03_report_citigroup_eyeing_bailout_from_nam.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>jerry manuel</category><category>JerryManuel</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>NY Mets</category><category>NyMets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/citigrouppic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last July I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/">suggested</a> that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) should cancel its $400 million deal to put its name on the new New York Mets stadium. Although previous CEO Chuck Prince inked the 20-year deal, I called for it to be canceled after Citi posted $17 billion in losses for the first half of 2008. Not surprisingly, it took more than my blog post to push Citi to cancel the $400 million deal.</p>
<p>After getting $45 billion in government bailout cash and another $305 billion in loan guarantees; and canceling the delivery of a $50 million corporate jet, it comes as no surprise that Citi is beginning to realize that times have changed. But as I suggested last July, there is a rich history of companies naming stadiums after themselves and soon ceasing to exist. For instance, there used to be a stadium in Houston named after a little energy trading firm you may have heard of -- Enron.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/">Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/usTopNews/idUKTRE51213720090203>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>mets</category><category>naming rights</category><category>NamingRights</category><category>New Yotk Mets</category><category>NewYotkMets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Chicago ObamaSox?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/obamabaseball.jpg" />Gotta love it when the worlds of sports and politics combine ... I mean at least our founding fathers had enough sense to try and separate church and state, right? Perhaps this news isn't that big of a deal, but I thought it funny that we now have the Chicago White Sox releasing a special Barack Obama hat.<br /><br />That's right, the Chicago White Sox are fashioning a new hat based on their top fan in chief, President Obama. The Sox (not to be confused with the Sawx, don't bother me Boston fans) are going to release two special edition hats with Obama tributes on the back and the side of the cap.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Chicago ObamaSox?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/">The Chicago ObamaSox?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61341>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442436/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicago white sox</category><category>ChicagoWhiteSox</category><category>featured</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>merchandising</category><category>obama</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>white sox</category><category>WhiteSox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/images/2007/02/15/QJq2yf5W.jpg" />Perhaps this is a post-season tilt that the Cubbies may actually be able to win. Sorry Chicago, but this blogger is a dyed-in-the-wool Cincinnati Reds fan ... and I love to take cheap shots at the competition whenever I can. <br /><br />You see, the Cubs are suing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">Under Armour, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">UA</a>) for breach of contract (check out <a href="http://www.sportsonesource.com">SportsOneSource Media</a> for the heads up). The UA logo is emblazoned on the left-center and right-center field doors embedded in the iconic ivy walls of Wrigley Field. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/">Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1440348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>Chicago Cubs</category><category>ChicagoCubs</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>ua</category><category>Under Armour</category><category>UnderArmour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scott Boras on why Major League Baseball is better without a Salary Cap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" height="140" width="232" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/mlb_logo.bmp.jpg" />After the New York Yankees signed the three biggest free agents on the market, Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/">sent an email</a> to Bloomberg calling for a salary cap: "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them. Frankly, the sport might need a salary cap." He added that "I paid $220 million for my team; now they get three players for $420 million."<br /><br />Under a salary cap system, teams would be limited as far as how much they can spend on player salaries each year -- the idea is to allow smaller-market teams to be competitive.<br /><br />But in an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28450814">interview with CNBC</a>, Scott Boras -- the controversial super-agent who represents Mark Teixeira, Manny Ramirez and many others -- explained why he doesn't think baseball should have a salary cap. Of course it's a pretty self-serving argument but here's what he said:<em> </em>"I'm not sure what a salary cap does other than it prevents choices."<br /><br />Of course Scott Boras could sell a champion sailor to a guy in the desert, but he actually might be onto something with this one: The free agent frenzy of out of control spending adds a "Hot Stove" season to baseball that others sports lack. And for all the talk about big budget teams killing competitiveness, the two teams that made it to the World Series ranked 13th and 29th (second to last) on the list of <a href="http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/salaries">teams with the biggest budgets.</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/">Scott Boras on why Major League Baseball is better without a Salary Cap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/28450814>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416220/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baseball</category><category>featured</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Milwaukee Brewers</category><category>MilwaukeeBrewers</category><category>MLB</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>Salary Cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><category>Scott Boras</category><category>ScottBoras</category><category>World series</category><category>WorldSeries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Major League Baseball need a salary cap?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img height="162" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/mlb_logo.bmp.jpg" width="268" align="right" vspace="4" />With the signings of C.C. Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Mark Teixeira, The New York Yankees have signed the three biggest contracts of the off-season.<br /><br />That spending spree is raising concerns about competitive balance in baseball, and Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio is none too pleased. In an <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081223&amp;content_id=3727641&amp;vkey=hotstove2008&amp;fext=.jsp">email to Bloomberg</a>, he wrote that "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them. Frankly, the sport might need a salary cap."<br /><br />In a phone interview with Bloomberg, he added that "I paid $220 million for my team; now they get three players for $420 million." Brewers assistant general manager Gord Ash had some fighting words for the Yankees: "This is very reminiscent of what they have tried before. It didn't work then, and I'm not sure it's going to work now."<br /><br />Whether baseball will ever end up with a salary cap is an open question. Under the current system, teams that spend huge sums of money on players are required to pay a "luxury tax" to the league, but that seems to do little to dissuade these signings.<br /><br />For the sport as a business, a salary cap seems to be the way to go. This arms race hurts profitability for all teams, and it certainly seems to be having a negative impact on team values. According to Forbes, the average National Football League team, which operates under a salary cap with non-guaranteed contracts, is worth $1.04 billion. In baseball, only the Yankees are valued at more than $1 billion, and the league average is just $472 million.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/">Does Major League Baseball need a salary cap?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081223&amp;content_id=3727641&amp;vkey=hotstove2008&amp;fext=.jsp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brewers</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MLB</category><category>Salary Cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Roger Clemens"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/roger-clemens.jpg" />Are you disgusted yet? This week <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) testified -- no they lobbied, hmm, actually they complained -- well the truth is they <em>whined </em>to Congress that short-seller William Ackman had trashed its reputation, and its stock for personal gain -- gee, no kidding -- but the big problem is he seems to have been correct to a major extent. For more on this see <a title="View MBIA asks Congress to fight its battles with Ackman on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/mbia-asks-congress-to-fight-its-battles-with-ackman/" target="_blank">MBIA asks Congress to fight its battles with Ackman</a> by Peter Cohan or <a title="View MBIA plays the spooky short-seller card on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/mbia-plays-the-spooky-short-seller-card/" target="_blank">MBIA plays the spooky short-seller card</a> by Zac Bissonnette.</p>
<p>I own MBIA shares and recently "adventured" into more, but it was not based on management crying foul and everything being just fine. I did it because I think the company will work through the mess over time and that it is oversold now based on fear. MBIA needs to focus on cleaning up its exposure to risk and underwriting standards and stop looking for scapegoats.</p>
<p>Others are in the same boat. There are times the squirming around the truth is painful to watch. This week we watched a baseball pitching icon, Roger Clemens, remind us once again of the first rule of holes: "If you're in one, stop digging." I'm afraid this truism that I often refer to will continue to be a recurring theme in my stories every so often, because some folks just don't get it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/">It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1108729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>C</category><category>CFC</category><category>Clemens</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>featured</category><category>Liber</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>Roger Clemens</category><category>RogerClemens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch is probably too busy plotting world domination to spend much time worrying about something trivial like baseball -- until now.</p>
<p>America's pastime is about to start post-season play, most of which will be televised on the company's Fox television network. Already, there was one huge surprise as the Philadelphia Phillies overtook the New York Mets to win the National League East. But this isn't the type of surprise that the media mogul probably likes because a team from a smaller media market beat one from a larger one.</p>
<p>Remember that last year's series between the St. Louis Cardinals and Detroit Tigers had <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15475631/">record-low television ratings</a>. Advertisers pay a premium price for television spots on the World Series because of the huge audience it attracts. Fox probably has guaranteed that the commercials will be seen by a set amount of viewers and must refund money to advertisers if these targets aren't hit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/">Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15475631/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1002301/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arizona diamondbacks</category><category>ArizonaDiamondbacks</category><category>colorado rockies</category><category>ColoradoRockies</category><category>featured</category><category>fox</category><category>fox sports</category><category>FoxSports</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>new york mets</category><category>new york yankees</category><category>NewYorkMets</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>nws</category><category>philadelphia phillies</category><category>PhiladelphiaPhillies</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>television ratings</category><category>TelevisionRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taking a $752,467 stand: Bonds' ball to be branded]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="255" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/bonds.jpg" alt="" />During the past week or so, fashion designer Marc Ecko has been <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-to-do-with-the-barry-bonds-home-run-ball/">tabulating votes</a> to decide what to do with Barry Bonds' 756th home-run ball. The three choices offered in an online poll were: Bestow It, Brand It, Banish It. <br /><br />The fans <a target="_blank" href="http://www.vote756.com/marcecko/">have spoken</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/09/26/bc.bbn.bonds.756ball.ap/">door-number-2 was selected</a>; the ball -- bought by Ecko for $752,467 -- will be marked with an asterisk before being handed over to the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, NY. According to the site Ecko set up for the express purpose of voting, 34% favored giving the ball, unblemished, to the Hall of Fame. 19% of voters wanted the ball banished, and 47% preferred branding it. The asterisk merely serves as a permanent reminder that Hank Aaron's record was toppled by someone facing allegations of steroid use. Bonds has repeatedly denied knowingly taking any performance-enhancing drugs. <br /><br />Ecko and Hall of Fame president Dale Petroskey both appeared on NBC's <em>Today </em>show to discuss the matter. Petroskey noted that, regardless of the asterisk, "We're happy to get [the ball] ... we're a nonprofit history museum, so this ball wouldn't be coming to Cooperstown without Marc Ecko buying it from the fan who caught it." <br /><br />Bonds, naturally, had a <a target="_blank" href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/09/19/SP6JS8JMH.DTL">compelling opinion</a> on the matter, telling <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>, "[Marc Ecko's] stupid. He's an idiot ... What he's doing is stupid." <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/">Taking a $752,467 stand: Bonds' ball to be branded</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/09/26/bc.bbn.bonds.756ball.ap/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>756</category><category>756*</category><category>Barry Bonds</category><category>BarryBonds</category><category>baseball</category><category>Baseball hall of fame</category><category>BaseballHallOfFame</category><category>Cooperstown</category><category>Hank Aaron</category><category>HankAaron</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Marc Ecko</category><category>MarcEcko</category><category>MLB</category><category>San Francisco Giants</category><category>SanFranciscoGiants</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tribune may sell Cubs, Wrigley Field separately]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wrigleyfield.jpg" />Many people are puzzled over Sam Zell's highly leveraged <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tribune22aug22,0,4095467.story?coll=la-home-center">$8.2 billion purchase of the Tribune Co</a>. in light of the decline in the newspaper business. One of the diamonds in the deal, however, is the Chicago Cubs, and indications are that he intends to quickly mine that gem for all it's worth.<br /><br />According to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cubs15sep15,1,2193699.story?track=rss&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true">Los Angeles Times</a>, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Tribune Co</a>.'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TRB</a>) avowed intention to sell the Cubbies may be considerably more complex than most franchise sales. The Tribune owns not only the ball club, but also <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/726513/000110465907013912/a07-1375_110k.htm">the ballpark, and 25% of the cable TV network</a> that carries its broadcasts, and could choose to sell them separately. <br /><br />The Cubs, despite a century-long title drought, continue to draw capacity crowds to legendary Wrigley Field, over three million last year alone. This year, to the surprise of most prognosticators, the team is fighting for the NL Central pennant, great timing for the sellers. According to <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/33/07mlb_The-Business-Of-Baseball_DOV.html">Forbes</a>, the team alone is currently worth $592 million, on an operating income of $22 million.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tribune may sell Cubs, Wrigley Field separately</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/">Tribune may sell Cubs, Wrigley Field separately</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cubs15sep15,1,2193699.story?track=rss&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/tribune-may-sell-cubs-wrigley-field-separately/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>chicago cubs</category><category>ChicagoCubs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>sam zell</category><category>SamZell</category><category>trb</category><category>tribune co.</category><category>TribuneCo.</category><category>wrigley field</category><category>WrigleyField</category><category>zell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney, Comcast, Time Warner may bid for Yankees TV network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img width="225" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="247" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/yankees.jpg" alt="" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas">Comcast Corp</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) may be tempted to pick up the Yankee Entertainment &amp; Sports Network, the cable TV channel that broadcasts the baseball team's games which <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601079&amp;sid=aTcfoWsgk6Yg&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a> said could be worth as much as $2 billion.</p>
<p>The channel, whose owners include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group Inc. </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"> GS</a>) and former New Jersey Nets owner Raymond Chambers, is "running a limited check" and would only consider selling if it got a price "reflecting its real value," spokesman Peter Rose told Bloomberg. Funny guy to be quoted in a baseball story. I guess anything is for sale at the right price. What an original concept.</p>
<p>It will be an interesting test of wills between Disney's ESPN and Comcast. ESPN remains a juggernaut for the house that Mickey built. Comcast is trying to challenge ESPN with its Comcast SportsNet channels including the one I watch in Philadelphia that broadcasts Phillies games.</p>
<p>Remember, we're talking about the Yankees here, one of the most recognized though not necessarily loved franchises in baseball. New Yorkers, though, continue to love their Bronx Bombers even though they have struggled this year.</p>
<p>But the time the YES network is sold, however, slugger Alex Rodriguez will have left the Big Apple for parts unknown. With $2 billion in the bank, I'm sure the team could afford to replace him.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/">Disney, Comcast, Time Warner may bid for Yankees TV network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601079&amp;sid=aTcfoWsgk6Yg&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/956634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/disney-comcast-time-warner-may-bid-for-yankees-tv-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alex rodriguez</category><category>AlexRodriguez</category><category>baseball</category><category>cable tv</category><category>CableTv</category><category>cmcsa</category><category>comcast sportsnet</category><category>ComcastSportsnet</category><category>dis</category><category>espn</category><category>inthenews</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>media</category><category>new york yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>sports</category><category>sports tv</category><category>SportsTv</category><category>twx</category><category>yes network</category><category>YesNetwork</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cubbies for sale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img height="174" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/cubs.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />"June swoon." "Lovable losers." "Completely Useless By September." The beleaguered and disrespected Chicago Cubs are a storied franchise with an historic ballpark, enthusiastic and loyal fans, and a supposed "curse" that has followed the team for nearly a century. In recent years, things have rolled even further downhill. In 2003, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bartman" target="_blank">one misguided fan</a> contributed to the team's elimination from the National League Championship Series. In 2005 and 2006, Cubs fans had to watch as their respective cross-city and division rivals, the Chicago White Sox and the St. Louis Cardinals, earned the World-Champion title. <br /><br />For the boys in blue, it's time for a change, and maybe a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/25/magazines/fortune/cubs.fortune/index.htm?section=money_news_funny" target="_blank">new owner</a> is just what the club needs as it approaches the 2008 season, marking the 100-year mark from the Cubs' last World-Series victory. For the past 26 years, publishing firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">Tribune </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">TRB</a>) has owned the ball club, but as it progresses through its $8.2 billion buyout to Windy City real-estate mogul Sam Zell, it is planning a sale of the Cubs for somewhere close to $1 billion (Tribune acquired the team in 1981 for $21 million.) The deal, record-setting for the sporting world if it tops $1 billion, would include the ivy-covered walls of Wrigley Field and a 25% stake in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Comcast </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CMCSA</a>) Sportsnet Chicago. <br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cubbies for sale</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/">Cubbies for sale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/25/magazines/fortune/cubs.fortune/index.htm?section=money_news_funny>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/927262/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/cubbies-for-sale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chicago Cubs</category><category>ChicagoCubs</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>TRB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World watches while Bonds chases record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img height="257" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/bonds.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Last night, Allan Kreda commented on how Barry Bonds' <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/">personal bottom line</a> might fare if (when) he topples Hank Aaron's home-run record (he's currently 10 runs shy at 746). The controversial slugger is lacking in lucrative endorsement deals and facing hefty legal fees. Not that I feel too badly for the guy. <br /><br />One group that is hoping to benefit as Bonds continues to chase the record is <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/30/commentary/sportsbiz/index.htm?section=money_news_funny">television broadcasters</a>. Polarizing personality or not, Barry Bonds is keeping baseball fans interested in seeing a new entry in the record books (even if an asterisk is involved).<br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys"><br />Walt Disney's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ESPN is hoping to break into its normally scheduled programming whenever Bonds comes to bat once there is the potential to tie or break the record. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) FOX is working with Major League Baseball to air an extra game (outside of its set broadcast schedule) when the record-breaking is imminent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World watches while Bonds chases record</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/">World watches while Bonds chases record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/30/commentary/sportsbiz/index.htm?section=money_news_funny>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/world-watches-while-bonds-chases-record/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barry Bonds</category><category>BarryBonds</category><category>Baseball</category><category>DIS</category><category>ESPN</category><category>FOX</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Mark McGwire</category><category>MarkMcgwire</category><category>MLB</category><category>NWS</category><category>San Francisco Giants</category><category>SanFranciscoGiants</category><category>television ratings</category><category>TelevisionRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bonds won't get rich as baseball's home run king]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p>How much money would <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/sports/baseball/30shea.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=sports&amp;adxnnlx=1180554046-PCCppavM21NnALWHof5VYg">Barry Bonds</a> be worth if he liked the media and the media liked him? That is the proverbial $64,000 question with the brawny outfielder just 10 home runs shy of Hank Aaron's career home run record of 755. </p>
<p>The 42-year-old Bonds has a one-year $16 million contract with the San Francisco Giants and if he has saved and invested well during his lucrative playing years, he should have no financial worries heading into his life after baseball. His career earnings dating back to his rookie season with Pittsburgh in 1986 are at least $172 million. But with potential legal bills mounting, Bonds is probably saving every penny he can. He still may be indicted by federal prosecutors on charges of perjury and he could be fined hefty amounts by the U.S. government in tax penalties.</p>
<p>With all this going on for the soon-to-be home run king, he's practically invisible on the endorsement front. Companies don't want to go anywhere near Bonds because of still unproven suspicions of steroid use. That and his general unfriendliness towards the media, and he really is alone on an island most days at the ballpark. But that didn't seem to bother him much this week as the Giants visited Shea Stadium and the New York Mets. </p>
<p>Bonds didn't even speak to the media before the first game of the series on Tuesday. The most intriguing aspect of the Bonds home run-record chase is how Aaron himself says he won't attend when the record is broken. And Commissioner Bud Selig has not confirmed whether he will attend either. Some way for baseball to treat its most hallowed record. The same Major League Baseball which clearly turned its collective heads the other way when Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa (both bulked up beyond rational belief) were chasing Roger Maris' single season record of 61 in 1998. McGwire went on to hit 70 dingers that summer, a record Bonds surpassed with 73 in 2001. </p>
<p>Will Bonds ever reap the financial rewards of the record he's about to shatter? The answer, quite clearly, is no. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/">Bonds won't get rich as baseball's home run king</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://%20http//www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/sports/baseball/30shea.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=sports&amp;adxnnlx=1180554046-PCCppavM21NnALWHof5VYg>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907167/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/bonds-wont-get-rich-as-baseballs-home-run-king/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barry bonds</category><category>BarryBonds</category><category>bud selig</category><category>BudSelig</category><category>hank aaron</category><category>HankAaron</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>mlb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Kreda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Roger Clemens a good investment?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p>What lessons can investors learn from the return of Roger Clemens to the Yankees next week, possibly against the Boston Red Sox? Plenty.</p>
<p>Like great investors, great baseball executives know where to find value. On the face of it, spending lots of money on a 44-year-old pitcher seems like a poor investment. But this isn't just any player. Clemens has already won 348 games, along with seven Cy Young Awards, making him one of the best to ever play the game.</p>
<p>The Yankees are going to pay him an astounding $4.5 million  <em>per month</em> for four months work. That works out to about $9,000 per pitch regardless whether they are balls or strikes. Sure is nice work if you can get it, but is Yankee owner George Steinbrenner going to get his money's worth from Clemens? They have to reach the postseason, period. </p>
<p>The Bronx Bombers faced a double-digit deficit to the Red Sox last weekend, before rebounding slightly. They've been forced to start a record seven rookies in the team's first 42 games, so adding Clemens surely will be a welcome injection for the decimated starting staff. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Roger Clemens a good investment?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/">Is Roger Clemens a good investment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 May 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.fanhouse.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://yankees.aolsportsblog.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/is-roger-clemens-a-good-investment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston red sox</category><category>BostonRedSox</category><category>george steinbrenner</category><category>GeorgeSteinbrenner</category><category>joe torre</category><category>JoeTorre</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>mlb</category><category>new york yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>roger clemens</category><category>RogerClemens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan Kreda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It shoots, it scores! NBA announces video download store]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tech-for-the-rest-of-us/" rel="tag">Tech for the Rest of Us</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="117" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/bball.jpg" />Maybe it was the smugness <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Laettner" target="_blank">Christian Laettner</a> displayed during my formative years, or the <a href="http://www.usabasketball.com/rules/rules.html" target="_blank">subtle differences</a> between NBA and NCAA Basketball rules, but professional basketball has always been my least favorite of the major sports. <br /><br />I am impressed, however, with the National Basketball Association's acknowledgment of the digital age. Today, the league announced that it has rolled out a video-download store, at which fans can <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/07/technology/07ecom.html?ref=business" target="_blank">purchase digital copies</a> of playoff games for $3 a pop. Entire series are available for $13 each, with a full playoff season <a href="http://www.thedailyreel.com/news-opinion/news/nba-sells-playoff-game-downloads?gnewsid=1178544511.25" target="_blank">available for $80</a>. <br /><br />The league's vice president of interactive services was quoted by the <em>New York Times </em>as saying "great games and surprising results have driven the most popular downloads." Among the heaviest downloads have been the series between the Golden State Warriors and the Dallas Mavericks, as well as last year's final championship-series match-up between the Mavericks and the Miami Heat. <br /><br />The NBA is the first of the major sports organizations to offer such a service, though other leagues are reportedly converting game footage into digital clips in order to satiate fan demand. An executive with Major League Baseball reveals the league's plans to introduce a video-search product later this year, allowing fans to search through hundreds of clips to find specific highlights (which will likely be available for free). The National Football League is introducing a video-heavy version of its web site this summer and exploring the ramifications of offering historical video footage. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/">It shoots, it scores! NBA announces video download store</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/07/technology/07ecom.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890540/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/it-shoots-it-scores-nba-announces-video-download-store/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dallas Mavericks</category><category>DallasMavericks</category><category>digital downloads</category><category>DigitalDownloads</category><category>Golden State Warriors</category><category>GoldenStateWarriors</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Miami Heat</category><category>MiamiHeat</category><category>MLB</category><category>National Basketball Association</category><category>National Football League</category><category>NationalBasketballAssociation</category><category>NationalFootballLeague</category><category>NBA</category><category>NFL</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cable shares punished by Major League Baseball deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>Cable stocks were down a bit with the market this morning as Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX), Time Warner Cable (TWC), and Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) are all lower. The one bit of possibly troubling news is the potential agreement between Major League Baseball getting the exclusive "Away-Game" pact with DirectTV Group, Inc. (NYSE:DTV). The weak stock market is hurting even DirecTV, with DTV shares down over 1% right after the open. <br /><br />For a satellite company to get an exclusive on away-games is simply flabergasting. This deal is certain to have many critics.  DirecTV sent a letter to the FCC on Friday detailing its $700 million deal over a 7-year period starting in 2009. Senator John Kerry has also asked the FCC to investigate the deal. <br /><br />The away-game package has been available through iNDemand for some time, but this would be exclusive to DirecTV and via the league's website. INHD is available as part of the high-def offerings from cable operators and is owned by INDEMAND Networks, whose shareholders are Comcast INDEMAND Holdings, Inc., Cox Communications Holdings, Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership.<br /><span style="font-style: italic;" /><span style="font-style: italic;"><br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/">Cable shares punished by Major League Baseball deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/845789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMSA</category><category>DTV</category><category>FCC</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Satellite TV</category><category>SatelliteTv</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
