<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[GOOG/eBay MATTERS. It's all about Sun-tzu!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>This morning it was reported that e<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/google-ebay-form-advertising-alliance/n20060828040809990007"><font color="#0b497a">Bay and Google <!--StartFragment -->formed an advertising alliance</font></a>. This strategy reminds me of the quote attributed to Sun-tzu in the Art of War: <em>"Keep you friends close, and your enemies even closer."</em></p>
<p>In his take this morning, Peter Cohan writes that he thinks the <a title="View Google eBay deal is much ado about nothing on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/google-ebay-deal-is-much-ado-about-nothing/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Google eBay deal is much ado about nothing</font></a>. But I beg to differ, on several different levels.</p>
<p>First, I think it's a good strategic move for both companies. This deal creates opportunities for both companies as "Web2.0" becomes even more tangled. While both companies did not promote any near-term financial benefit, the merging of interests does give further indication of how eBay intends to deploy its new Skype (costly) "asset" with it's concept of "click-to-call." </p>
<p>This will allow buyers and sellers to communicate immediately, perhaps allowing for better self-policing and processing of sale items. </p>
<p>Second, and more importantly, this deal shows that both firms see advantages in working together when mutual benefits can be derived -- even though they are competitors in many ways. </p>
<p>Since eBay has also formed an alliance with Yahoo domestically, it also shows that the company feels that it is important to promote competition in more ways than just in its own marketplace. Perhaps this deal will allow eBay to keep a closer eye on its new nemesis.</p>
<p>Third, and perhaps most important, while this deal does nothing to put cash on the bottom line, it does make it harder for a newcomer to gain traction. That benefit should not be ignored. You never know when another MySpace will pop-up out of nowhere to claim a slice of the Internet pie.</p>
<p>Finally, I think the move shows how management at both companies is focused right now on creating more shareholder value. Last Friday in my post, <a title="View GOOG at $600 (good luck!) + eBay at, what? on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/goog-at-600-good-luck-ebay-at-what/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">GOOG at $600 (good luck!) + eBay at, what?</font></a>, I called into question the valuations of both companies. The management teams seem to be feeling the heat to shore up their generous stock prices. </p>
<p>GOOG &amp; eBay have formed numerous alliances with major and minor web players and continue to do so. This is smart. At this stage of the Web's development, <strong>everyone wants to be everywhere since no one has any idea about the end game.</strong> </p>
<p>Disclosure: I have never held any position in Google long or short. I owned shares in eBay until January 2006 and have no current position.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture &amp; Planning firm.</em></p>
<dt class="quote"></dt><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/">GOOG/eBay MATTERS. It's all about Sun-tzu!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/google-ebay-form-advertising-alliance/n20060828040809990007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/660048/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/28/goog-ebay-alliance-does-matter-itsall-about-sun-tzu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ebay</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>growth strategy</category><category>GrowthStrategy</category><category>Marketing strategy</category><category>MarketingStrategy</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Sun-tzu</category><category>valuation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's top 10 'belly dance' moves]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a></p><a href="http://www.wired.com/news/culture/mac/0,70546-0.html?tw=wn_technology_2"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0"align="right" alt="apple and the mighty mouse" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/03/apple_mightymouse.jpg"/></a>Was it when Steve Jobs announced that smaller, more portable laptops would never be popular among consumers,later to go all mini, all the time with the iBook? Or, when Apple finally let its consumers have more than one clickeron their mouse, despite a decade of insistence that one was the loveliest number? Which is your favorite of Apple'smany marketing flip-flops?<br /><br /><em>Wired</em> has a highly entertaining (and not a little enlightening) tripthrough what they call the "belly dance" moves Apple has made over the years. Number One: when Jobs announcedthat Intel's processor would be the wave of the future, contrary to his insistence, in November 2003, that the PowerPCwould never die.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/">Apple's top 10 'belly dance' moves</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.wired.com/news/culture/mac/0,70546-0.html?tw=wn_technology_2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/604445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/apples-top-10-belly-dance-moves/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple products</category><category>AppleProducts</category><category>flip-flops</category><category>intel</category><category>lists</category><category>marketing strategy</category><category>MarketingStrategy</category><category>powerpc</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>top 10</category><category>Top10</category><category>wired</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walmart to launch 'Exsto' urban menswear line]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p>Walmart and fashion - will they ever go together? I, for one, can't fathom the combo. The retailer has been fighting theuphill battle of competing in a marketplace where Target is the pinnacle and even <em>Kmart</em> is hipper-than-them. Ohwhat a sad place to be. And now they'll be in that sad place with a menswear line that no one could possible pronounce.Or spell.<br /><br />Really. I had to toggle four times to type Exsto. Perhaps the young urban males to whom theclothing line will be targeted won't care how it's spelled, or pronounced, and will shove it in their carts along withthe CDs full of rap ... oh wait! Doesn't Walmart still refuse to carry music with explicit lyrics - the type enjoyedmost by young urban males?<br /><br />The strategy is questionable, but at least the company charged with producing themenswear has some street cred. G-III Apparel also produces clothing lines for Sean John, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein,and Guess.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/">Walmart to launch 'Exsto' urban menswear line</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12084031/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/604448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/walmart-to-launch-exsto-urban-menswear-line/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>exsto</category><category>g-iii</category><category>g-iii apparel</category><category>G-iiiApparel</category><category>kmart</category><category>marketing strategy</category><category>MarketingStrategy</category><category>menswear</category><category>target</category><category>urban males</category><category>UrbanMales</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><category>young urban males</category><category>YoungUrbanMales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
