<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot Earnings Preview: Signs of Recovery?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/hd-logo-240.jpg" />Atlanta-based big-box retailer Home Depot Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) is scheduled to discuss its fourth-quarter and fiscal year financial results in a conference call Tuesday, Feb. 23, at 9:00 AM (ET). Catch the live webcast of the call (later archived) at the <a href="http://earnings.homedepot.com/">company's website</a>.</p>
<p>During the three months that ended in January, Home Depot announced an upgrade of its <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/the-home-depot-transitions-to-fujitsu-u-scan-retail-self-checkout-software/rfid288814772/?channel=pf">self-checkout system</a> and an <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/the-home-depot-to-launch-exclusive-martha-stewart-living-brand-of-paint-in-march-2010/rfid277936798/?channel=pf">agreement with Martha Stewart</a> Living Omnimedia (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>), as well as declared a <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-home-depot-declares-third-quarter-dividend-of-22-5-cents/rfid272572840?channel=pf">quarterly dividend</a>. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expect the world's largest home improvement retailer to report fourth-quarter earnings of $0.17 per share, down two cents year over year. Revenue for the period is expected to have fallen 3.7% to $14.1 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Depot Earnings Preview: Signs of Recovery?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/">Home Depot Earnings Preview: Signs of Recovery?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19368130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/home-depot-earnings-preview-signs-of-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>HD</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LOW</category><category>Lowes</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MSO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings Highlights: Campbell, Dell, Goodyear, JCPenney, Merck, Playboy ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpb/" rel="tag">Campbell Soup (CPB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/q/" rel="tag">Qwest Communications Intl (Q)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmi/" rel="tag">Waste Management Inc. (WMI)</a></p><p>Here are some highlights from this past week's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" target="_blank">earnings coverage</a> on BloggingStocks:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Co.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">ANF</a>) lower <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/abercrombie-and-fitch-posts-lower-sales-in-q4/">Q4 earnings</a> topped estimates and same-store sales also declined.</li>
    <li><strong>Campbell Soup Co.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/campbell-soup-company/cpb/nys">CPB</a>) reaffirmed its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/campbell-soup-slips-after-slashing-guidance/">earnings outlook</a> but lowered its revenue forecast for the full year.</li>
    <li><strong>Daimler AG</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dai/nys">DAI</a>) provided <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/closing-bell-up-and-away-again-dai-tm-siri-msft-yhoo/">guidance</a> for the year that included slashing its dividend, sending shares lower.</li>
    <li><strong>Dell Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) lower <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/dell-sells-off-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/">Q4 earnings</a> beat estimates by a penny but it didn't offer guidance, sending shares lower.</li>
    <li><strong>Goodyear Tire &amp; Rubber Co.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) easily topped <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/goodyear-may-have-had-a-good-q4-but-im-not-buying/">Q4 earnings</a> estimates and revenue increased as well.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings Highlights: Campbell, Dell, Goodyear, JCPenney, Merck, Playboy ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/">Earnings Highlights: Campbell, Dell, Goodyear, JCPenney, Merck, Playboy ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19360822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/20/earnings-highlights-campbell-dell-goodyear-jcpenney-merck/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Abercrombie and Fitch</category><category>ANF</category><category>Campbell Soup</category><category>CPB</category><category>DAI</category><category>Daimler</category><category>DELL</category><category>earnings</category><category>Goodyear</category><category>GT</category><category>Hormel</category><category>HRL</category><category>JCP</category><category>JCPenney</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>MSO</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>Qwest</category><category>Valueclick</category><category>VCLK</category><category>Waste Management</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview: More retail earnings: Gap, Home Depot, Sears, Target ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/target-shoppers-200.jpg" alt="" />On the heels of last week's better-than-expected earnings results from retailers Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Co. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">ANF</a>), Kohl's Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">KSS</a>), Macy's Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>), Urban Outfitters Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/urban-outfitters-inc/urbn/nas">URBN</a>) and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) -- as well as disappointing numbers from Blockbuster Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/headlines/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) and JCPenney Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">JCP</a>) -- the coming week will bring results from more shopping- and strip-mall favorites.</p>
<p><strong>TJX Companies Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tjx-companies-incorporated/tjx/nys">TJX</a>), which operates T.J. Maxx and Marshalls stores in the U.S., settled <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-tjx-companies-inc-announces-settlement-agreement-resulting-in-dismissal-of-putative-financial-institutions-class-action-settlement-costs-already-reflected-in-previously-announced-reserve/rfid247576256?channel=pf">a class action</a>, announced <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-tjx-companies-inc-announces-new-1-billion-share-repurchase-program-declares-quarterly-common-stock-dividend/rfid253344953?channel=pf">share buybacks</a> and <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-tjx-companies-inc-raises-third-quarter-and-full-year-outlook-updates-long-term-growth-plans/rfid262247929?channel=pf">raised its guidance</a> in the third quarter. For the three months that ended in October, analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expect TJX to report earnings of $0.80 per share, up from $0.57 in the same period of last year. Revenue is expected to total $5.3 billion, or 10.2% higher than a year ago. So far, the full-year forecast is for a profit of $2.59 per share (+22.3%) on $20.0 billion (+5.5%) in sales.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview: More retail earnings: Gap, Home Depot, Sears, Target ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/">The week in preview: More retail earnings: Gap, Home Depot, Sears, Target ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/15/the-week-in-preview-more-retail-earnings-gap-home-depot-sear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Abercrombie and Fitch</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>ANF</category><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>Don Fisher</category><category>featured</category><category>Gap</category><category>GPS</category><category>HD</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>JCP</category><category>JCPenney</category><category>Kohls</category><category>KSS</category><category>LOW</category><category>Lowes</category><category>Macys</category><category>Marshalls</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Sears</category><category>SHLD</category><category>T.J. Maxx</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>TJX</category><category>Urban Outfitters</category><category>URBN</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walmart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who profited from Bear Stearns' collapse? One insider did, and got away with it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/bearstearnspic.jpg" />So, I was flipping through some articles in <em>Rolling Stone</em>, when I found a very interesting economic story - yes, in <em>Rolling Stone</em>. The article, "<a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/30481512/wall_streets_naked_swindle/print">Wall Street's Naked Swindle</a>," takes a look at what happened in the options pits leading up to the death of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. According to the article, an unknown option buyer made "one of the craziest bets Wall Street has ever seen," by shorting Bear Stearns. The unknown trader felt that Bear Stearns would lose "more than half" of its value in nine days or less, a bet that one financial analyst likened to buying 1.7 million lottery tickets.<br /><br />What is crazy is that this bet paid off, leading to only one conclusion: insider trading (cue dramatic music). When Bear Stearns dropped from roughly $63 to $2 per share on March 17th (just six days later), the person purchasing the options made roughly $270 million. Senator Chris Dodd from the Senate Banking Committee thought that something wasn't on the up and up with this trade, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) promised it would look into the trade. Of course, nothing has happened since.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who profited from Bear Stearns' collapse? One insider did, and got away with it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/">Who profited from Bear Stearns' collapse? One insider did, and got away with it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202427/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/who-profited-from-bear-stearns-collapse-one-insider-did-and-g/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>bank failure</category><category>BankBailout</category><category>BankFailure</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>insider trading</category><category>InsiderTrading</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>SEC</category><category>theft</category><category>Timothy Geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart is still money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_martha.jpg" alt="" />If I was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/">worried about the fate of Martha Stewart's flagship magazine,</a> <em>Martha Stewart Living</em>, perhaps my concerns were unfounded. The statement from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) could not be more bold, more unfailingly optimistic (like Martha herself): <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123983401443422587.html">Martha is getting a raise</a>.<br /><br />It's a big one, from her current CEO salary of $900,000 a year to at least $2 million annually for the next three years, plus a hefty "retention incentive" of $3 million today. <br /><br /><em>But where was she going?</em> you might ask. After all, the company is <strong>her very self</strong>, media-opolied. As far as I can tell, she was going nowhere, but without her there is little left. Martha's aspirational persona has made an indelible mark on our culture, one that has no danger of falling victim to our economic downturn. She represents the soul of the DIY ethos; not for nothing do people say of any well-executed craft, especially one involving vintage pieces found at a thrift store, "that's so Martha!"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martha Stewart is still money</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/">Martha Stewart is still money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1519129/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/martha-stewart-is-still-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>martha</category><category>martha stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MarthaStewartLiving</category><category>mso</category><category>stewart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview: Eye on Marvel, KBR, First Solar, Deckers and more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/mvl_shoo_fslr_kbr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected the parade of earnings declines to continue into the final week of February, with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">Nordstrom Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">JWN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wynn-resorts-limited/wynn/nas">Wynn Resorts Ltd.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wynn-resorts-limited/wynn/nas">WYNN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">Macy's Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">Limited Brands Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">LTD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/royal-bk-cda-montreal-que/ry/nys">Royal Bank Of Canada</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/royal-bk-cda-montreal-que/ry/nys">RY</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/del-monte-foods-company/dlm/nys">Del Monte Foods Co.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/del-monte-foods-company/dlm/nys">DLM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">Kohl's Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">KSS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">Washington Post Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">Gap Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">GPS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/campbell-soup-company/cpb/nys">Campbell Soup Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/campbell-soup-company/cpb/nys">CPB</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/radioshack-corporation/rsh/nys">RadioShack Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/radioshack-corporation/rsh/nys">RSH</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys">H.J. Heinz Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys">HNZ</a>) all expected to post lower earnings for the most recent quarter. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/office-depot-inc/odp/nys">Office Depot Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/office-depot-inc/odp/nys">ODP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/saks-incorporated/sks/nys">Saks Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/saks-incorporated/sks/nys">SKS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cooper-tire-and-rubber-company/ctb/nys">Cooper Tire &amp; Rubber Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cooper-tire-and-rubber-company/ctb/nys">CTB</a>) are expect to have swung to a loss.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview: Eye on Marvel, KBR, First Solar, Deckers and more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/">The week in preview: Eye on Marvel, KBR, First Solar, Deckers and more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466844/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/the-week-in-preview-eye-on-marvel-kbr-first-solar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Campbell</category><category>Cooper</category><category>CPB</category><category>CRM</category><category>CTB</category><category>DECK</category><category>Deckers</category><category>Del Monte</category><category>Dell</category><category>Digital Realty Trust</category><category>DLM</category><category>DLR</category><category>DLTR</category><category>Dollar Tree</category><category>DreamWorks</category><category>DWA</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>First Solar</category><category>Flowserve</category><category>FLS</category><category>footwear</category><category>FSLR</category><category>Gap</category><category>GPS</category><category>Halliburton</category><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>HD</category><category>Heinz</category><category>HNZ</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JWN</category><category>KBR</category><category>Kohls</category><category>KSS</category><category>Limited Brands</category><category>LTD</category><category>M</category><category>Macys</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Marvel</category><category>Motley Fool</category><category>MSO</category><category>MVL</category><category>Nordstrom</category><category>ODP</category><category>Office Depot</category><category>PCG</category><category>RadioShack</category><category>RBC</category><category>Royal Bank of Canada</category><category>RSH</category><category>RY</category><category>Safeway</category><category>Saks</category><category>Salesforce.com</category><category>SHOO</category><category>SJM</category><category>SKS</category><category>Smucker</category><category>Spider-Man</category><category>Steven Madden</category><category>SWY</category><category>Target</category><category>Teleflex</category><category>TFX</category><category>TGT</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>WPO</category><category>WYNN</category><category>Wynn Resorts</category><category>X-Men</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could Martha Stewart Living mag be troubled?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/martha_stewart_living.jpg" />In a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/seattle-post-intelligencer-closing-say-media-insiders/">previous post about the medium</a> I call "periodicals printed on paper," I wrote that the universe of magazines and newspapers was being winnowed, and only the very best would survive. As my mind's eye darted around a mental image of a newsstand, a few periodicals stood out as "best"; <em>Martha Stewart Living</em> chief among them. <em>MSL</em> has not just created a loyal following and niche audience; it is a symbol of an entire subset of the population, an aspirational icon who is, while not exactly an ordinary person herself, creates a mostly achievable lifestyle. Her magazine will always represent the soul of the DIY culture; not for nothing do people say of any well-executed craft, especially one involving vintage pieces found at a thrift store, "that's so Martha!"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could Martha Stewart Living mag be troubled?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/">Could Martha Stewart Living mag be troubled?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1446276/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/could-martha-stewart-living-mag-be-troubled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boodro</category><category>living</category><category>magazine</category><category>martha stewart</category><category>martha stewart living</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MarthaStewartLiving</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-ivan-boesky.jpg" />We recently presented a look at some of the most <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">notorious financial felons</a> of contemporary times.</p>
<p>Since then, news has included the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jj7fAsa1HVVJPue2eEgtWlTqkONQD94HNG3O0">indictment of Mark Cuban</a> for insider trading in a case that is somewhat reminiscent of Martha Stewart's case. According to the SEC, the billionaire entrepreneur asked his broker to sell all his shares of Mamma.com after the company's CEO confidentially told him of an impending stock offering that would dilute the value of all existing shares. By selling before the information became public, Cuban is said to have sidestepped losses of more than $750,000. Cuban insists, though, that no agreement existed to keep the information confidential.</p>
<p>And then there was the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h9PvQtj8plxTnRZS7hHmJap_Rt2AD94ICFU00">indictment in Texas of Vice President Dick Cheney</a>, along with former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and others. There seems to be a conflict of interest between the  vice president's influence on the federal agency that oversees federal immigration detention centers and his substantial holdings in Vanguard Group, which invests in private prison companies. But does the lame-duck county district attorney, who was a no-show in court, have the authority to bring charges against federal officials with regard to federally run institutions?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/">Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1381784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adelphia</category><category>ADM</category><category>Alberto Gonzales</category><category>Andrew Fastow</category><category>Barry Minkow</category><category>Bernard Ebbers</category><category>Boris Berezovsky</category><category>Charles Keating</category><category>Dennis Kozlowski</category><category>Dick Cheney</category><category>Enron</category><category>financial felons</category><category>George Soros</category><category>insider trading</category><category>Ivan Boesky</category><category>Jack Abramoff</category><category>Jeff Skilling</category><category>John Rigas</category><category>Joseph Nacchio</category><category>Ken Lay</category><category>Lou Pearlman</category><category>Mamma.com</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Mark Whitacre</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Michael Milken</category><category>Nick Leeson</category><category>Qwest</category><category>Ted Stevens</category><category>Tyco</category><category>Vanguard Group</category><category>Worldcom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Martha Stewart]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/imcl/" rel="tag">ImClone Systems (IMCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-martha-stewart.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of a feature in which we wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial felons. <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">See all 17</a>.</em></p>
<p>I sometimes get the impression that people think I'm joking when I say I love Martha Stewart. I get it; I don't look like I have much in common with Martha. My apartment is cluttered, my cleaning habits are slapdash at best, and my hair is generally unkempt. I have at least a week's worth of random garbage traveling with me in the Hyundai at all times -- and I often get the distinct impression that people from New England are looking down on me.</p>
<p>Despite our differences, Martha is a personal hero of mine. Flipping through her magazine, <em>Martha Stewart Living</em>, is not unlike paging through a <em>National Geographic</em>. It's a glossy, impeccably photographed glimpse into an exotic world that I can only hope one day to visit. If the July 2007 issue can be believed, Martha is the type of woman who, on a whim, jaunts out to East Hampton for a weekend of kayaking and antiquing. In between horseback rides and hikes, she just might whip up some pasta with salted pressed fish roe, or perhaps a nice avocado gelato. Can you <em>imagine</em>?</p>
<p>So you can appreciate my shock upon discovering that Martha, this creature of uncommon refinement, might also be a common white-collar criminal. On December 27, 2001, Stewart dumped 3,928 shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imclone-systems-incorporated/imcl/nas">ImClone Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/imclone-systems-incorporated/imcl/nas">IMCL</a>) through her broker, Peter Bacanovic of Merrill Lynch. Martha -- the CEO herself of an eponymous multi-million-dollar media empire, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) -- <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9503E3DE143CF930A25755C0A9649C8B63&amp;scp=4&amp;sq=martha%20stewart%20imclone&amp;st=cse">raked in about $288,000</a> from the sale. The next day, after the market closed, ImClone announced that its cancer drug Erbitux had been rejected by the Food &amp; Drug Administration. It was an explosive bit of news that sent ImClone shares plunging.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Felons: Martha Stewart</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/">Financial Felons: Martha Stewart</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1365999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/24/financial-felons-martha-stewart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial felons</category><category>imclone systems</category><category>insider trading</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>peter bacanovic</category><category>Samuel Waksal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart does have a sense of humor!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p>Martha Stewart's daughter Alexis and Jennifer Koppelman Hutt, co-hosts of a show on Sirius Satellite Radio, are teaming up for a new television parody of vintage <em>Martha Stewart Living</em> episodes. The title? <em>Whatever, Martha!<br /><br /></em>Surprisingly, the show has the blessing of Martha Stewart, who is not normally known as a barrel full of laughs. She<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/business/media/11martha.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin"> told</a> <em>The New York Times</em> that "They promised not to be mean, and I had to trust them. I'm not going to have a heart attack."<br /><br />The half-hour show, set to debut on <a href="http://www.fineliving.com/">Fine Living</a> on September 16th, will feature old clips from Ms. Stewart's show alongside sarcastic commentary from her daughter and Ms. Hutt. There are no clips available online but it sounds similar to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheap_Seats">ESPN Classic's Cheap Seats</a>.<br /><br />It's nice to see that Martha Stewart has a sense of humor. Given that shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) have gone from $20 to $8 in a little more than a year and a half, she will need it. The debut of the new show is symptomatic of the problems the company is facing: Stewart went from an icon to a cliche, and now she completes the cycle by becoming a joke.<br /><br />With the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/">recent resignation</a> of its CEO following the completion of the Emeril acquisition, this is a company in turmoil. Given its lackluster ability to generate profits during its prime, it seems like a stock worth avoiding.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/">Martha Stewart does have a sense of humor!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/business/media/11martha.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1280596/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/11/martha-stewart-does-have-a-sense-of-humor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MarthaStewartLivingOmnimedia</category><category>MSO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart goes to Wal-Mart]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/martha-stewart-crafts-expands-into-wal/rfid120002677">recent announcement</a> that its crafts line would be debuting in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) stores nationally sent MSO up more than 5% at first, but the stock has since given all that back and then some: the stock is down nearly 10% from where it was before the announcement.<br />The company needs to replace the guaranteed licensing fees from K-Mart that are in the process of phasing out, and revenue from that business is likely to plummet when the guarantee declines from $65 million this year to around $20 million next year.<br /><br />But Wal-Mart? Haven't their been entire books written on how tough it is to make money selling to Wal-Mart? It's easy for me to understand Wall Street's skepticism about this deal, and there have been a lot of uninspiring developments for the company in recent months: first the company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/">paid $45 million</a> for the Emeril empire, what was supposed to be company transforming acquisition. Then a few months later, CEO Susan Lyne <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/">resigned</a> abruptly -- which doesn't speak well for the new strategy.<br /><br />Maybe the Wal-Mart deal will work out splendidly -- but the company appears to be all over the place.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/">Martha Stewart goes to Wal-Mart</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/martha-stewart-crafts-expands-into-wal/rfid120002677>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1251032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/martha-stewart-goes-to-wal-mart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MSO</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia CEO resigns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/marthamartha.jpg" />Bad news out of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) today: CEO Susan Lyne has stepped down after four years as the company's CEO. <span id="selectNewsText" class="lh18 txt12">President of Media Wenda Harris Millard and President of Merchandising Robin Marino will become co-CEOs.</span></p>
<p>Oh, how quickly things change. Back in April, Martha Stewart Living announced that it was acquiring the Emeril brand for $50 million, with an optimistic Lyne saying, "This acquisition is strategically important to our company as we continue to expand and diversify our business and represents a significant opportunity for us going forward." The company said it expected the acquisition to add $8 million of EBITDA in its first year of operation. Now Lyne is gone without explanation, and the press release didn't even mention the "strategically important" Emeril deal, which has a value of more than 10% of the company's market cap.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia CEO resigns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia CEO resigns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/business/media/12martha.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1222409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-ceo-resigns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MSO</category><category>Susan Lyne</category><category>SusanLyne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Macy's Q1 beats analysts, but don't expect me to buy the stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/macyslogo.jpg" alt="" />Retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">Macy's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys">M</a>) first fiscal <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/macys-inc-reports-first-quarter-results/rfid103117472">quarter</a> wasn't that bad, at least in terms of the analyst game. The company, which competes with mall colleagues such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">J.C. Penney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">JCP</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>), reported net income of 2 cents per diluted share from continuing operations. The denizens of Wall Street thought the company would lose 2 cents, so management came ahead in this regard by four pennies. Bravo!</p>
<p>However, does this news excite me? Not necessarily. Macy's needs a little help in its sales department. First, the overall top line declined almost 3%, coming in at $5.7 billion. Second, and perhaps even more telling, same-store sales were weak during the quarter, decreasing by 2.6%. And then there's the issue of cash flow. Operational cash flow from continuing operations was excellent compared with last year's quarter since $21 million was generated this time around as opposed to $370 million being used last time around. Nevertheless, when you take into account capital spending, no free cash flow was left over in the first quarter. And cash has been decreasing on the balance sheet. Oh, and gross margin went down, too. </p>
<p>I wasn't too taken by Macy's current earnings report, and I'm not putting the company on my list of investment ideas right now, even though the stock closed up yesterday on the news (heck, the company didn't repurchase any shares last quarter and stated that it didn't see any more share repurchases coming for the rest of the year, so apparently the stock isn't on management's ideas list, either). I think there might be better retail investments out there, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>). Yes, the retailer may have strong associations with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/macys-m-hooks-up-with-trump-martha-and-others/">Donald Trump and Martha Stewart</a>, but I will not be blinded by such celebrity value. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own shares in any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/">Macy's Q1 beats analysts, but don't expect me to buy the stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/macys-inc-reports-first-quarter-results/rfid103117472>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/macys-q1-beats-analysts-but-dont-expect-me-to-buy-the-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Donald Trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Macys</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>retail industry</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>RetailIndustry</category><category>RetailStocks</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia set to buy Emeril empire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/from-emerils-kitchens.jpg" alt="" />Last month, I reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) was actively <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/">seeking an acquisition</a> to diversify beyond its core Martha Stewart brand.<br /><br />Now the company has found what it hopes is it's missing piece, and is set to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120339779999776477.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">acquire superstar chef Emeril Lagasse</a>'s [subscription required] media and licensing empire for $45 million in cash and $5 million in stock, according to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.<br /><br />The purchase price will include the rights to Emeril's television programs, syndicated episodes of the "Emeril Live" show on the Food Network, cookbooks and Emeril's websites, and licensing deals from All-Clad cookware, W&uuml;sthof cutlery, Wedgwood tableware and T-fal appliances. The acquisition also includes Emeril-branded spices, marinades, coffee, Bam! B-Q sauce and other food products, according to the <em>Journal</em>. Emeril's restaurants and corporate office are not part of the deal.<br /><br />It seems likely that the market will react positively to this development, but I wouldn't be buying here. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia hasn't been able to make much money from the Martha Stewart brand and adding another brand to a failing company hardly seems like a recipe for success.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia set to buy Emeril empire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120339779999776477.html?mod=todays_us_page_one>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1118412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-set-to-buy-emeril-empire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Emeril</category><category>emeril lagasse</category><category>EmerilLagasse</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MSO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia be saved?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><p>With its stock sitting in a toilet that would make the housekeeping goddess cringe, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys">MSO</a>) is looking for something to boost its operations.</p>
<p><em>Fortune</em> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/news/companies/kapner_rowley.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008011618">reports</a> it has learned that the company "has held recent talks with two prominent tastemakers, the fashion designer Cynthia Rowley and Jonathan Adler, known for his home d&eacute;cor, with the aim of building multifaceted brands around these personalities that span television, publishing and the internet."</p>
<p>The talks have reportedly broken off, but CEO Susan Lyne has said that she is on the prowl for acquisitions. Acquisitions have a bad habit of failing to generate value for the acquirer, and <em>Fortune</em> notes that "The pressure to do a deal will intensify this year, as MSO prepares to take a hit on several fronts." And therein lies the problem.</p>
<p>The company has historically been unable to generate a profit, and that's not going to get any better in the near future. An acquisition driven by what amounts to desperation is unlikely to change that. And signing a big star will cost a lot money, and the value of that star's brand will tend to aggregate to them, not MSO -- that's the nature of licensing deals.</p>
<p>Bottom line: If you want to buy shares of MSO, it should be because you're bullish on the future of the company as it is now, not because you're hoping that a management team that has failed to generate value can make a killer acquisition that will restore the company to its once high-flying status.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/">Can Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia be saved?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/news/companies/kapner_rowley.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008011618>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1092003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/can-martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-be-saved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>MarthaStewartLivingOmnimedia</category><category>MSO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>BloggingStocks readers and AOL Money &amp; Finance visitors have spoken, and below are the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007">Best &amp; Worst of 2007</a>. (See the individual posts for full results.)</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Company of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-company-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Company of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=3">Google</a>, internet search provider turned diversified services giant, received 51% of the vote, beating such strong contenders as Apple and Coca-Cola.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest gadget of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-gadget-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Hottest Gadget of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> After all the hoopla surrounding the launch of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=2">iPhone</a>, it's no big surprise that it tops this category, with 47% of the vote, besting second place finisher the Nintendo Wii.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Dumbest celebrity 'feuds' on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-dumbest-celebrity-feuds/" target="_blank"><strong>Dumbest Celebrity Feud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=4">Rosie O'Donnell's squabbles with Donald Trump</a> (and also with Elizabeth Hasselbeck) garnered 66% of the vote, easily beating out the back-and-forth between Britney Spears and her ex, Kevin Federline.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest cars of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-cars-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Hottest Car of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=13">Cadillac CTS</a> led with 43% of the vote, easily beating the BMW M3 and others in this category.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Dumbest moments in business on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-dumbest-moments-in-business/" target="_blank"><strong>Dumbest Moment in Business</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=5">JetBlue's</a> stranding of passengers on a cramped, grounded airliner for hours netted 51% of the vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Cadillac CTS</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>Dubai</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>globalization</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>iPhone</category><category>JBLU</category><category>JetBlue</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Rosie O'Donnell</category><category>Sanjaya Malakar</category><category>weak dollar</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>We recently took a look at the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007">Best &amp; Worst of 2007</a> in sixteen categories and asked you to vote for your favorites, as well as sharing the reasons for your picks and any other contenders we may have overlooked. And voting is off to a strong start, with more than 100,000 votes in each category so far.</p>
<p>Some categories have shaped up to be close races. Chuck Prince, Bill Ford, and Bob Nardelli each have a little less than a third of the vote for <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Best CEO departure of 2007 on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/" target="_blank">Best CEO Departure of the Year</a>. Britney Spears and Michael Vick are neck and neck as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Celebrities most likely to lose it all on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-celebrities-most-likely-to-lose-it-all/" target="_blank">Celebrity Most Likely to Lose It All</a>, while Lindsey Lohan's relatively low profile recently has garnered her just 6 percent of that vote. In the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Shameless attempts at cashing in on '15 minutes' on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-shameless-attempts-at-cashing-in-on-15/" target="_blank">Most Shameless Attempt at Cashing in on '15 Minutes'</a>, Sanjaya Malakar has a slim lead over Howard K. Stern/Larry Birkhead, but poor Chris "Leave Britney Alone!" Crocker has gotten no respect with a mere 6 percent of the vote. McDonald's has a small lead as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest chain restaurant on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-chain-restaurant/" target="_blank">Hottest Chain Restaurant</a>, thought Chipotle isn't far behind with more than a quarter of the vote. And while the iPhone has the lead now as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest gadget of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-gadget-of-the-year/" target="_blank">Hottest Gadget of the Year</a>, it and the Nintendo Wii have been trading places as the front runner. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054623/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Austin</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Best and Worst of 2007</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>Bill Ford</category><category>BMW M3</category><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Cadillac CTS</category><category>Chipotle</category><category>Chris Crocker</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>Dubai</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Google</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>Howard K. Stern</category><category>Jet Blue</category><category>Larry Birkhead</category><category>Lindsey Lohan</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>Michael Vick</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Neil Cavuto</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>private equity</category><category>Regions Bank</category><category>Research in Motion</category><category>Rosie O'Donnell</category><category>Sanjaya Malakar</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most annoying money personality]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><em><iframe align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=127261&amp;pollId=127361&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance&amp;popup=yes" frameborder="0" width="229" scrolling="no" height="190"></iframe>This post was part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007"><strong>Best &amp; Worst of 2007</strong></a>. Voting has now closed and readers have chosen <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=15">Martha Stewart</a></strong> as the most annoying money personality of the year. Let us know in the comments if you are pleased with this result.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/most-annoying.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In last year's Best &amp; Worst in Money awards, Donald Trump was the easy victor in the <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/most-annoying-money-expert">Most Annoying Money Expert</a> category, securing 44% of the votes, more than twice as much as Suze Orman, Jim Cramer, or Mark Cuban. Trump won by such a landslide that this year we decided to take him out of the running, giving some new personalities a shot at the prize. </p>
<p>So, let's take a look at the contestants for this year's Donald Trump Honorary Most Annoying Money Personality contest:</p>
<p><strong>Maria Bartiromo</strong>, CNBC's famed "Money Honey," isn't looking so sweet and spunky these days. She now seems a touch vampish as the apparent centerpiece in a Citigroup scandal that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/marias-up-chuck-prince-is-out-and-todd-thomson-must-be-kickin/">led to the ouster of exec Todd Thomson</a>. Thomson might have earned the CEO spot recently vacated by Chuck Prince if he hadn't offered Bartiromo a spot on a Citi jet to fly to Asia to speak to customers. </p>
<p>Maria's journalistic ethics were called into question for accepting the junket, but CNBC, which nets plenty of advertising from Citi, glossed over the scandal. Criticism of Maria, however, helped raise the profile of CNBC's new sweetheart, Erin Burnett. In September, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/">AOL's Money Face-Off</a> found them virtually neck-and-neck among voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most annoying money personality</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most annoying money personality</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1048319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-annoying-money-personality/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best and Worst of 2007</category><category>Maria Bartiromo</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Robert Kiyosaki</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been three weeks since our <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars"><strong>Money Face-Off</strong></a> feature ran here at BloggingStocks and on AOL, offering you the opportunity to share who you though had the financial edge in a series of twenty head-to-head match-ups. So I thought I'd take another look and see how things have worked out. </p>
<p>It's hard to pick just one big winner. In terms of the largest lead over a rival, <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/">Ivanka Trump</a></strong> easily beats Paris Hilton with 89% of the vote. Others holding big leads over their opponents include <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-warren-buffett-vs-eddie-lampert/"><strong>Warren Buffett</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-george-lucas-vs-steven-spielberg/"><strong>Steven Spielberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-rupert-murdoch-vs-sumner-redstone/"><strong>Rupert Murdoch</strong></a>. </p>
<p>In terms of receiving the most votes, the clear leader is the <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> match-up, with just short of 150,000 votes. Other big vote getters were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-rudy-giuliani-vs-mike-bloomberg/"><strong>Rudy Giuliani vs. Michael Bloomberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/"><strong>Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs</strong></a>. In terms of the liveliest discussions in the comments, the winners are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/"><strong>Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-bono-vs-angelina-jolie/"><strong>Bono vs. Angelina Jolie</strong></a>. Also check out the comments for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/"><strong>J.K. Rowling vs. J.R.R Tolkien</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/"><strong>Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</strong></a> posts. </p>
<p>As for the face-off posts here that got the most attention, the clear winner is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, with more than 13,000 hits. <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-britney-spears-vs-lindsay-lohan/">Lindsay Lohan vs. Britney Spears</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> also attracted lots of readers.</p>
<p>Results for all the face-offs follow below, but keep in mind that the voting is still open. It's not too late to add your vote or let us know what you think.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/">Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Diddy</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>Erin Burnett</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Heidi Klum</category><category>Henry Kravis</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>J.K. Rowling</category><category>J.R.R. Tolkien</category><category>Jay-Z</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>Kirk Kerkorian</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Maria Bartiromo</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Mike Bloomberg</category><category>Money Face-Offs</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>Rudy Giuliani</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Schwarzman</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Suze Orman</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Tyra Banks</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been a week since our <strong>Money Face-Off</strong> posts ran here on BloggingStocks, and less than that since the <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a> were featured on the AOL welcome page, and the response has been terrific. Many of the face-off polls have had more than 50,000 votes, a couple of them approaching 100,000. </p>
<p>The biggest response came to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a> match-up. So far, about 75 percent of respondents feel that Oprah is the more successful media magnate. Not that much surprise there, as Oprah's fans are legion. Interestingly, though, of the twenty-some comments the post has received, most of them are pro-Martha.</p>
<p>Another clear leader is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/">Bill Gates over rival Steve Jobs</a>. About three quarters of poll votes have gone his way, despite all the buzz recently about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and the popularity of its products. Maybe readers are just happy that Gates is stepping down. Let us know what you think.</p>
<p>Alan Greenspan seems to be everywhere these days, promoting his new book, including Comedy Central's <em>The Daily Show</em> and NPR's <em>Fresh Air</em>. In our match-up of the current and former Fed chairs, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-alan-greenspan-vs-ben-bernanke/">Ben Bernanke vs. Alan Greenspan</a>, more than 70 percent of respondents have voted for Greenspan. Comments to the post are mixed, but seem to me to focus on Greenspan, whether pro or con.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/">Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Apple</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Money Face-Off</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>the Fed</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
