<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The right REITs focus on rentals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>"Home prices are becoming affordable again, so the decline in prices is likely more than half over," say Dr. Marvin Appel and Gerald Appel of Systems &amp; Forecasts.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the technical experts believe that long-term investors can now look to get back into the real estate investment market and recommend two ETFs that are based on rental REITs.</p>
<p>"Many analysts do not expect the financial markets to improve significantly until home prices stop falling. The pace of existing home sales remains low, and available inventory relatively high, both indicating that buyers are not yet able to step into the market at current prices.</p>
<p>"However, that could change within a year. Home prices are becoming affordable again, so the decline in prices is likely more than half over.</p>
<p>"The median home price is now more affordable to the median household than at any time since the start of 2004. My analysis suggests that housing prices will have to fall a bit more, but the housing market is not far from being reasonably valued for the first time in five years.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The right REITs focus on rentals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/">The right REITs focus on rentals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1296718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/27/the-right-reits-focus-on-rentals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>gerlad appel</category><category>housing</category><category>icf</category><category>income investing</category><category>IncomeInvesting</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iShares Cohen Steers Realty Majors ETF</category><category>iShares FTSE Nareit Residential REIT Index ETF</category><category>IsharesCohenSteersRealtyMajorsEtf</category><category>IsharesFtseNareitResidentialReitIndexEtf</category><category>marvin appel</category><category>MarvinAppel</category><category>real estate investment trust</category><category>reit</category><category>rental reits</category><category>rez</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>Systems Forecasts</category><category>SystemsForecasts</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Barron's forgets fees and taxes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p>Regular readers know that I enjoy Barron's Weekly (subscription required) one of the best business journals around and that it has provoked some of my better investment ideas. However, even Barron's can fall prey to bad or incomplete reporting, (as if there were a difference), as they benefit from market activity and can stretch an idea too far, becoming all too common.</p>
<p>Barron's incomplete and common story was in the June 9, 2008 issue titled <em>"Timing is Everything".</em> What I find common, and thus objectionable, is the fact that they choose to tout Appel Asset Management's like so many brokerage houses do numerous funds (for the fees), ignoring basic tidbits like said fees, and taxes. The Appels seem to do an admirable job for their investors but they do not beat the indices, so who cares?</p>
<p>Their simple strategy is to invest in the two broadly based hot ETF's, counting on momentum lasting more than one quarter, and switch them out each quarter. This they claim takes only an hour of work every three months, how lovely. In the story they state "From 1979 through 2007, Marvin Appel <strong><em>would have</em></strong> (emphasis mine) returned 16% a year, before fees, better than the 15% a year performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index". They also leave out how long the approach has <em><strong>actually</strong></em> been in place.</p>
<p><em><span class="symbol"></span></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Barron's forgets fees and taxes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/">Sunday Funnies: Barron's forgets fees and taxes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1233073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/sunday-funnies-barrons-forgets-fees-and-taxes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Appel Asset Management</category><category>AppelAssetManagement</category><category>Barrons</category><category>Fees and Taxes</category><category>FeesAndTaxes</category><category>index investing</category><category>IndexInvesting</category><category>Marvin Appel</category><category>MarvinAppel</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commodity stocks vs. ETFs: The best bet for buying in]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p>The <em>New York Times</em> recently made a case for <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0D14FB34550C7B8DDDAA0894DF404482&amp;showabstract=1">investing in stocks to gain exposure to commodities</a>:</p>
<p><em>But there is an easy way to get a shot at commodity-like returns, without investing directly in commodities or their indexes. Investors can buy shares of the natural resource companies that produce commodities.</em> </p>
<p>However, investors need to be careful: just because a stock is in a sector related to commodities doesn't mean that it will move with the prices of those commodities. Other factors, including decisions by management, any hedging the company may have in place, and other company-specific factors, may cause their returns to differ from those of the underlying commodities. While it's quite true that, as the <em>New York Times</em> points out, natural resources stocks have outperformed commodities in recent years, that is not a trend that will necessarily continue. </p>
<p>There may be good reasons to buy these stocks, but if you want to make a bet on commodities prices, the best way to do that is with exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Back in his days at the Motley Fool, BloggingStocks contributor (who is <em>the</em> source for news and analysis for private equity, by the way) Tom Taulli wrote a nice piece about how to <a href="http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2005/mft05042908.htm">invest in commodities through ETFs</a>.</p>
<p>If you really want to learn about ETFs, I recommend picking up a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Investing-Exchange-Traded-Funds-Made-Easy/dp/0131869736/ref=pd_bbs_1/105-3925804-4090061?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1174252754&amp;sr=8-1"><em>Investing with Exchange-Traded Funds Made Easy</em></a><em>: Higher Returns with Lower Costs -- Do It Yourself Strategies without Paying Fund Managers</em> by Marvin Appel.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/">Commodity stocks vs. ETFs: The best bet for buying in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/855112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/07/commodity-stocks-vs-etfs-the-best-bet-for-buying-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodities</category><category>commodity stocks</category><category>CommodityStocks</category><category>ETFs</category><category>exchange-traded funds</category><category>Marvin Appel</category><category>MarvinAppel</category><category>Tom Taulli</category><category>TomTaulli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
