After months of speculation and years of underperformance, the New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) has decided not to sell the Boston Globe and related businesses. The company claims that the changes made at the Globe to slash expenses and right the ship financially have made it worth holding on to the newspaper. This comes after two parties submitted their final bids (similar financially) for the beleaguered 137-year-old property.

The NY Times Co. picked up the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion. Since then, it's watched the paper's revenue and circulation plummet, a situation worsened by the advent of the internet and the newspaper industry's generally slow response to it. Now, it's apparently worth just under 10% of NYT's original purchase price, with the offers pushed higher by both parties' willingness to assume $59 million in pension liabilities.

The Fairfield Greenwich Group has agreed to pay an $8 million settlement to a small group of investors in Massachusetts that lost money through the Madoff scam. This is expected to be a full repayment. Fairfield is also going to pay a $500,000 fine to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As part of the deal, the feeder fund does not have to admit any wrongdoing.

According to a report in USA Today, this is the first Madoff case in which a regulator secured some relief for investors. While this only addresses a relative handful of investors, the Massachusetts Secretary of State believes that it may become a precedent for other actions.

Albert Gonzalez is calling it quits. Accused of masterminding the largest identity theft in the United States ever, he has agreed to plead guilty in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts. Separate charges filed in New Jersey, however, remain.

The 28 year-old faces 15 to 25 years in prison and will forfeit $1.65 million and a Miami condo (in addition to $1.1 million already seized). If the judge accepts the terms, this would be the longest sentence ever recorded for a hacking case.

Fairfield Greenwich Group is trying to play ball, but Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin isn't listening.

Instead, he's sending out notices to find all the investors who lost money with Fairfield as a result of its investments in Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme. The state does not intend to settle, though negotiations between the state and Fairfield are ongoing.

Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB) expects almost half of all U.S. homeowners to be underwater -- figuratively, of course -- by 2011.

Declines in home prices and the fact that some of those difficult mortgages just aren't going away put 26% of homeowners in this situation by the end of last March, and it seems the situation is only going to get worse. Unlike the early stages of the credit crisis, which were driven by subprime mortgages, the next iteration will have a greater effect on prime mortgage borrowers, which comprise two-thirds of the loans outstanding.

Hedge fund manager Michael Regan has pleaded guilty to running a Ponzi scheme. Manager of the Massachusetts-based River Stream Fund, he admitted to defrauding around 70 investors. The fund held just shy of $20 million in assets ... despite the relatively meager $101,600 sitting in its accounts. The fund purported to return 20 percent a year since 2001, paying out $9 million in "profits" and returned capital.

To see the impact of credit market strain in the United States one need not travel farther west than The Bay State.

On Tuesday, Massachusetts, which would rank in the top 100 countries in the world in terms of GDP if ranked as a nation, postponed the sale of $750 million in short-term notes for the second time in two weeks, due to a lack of demand.

However, it should be pointed out that Massachusetts's decision occurred before the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision, announced Tuesday at 9 a.m. EDT, to buy all corporate commercial paper to ease tight credit markets.

Further, although the municipal market differs from the corporate commercial paper market, the Fed's action aimed at easing conditions in the credit market overall, via both guaranteeing debt payment and by moral suasion. Many economists see this as the Fed's attempt to change market psychology via the central bank's enormous financial resources, monetary policy stance, and regulatory powers.

Still, economists caution that the Fed's commercial paper guarantee does not end counterparty risk; it simply eliminates a segment of that counterparty risk. According to economist David H. Wang, more actions by the Fed and U.S. Treasury undoubtedly will be needed to get credit flowing more freely and also reduce perhaps the biggest systemic problem: fear. Commercial paper is about a $1.5 trillion market, while states and local governments borrow about $2.8 trillion, Wang said.

The Boston Globe interviews Warren Group CEO Timothy Warren whose firm tracks housing in Massachusetts. He suggests that it could take about 10 years before housing prices return to where they were at the peak in 2005.

Warren is a breath of fresh air when it comes to analyzing the housing market. Unlike industry-sponsored studies -- such as this bubbly comment from the National Association of Realtors -- Warren carefully tracks and analyzes data and his observations are not filtered by the need to use public pronouncements to spur real estate transactions.

But Warren's loyalty appears to lie with objective data gathering and analysis, rather than having an ulterior motive. He thinks that the declining number of home sales is worse than the previous housing slump of the early 1990s. He notes that "In the 1990s, we had just two years when the number of sales declined. We are in the fourth year of declining sales in the current slump."

Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin is suing Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER), accusing the firm of defrauding the city of Springfield, home of Homer Simpson, with subprime investments.

Merrill Lynch has already taken the unusual step of agreeing to buy back $13.9 million in subprime debt from the municipality at its original value after deciding that brokers had not been authorized by the city to buy the debt in the first place.

Merrill says it's puzzled by the suit, but Massachusetts is arguing that it told Merill to invest in "instruments that yielded more than Merrill's money market account as long as the products were triple-A rated by the major credit-rating agencies." It says that Merrill didn't warn Springfield about the risks of the CDOs.

Springfield officials -- and the secretary of state -- should take a look at the chart above. The idea that they could earn above-average returns with no risk defies the most basic principles of investing.

Maybe the lawsuit does have merit -- I have no idea. It appears that Springfield may have been misled about what it was getting itself into. But the fact is, Merrill lost big on subprime too because everyone forgot about the handy-dandy chart above: if it sounds too good to be true ...

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick will announce a new state program to help homeowners in his state avoid foreclosure, according to the Boston Globe this morning. He's pressing mortgage companies to accept a short sale (less than what is actually due on the mortgage) so homeowners late on their monthly payments can get out without going into foreclosure. Short sales are a common tool used to avoid foreclosure, but in today's market with housing prices dropping, it's been much harder to get banks to accept a deal. Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC), J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), Citigroup (NYSE: C) and HSBC have been in talks with the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Economic Development to come up with a plan.

Many times in today's housing market the borrower owes more than the house is worth. I've heard from people who attend auctions regularly that the number of buyers (aside from the banks themselves) at auctions keeps dropping because there are no good deals - the minimum price set by the institution is higher than the property could sell for on the open market.

Massachusetts energy company NSTAR (NYSE: NST) recently reported solid earnings for 1Q 2007. NSTAR has received widespread recognition for its innovative programs to help customers become aware of and reduce their energy usage through Power Cost Monitor, while at the same time reducing its own residential users' billing rates by 8% this summer.

The stock bears investigation for inclusion in a balanced portfolio. Possessing solid earnings, high customer satisfaction, and environmentally aware policies, NSTAR pays a dividend of $.325 per common share, and the company has a long, long history of paying out dividends. NSTAR has a P/E multiple slightly below industry average, and EPS slightly above industry average. The stock price has quite literally not budged since 1 January 2007, opening the year trading at $34.95, and closing the end of May at $34.85. NSTAR has annual revenues of $3.5 billion and serves 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts.

For 1Q 2007, NSTAR reported earnings of $47.8 million or EPS of $.45, up 10% from 1Q 2006. Electric sales were up 2% by volume while gas sales were up 14% by volume. NSTAR recently signed a 7-year rate agreement that will give it a large measure of earnings stability. Recently, NSTAR announced a partnership with Evergreen Solar, Inc. to provide solar generated energy as an affordable option for customers. NSTAR expects this small portion of its power generation to grow rapidly, further reducing generation costs, thus increasing the desirability of renewable energy choices for customers. NSTAR reported March 2006- 2007 EPS to be $1.96, up 8% from the previous reporting period.