<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy (PLA): Speculative bet on the bunny]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is a speculative stock, with plenty of potential but also downside risk," suggests <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3257 ">Alex Green</a>. In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3257 ">The Oxford Club</a>, he looks at the firm's turnaround potential.</p>
<p>"Yes, Playboy's publishing empire is a big money loser. But it still has one of the most recognized brands in the world. The rabbit head logo generates more than $1 billion in licensing fees annually. </p>
<p>"When you consider that Playboy Enterprises has a market capitalization of a little over $100 million, you begin to see how undervalued this stock is. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy (PLA): Speculative bet on the bunny</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/">Playboy (PLA): Speculative bet on the bunny</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19103712/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alex green</category><category>entertainment stocks</category><category>EntertainmentStocks</category><category>magazine stocks</category><category>MagazineStocks</category><category>media stocks</category><category>MediaStocks</category><category>oxford club</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>publishing stocks</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cisco (CSCO) targets consumer entertainment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/csco-cisco-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) has increasingly developed a series of technologies more closely tied to end-users -- with a focus on the home entertainment hub," notes <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3009 ">Toby Smith</a>.</p>
<p>The editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3009 ">ChangeWave Investing</a> explains, "The company understands that the market for consumer electronics products is too big and too important to ignore."</p>
<p>"It is well known that Cisco is the dominant supplier of the switches and routers that enable networks and computers to be linked together.</p>
<p>"Recently, Cisco made its most consumer-oriented acquisition by picking up privately held Pure Digital Technologies, the maker of the popular and simple-to-use Flip video camcorder.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cisco (CSCO) targets consumer entertainment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/">Cisco (CSCO) targets consumer entertainment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504763/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/cisco-csco-a-shift-to-consumer-entertainment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>changewave investing</category><category>cisco</category><category>consumer electronic stocks</category><category>csco</category><category>digital media stocks</category><category>DigitalMediaStocks</category><category>entertainment stocks</category><category>EntertainmentStocks</category><category>home entertainment stocks</category><category>HomeEntertainmentStocks</category><category>media stocks</category><category>MediaStocks</category><category>network stocks</category><category>networking</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>toby smith</category><category>TobySmith</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why so much fear over AOL's (TWX) lowered expectations?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>It's hard to make sense of what market analysts do sometimes. The stock prices of companies can swoon and sway based on analysts who can be 1) mostly incorrect about the prospects for covered companies, 2) dismal in their track records of earnings predictions and 3) falling into a pattern of some other weird alternative like market influence. I'm not saying all are that way, but some sure seem like it. When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has a fantastic quarter but <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/liveblogging-googles-q2-results/">misses over-inflated earnings</a> projections just a tiny amount, the stock price plummets (only to recover shortly thereafter). What is the point? To some, analysts run the market.<br /><br />The same thing happened to AOL, a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>). The company that owns this blog performed a fast and well-timed turnaround last year from a subscription-based model to an advertising-based model and the bet paid off from many perspectives. Of course, some analysts thought an immediate gratification of revenue from ad sources would befall AOL the first day this switch started happening. Unless things can be changed 'on a dime,' that generally never happens. Nevertheless, I consider AOL's strategy to morph into an ad-based revenue model to have worked pretty darn well in such a short period of time.</p>
<p>Alas, the double-digit ad revenue growth predictions by AOL execs, which turned into a few quarters of 40% ad revenue growth, set the stage for later disappointment. Although AOL's advertising revenue was less than expected for the second quarter that was reported on August 1st, it still went up a healthy 16%.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why so much fear over AOL's (TWX) lowered expectations?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/">Why so much fear over AOL's (TWX) lowered expectations?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20349510/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/971136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/23/why-so-much-fear-over-aols-twx-lowered-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>AOL financials</category><category>AolFinancials</category><category>internet</category><category>media</category><category>media stocks</category><category>MediaStocks</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS is in for a tough slog]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p> <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cbs-1st-quarter-earnings-drop-on-charge/n20070503082809990004">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cbs-1st-quarter-earnings-drop-on-charge/n20070503082809990004">CBS</a>) needs hits and needs them now.</p>
<p> The company today reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cbs-1st-quarter-earnings-drop-on-charge/n20070503082809990004 ">lackluster first quarter</a> results. Profit from continuing operations was $213.5 million on revenue of $3.66 million. Excluding one-time items, profit was 33 cents, beating the 32-cent average profit forecast and $3.61 million revenue forecast of analysts polled by Thomson Financial.</p>
<p> Operating income excluding some costs at the company's television business, its largest, fell 6% to $399 million, while revenue rose a mere 2% to $2.57 billion. As <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=CBS:US&amp;sid=aPO7MOKtKfQI">Bloomberg News</a></em> points out ratings at the company's flagship network excluding sports are down 12% in the 18 to 49 year old demographic. Though CBS' "CSI" shows remain popular, the company is losing ground to ABC's "Grey's Anatomy" and Fox's "American Idol."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS is in for a tough slog</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/">CBS is in for a tough slog</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 May 2007 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cbs-1st-quarter-earnings-drop-on-charge/n20070503082809990004>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/887883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/03/cbs-is-in-for-a-tough-slog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>cbs radio</category><category>cbs television</category><category>CbsRadio</category><category>CbsTelevision</category><category>don imus</category><category>DonImus</category><category>media stocks</category><category>MediaStocks</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer: Daktronics is new media with room to run]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="daktronics scoreboard at indian's stadium" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/indians_scoreboard_laffy4k.jpg" />On tonight's <em>MAD MONEY </em>show on CNBC, Jim Cramer began his show saying "Out with the old and in with the new ... media." It isn't <em>all </em>out; he thinks outdoor advertising, traditionally as "old media" as you can get, will survive well because of the new digital ads. One of his two stocks in this category is Daktronics, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/daktronics-inc/dakt/nas">DAKT</a>), up 165% this year, but he thinks it's a buy and going higher. This isn't a billboard company, rather an interactive image advertising board for stadiums and sports. He's excited about Daktronics because even high schools are starting to add in boxes and special arenas. DAKT closed down 3% at $36.91 in normal trading, but shares rose to $38.30 after he touted the stock. Its 52-week range is $13.74 to $39.09.<br /><br />[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laffy4k/199393562/">Photo Chris Metcalf</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/">Cramer: Daktronics is new media with room to run</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/716774/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/11/cramer-daktronics-is-new-media-with-room-to-run/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>advertising stocks</category><category>AdvertisingStocks</category><category>cnbc</category><category>cramer</category><category>dakt</category><category>daktronics</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>media</category><category>media stocks</category><category>MediaStocks</category><category>new media</category><category>NewMedia</category><category>old media</category><category>OldMedia</category><category>outdoor advertising</category><category>outdoor advertising stocks</category><category>OutdoorAdvertising</category><category>OutdoorAdvertisingStocks</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
