<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 12-10-07: ARTC volatility high on heavy put volume]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arthrocare-corporation/artc/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/media/2007/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>ArthroCare</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arthrocare-corporation/artc/nas">ARTC</a>), a medical device company, is recently down $2.48 to $52.42. ARTC December 50 straddle is priced at $6.10. ARTC call option volume of 1,233 contracts compares to put volume of 8,267 contracts. ARTC January option implied volatility of 64 is above its 26-week average of 41 according to Track Data, suggesting larger downside risks.</p>
<p><em>Daily Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of <a href="http://theflyonthewall.com">theflyonthewall.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/">Option update 12-10-07: ARTC volatility high on heavy put volume</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1059340/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/option-update-12-10-07-artc-volatility-high-on-heavy-put-volume/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ARTC</category><category>ArthroCare</category><category>medical device</category><category>MedicalDevice</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson earnings: A quarter only a mother could love]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p>The headline on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) earnings release says that revenue rose 13.2%. It did, but it didn't. Adjusting the numbers for the company's purchase of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer's</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) consumer health business and sales were only up 3.2% to $15.1 billion.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKN1718738920070717?rpc=44">quick look</a> at the company's segment data shows a more accurate picture. JNJ's pharma division revenue rose 5.8% to $6.1 billion. The company's medical device units, which includes stents, had a revenue increase of 5.1% to $5.4 billion. US growth in the unit was only 1.1%.</p>
<p>A few of the company's key drugs like PROCRIT lost ground. Its sales fell 6% to $758 million. Sales of DURAGESIC were down 14% to $289 million. </p>
<p>While the company showed pro forma figures of its consumer division to demonstrate the benefits of the Pfizer deal, it would appear that they too were underwhelming. If the company's total sales rose 3.2% with Pfizer numbers included in both years and JNJ's two other big divisions up over 5%, the consumer segment must not have done very well.</p>
<p>JNJ stock is down 1.3% to $63. That's what fuzzy numbers will get you.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/">Johnson &amp; Johnson earnings: A quarter only a mother could love</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKN1718738920070717?rpc=44>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/942574/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/johnson-and-johnson-a-quarter-only-a-mother-could-love/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DURAGESIC</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>jnj</category><category>medical device</category><category>MedicalDevice</category><category>pfe</category><category>PROCRIT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer calls bottom on some medical stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>On today's <em>STOP TRADING</em> segment on CNBC, Jim Cramer said many medical stocks have bottomed out; even some where he had been "long and wrong."<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/st-jude-medical-inc/stj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">St. Jude Medical Inc</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/st-jude-medical-inc/stj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">STJ</a>) would be an ideal buyout candidate if you believed the bad news was priced in the shares, according to Cramer, who urged people to buy both options and shares. Cramer even said <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">Amgen Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys"> Boston Scientific Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys">BSX</a>) might be worth considering since their shares aren't being hurt by negative news. He has been defending Amgen for some time. Here is something he noted on it back in late January when he helped push it up to $70.85. Shares are now down to $60.00 and have dipped down close to $55.00. Boston Scientific and St. Jude are both up more than $2.00 from their lows. </p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">His positive call on Boston Scientific has proven right. The question is whether lightning will also strike with St. Jude, up about 14% this year.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Cramer noted <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas">Costco Wholesale Corp</a>. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas">COST</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corp</a>. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) positively. He remains negative on homebuilders, arguing that increased housing starts results in more inventory they can't sell.</span></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/">Cramer calls bottom on some medical stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/876456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/cramer-calls-bottom-on-some-medical-device-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amgn</category><category>bsx</category><category>cnbc</category><category>cost</category><category>cramer</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mad money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>medical device</category><category>MedicalDevice</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>stj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
