<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Dendreon Sinks on Lengthy Medicare Timeline]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.dendreon.com/investors/" target="_blank"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/dndn-dendreon-logo.jpg" alt="DNDN logo" /></a>Dendreon (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">DNDN</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after <a href="http://www.biosciencetechnology.com/News/FeedsAP/2010/07/dendreon-medicare-reviews-provenge-costs/" target="_blank">Medicare administrators said they will take a full year to determine whether the government should cover DNDN's expensive prostate cancer treatment Provenge</a>. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on DNDN, which will give us a chance to make money on DNDN while this decision remains pending.<br />
<br />
This morning, DNDN opened at $28.18. So far today the stock has hit a high of $29.76 and a low of $28.01. As of 12:10, DNDN is trading at $28.87, down $3.46 (-10.7%). The chart for DNDN looks bearish.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dendreon Sinks on Lengthy Medicare Timeline</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/">Dendreon Sinks on Lengthy Medicare Timeline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19538707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/01/dendreon-sinks-on-lengthy-medicare-timeline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cancer</category><category>Dendreon</category><category>DNDN</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>Medicare</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CardioNet Collapses on Medicare Disappointment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="CardioNet BEAT logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/cardionetlogo.jpg" />Shares of CardioNet (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cardionet-inc/beat/nas">BEAT</a>) were punished Monday morning after an <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/cardionet-inc-provides-update-on-reimbursement-for-mobile-cardiovascular-telemetry-2010-06-28?reflink=MW_news_stmp">unfavorable decision</a> from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The administrative group proposed that the reimbursement rates on the technical component of mobile cardiovascular telemetry should stay carrier-priced for 2011, defying CardioNet's wishes to obtain a national reimbursement rate for the technology.</p>
<p>Now, CardioNet will attempt to lobby CMS during the public comment period prior to the final ruling, which is due by Nov. 1. "We will work diligently during the public comments period to request that CMS change its recommendation to one that is more beneficial to Medicare recipients who depend on" devices containing CardioNet's technology, explained CEO Joe Capper.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CardioNet Collapses on Medicare Disappointment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/">CardioNet Collapses on Medicare Disappointment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19533536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/28/cardionet-collapses-on-medicare-disappointment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BEAT</category><category>CardioNet</category><category>CMS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Joe Capper</category><category>Medicaid</category><category>Medicare</category><category>reimbursement</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President's Health Care Summit to Limit Insurance Price Hikes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/obamahands240.jpg"  alt="" />President Obama plans to hold a <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35518700">health care summit</a> to try and piece back together fractured health care legislation. He is expected to announce that it would include denying or rolling back unwarranted increases by health insurance companies.</p>
<p>Here are some key points to his proposal:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Most Americans would buy health insurance with federal subsidies to help them afford premiums.</li>
    <li>It would bar insurance companies from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President's Health Care Summit to Limit Insurance Price Hikes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/">President's Health Care Summit to Limit Insurance Price Hikes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/35518700>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19367844/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/presidents-health-care-summit-to-limit-insurance-price-hikes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Health care summit</category><category>insurance rates</category><category>insurance reform</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Medicare</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Employee Mobility, Options Would Increase Under Health Care Reform Bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/unhappyworker.jpg" />It's been overlooked -- it's received scant coverage by the popular press -- but it's worth repeating: one benefit of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/19/us/politics/1119-plan-comparison.html">health care reform legislation</a> will be enhanced employee mobility.</p>
<p>Don't misunderstand: a bill that prohibits discrimination by insurance companies due to medical condition/history, provides substantial subsidies for those who don't have health insurance from their employer, and that also offers much-needed tax breaks for small businesses who do provide coverage, is a major accomplishment. It's big change and it's big news. If the health care reform bill passes, it would be the biggest social policy advance by the United States since the passage of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(United_States)">Medicare in 1965</a>, and it would rank third behind the latter and the establishment of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States)">Social Security in 1935</a> in terms of social safety net significance.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Employee Mobility, Options Would Increase Under Health Care Reform Bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/">Employee Mobility, Options Would Increase Under Health Care Reform Bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19288592/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/employee-mobility-options-would-increase-under-health-care-refo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benefits portability</category><category>health care reform</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job mobility</category><category>Medicare</category><category>Social Security</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate votes 60 to 39 for health care debate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/capitol-senate200.jpg" alt="" />The U.S. Senate voted along party lines, 60 to 39, to <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34081901">proceed with debate on health care reform</a>.</p>
<p>The last two holdouts, Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana decided to finally vote with the majority.</p>
<p>Details of the bill are sketchy at this point. The Senate version would require most everyone to purchase health care. Coverage would be extended to an additional 30 million persons. Coverage could not be denied for preexisting conditions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The U.S. Senate votes 60 to 39 for health care debate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/">The U.S. Senate votes 60 to 39 for health care debate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249288/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-u-s-senate-votes-60-to-39-for-health-care-debate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blanche Lincoln</category><category>Congress</category><category>health care reform</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mary Landrieu</category><category>Medicare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/logo_medicare.gif" alt="" />U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada and Senate Majority Leader, is weighing increasing the Medicare payroll tax by 0.4 to 0.5 percentage point, as a way to help fund universal health care, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> reported Thursday (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125805315659245665.html">subscription required.</a>)<br /><br />The current employee share of the Medicare tax is 1.45%. Reid's proposal would apply to only those earning more than $250,000 per year, which would conform to President Obama's campaign promise to not raise taxes on individuals earning under $250,000 per year, CNN.com <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/12/source-reid-considering-hiking-medicare-payroll-tax/">reported Thursday. <br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/">Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harry Reid</category><category>health care</category><category>health care reform</category><category>medicare</category><category>payroll tax</category><category>PayrollTax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Health care reform update: Look for an overhaul that gives Congress flexibility]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/pills.jpg" />Health care reform's long and winding road continues, as debate will begin soon on several bills in the House and Senate. Each chamber is likely to approve a bill, with the all-important conference committee set to reconcile the two after each chamber's vote.<br /><br />Let's put on the old political science hat for a moment to see if history and research can tell us anything about the likely shape of the health care reform bill at this stage of the U.S. public policy process. <br /><br />The House, Senate, and conference committee (CC) outcomes are labeled: Probable, Possible, Doubtful.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Health care reform update: Look for an overhaul that gives Congress flexibility</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/">Health care reform update: Look for an overhaul that gives Congress flexibility</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19204551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/health-care-reform-update-look-for-an-overhaul-that-gives-congr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>health care reform</category><category>medical reform</category><category>MedicalReform</category><category>medicare</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some advice: if health care reform doesn't pass, become a doctor, nurse, or health care employee]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/001-blood-pressure2.jpg" />After discussing the status of health care with my three trusted economist friends and one equally-trusted public policy colleague, here is their employment advice for if health care reform doesn't pass and rein-in health care costs. <br /><br />If health care reform doesn't pass, those citizens capable of doing so should consider becoming doctors, nurses, radiologists, surgical specialists, hospital technical support staff etc. -- i.e. consider almost any job/position in or affiliated with health care.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some advice: if health care reform doesn't pass, become a doctor, nurse, or health care employee</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/">Some advice: if health care reform doesn't pass, become a doctor, nurse, or health care employee</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19154512/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/some-advice-if-health-care-reform-doesnt-pass-become-a-doctor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>health care reform</category><category>health costs</category><category>HealthCosts</category><category>medical field</category><category>MedicalField</category><category>medicare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's the outlook for health care costs in the years ahead?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/pills.jpg" />"<em>Capital,"</em> Maxwell Emery (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume_Cronyn">Hume Cronyn</a>) said in the finance film <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rollover_(film)"><em>Rollover (1981</em></a>), <em>"has a life of its own."</em><br /><br />The market absolutists and conservatives who oppose health care reform are going to find out just how much havoc that capital force can generate in the years ahead, as it relates to health care costs.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What's the outlook for health care costs in the years ahead?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/">What's the outlook for health care costs in the years ahead?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19142959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/what-s-the-outlook-for-health-care-costs-in-the-years-ahead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capital costs</category><category>CapitalCosts</category><category>health care</category><category>health care reform</category><category>maxwell emery</category><category>MaxwellEmery</category><category>medicaid</category><category>medicare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: When an analyst causes the rally (BEAT, SCHW, CIT, DELL, GS, POT)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Today was one of those days that was going to start out soft, but a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/13/goldman-sachs-meredith-whitney-the-good-bad-call-gs/">key analyst upgrade</a> saved the day. There was actually no early economic data, and traders are putting on their pre-earnings trades. Here is a quick look at the earnings previews for this <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/13/full-360-review-of-technology-earnings-previews-nvls-intc-xlnx-goog-ibm/">week's key technology stocks</a> and for <a href="http:// http://247wallst.com/2009/07/13/banks-and-brokers-major-earnings-on-deck-gs-jpm-schw-bac-c/">this week's key financial stocks</a>. <br /><br />Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	8,313.92 	+167.40 (2.05%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	901.05 	+21.92 (2.49%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,793.21 	+37.18 (2.12%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/13/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-bby-cpla-gs-hgsi-mar-sndk-sgms/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: When an analyst causes the rally (BEAT, SCHW, CIT, DELL, GS, POT)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/">Closing Bell: When an analyst causes the rally (BEAT, SCHW, CIT, DELL, GS, POT)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19096506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/closing-bell-when-an-analyst-causes-the-rally-beat-schw-cit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BEAT</category><category>cardionet</category><category>medicare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Biotech stock #3: Cepheid (CPHD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img  height="200" alt="biotech stocks cepheid" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/cepheid.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />When my son had a huge boil under his arm, it turned out that it was filled with the killer staph, MRSA. It also turns out that my (otherwise) great doctor used a traditional lab to process the test, which took a week to determine it was MRSA.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cepheid-inc/cphd/nas">Cepheid</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cepheid-inc/cphd/nas">CPHD</a>) manufactures the equipment and test that takes just two hours to do the same thing -- and is better and cheaper than traditional tests. CPHD wins 90%-plus of all competitive bids and its test could be available in low-tech facilities, such as doctor's offices or nursing homes, next year.</p>
<p>The big catalyst for this stock, however, is that Medicare will stop paying for all hospital-acquired infections except MRSA in October. So institutions need a quick test if they are going to be reimbursed for treatment.</p>
<p>The stock has fallen from $30 to under $9. It's worth $20 - $22 to an acquirer.</p>
<p>Your best strategy for life-changing profits?</p>
<p>Buy the call options.</p>
<p><strong>Next: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/"><strong>Biotech Stock #4</strong></a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Biotech stock #3: Cepheid (CPHD)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/">Biotech stock #3: Cepheid (CPHD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/11/biotech-stock-3-cepheid-cphd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>call options</category><category>CallOptions</category><category>cepheid</category><category>cphd</category><category>medicare</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>MichaelShulman</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><category>top stocks</category><category>TopStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Humana (HUM) plummets on Medicare warning]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://www.humana.com/about/investor_relations/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="HUM logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/hum-humana-logojpg.jpg" /></a><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1235408797917*/">Humana</a> (NYSE: <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1235408797917*/">HUM</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/humana-inc/hum/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is declining today after the company said preliminary <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/humana-comments-on-preliminary-2010/284463">2010 Medicare Advantage payment rates could cause reduced profits</a> in 2010. These comments from HUM are dragging down the entire group, including industry stalwart <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys">UnitedHealth Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys">UNH</a>), which is off by upwards of 15%. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on HUM.<br /><br />This morning, HUM opened at $36.70. So far today the stock has hit a low of $30.57 and a high of $36.86. As of 11:55, HUM is trading at $31.41, down $9.13 (-22.5%). Prior to today, the chart for HUM looked bullish, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives HUM a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Humana (HUM) plummets on Medicare warning</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/">Humana (HUM) plummets on Medicare warning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468864/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/humana-hum-plummets-on-medicare-warning/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HUM</category><category>Humana</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>Medicare</category><category>options</category><category>UNH</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wellpoint (WLP) forced to halt Medicare marketing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://ir.wellpoint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130104&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="WLP logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/wlp-wellpoint-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wellpoint-inc/wlp/nys">Wellpoint</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wellpoint-inc/wlp/nys">WLP</a> - <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wellpoint-inc/wlp/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is dropping today after <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1340310320090113?rpc=33">the company announced it will suspend marketing of its Medicare plans</a> for seniors while it corrects a number of compliance problems. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on WLP.<br /><br />This morning, WLP opened at $37.40. So far today the stock has hit a low of $36.77 and a high of $39.45. As of 12:25, WLP is trading at $38.74, down $2.22 (-5.4%). The chart for WLP looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives WLP a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a March <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverages nice returns.<br /><br />For this particular trade, we will make a 6.4% return in two months as long as WLP is below $50 at March expiration. Wellpoint would have to rise by more than 28% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br />WLP hasn't been above $50 since September and shown resistance around $45 recently.<br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in WLP</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/">Wellpoint (WLP) forced to halt Medicare marketing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1340310320090113?rpc=33>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1428342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/wellpoint-wlp-forced-to-halt-medicare-marketing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>Medicare</category><category>options</category><category>wellpoint</category><category>WLP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Medicare fraud accusations catch up with Tenet Healthcare]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-tenet-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Former hippies might notice that the ticker symbol for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tenet-healthcare-corporation/thc/nys">Tenet Healthcare Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tenet-healthcare-corporation/thc/nys">THC</a>) is also the acronym for the active compound in marijuana, but this apparent inattention to detail is likely the least of the company's concerns. When Tenet was formed in 1995, it was born out of a merger between American Medical International and scandal-plagued National Medical Enterprises. Executives at the newly reborn healthcare services company hoped that its new name would help erase any unpleasant investor associations with its previous incarnation.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At number 19 on our list of SPX losers, THC shed 73% of its value during the 10-year period ending June 30, 2008. Prior to a stomach-churning sell-off in the fall of 2002, the shares were entrenched in a near-vertical uptrend that peaked at $52.50. It seems that a seedy healthcare services company by any other name ...</p>
<p>October 2002 marked the stock's peak, as well as the beginning of its steep descent. First, the company reported fiscal first-quarter earnings that surpassed analysts' estimates by 2 cents per share. A few weeks later, Tenet was named co-defendant in a lawsuit filed by the widow of a man who'd accepted an artificial heart, which she alleged "stripped him of his human dignity." This relatively minor suit, worth just $100,000, wouldn't break THC -- but it nonetheless heralded the beginning of the end. Toward the end of the month, the shares tumbled sharply after an analyst downgraded Tenet and warned that it was too dependent on Medicare reimbursements from the government.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Medicare fraud accusations catch up with Tenet Healthcare</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/">Worst 10-year performers: Medicare fraud accusations catch up with Tenet Healthcare</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/27/worst-10-year-performers-medicare-fraud-accusations-ensnare-tenet-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>healthcare industry</category><category>medicare</category><category>Tenet Healthcare Corporation</category><category>TenetHealthcareCorporation</category><category>THC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Baby Boomers, in some cases already facing the 'double demands' of caring for kids and aging parents, have another economic concern, at least for the next phase of the housing cycle: substantially lower household net worth, as a result of declining home prices, so says a Washington-based think tank.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/press-releases/press-releases/baby-boomers-face-massive-loss-of-retirement-wealth-due-to-housing-market-meltdown/">Center for Economic and Policy Research says</a> the median households head by those ages 45-54 in 2009 will have about 25% less wealth than the similar demographic in 2004. In dollars, household wealth will decline to $113,268 from $150,113.<br /><br />Further, the above assume March 2008's housing prices hold for 2009: if they don't and prices fall another 10%, household net worth declines by about 35%; 20%, by about 45%, <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/press-releases/press-releases/baby-boomers-face-massive-loss-of-retirement-wealth-due-to-housing-market-meltdown/">the CEPR said.</a> <br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson, who is not affiliated with the CEPR or the study, told BloggingStocks part of the problem was "unreasonable expectations regarding home appreciation rates, the belief that 10-15% real estate gains would continue for decades. It got too many adults out of the traditional saving and investing mode and into thinking their home would serve as a major return on investment." Most homes do appreciate, and they can help build wealth, Dawson said, but homeowners must think in terms of a 6-9% average, annual appreciation rate, "which is a more-realistic return for residential dwellings."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/">Housing sector slump seen decreasing some Baby Boomers' nest eggs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1237025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/housing-sector-slump-seen-decreasing-some-baby-boomers-nest-egg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>assets</category><category>baby boomers</category><category>bonds</category><category>Center for Economic and Policy Researc</category><category>estates</category><category>housing</category><category>housing sector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home prices</category><category>Medicare</category><category>personal finance</category><category>Social Security</category><category>stocks</category><category>wealth management</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UnitedHealth (UNH) drops on potential Medicare bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/main/Investors.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="UNH logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/unh-unitedhealth-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys">UnitedHealth</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys">UNH</a>) shares are in the red today even though <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=630506&amp;Category=Before%20the%20bell">a bill that would have reduced Medicare reimbursements to health insurers was defeated in the House of Representatives yesterday</a>. However, shares of UNH are declining this morning with other insurers on news that Congress will likely pass a different bill with slightly smaller cuts next week. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on UNH.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $59.46 in December, the stock hit a one-year low of $31.49 in May. This morning, UNH opened at $30.30. So far today the stock has hit a low of $30.00 and a high of $30.88. As of 1:25, UNH is trading at $30.70, down 31 cents(-1.0%). The chart for UNH looks neutral and improving, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 Stars (out of 5) Hold rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a September <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">.</a><a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $35 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 9.9% return in three months as long as UNH is below $35 at September expiration. UNH would have to rise by more than 14% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a><br /><br />UNH hasn't been above 35 since May and has shown resistance around $34.50 recently.<br /><em><br />Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in UNH.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/">UnitedHealth (UNH) drops on potential Medicare bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1224945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/unitedhealth-unh-drops-on-potential-medicare-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>congress</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>Medicare</category><category>options</category><category>unh</category><category>UnitedHealth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />With a sluggish economy, uncertain job growth, the most serious housing recession in more than 20 years, record oil and gasoline prices, ramping food costs, and a foreign policy landscape that's challenging (to say the least), decision makers in the United States, public and private, have more than enough to be concerned about, near-term, most analysts and citizens would agree. <br /><br />Still, the above wasn't enough to prevent the annual "alarm sounding" about long-term concerns, such as Social Security and Medicare, the likes of which occurred again this week when the <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR08/VI_LRact_bal.html#102806">Social Security Trustees released their revised 2008 actuarial balance</a>, which is a status report. <br /><br />Moreover, while it's never prudent to ignore the tax and benefits implications of entitlement programs as large as <a href="http://www.ssa.gov/">Social Security</a> and <a href="http://www.medicare.gov/">Medicare,</a> it's important that investors and taxpayers also keep in mind one undeniable reality pertaining to statistical analysis of this sort. Namely, that we're dealing with longitudinal projections stretching out decades in which -- if any one of 20 variables (or more) change -- receipts and outlays would change substantially.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/">The economics of Social Security, Medicare, and you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/the-economics-of-social-security-medicare-and-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boom</category><category>Baby Boom generation</category><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>entitlements</category><category>featured</category><category>GDP</category><category>health care</category><category>immigration</category><category>Medicare</category><category>payroll taxes</category><category>pensions</category><category>senior citizens</category><category>Social Security</category><category>Social Security Administration</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If you are under 40 forget about getting Social Security]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>While it comes as no surprise, both Medicare and Social Security are financial disasters waiting to happen. In a report issued today by trustees of these two large government programs, while the dates of bankruptcy are unchanged, the date of the programs being cash flow negative have moved up to a date closer than was previously thought.</p>
<p>According to an <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080325/ap_on_go_ot/social_security">AP report</a>: " The first year that payments will exceed income for Social Security will occur in 2017, just nine years from now, reflecting growing demands from the retirement of 78 million baby boomers. Medicare is projected to pay out more than it receives in income starting this year.</p>
<p>"The financial difficulties facing Social Security and Medicare pose enormous challenges," the trustees said in their report. "The sooner these challenges are addressed, the more varied and less disruptive their solutions can be."</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If you are under 40 forget about getting Social Security</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/">If you are under 40 forget about getting Social Security</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080325/ap_on_go_ot/social_security>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1148964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/if-you-are-under-40-foget-about-getting-social-security/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chile pension system</category><category>ChilePensionSystem</category><category>Henry paulson</category><category>HenryPaulson</category><category>medicare</category><category>social security</category><category>SocialSecurity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/george-w-bush.jpg" />American President George Bush announced his <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bush-unveils-31-trillion-spending-plan/20080204114409990002">new budget spending plan</a> today, and the package came out to a total of $3.1 trillion.<br /><br />Today's federal budget proposal marks the first time in America's history that a budget plan has been in excess of $3 trillion. Bush claims that his budget is "good" and "solid" and that the passing of this budget will help keep the troubled American economy growing.<br /><br />All in all, this budget looks to lift government spending by 6% during the fiscal year 2009, and it will probably come to no one's surprise that defense gets a nice little boost from today's budget. Bush is looking to allocate 8.2% of his spending on security, and the budget is looking to stake a $70 billion "placeholder" for war costs during 2009. The Pentagon should be pleased with its figures, as Bush is looking to allocate $515.4 billion its way... the highest allocation since WWII (and represents a 7.5% jump).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/">Bush announces new $3.1 trillion budget plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/bush-announces-new-3-1-trillion-budget-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>federal budget</category><category>FederalBudget</category><category>George Bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>HarryReid</category><category>House of Representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Judd Gregg</category><category>JuddGregg</category><category>Kent Conrad</category><category>KentConrad</category><category>medicare</category><category>Pentagon</category><category>politics</category><category>Senate</category><category>Steny Hoyer</category><category>StenyHoyer</category><category>war</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Age discrimination tested in Medicare decision]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><img width="150" height="NaN" align="right" alt="medicare logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/logo_medicare.gif" />A recent ruling handed down by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has given employers discretion in using Medicare eligibility as a factor when calculating <a href="http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/12/27/medicare_for_employees">health care benefits for retired employees</a>, as reported by Marketplace. The AARP had raised a stink about the issue claiming that having employers shift health care costs to Medicare when applicable amounted to age discrimination. My question is, if the level of care and benefits remains the same, who really cares from what direction the bills are paid? If employers carry the burden then we all see it in our bottom line. If the government pays for it, then we all see it in our tax load. The end effect to us as a society is basically the same.<br /><br />This decision reaffirms in part exactly what <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Medicare/">Medicare</a> was intended to do. The system has two major intents. First and foremost, Medicare is meant to fill the gap in cases where health care coverage is lacking. Secondly, Medicare is intended to help free the business world from the administration of benefits for people who no longer participate as an active part of their work force.<br /><br />If the level of actual benefits is in no way reduced and the process of accessing those benefits is in no way hampered, then there's no room to gripe about employers shifting the burden. In fact, this kind of move is exactly what American business needs right now. However, if this decision in any way dilutes the benefits that hard working people have bargained their working careers for, then the AARP has an extremely valid argument and they desire to have that argument tested by the Supreme Court.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/">Age discrimination tested in Medicare decision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071929/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/age-discrimination-tested-in-medicare-decision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AARP</category><category>age-discrimination</category><category>benefits</category><category>cost-shift</category><category>discrimination</category><category>EEOC</category><category>health-care</category><category>medicare</category><category>Supreme-Court</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
