<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nike_160.jpg" />Is Northwest shoe behemoth <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">Nike</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) starting to feel the sting of the economic crisis? It certainly appears that way with the company announcing that it will cut 1,750 jobs, or roughly <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1451187120090514?rpc=33">5% of its total work force</a>. The cuts are the largest in the company's history, and roughly 500 of the positions will be eliminated from Nike's Oregon headquarters, which employs more than 3,000. A majority of these cuts will occur over the next week.<br /><br />Nike is making the move in hopes of cutting costs and boosting competitiveness, which I will address in a moment. Back in February, Nike hinted that a review of its operations would result in a 4% cut to the firm's staff. Furthermore, the athletic apparel and footwear firm has cut production at Chinese and Vietnamese factories, cut marketing spending, and has reorganized its global business into six geographically based groups. All of these moves have been made to help the company deal with the current economic slowdown and its impact on the consumer. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/">JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 May 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1546994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>athletic apparel</category><category>athletic shoes</category><category>AthleticApparel</category><category>AthleticShoes</category><category>featured</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>nike</category><category>nke</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>TigerWoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who would you pay to watch play?  Perhaps Nike?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/nikeswoosh.gif" />I know that discretionary spending is light thanks to the current economic crisis, but I found an <a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28752209/">interesting article on MSNBC.com</a> that looked at what athletes other athletes would pay to watch. The number one answer was no surprise, Tiger Woods. Keep in mind that this wasn't a broad survey of athletes; in fact, it was just 40 athletes. Nevertheless, Tiger beat Michael Jordan (MJ) as the athlete most athletes would pay to see.<br /><br />I have seen MJ play in person (the good MJ, not the Wizards MJ), so I would have to say that I would pay to see Tiger (which would have happened if he hadn't been forced out of the Ryder Cup) knock that dimpled white ball around for 18 (or more) holes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who would you pay to watch play?  Perhaps Nike?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/">Who would you pay to watch play?  Perhaps Nike?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28752209/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/who-would-you-pay-to-watch-play-perhaps-nike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>discretionary spending</category><category>DiscretionarySpending</category><category>featured</category><category>michael jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>Nike</category><category>pro athlete</category><category>ProAthlete</category><category>tiger woods</category><category>TigerWoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />At a mere $276 million, celebrity talk-show host and entertainment billionaire Oprah Winfrey could afford to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), which closed Tuesday at $5.91 per share and keeps on climbing to over $6.50 a share in morning trading. The story alone and the associated publicity would be worth at least that. Furthermore, she could at least make an offer and demand a meeting with the Federal Reserve Board to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>If her offer was rejected, she would still be able to generate millions of dollars of publicity and perhaps she might want to acquire the asset, in particular if the Fed is going to protect the acquirer from potential losses. She could really become an international mogul, the likes of which has not been seen. We all know that Oprah wants to do good. She is so giving, this could be the ultimate.</p>
<p>I could just see the headlines: <em>Oprah Winfrey takes on </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JP Morgan Chase</em></a><em> (NYSE: </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JPM</em></a><em>) and the Federal Reserve to rescue John Q. Public.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/">Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Jimmy Cayne</category><category>JimmyCayne</category><category>Joseph Lewis</category><category>JosephLewis</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's big give</category><category>Oprah'sBigGive</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Skywalker Ranch</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sara Lee without her underwear]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="hanes underwear: too sexy for sara lee?" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/hanes_comfortsoft.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Sara Lee Corporation (NYSE:SLE), manufacturers of Ball Park Franks, Jimmy Dean sausage, and Sara Lee fatty baked snacks, has completed the spin-off of its Hanes division to form a <a href="http://www.saralee.com/newsroom/news_release_popup.aspx?id=343">separate company, Hanesbrands, (NYSE:HBI)</a>, which began trading yesterday, September 6. Current Sara Lee shareholders received one share of Hanesbrands stock for every eight shares of Sara Lee. The Hanesbrands moniker includes some very common names: Hanes underwear, made famous by Michael Jordan in his series of "you have been briefed" ads; Bali and Wonder bras; as well as L'eggs and Just My Size hoisery. </p>
<p>Several years ago, Sara Lee Coroporation management decided to reduce the range of the portfolio of brands that had grown to cover snack foods, beverages, as well as household and body care products, and a line of intmate and casual clothing. One does have to wonder whoever thought it was a good idea to merge fatty snacks with an underwear company in order 'to achieve transformational synergies' or some such business lunacy. Probably best not to think about the image too long.</p>
<p>Approximately 95 million shares of Hanesbrands stock were distributed to Sara Lee stockholders in the transaction. Sara Lee Corporation received $2.4 billion for the stock from Hanesbrands. In its first day of trading, Hanesbrands stock closed at $22.20, up $1.90, with 3.7 million shares trading hands.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/">Sara Lee without her underwear</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/665405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/sara-lee-without-her-underwear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hanes</category><category>hanes underwear</category><category>hanesbrands</category><category>HanesUnderwear</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>sara lee</category><category>Sara Lee Corporation</category><category>SaraLee</category><category>SaraLeeCorporation</category><category>spin-off</category><category>spinoff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
