Microsoft Corp. posts
FeedPosted Oct 30th 2009 12:45PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, Microsoft (MSFT)
Although Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) has much of the business world wrapped around at least some of its software, the largest software company in the world is mostly known for its consumer products. Names like Windows, Zune, Windows Mobile, Sidekick, and Xbox are household terms (well, in gadget households perhaps).
Still, with all those names, why hasn't Microsoft formed some kind of overall consumer ecosystem so that all these products fit, work, and play together seamlessly?
Continue reading Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?
Posted Aug 27th 2009 2:30PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)
Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) made the decision to use competitor Microsoft Corp.'s (NASDAQ: MSFT) Bing search technology soon to power the internet searches across its vast empire. That doesn't mean that Yahoo! still won't compete with Microsoft aggressively. After all, Yahoo!'s agreement with Microsoft is only to use the software giant's Bing search technology in the back end -- not in the customer's face.
Yahoo!'s Prabhakar Raghavan indicated that "It is our belief that the battle has moved beyond the back end ... what we do with it, how we paint it, how we render it, that's entirely up to us." This confuses the issue a bit but what he is saying is that Yahoo! will use Microsoft's technology, but will still heavily compete with the company in terms of customer-facing search market share. The thoughts of a Microsoft-Yahoo! full-frontal assault on Google Inc.'s (NASDAQ: GOOG) market-leading share won't really be positioned that way after all.
Continue reading Yahoo! still intends to compete with Microsoft on internet search
Posted Dec 16th 2008 5:44PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and services, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT)
Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:
MSFT) has had troubles recently trying to convince customers to use its Windows Live services over the competitor's products, namely those produced by
Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:
GOOG). Although Windows Live is a fine collection of services, Google gets all the glory just because of its name and because its products are no-frills and work very well. Microsoft's software doesn't exactly have the same reputation, unfortunately.
But Windows Live just got way better. Microsoft, as of late, has
opened itself up to collaborating with other services, websites and partners to allow customers a "one-stop shop" for doing everything in one place. AOL did this recently by allowing all the popular email services (Yahoo! Mail, Hotmail, Google's Gmail) to be accessed from its custom homepage.
As these companies are now figuring out, the world does not revolve around just themselves. Customers use services from multiple companies and sources and making it all accessible under one brand or roof is now what all companies are trying to make available to their customers. Microsoft's attempt here with
Windows Live includes integration of popular social networking sites (Facebook, MySpace) as well as instant messaging and email from many popular sources.
This is a great move from Microsoft. Instead of forcing customers to play in its own sandbox, the software giant has figured out that perhaps more of its customers will come to it and stay there if it offers a connection to non-Microsoft services and products that complement its own (not compete).
Posted Oct 27th 2008 2:10PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Competitive strategy, Microsoft (MSFT)
This post is part of a feature on companies and products that our bloggers think are in need of a makeover. See all 26.
When Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) released its Windows Vista operating system product almost two years ago, the market was initially excited. That excitement turned to boring indifference as customers, both business and consumer, realized that this was just another update to Windows. Nothing revolutionary, or even evolutionary (in many minds). The problem was this: Windows Vista was a huge change under the hood, but where its users interact with it, it seems like a boring reinvention of an operating system from half a decade ago.
But Microsoft doesn't just make operating systems. It's into the office productivity business (Microsoft Office, anyone), it's big into the mobile business (Windows Mobile), and it's tried desperately to compete with Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) in the web search advertising business (which has largely failed). So, the company, which continues to make a ton of cash every quarter by selling Windows on all those global PCs that are sold, has no debt and a ton of cash under the mattress. It's still a boring company with a business model that's being made rapidly outdated by the internet and web-based competitors. Should it take its cash, return it to shareholders, and close up shop? Though this was suggested of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) some time back, that company roared back (maybe you've heard). Can Microsoft?
Continue reading Makeover needed: Microsoft
Next Page >