<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/msft.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) Google Apps project has gained steam (and customers) since its introduction a few years ago. Although it's not yet a true competitor to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Office juggernaut, it is making headway.</p>
<p>The "software as a service" camp is doing nothing but speeding up, as small and large businesses would like to offload expensive software installations and just use the Internet as a vehicle for getting things done across boundaries and time zones. Microsoft, though, is not capitulating just yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/">Microsoft cuts software as a service prices to match Google Apps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Microsoft-Turns-on-a-Dime-to-Beat-Back-Google-Apps-68549.html?wlc=1257335734>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19222625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-cuts-software-as-a-service-prices-to-match-google-apps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Apps</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Software as a service</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/rsz_msftlarge.jpg" />Although <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has much of the business world wrapped around at least some of its software, the largest software company in the world is mostly known for its consumer products. Names like Windows, Zune, Windows Mobile, Sidekick, and Xbox are household terms (well, in gadget households perhaps). </p>
<p>Still, with all those names, why hasn't Microsoft formed some kind of overall consumer ecosystem so that all these products fit, work, and play together seamlessly?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/">Microsoft is not competing in the most efficient manner possible -- why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215967/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/microsoft-is-not-competing-in-the-most-efficient-manner-possible/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Danger Sidekick</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sidekick phone</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows mobile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! still intends to compete with Microsoft on internet search]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="118" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/bing.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) made the decision to use competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Bing search technology soon to power the internet searches across its vast empire. That doesn't mean that Yahoo! still won't compete with Microsoft aggressively. After all, Yahoo!'s agreement with Microsoft is only to use the software giant's Bing search technology in the <em>back end</em> -- not in the customer's face.</p>
<p>Yahoo!'s Prabhakar Raghavan indicated that "It is our belief that the battle has moved beyond the back end ... what we do with it, how we paint it, how we render it, that's entirely up to us." This confuses the issue a bit but what he is saying is that Yahoo! will use Microsoft's technology, but will still heavily compete with the company in terms of customer-facing search market share. The thoughts of a Microsoft-Yahoo! full-frontal assault on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) market-leading share won't really be positioned that way after all.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! still intends to compete with Microsoft on internet search</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/">Yahoo! still intends to compete with Microsoft on internet search</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19141025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/27/yahoo-still-intends-to-compete-with-microsoft-on-internet-searc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing search</category><category>GOOG:</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Larry Cornett</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Prabhakar Raghavan</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>Yahoo search</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo! all fight Google over potential book sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/google_book_search_b.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has grown plenty of enemies in the past five years due to its unprecedented growth and customer uptake. Put simply, Google produces products people want to use, and as such it has grown to a fantastic size (in product use and revenue). </p>
<p>Google's audacity in wanting to scan in books and make them available to anyone in digital form, though, has been a thorn in the company's side.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo! all fight Google over potential book sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/">Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo! all fight Google over potential book sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19138314/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/25/amazon-microsoft-and-yahoo-all-fight-google-over-potential-boo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google book sales</category><category>Google Book Search</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/ms.jpg" alt="" /><a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was hung out to dry back in 2002 when the U.S. government slapped it with all kinds of fines and limits based on its anti-competitive behavior in the PC market. Although Microsoft financially overcame all that was set against it, the company has not really wilted in terms of its software products or even the use of its market-leading internet browser, Internet Explorer.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/">Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200908131430DOWJONESDJONLINE000588_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19129299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anti-trust ruling</category><category>Anti-trustRuling</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft anti-trust</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftAnti-trust</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFDT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/office.jpg" />When <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) released Google Docs a few years back, it may have scared software competitor <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) just a bit. Office is one of Microsoft's largest cash cows and the company knows many previous software applications are being ported to jut the web -- not to your local PC. Google's entire existence is based on this. So, when will we see Microsoft Office for the web?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/">Microsoft's new Office product to compete for free with Google Docs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56C34T20090713>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19097111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/microsofts-new-office-product-to-compete-for-free-with-google-d/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Dosc</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleDosc</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Office</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftOffice</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/bing.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has hit an initial home run with its Bing "decision engine" that it has been advertising like crazy. But, with over 60% of the search market share in the U.S., should leader <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) be worried about the newer competitor?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/">Microsoft's Bing has Google running scared? Yeah, right.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06142009/business/fear_grips_google_174235.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19066969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>Google seatch</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>GoogleSeatch</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft to spend $100 million marketing new search engine?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/ls.jpg" alt="" />Does <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) really continue to believe that it can grab internet search market share away from giants like<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas"> Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>)? The software company, which time and time again has said it intends to continue competing in the race for search market share, is about to release its latest effort -- <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/26/microsoft_bing_search/">Bing</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft to spend $100 million marketing new search engine?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/">Microsoft to spend $100 million marketing new search engine?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/24/AR2009052402027.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1562840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google search</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><category>Live Search</category><category>LiveSearch</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Windows 7 coming this summer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/windows-7-aurora-green-wallpaper.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) took many of the chin when it released Windows Vista over two years ago when it received as many panning reviews as possible for the world's largest software company. Since then, the software behemoth has been planning a Vista successor that is leaner, safer, and doesn't require the latest PC to provide optimum performance.<br /><br />That being said, the rumor is that the new Windows 7 will be available for sale and on new PCs sometime at the beginning of 2010. According to one of Microsoft's chief Windows engineering leads, the world could see Windows 7 sometime this summer.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Windows 7 coming this summer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/">Microsoft's Windows 7 coming this summer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 May 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=339468>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1548897/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-windows-7-coming-this-summer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MSFT</category><category>steven sinofsky</category><category>StevenSinofsky</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Verizon talking to Microsoft about iPhone rival partnership? Here we go again.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/iphone.jpg" alt="" />Verizon Wireless, a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon Communications, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) may be partnering soon to take on the <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iPhone. The iPhone, which has re-defined the mobile handset and has racked up huge sales worldwide in the 22 months in existence, needs a strong competitor. So far, all the iPhone "killers" have been anything but.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Verizon talking to Microsoft about iPhone rival partnership? Here we go again.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/">Verizon talking to Microsoft about iPhone rival partnership? Here we go again.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=azrJ.IXiCNQI&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1531456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/verizon-talking-to-microsoft-about-iphone-rival-partnership-her/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DEnny Strigl</category><category>DennyStrigl</category><category>iPhone</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Verizon iPhone</category><category>Verizon Wireless</category><category>VerizonIphone</category><category>VerizonWireless</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Office seeing enhanced competition with free OpenOffice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/office.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is putting the final touches on Windows 7, and by all accounts it will be Microsoft's best operating system product <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=windows&amp;articleId=9132211&amp;taxonomyId=125&amp;intsrc=kc_feat">in nearly a decade</a> when it's released. But that's not the only cash cow the software giant has -- its Office franchise is hugely profitable as well. Could that piece of its business ever be in jeopardy, though?<br /><br />The OpenOffice.org full software productivity suite is, in an odd way, Microsoft Office's largest competitor. Largest in that it's unknown in almost every corporate circle I've seen, and significant in that it provides -- for free -- almost everything the costly Microsoft Office does.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft Office seeing enhanced competition with free OpenOffice</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/">Microsoft Office seeing enhanced competition with free OpenOffice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705300062/Free-OpenOffice-giving-Microsoft-a-fight.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1530213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/microsoft-msft-office-seeing-enhanced-competition-with-free-op/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Office</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftOffice</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Office 2007</category><category>Office2007</category><category>openoffice.org</category><category>openoffice.org-3.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/sun.jpg" />If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) really does go ahead and buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) for a cool $6.5 billion or more, the two former adversaries could be joined into a powerful computing combination. One of its -- no, its largest competitor would be: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). With many powerful players challenging Microsoft's dominance these days (Google in the consumer space), here's another one. That is, if the merger speculation turns out to be true.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/">Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessinsider.com/ballmer-sun-micro-nothing-but-a-sandbag-for-ibm-2009-3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1493379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM Corp.</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Android a sleeper threat to Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/android.jpg" /> <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) Android operating system was publicly marketed as a mobile operating system when it was released. The first wireless handset it was available on was the G1 smartphone offered by the fourth-largest U.S. wireless carrier, T-Mobile USA. But, you can't keep an open-source operating system developed by the Google behemoth down to just one platform.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's Android a sleeper threat to Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/">Google's Android a sleeper threat to Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azdqc9vK2gfg&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1466470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/googles-android-a-sleeper-threat-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Android</category><category>GoogleAndroid</category><category>Inc.</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Surface</category><category>Microsoft Tablet</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftSurface</category><category>MicrosoftTablet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's newest Windows Live services: its best yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/live.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has had troubles recently trying to convince customers to use its Windows Live services over the competitor's products, namely those produced by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Although Windows Live is a fine collection of services, Google gets all the glory just because of its name and because its products are no-frills and work very well. Microsoft's software doesn't exactly have the same reputation, unfortunately.<br /><br />But Windows Live just got way better. Microsoft, as of late, has <a href="http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?ArticleId=423945&amp;publicationSubCategoryId=71">opened itself up to collaborating with other services</a>, websites and partners to allow customers a "one-stop shop" for doing everything in one place. AOL did this recently by allowing all the popular email services (Yahoo! Mail, Hotmail, Google's Gmail) to be accessed from its custom homepage. <br /><br />As these companies are now figuring out, the world does not revolve around just themselves. Customers use services from multiple companies and sources and making it all accessible under one brand or roof is now what all companies are trying to make available to their customers. Microsoft's attempt here with <a href="http://download.live.com/">Windows Live</a> includes integration of popular social networking sites (Facebook, MySpace) as well as instant messaging and email from many popular sources.<br /><br />This is a great move from Microsoft. Instead of forcing customers to play in its own sandbox, the software giant has figured out that perhaps more of its customers will come to it and stay there if it offers a connection to non-Microsoft services and products that complement its own (not compete).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/">Microsoft's newest Windows Live services: its best yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?ArticleId=423945&amp;publicationSubCategoryId=71>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/microsofts-newest-windows-live-services-its-best-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Live</category><category>WindowsLive</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Makeover needed: Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-21-200cm101608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of a feature on companies and products that our bloggers think are in need of a makeover.</em> <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/makeovers-needed" target="_blank"><em>See all 26</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) released its Windows Vista operating system product almost two years ago, the market was initially excited. That excitement turned to boring indifference as customers, both business and consumer, realized that this was just another update to Windows. Nothing revolutionary, or even evolutionary (in many minds). The problem was this: Windows Vista was a huge change under the hood, but where its users interact with it, it seems like a boring reinvention of an operating system from half a decade ago.</p>
<p>But Microsoft doesn't just make operating systems. It's into the office productivity business (Microsoft Office, anyone), it's big into the mobile business (Windows Mobile), and it's tried desperately to compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) in the web search advertising business (which has largely failed). So, the company, which continues to make a ton of cash every quarter by selling Windows on all those global PCs that are sold, has no debt and a ton of cash under the mattress. It's still a boring company with a business model that's being made rapidly outdated by the internet and web-based competitors. Should it take its cash, return it to shareholders, and close up shop? <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Dell-Apple-should-close-shop/2100-1001_3-203937.html">Though this was suggested</a> of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) some time back, that company roared back (maybe you've heard). Can Microsoft?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Makeover needed: Microsoft</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/">Makeover needed: Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1339639/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/27/makeover-needed-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Android</category><category>Apple</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>iPhone</category><category>makeover</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft makeover</category><category>Microsoft Office</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>Vista</category><category>web search</category><category>WIndows Mobil</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's "Seinfeld/Gates" ads were good, but not good enough]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rIjNJZpRtj8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rIjNJZpRtj8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>When the first Bill Gates/Jerry Seinfeld television commercial was released about three weeks ago, there were mostly negative reviews of it. After all, the spot was odd, didn't mention <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) products at all, and really did not have any connection to what Microsoft was all about. Most likely, this was by design. This was Microsoft's attempt to fend off those cute (but now, annoying) <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) ads that have a "hip and cool" actor portraying the Mac PC while a geeky, nerdy actor portrays the Windows PC. And this was Microsoft's comeback? That was the question many asked.<br /><br />The second commercial in the series was much better -- but it seemed more like a sitcom mini-episode than anything. The editing and writing was admirable, but still -- the connection with Microsoft's products, vision and former leader and founder was small and light at best. Where was Microsoft going with this? Was the company trying to re-invent Seinfeld's own award-winning sitcom that aired on NBC until 1998? Who knows? Throughout both commercials, though, Microsoft was generating a buzz. Although much of the best-covered buzz was negative.<br /><br />Although there are reports that Microsoft is "<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10044931-56.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0">dumping Seinfeld</a>," perhaps he was just a way to generate initial buzz about Microsoft's campaign to position Windows Vista and other Microsoft products as helpful lifestyle tools. Although the company says that a move away from the Seinfeld-Gates shtick was a planned move, maybe it was and maybe it wasn't. Regardless, Microsoft does have an enormous challenge to really get consumers convinced that a Windows PC can be just as cool as an Apple PC. Maybe a rotation of stand-up comics throughout its spots could do the trick.<br /><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBWPf1BWtkw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBWPf1BWtkw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/">Microsoft's "Seinfeld/Gates" ads were good, but not good enough</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10044931-56.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1317696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/microsofts-seinfeld-gates-ads-were-good-but-not-good-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Gill Gates</category><category>GillGates</category><category>Jerry Seinfeld</category><category>JerrySeinfeld</category><category>Microsoft Ads</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftAds</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Seinfeld ads</category><category>SeinfeldAds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT): A monopolist role reversal?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/msft.jpg" /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/aaplw.jpg" />When <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was seen as a monopolist in the 1990s, governments all over the world hit it with antitrust lawsuits. The world's largest software company saw its kingdom under attack even as it continued selling operating system software (and later, internet browsers) to all the world's PC manufacturers. <br /><br />Microsoft is still the king when it comes to software these days, but an old nemesis, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) is shaping up to become the next monopolist in the PC technology arena.
<p>Apple's iPod/iTunes ecosystem could be called a monopoly. It commands the lion's share of the digital music player and downloading market and customers just can't stop buying the hardware and software. Does that make Apple a monopolist? After all, by some measures, Apple's market share is now larger than Wall Street darling <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Does Apple's 11% share of the PC market make it a monopolist? Does this smaller market share even suggest that? On the surface, no. But Apple's influence extends way beyond that hardware market share figure. Its control of entire market segments would suggest Apple may resemble <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/157545">what Microsoft looked like 10 years ago.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT): A monopolist role reversal?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/">Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT): A monopolist role reversal?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newsweek.com/id/157545>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1308305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/apple-aapl-and-microsoft-msft-a-monopolist-role-reversal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>iPhone</category><category>iPod</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>Monopoly</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft to open $400 million data center in Iowa]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/msft.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) will be building its fourth data center in Des Moines, Iowa at a cost of $500 million, the software maker said yesterday. The reasons give for Iowa as the site for such a large project were tax breaks as well as low energy costs. The data center will be located on a 42-acre plot of land just outside Des Moines. Fifty to 75 workers are expected at the new data center, with an average salary of $70,000 annually.<br /><br />Microsoft must think adding large data centers will help its online efforts compete against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Perhaps the company is right -- because right now, no company can touch Google's online search market. However, there are more Microsoft Hotmail and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) Mail users than Google Gmail users. Google's market share lead doesn't extend into all its online product offerings, but don't think for a second that the Mountain View-based company doesn't want to steal as many users away from Microsoft's Hotmail as possible -- plus grab customers of other Microsoft online services.<br /><br />The new data center will take a year to 18 months to compete, although company officials were mum on how many servers would reside there, as the company is still designing the data center. It did say that its data center servers would be contained in shipping containers instead of the standard server rack to allow more transport and setup flexibility. The state of Iowa is expected to give <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9113202&amp;intsrc=hm_list">combined tax breaks to Ole' Softie of about $3 million</a> per year. Not to be outdone, though, Google is <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9113202&amp;intsrc=hm_list">building a $600 million data center</a> just 122 miles west of Des Moines. At last, two of the largest forces in computing will be neighbors soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/">Microsoft to open $400 million data center in Iowa</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9113202&amp;intsrc=hm_list>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1292109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/microsoft-to-open-400-million-data-center-in-iowa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft data center</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftDataCenter</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Windows XP going away after June 30]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/winxp.jpg" />A week from today, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) will no longer allow computer manufacturers to sell Windows XP. <br /><br />That's right, "Ole Softie" is basically stating that new PCs must come with a flavor of Windows Vista. Although <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) will let customers keep a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/">pre-installed version of Windows XP</a> for a fee, the general consensus is that if you want a new PC with Windows XP on it from the factory, you better order it this week.<br /><br />Windows XP will still be available from those generic "beige box" system builders until January of next year, so all is not lost. But from major computer manufacturers, it's gone next week. <br /><br />Windows Vista has gotten a ton of bad press in the last year though hundreds of millions of the system have shipped already thanks to it coming pre-loaded on desktop and laptop PCs from all the leading PC makers. Still, there are some "keep it simple stupid" customers that have written off Windows Vista as being a slothy hog of an operating system and only want Windows XP on that daily-driver PC that may be a few years old, but works perfectly and is very stable. <br /><br />Moral of the story -- if you've been waiting to order that new laptop with pre-installed Windows XP get that order in now or get ready to use Windows Vista.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/">Microsoft's Windows XP going away after June 30</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9968449-56.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/microsofts-msft-windows-xp-going-away-after-june-30/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Windows Vista</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftWindowsVista</category><category>msft</category><category>Windows XP</category><category>Windows XP date</category><category>WindowsXp</category><category>WindowsXpDate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: Microsoft vs. Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-google-microsoft-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has been around more than 30 years now and continues to make money hand over first every quarter. Its growth has slowed to levels representative of a mature company, but the power the computer software maker has over the flow of the world's information is very formidable. Then you have <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), a company just a decade old but with power that rivals Microsoft in many ways. In a sense, Microsoft provides the river, and Google provides the current.</p>
<p>That's probably not what Microsoft executives had in mind, but that's reality. The two companies are uniquely different cultures: Microsoft is a standard, dyed-in-the-wool, buttoned-down corporation and Google operates in an organized chaos type of way, much like a start-up software company. The difference is that Google's revenue and growth is slowly reaching where Microsoft's is, and it's only taken a fraction of the time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Battle of the Brands: Microsoft vs. Google</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/">Battle of the Brands: Microsoft vs. Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1171966/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/battle-of-the-brands-microsoft-vs-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battel of the brands</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>webware</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
