<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/billgates.jpg" alt="" />It's easy to save the world when you've already taken care of yourself. But, we rely on these mavericks -- the wealthy who realize they can make a difference -- to do what we cannot on our own. So, it comes as a relief that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a>, founder of Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) believes <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/executivecompensation/">executive compensation</a> is still too high. </p>
<div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"> </div>
<p>It's a murky topic, and some forms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/regulation/">regulation</a>, Gates believes, won't help. In a discussion on philanthropy at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/92ndStreetY/">92nd Street Y</a> in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a>, where many of the people Gates criticized send their kids for early education, the former CEO and still rich guy cites the $1 million executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/salarycap/">salary cap</a> required by law in 1993 as a big mistake. While compensation has to be controlled,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112"> he believes this measure backfired and thinks that other, similar efforts are doomed to fail now</a>. </p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/">Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>92nd st y</category><category>92ndStY</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>compensation</category><category>compensation caps</category><category>CompensationCaps</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>ExecutiveSalary</category><category>gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkNewYork</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>salary cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" alt="" />Even the thought is hard to believe for anyone who's been watching Apple Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">AAPL</a>) over the long run. Once upon a time, the company was presumed dead, while Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) continued its march to market dominance. Today, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/" target="_blank">Apple's $180 billion</a> market value is evidence of a new era. Though it's still behind Microsoft's $250 billion, the company's rapid ascent and substantial market presence make at least speculation of catching up to the Redmond giant worth a few minutes of thought. </p>
<p>Microsoft is currently the most valuable technology company in the world, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/" target="_blank">according to a Reuters report</a>. Even Google, Inc (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), with its astounding brand recognition and position as gateway to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/internet/">internet</a>, is worth "only" $136 billion. Apple, which was once considered a computer company that sold into education and appealed to some graphics geeks, has reasserted itself as a major global presence.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/">Is Apple closing in on Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33804993/ns/business-world_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/is-apple-closing-in-on-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>applestore</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iphone</category><category>itunes</category><category>itunes music store</category><category>itunes store</category><category>ItunesMusicStore</category><category>ItunesStore</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wii dethroned, Nintendo profit halved]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/wii_logo_220.jpg" />If the Wii were still cool, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo</a> (OTC: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) wouldn't have had to take a heavy hand to its full-year earnings forecast. The company's profit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59S1IO20091029?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522">fell 52% year-over-year for the past quarter</a>, due in large part to a decline in the game's popularity. Demand has slipped, with <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) gaining ground with the core market of zealous gamers. Also, it's seen its position eroded by <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/iPhone/">iPhone</a>, which is picking up some momentum as a gaming platform. </p>
<p>Nintendo's Q3 operating profit dropped to JPY64 billion ($709 million), falling far short of the analyst estimate of JPY90 billion. For the year ending March 2010, the company has chopped its forecast to JPY370 billion, far lower than the analyst expectation of JPY442.8 billion. </p>
<p>After dominating the gaming industry for the past three years, Nintendo's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Wii/">Wii</a> gave up its position in the top spot to Sony's PlayStation 3 last month. The company has also been hurt by an increase in the value of the yen, which has hurt all Japanese exporters. Yet, even by local standards, Nintendo isn't measuring up. Its stock price is down 28% this year, compared to a 14% increase in the Nikkei 225. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/">Wii dethroned, Nintendo profit halved</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59S1IO20091029?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wii-dethroned-nintendo-profit-halved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>gaming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iphone</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft games</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftGames</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>nintendo</category><category>nintendods</category><category>nintendowii</category><category>ntdoy</category><category>playstation3</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sony playstation</category><category>sony playstation 3</category><category>SonyPlaystation</category><category>SonyPlaystation3</category><category>wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/iaci-iac-interactive-logo.jpg" />Unless you already have a major foothold in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> market - or an amazing, disruptive technology that can make the world take notice - there isn't much point in staying. Competing with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is hard enough, even when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) ... and, apparently, when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IAC/InterActive Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IACI</a>). <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BarryDiller/">Barry Diller</a> is ready to give up Jeeves, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO" target="_blank">but only if asked nicely</a>. </p>
<p>Diller's presence in the search space is <a href="http://www.ask.com" target="_blank">Ask.com</a>, ranked #4 behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a>. With a substantial gap between first and second, fourth barely registers at all. Ask.com has only a 2% U.S. market share, according to Hitwise, more than 60 percentage points behind the industry leader.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/">Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>bing</category><category>diller</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>iacinteractive</category><category>iacinteractivecorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft bing</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftBing</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Phishers using new lures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/phishing.jpg" alt="" />Your e-mail account is a goldmine. Technology companies push hard to keep your data secure, but there are plenty of scumbags out there who always seem to find a new way to gain an edge over the guys in white hats. Phishers, in particular, are eager to find new ways to profit from your identity and information, and they're getting some new tricks. </p>
<p>Phishing scam activity was quiet at the beginning of this year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-10-27-cybercrime-phishing-account-passwords_N.htm">according to a report in <em>USA Today</em></a>, but these attacks surged 200% from May through September, says the X-Force team at <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>). Webmail, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialmedia/">social media</a> and gaming accounts are their primary targets. E-mail access, in particular, is highly sought after, since they can be use to push out spam ... while bypassing filters. </p>
<p>These "virgin" e-mail accounts command top dollar: a digital criminal can pick up as much as $2 for a clean account from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Windows Live, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) Gmail, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) YahooMail or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aol.com">AOL</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>). This is more than twice the amount typically paid for a stolen credit card account, according to Fred Rica, principal in the security practice at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/PricewaterhouseCoopers/">PricewaterhouseCoopers</a>. Many webmail users actually do half the criminals' job for them, with 33% using just one password online and 48% using only a handful. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Phishers using new lures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/">Phishers using new lures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-10-27-cybercrime-phishing-account-passwords_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/phishers-using-new-lures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>aol mail</category><category>AolMail</category><category>email</category><category>email access</category><category>EmailAccess</category><category>facebook</category><category>gmail</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>ibm</category><category>ibm corp.</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>pricewaterhousecoopers</category><category>pwc</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>socialnetworking</category><category>timewarner</category><category>timewarnertwx</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>webmail</category><category>windows live</category><category>WindowsLive</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo mail</category><category>YahooMail</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stars aligned for increase in IT spending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/intel-logo-blue.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Windows7/">Windows 7</a>, the latest operating system from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), is expected to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSDEL44362820091027">help jumpstart some IT spending</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) also sees this happening. A new operating system often means a chance to upgrade from dated equipment that isn't worth upgrading, especially with favorable pricing for technology right now. Everything's coming together for a strong 2010 for the high-tech sector, so it's also worth watching <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett Packard</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a>). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stars aligned for increase in IT spending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/">Stars aligned for increase in IT spending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSDEL44362820091027>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19211391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/stars-aligned-for-increase-in-it-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>hpq</category><category>inc.</category><category>information technology</category><category>information technology stocks</category><category>InformationTechnology</category><category>InformationTechnologyStocks</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>it spending</category><category>ItSpending</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>otellini</category><category>paul otellini</category><category>PaulOtellini</category><category>windows 7</category><category>Windows7</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/steve-jobs.jpg" width="220" height="150" alt="" /></div>
Those with aspirations of unfettered wealth look for clues everywhere. From top schools to unique talents, they build profiles of what it takes to become absurdly wealthy ... as though the process can be blueprinted. Well, if you're looking for answers, the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/400richest/" target="_blank">Forbes 400</a> list is a great place to start. If anyone has mastered the art of making money, it's this collection of billionaires. They have the answers, and you are ready to learn.
<p> </p>
<p>A look at the lives of the Forbes 400 implies that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/" target="_blank">the most important attribute is the ability to sift through ambiguity</a>. Contradictions abound, meaning that shades of gray hold the answer to your burning desire for riches. Should you go to a great school? Well, yes ... but only if you're going for an MBA and plan to work for a major financial firm. But, you can still go to an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/IvyLeague/">Ivy League</a> school if you're not studying finance but join <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SkullandBones/">Skull and Bones</a>. Of course, dropping out of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Harvard/">Harvard</a> can be a great way to launch a career in the technology field.</p>
<p>It's tricky. There are no easy answers. But, the road to billions is littered with the corpses of aspiring magnates who thought it wouldn't be difficult. So, don't just read the seven attributes after the jump. Understand them. Read them twice. Then, your future financial situation will be assured. </p>
<p>Or, you can just do one of those chain e-mails and wish for wealth. </p>
<p>[Thanks, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/400richest/" target="_blank">Forbes</a> and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/" target="_blank">MSNBC</a>]</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/">Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>columbia</category><category>columbia university</category><category>ColumbiaUniversity</category><category>dell</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>forbes</category><category>forbes 400</category><category>forbes magazine</category><category>forbes.com</category><category>Forbes400</category><category>ForbesMagazine</category><category>goldman</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group gs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>goldmansachsgroup</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroupGs</category><category>gs</category><category>harvard</category><category>harvard business school</category><category>harvard university</category><category>HarvardBusinessSchool</category><category>HarvardUniversity</category><category>inc.</category><category>ivy league</category><category>IvyLeague</category><category>larry ellison</category><category>LarryEllison</category><category>mark zuckerberg</category><category>MarkZuckerberg</category><category>michael dell</category><category>MichaelDell</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>skull and bones</category><category>SkullAndBones</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>university of pennsylvania</category><category>UniversityOfPennsylvania</category><category>wharton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tech titans vs. telecom giants for control of mobile ad revenue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Spokesmodels for Japanese mobile giant NTT DoCoMo display the company's newest handsets."  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/phones.jpg" />Even now that the battle for internet advertising search dollars has all but been won by market leader <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), market followers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) are still not giving up without a fight. Both internet portals are just shifting as fast as possible to the mobile space. As in, mobile phone.<br /><br />But Google already is a leader there as well -- and it's something I've heard from Google CEO Eric Schmidt's lips for over 18 months now: the new frontier is mobile. Mobile search, navigation, browsing and related activities will be brought (hopefully) to a more broad audience due to numbers alone. There are way more internet-capable mobile phones in use globally and in the U.S. compared to total personal computers in use. Sounds like quite an opportunity, yes?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tech titans vs. telecom giants for control of mobile ad revenue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/">Tech titans vs. telecom giants for control of mobile ad revenue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=adQBj7tjc4i0&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1055344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/tech-titans-vs-telecom-giants-for-control-of-mobile-ad-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft MSFT</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>mobile advertising</category><category>MobileAdvertising</category><category>phone advertising</category><category>PhoneAdvertising</category><category>telecom</category><category>Verizon</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will a pending Microsoft audio player challenge the iPod?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/playsforsure.gif" alt="" id="vimage_1" />We've all heard this before. Microsoft, unsatisfied by the disjointed and unwieldly array of digital audio players (DAPs) made by hundreds of manufacturers that work with the Microsoft "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlaysForSure">PlaysForSure</a>" platform, <a href="http://today.reuters.com/stocks/QuoteCompanyNewsArticle.aspx?view=CN&amp;storyID=2006-07-05T205941Z_01_N05308816_RTRIDST_0_MEDIA-MICROSOFT.XML&amp;rpc=66">intends to release its own DAP this fall</a>. Why now? To capitalize on the fall and holiday shopping season and to take another&nbsp;stab at knocking the Apple iPod off its five-year perch at the top.<br /><br />What all these manufacturers cannot seem to get through&nbsp;their collective thick skulls is that not just the iPod rules the DAP marketplace -- it's the entire Apple digital music ecosystem that includes an unreal amount of OEM and aftermarket accessories, an unmistakable iPod industrial design that just recently has been matched by some manufacturers like <a href="http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Default.aspx?CatID=1166">SanDisk</a> and <a href="http://www.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=213&amp;subcategory=214&amp;product=15283">Creative</a> (well, close anyway), and the most important part of the ecosystem -- tight integration with a super-simple PC or Mac-based audio collection and organization system -- iTunes.<br /><br />When Microsoft can re-invent an entire, easy-to-use digital audio ecosystem like Apple has, it may have a chance to dent Apple's iPod marketshare. A digital audio player alone, though, is not enough -- no matter how slick and inexpensive it is. <br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 7-6-06]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/">Will a pending Microsoft audio player challenge the iPod?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/stocks/QuoteCompanyNewsArticle.aspx?view=CN&amp;storyID=2006-07-05T205941Z_01_N05308816_RTRIDST_0_MEDIA-MICROSOFT.XML&amp;rpc=66>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/640082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/will-a-pending-microsoft-audio-player-challenge-the-ipod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple iPod</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>iPod</category><category>Microsoft MSFT</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
