<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Wal-Mart punishing Miley Cyrus for photos?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img style="WIDTH: 175px; HEIGHT: 229px" height="229" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/miley-cyrus.jpg" width="175" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>The <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/corrections?mod=topnav_Corrections">Wall Street Journal</a></em> today corrected a story reporting that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121262565274046979.html?mod=Corrections">would host a Miley Cyrus performance</a> at today's shareholders' meeting. Could the change have anything to do with those <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/06/miley200806"><em>Vanity Fair</em> photos</a>?</p>
<p>Of course not. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/27/should-you-dump-disney-on-topless-miley-cyrus-mag-cover/">15-year old billion dollar phenomenon</a> won't appear "because of a scheduling conflict, the company said." The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> owes its readers an explanation for its faulty reporting. And the way to do that would be to investigate the <em>scheduling conflict</em>. Here are some questions for the <em>Wall Street Journal's</em> reporters to ask Wal-Mart and Miley:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>What was the exact scheduling conflict that came up so suddenly between Thursday and this morning?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Did Miley decide to book another concert appearance on Thursday just so she could have an excuse to cancel her appearance with Wal-Mart?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Or did Wal-Mart suddenly decide that Miley's <em>Vanity Fair</em> photos made her "inappropriate"?</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>Can't Rupert Murdoch hire any competent journalists? We need to know what Miley's scheduling conflict was. A one line correction won't do.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Wal-Mart securities.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/">Is Wal-Mart punishing Miley Cyrus for photos?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/is-wal-mart-punishing-miley-cyrus-for-photos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>miley cy</category><category>miley cyrus</category><category>miley cyrus billiona...</category><category>miley cyrus photos</category><category>MileyCy</category><category>MileyCyrus</category><category>MileyCyrusBilliona...</category><category>MileyCyrusPhotos</category><category>Vanity fa</category><category>vanity fair</category><category>VanityFa</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wal</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>walmart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
