As Michael Fowlkes points out, economist Milton Friedman recently passed away and his accomplishments have been lionized. But I disagree with Friedman's views on corporate philanthropy.
Specifically I think Friedman was wrong to argue that corporations have only one purpose -- to maximize shareholder value. Friedman thought that chief executive officers who talked about giving back to their communities were merely displaying one of their ''suicidal impulses.'' The notion that businesses should aim to avoid pollution, say, or donate resources to a neighborhood was ''pure and unadulterated socialism,'' Friedman wrote in 1970. Corporations, Friedman argued, had but one purpose: to increase profits as much as was humanly possible. If you're feeling generous, give the money to shareholders.
In Value Leadership, I argued that corporations have a vital interest in giving to their communities. Companies that contribute to the communities in which they operate display a commitment to others that makes potential employees and customers feel better about the companies. In particular, I found three key activities that match corporate donors and recipients in a mutually beneficial way:
America's 10 Highest-Paid CEOs of 2011 (and How They Earned It)
The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
At the age of 94, one of the most respected economists ever, Milton Friedman, 

