<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Apple iPhone sales discrepancy with AT&amp;T activations is overblown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/iphone.jpg" />It seems that market analysts and pundits can't stop pulling out their anal selves from the woodwork to worry about possible sales discrepancies between <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>)'s iPhone sales numbers and accompanying <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) iPhone activations. Some have even pointed out what I call the <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9857622-37.html"><em>one million plus unit discrepancy</em></a>.<br /><br />Is this speculate discrepancy way off the mark? Analyst Ezra Gottheil thinks so. There is some market fear that Apple's iPhone sales not meeting up with AT&amp;T's iPhone activations means that Apple stands to lose out on two years worth of revenue on those "missing iPhones." Apple's sweetheart deal with AT&amp;T gives the tech company a cut of every AT&amp;T <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9747031-7.html">iPhone customer's monthly bill</a>, you see.<br /><br />Does Apple stand to lose future revenue streams by selling iPhones that are not activated by AT&amp;T customers? Sure -- but it's not a huge financial impact to the company according to Gottheil. Although quite a few iPhones have been rumored to have been sold, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/about-1-million-people-have-hacked-their-iphones/">unlocked </a>(using multiple hacking methods) and used with non-AT&amp;T wireless carriers, these numbers have not been wholly verified by either Apple or AT&amp;T. Has AT&amp;T <a href="http://topiphonenews.com/iphone-sales-figures-prompt-stockpile-questions/">stockpiled unactivated iPhones</a> that represent Apple's sales numbers and AT&amp;T's lower iPhone activation numbers? That's highly doubtful. Until a solid explanation comes forward, is it <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,141951-c,iphone/article.html">that big of a deal to Apple pundits</a>? For the time being, it seems so.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/">Apple iPhone sales discrepancy with AT&amp;T activations is overblown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,141951-c,iphone/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1101738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/31/apple-iphone-sales-discrepancy-with-atandt-activations-is-overblow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>Apple, Inc.</category><category>Apple,Inc.</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPhone sales</category><category>IphoneSales</category><category>Missing iPhones</category><category>MissingIphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
