<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why would Barnes &amp; Noble buy Borders?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/borders-inc-bgp-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />On Thursday, <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/2008/03/20/borders-is-for-sale-dont-all-jump-up-at-once-now/">I expressed skepticism</a> about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">Borders Group Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>) efforts to sell itself in the face of deteriorating fundamentals and a problematic balance sheet.</p>
<p><em>The New York Times</em> reports on Wall Street speculation over the past year that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/business/21books.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=login&amp;oref=slogin">Borders might sell itself to its larger rival</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>). "A combination of the biggest and second-biggest booksellers has long been believed to be an invitation for regulatory scrutiny."</p>
<p>On a conference call, Barnes &amp; Noble COO Mitchell S. Klipper said that, if approached by Borders, he would "certainly take a good look at the company and put it under review." The company's chairman, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120599729662351473.html">Leonard Riggio, told the <em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "I think it would be the height of irresponsibility for us not to look at something presented to us. If they want us to take a look, we would be pleased to do so. We also feel we would be obliged to do so."</p>
<p>Well of course they would. Why wouldn't they take a good look at the company? But ultimately, I think that the better-run Barnes &amp; Noble will take one look at Borders and decide it doesn't want anything to do with it. The brick-and-mortar book industry is in serious trouble -- there's no real antidote to competition from lower-cost providers like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) and even <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>). Borders is looking to set up its own e-commerce site, but I can't even imagine what competitive advantage it will have going up against an established rival like Amazon.</p>
<p>Barnes &amp; Noble is faring reasonably well and, given the long-term problems facing the industry, I just can't see any reason for the company to double down on brick-and-mortar book selling, taking on debt to acquire an ailing brand that would need more money to be pumped into it.</p>
<p>Most mergers and acquisitions don't create value, and I doubt that this one would be any exception. Given the strong track record of Barnes &amp; Noble's management, I don't think they'll make that mistake.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/">Why would Barnes &amp; Noble buy Borders?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1146435/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/22/why-would-barnes-and-noble-buy-borders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Barnes and Noble</category><category>BGP</category><category>BKS</category><category>Borders</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Leonard Riggio</category><category>Mitchell Klipper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
