<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley saved  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The U.S. decided it could not allow another investment bank to fail. And if it had allowed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">Morgan Stanley</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">MS</font></strong></a>). to file for bankruptcy -- as it did with Lehman Brothers -- that would not have happened. Why not? Because Morgan Stanley is now a commercial bank. But thanks to a guarantee from the Treasury and a change in the structure of its deal, Morgan Stanley has skated away from bankruptcy.</p>
<p>That's because Mitsubishi UFJ negotiated a new deal with Morgan Stanley. Instead of buying a mixture of common and preferred stock, Mitsubishi will acquire a 21% stake in Morgan Stanley by purchasing $9 billion worth of its preferred stock yielding <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/morgan-stanley-gets-discount-cost/story.aspx?guid=%7B6DABAC7C-C61C-489D-8476-624B3FA8AA7F%7D&amp;dist=msr_1">10%</a>. More specifically, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/10/13/2008-10-13T123302Z_01_LD305409_RTRIDST_0_MORGANSTANLEY-WRAPUP-2.html">$7.8 billion</a> of the Mitsubishi investment is in preferred shares which its can convert into Morgan Stanley common at $25.25 per common share. The other <a href="http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/10/13/2008-10-13T123302Z_01_LD305409_RTRIDST_0_MORGANSTANLEY-WRAPUP-2.html">$1.2 billion</a> is in perpetual noncumulative preferred stock that is not convertible into Morgan Stanley stock.</p>
<p>Why the change? Previously <a href="http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/10/13/2008-10-13T123302Z_01_LD305409_RTRIDST_0_MORGANSTANLEY-WRAPUP-2.html">$3 billion</a> of Mitsubishi's stake was to be in common stock purchased for $31.25 a share, but after Morgan Stanley's stock fell 58% last week -- this deal would have been embarrassing to complete. This weekend I was thinking about buying Morgan Stanley stock but I held back because I thought that the Treasury might inject senior preferred capital into Morgan Stanley which would drive down the value of its common.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Morgan Stanley saved  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/">Morgan Stanley saved  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1340468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/morgan-stanley-saved/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mitsubishi ufj</category><category>MitsubishiUfj</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>MS</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Morgan Stanley the next to fail?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The SEC's ban on short selling ended Thursday. This creates the conditions to resume the cycle of value destruction that brought down Lehman Brothers Holdings. What happens is that a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a6iIva9LWZSU&amp;refer=home">threat of a credit downgrade</a> causes a spike in the premiums for credit default swaps (CDSs) that insure the bank's debt. That premium spike requires a collateral call which the bank lacks the cash to meet. This jeopardizes its effort to raise capital and sends the stock plunging -- to the profit of the short sellers.</p>
<p>Enter <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">Morgan Stanley</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong><font color="#000000">MS</font></strong></a>). A few weeks ago, it announced that it would raise $9 billion from an investment from Japanese bank Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, which is due to close on October 14th. However, the $25 a share purchase price is now about <a href="http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1014949.shtml">double Morgan Stanley's closing stock price</a> Thursday. If the $9 billion capital commitment remains constant, MUFJ would own 65% of Morgan Stanley rather than the original 21%. </p>
<p>And this morning, a report emerges that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">Moody's</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">MCO</a>) will put $200 billion of Morgan Stanley's debt on downgrade watch -- helping drive its stock down 27% in pre-market. As happened at Bear Stearns and Lehman, hedge fund clients have pulled out their money and its CDS premiums are up so much that it can't issue new debt. Specifically, Morgan Stanley's 5-year CDSs rose to an upfront payment of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4985ZV20081010?sp=true">28%</a> of the amount insured -- yesterday it was 19% -- plus 5% percent a year. So Morgan Stanley would pay $2.8 million to insure $10 million of debt plus $500,000 a year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Morgan Stanley the next to fail?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/">Is Morgan Stanley the next to fail?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a6iIva9LWZSU&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1338557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/is-morgan-stanley-the-next-to-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Mitsubishi UFJ</category><category>MitsubishiUfj</category><category>moodys</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>mufj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Record oil gain adds salt to bailout wounds; MS, MSFT higher; AAPL lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" alt="" />Covering the market close has led to two outcomes: being a financial stock specialist or being a Bedlam patient off the anti-psychotics. Monday was nothing short of another disappointment. Today's markets were headed south after the $700 billion bailout plan received more add-ons (and criticism), but the tone of massively higher costs combined with a sudden $20.00 a barrel gain in oil led the markets further and further south. Interestingly enough, alternative energy stocks <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/09/alternative-ene.html ">failed to follow oil higher</a> at all. As the bailout received criticism, financial stocks tanked.<br /><br />These are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />DJIA     11,016.09 -372.35 -3.27%<br />NASDAQ   2,179.94 -93.96 -4.13%<br />S&amp;P500    1,207.75 -47.33 -3.77%<br />10YR T-Bond 3.824% (+0.055%)<br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/09/the-52-week--13.html">52-week lows</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/09/top-pre-mark-18.html ">Top Analyst Upgrades &amp; Downgrades</a><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas ">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas ">AAPL</a>) was a loser today after Morgan Stanley <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/09/coal-in-apples.html ">cut its estimates</a> for the high-flying tech stock. Shares were down almost 6% at $132.66 in today's final minutes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Record oil gain adds salt to bailout wounds; MS, MSFT higher; AAPL lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/">Closing Bell: Record oil gain adds salt to bailout wounds; MS, MSFT higher; AAPL lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1321294/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/closing-bell-record-oil-gain-adds-salt-to-bailout-wounds-ms-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>KMX</category><category>mitsubishi ufj</category><category>MitsubishiUfj</category><category>ms</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley sells up to 20% stake to Mitsubishi UFJ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" /></em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/mergersNews/idUSTFA00303320080922">Reuters</a> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><font color="#888888"><strong>Morgan Stanley</strong></font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><font color="#888888">MS</font></a>) will sell between 10% and 20% of its equity to Mitsubishi UFJ -- Japan's largest bank. It is not sure how much it will buy because it has not yet conducted due diligence. "MUFG said it would decide on the amount it would pay after carrying out due diligence," according to <em>Reuters</em>.</p>
<p>This -- combined with the announcement this morning that Morgan Stanley would change into a Bank Holding Company (BHC) -- increases the odds that it will remain independent. But its survival depends on raising more capital. In order to boost its ratio of assets to equity from 30.3:1 to 11:1 to meet the BHC capital standard, for example, Morgan Stanley would either need to reduce its assets or raise $60 billion in capital. If MUFJ bought a 20% stake at the current market price -- for $6 billion -- it would only go 10% of the way to reaching the $93.7 billion in capital needed to support its $1,031 billion in assets at an 11:1 ratio.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, investors are happy about the news, driving Morgan Stanley up 13% in pre-market.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#888888">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a>.<em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a>. <em>He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/">Morgan Stanley sells up to 20% stake to Mitsubishi UFJ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/mergersNews/idUSTFA00303320080922>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1320718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/morgan-stanley-sells-up-to-20-stake-to-mitsubishi-ufj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deals</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mitsubishi UFJ</category><category>MitsubishiUfj</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>mufj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
