<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/wolverine-origins-fl.jpg" alt="" />It was a great weekend for comic book fans. First, Saturday was <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/05/free-comic-book-day-2009-support-your-local-heroes.html">Free Comic Book Day</a>. I hope you were able to celebrate (I did!). Second, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</em>, licensed to and distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), opened on Friday. </p>
<p>As expected, it completely annihilated the competition (I would have said <em>clawed</em> the competition, but I'm sure that pun has already been done to death by now) at the domestic box office over the weekend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/">Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/05/free-comic-book-day-2009-support-your-local-heroes.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1534845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>17 again</category><category>17Again</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>comic book</category><category>ComicBook</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>ghosts of girlfriends past</category><category>GhostsOfGirlfriendsPast</category><category>h1n1</category><category>Marvel</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>obsessed</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Stephen King</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation has a monster good quarter ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/dreamworks.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>), whose cartoons compete with similar products from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), issued its Q1 stats after the bell on Tuesday afternoon. </p>
<p>Now, I'm just about 100% certain that I've used this goofy pun before, so let me apologize upfront for dragging it out yet again (you'll soon see that I had no choice): DreamWorks Animation had a quarter that dreams are made of!</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation has a monster good quarter </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/">DreamWorks Animation has a monster good quarter </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/dreamworks-animation-reports-first/rfid208484730>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/26/the-week-in-preview-high-hopes-for-first-solar-humana-dreamwo/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1531254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/dreamworks-animation-has-a-monster-good-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bee movie</category><category>BeeMovie</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>cartoon</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>flushed away</category><category>FlushedAway</category><category>jeffrey katzenberg</category><category>JeffreyKatzenberg</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Shrek</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>trey thoelcke</category><category>TreyThoelcke</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hannah Montana film sees big drop in second weekend -- yes, the fad is over]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/hannah1.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Well, my friends, last week <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/">I discussed</a> the better-than-expected box office results of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Hannah Montana: The Movie</em>. The project grossed well over $30 million in its opening weekend and ranked in first place. Looks like the half-life was short on this one. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, the early estimates for this past weekend place <em>Montana</em> in fourth place with roughly $12 million. This represents a huge dive of 60%. The film does not have any legs, let me tell you. Disney shareholders should be disappointed (I'm one, and I'm <em>very</em> disappointed). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hannah Montana film sees big drop in second weekend -- yes, the fad is over</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/">Hannah Montana film sees big drop in second weekend -- yes, the fad is over</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/general-electric-beats-in-q1-how-does-the-stock-look-now/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=crank.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1521667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hannah-montana-film-sees-big-drop-in-second-weekend-yes-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>17 again</category><category>17Again</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>crank</category><category>Crank: High Voltage</category><category>Crank:HighVoltage</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>fast and furious</category><category>FastAndFurious</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>hannah montana the movie</category><category>HannahMontanaTheMovie</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>State of Play</category><category>StateOfPlay</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>zac efron</category><category>ZacEfron</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hannah Montana is still hot, but is the fad close to an end? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/hannah1.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Well, I didn't necessarily think it was possible, but it was. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Hannah Montana: The Movie</em> rose to the top of the domestic box office charts over the Easter holiday weekend. </p>
<p>As of early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, the Miley Cyrus flick took in $34 million. Yes, I was bearish on her prospects, as you'll see in this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/is-disneys-hannah-montana-movie-going-to-fail-this-weekend/">preview article</a>. I agreed with industry experts when they said <em>Fast and Furious</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal, would retain its number-one status.</p>
<p>I was wrong. <em>Furious</em> came in second with over $28 million. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DreamWorks Animation</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) <em>Monsters vs. Aliens</em> was third with over $22 million, and its total tally has now gone beyond $140 million. It's doing decent business, and it looks like it has a chance to beat the $180 million that <em><a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=madagascar2.htm">Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa</a></em> captured. Not bad. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hannah Montana is still hot, but is the fad close to an end? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/">Hannah Montana is still hot, but is the fad close to an end? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/is-disneys-hannah-montana-movie-going-to-fail-this-weekend/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=madagascar2.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=daily&amp;id=hannahmontanamovie.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=daily&amp;id=monstersvsaliens.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1514859/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/looks-like-hannah-montana-is-still-hot-but-is-the-fad-close-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>fast and furious</category><category>FastAndFurious</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>hannah montana the movie</category><category>HannahMontanaTheMovie</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>miley cyrus</category><category>MileyCyrus</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>observe and report</category><category>ObserveAndReport</category><category>seth rogen</category><category>SethRogen</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Electric speeds up the box office]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/ge_logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) shareholders have a little something to celebrate today. <em>Fast &amp; Furious</em>, distributed by GE's Universal asset and starring Vin Diesel, came in first place over the weekend at domestic theaters according to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>. </p>
<p>The racing movie scored about $72 million as of early estimates, more than enough to secure the top spot. I know that such success won't do much for GE in terms of stock movement, but hey, as a GE shareholder myself, it's personally been a tough year with all the financial awfulness at GE Capital, so if one of GE's latest movies is a hit, I'll take it. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Electric speeds up the box office</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/">General Electric speeds up the box office</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1508405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/general-electric-speeds-up-the-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>Fast and Furious</category><category>FastAndFurious</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>the haunting in connecticut</category><category>TheHauntingInConnecticut</category><category>Universal</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>vin diesel</category><category>VinDiesel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas"><img hspace="4" height="297" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/200px-monsters-vs-aliens-poster.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) has done it again. The studio's new computer cartoon, <em>Monsters Vs. Aliens</em>, which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), debuted in the top slot over the weekend at domestic multiplexes. According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo estimates</a> at the time of this writing, the film earned around $58 million. I think we all expected the performance in terms of rank, but I have to say that I thought the film would have taken in north of $60 million. <br /></p>
<p>If you look at this very useful <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm">reference</a>, you'll see that the opening for <em>Monsters</em> is relatively decent when compared to other DreamWorks Animation openings. But since both <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> and <em>Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa</em> had both hit the $60 million mark, I thought <em>Monsters</em> could do the same. An element to keep in mind is the timing. This is the first time that the studio opened one of its animated projects in March since <em>The Road to El Dorado</em>, and that one doesn't really count since it wasn't a CGI affair. So from that standpoint, perhaps this is a big victory.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/">'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation finds that a panda is no ogre when it comes to earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/dreamworks.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/dreamworks-animation-reports-fourth/rfid188443811">Q4 earnings</a> after the bell on Tuesday, and the shares dropped over 5% in the after-hours session. As you might have guessed, the company missed expectations. </p>
<p>According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/earnings-preview-can-dreamworks-animation-kick-it-in-q4">earnings preview</a>, the call was for 60 cents per share. Unfortunately, DreamWorks reported 58 cents per share on a 31% drop in net sales. However, there also was a 12-cent per-share tax benefit included in that bottom-line number. Last year, DreamWorks reported 98 cents per share. </p>
<p>This wasn't the quarter that dreams are made of. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation finds that a panda is no ogre when it comes to earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/">DreamWorks Animation finds that a panda is no ogre when it comes to earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/dreamworks-animation-reports-fourth/rfid188443811>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/earnings-preview-can-dreamworks-animation-kick-it-in-q4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://seekingalpha.com/article/122438-dreamworks-animation-skg-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/436ca602-02cf-11de-b58b-000077b07658.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/margin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1470806/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dreamworks-animation-finds-that-a-panda-is-no-ogre-when-it-comes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>flushed away</category><category>FlushedAway</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeffrey katzenberg</category><category>JeffreyKatzenberg</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>over the hedge</category><category>OverTheHedge</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p>So, I'm still <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ironman_head.jpg" />trying to figure out a strategy for the coming year for my portfolio. Stocks are starting to feel a little better to me, but I'm very, very cautious about timing in terms of trades. For instance, I'd rather wait until we see a substantial pullback from the recent rally before taking some of my cash on the sidelines and putting it to work. But I've got two ideas in the movie sector that I'm looking at: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>).
<p>First off, both are great companies. No, not every move they make is perfect (example: Marvel still can't properly monetize its Incredible Hulk property with a decent film). But both stocks have held up relatively well, in my opinion, during the financial implosion. Both stocks are also below their respective 52-week high's and above their respective 52-week low's. That's not a bad position to be in (although I should point out that I generally would like to get these two around their 52-week low's). But which stock has the edge?</p>
<p>Well, Marvel's shares have been strong lately. According to the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">AOL quote</a> at the time of this writing, Marvel is in the green in all time frames (year-to-date, one-month, one-year, etc.). DreamWorks Animation is in the red in a couple spots, but for the most part, it's been performing somewhat similarly to Marvel. I don't really see that much of a difference in terms of strength. Plus, both are arguably essentially equal in terms of valuation (at least in my opinion).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/">DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>film</category><category>Incredible Hulk</category><category>IncredibleHulk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel Entertainment</category><category>MarvelEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
