The controversial O.J. Simpson tell-all If I Did It has gone onto the presses. Its publisher, Beaufort Books, has ordered a first run of 125,000 copies, and claims to have sold almost the entire run already.

The idea of this book sickens me. I understand that, by court order, the proceeds will be awarded to the family of one of Simpson's victims, Ron Goldman. His family apparently believes that readers will see through the ruse of presenting the work as fiction, and take it as Simpson's confession.

Even if the profits are appropriately distributed, I don't think that justifies buying the work. I'm aghast to think anyone would spend a penny on this book. The mere existence of such a confession rubs our collective noses in the failure of our legal system, and the publicity surrounding its publishing is bound to benefit the author in some way. We all know what he did, and how he did it, and that he hasn't, and won't pay the price for his crime.

The best we can do now is turn our backs on him. Completely. Here's hoping Beaufort Books ends up with 125,000 remainders.

MurderAuction.com is easily one of the creepiest websites I have ever visited. The site is a haven for collectors of "murderabilia" -- mementos related to the cases of famous criminals, including prison artwork like a sketch of Osama Bin Laden by Washington DC sniper Lee Boyd Malvo and the psychiatric evaluation of serial killer Ed Gein.

It's difficult for me, and probably most of our readers, to understand why anyone would want to own this stuff. Texas Senator John Cornyn has had enough, and has introduced legislation to put an end to this cottage industry. His law would make it illegal for state and federal prisoners to mail such items for the purpose of interstate commerce.

What's interesting is that prisoners are generally not allowed to run businesses behind bars anyway, and they generally don't profit from the sale of their artwork on sites like MurderAuction. Some inmates will send their work to followers who send them "fan mail" and then the work turns up online. But since the inmates aren't profiting and, in many cases aren't aware of the market for their work, it's hard to see how it qualifies as interstate commerce.

It's hard for me to understand why the government should play a role in this. It seems like a freedom of expression issue, and I don't see the point of using government resources to stop collectors from trading murderabilia online. If the prisoner if profiting, that's illegal anyway.

Of course, sites like eBay (NASDAQ: EBAY) should, and do, ban the listing of murderabilia on their sites. But why should Uncle Sam stop collectors from trading artwork?

Take Two Interactive's (NASDAQ: TTWO) Rockstar Games was expected to release its latest game, Manhunt 2, on July 10 for Nintendo's (OTC: NTDOY) Wii and Sony Corporation's (NYSE: SNE) PlayStation 2 consoles. However, Britain, America's friendly Democratic neighbor, has banned sales for -- get this -- "unremitting bleakness and callousness of tone."

I think that is how my mother referred to my dress code back in high school.

The banning comes after a 14-year old British schoolboy was murdered by a friend, Warren Leglanc, age 17. The parents of the schoolboy blamed a video game for their son's death. Patric Pakeerah, the father of the murdered boy, welcomed the decision, saying "It's a video instruction on how to murder somebody; it just shows how you kill people and what weapons you use."

I'd hate to see if Mr. Pakeerah ever watched prime-time television. Or the news, for that matter.