<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/robeputer240.jpg"  alt="Twitter and Facebook going off-platform" />Twitter has struggled to bring more users onto its website. Approximately <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/twitter-gets-a-step-closer-to-corporate-accounts/">70% of end-user interaction</a> with the microblogging service takes place away from <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter.com</a>. As the company moves toward its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/">search-based ad model</a>, expected to be released later this quarter, website traffic is becoming increasingly important. Yet, it's this gap between use and on-site action that might protect the company going forward ... at least if <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> can be used as an indicator.<br />
<br />
With Facebook Connect, members of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialnetworking/">social networking</a> site can interact with their profiles "remotely." If you want to share this blog post on Facebook, for example, you can do it without opening a new browser, plucking www.facebook.com on the keyboard and pasting the URL into the status field. This connection, even though it costs Facebook a pageview or two, reinforces the user's relationship with the site, increasing the likelihood that he or she will remain active overall. It also provides fodder for other members, fueling more clicks, comments and likes ... and ultimately cash in the Facebook till.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/">Off-Platform Key to Social Media Survival and Success</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19431000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/off-platform-key-to-social-media-survival-and-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook apps</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>hootsuite</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>news corp</category><category>News CorpB NWS</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NWS</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Pulls Facebook and MySpace into Outlook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/outlook.jpg" />Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has been decent recently about integrating tools outside its own realm into its newer products. Take, for example, Outlook. The most widely-used corporate email client has lost ground in recent years to web-based email alternatives that allow email usage without a locally-installed application.</p>
<p>From looking at the newer Outlook 2010 (which has not been released yet), Microsoft is trying something new: making Outlook a central communication hugs that not only handles corporate email, but integrates such social networking services as MySpace, Twitter and Facebook.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft Pulls Facebook and MySpace into Outlook</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/">Microsoft Pulls Facebook and MySpace into Outlook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwaYzrjD_u-1m-9xLhvEQ5TLcUzAD9DU431G2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19363269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/microsoft-pulls-in-facebook-and-myspace-into-outlook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MicrosoftFacebook</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MySpace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>Outlook 2010</category><category>Outlook2010</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social Media Backlash?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/facebook-screen-240.jpg" alt="" />As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> passes the 400 million user threshold, a flight from social media is beginning to take shape. A growing number of users are reconsidering the sharing (and oversharing) of life details. Reasons vary -- from seeing their networks swell from just close friends to distant connections and strangers to worries over where their personal information can wind up. More than anything else, they say they want to return to "real life." <br /> <br /> Depending on how this shakes out, the trend could force <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialmedia/">social media</a> company employees to get back to real life as well. If the backlash gains momentum, it could cost these companies traffic, which translates to a revenue hit and, in the extreme, viability. Yet, if the likes of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/LinkedIn/">LinkedIn</a> and Facebook can weather the storm, they will come out the other side stronger than they are now.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social Media Backlash?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/">Social Media Backlash?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2010-02-10-1Asocialbacklash10_CV_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19352048/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/social-media-backlash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>Apple</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>friendster</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>Internet</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>media</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NWS</category><category>online ad</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>seppukoo</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Wants to Be MySpace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" />If <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/MarkZuckerberg/">Mark Zuckerberg</a> knew then what he knows now ... <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> would be more like MySpace, which is now owned by News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>). And, he's willing to admit this in public. </p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_zuckerberg_says_the_age_of_privacy_is_ov.php" target="_blank">six-minute on-stage interview with TechCrunch</a>, Zuckerberg went on at length about the social media platform's privacy settings, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/facebooks-new-privacy-settings-spark-a-public-spat/19286612/" target="_blank">which have been the subject of unending debate</a>. He says that he'd make more data public by default if he could start Facebook again. Though Zuckerberg cites Internet trends that indicate a reduced concern with privacy, the real reasons are more likely financial.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Wants to Be MySpace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/">Facebook Wants to Be MySpace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19311576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Digital Sky Technologies</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mark Zuckerberg</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>Privacy Policy</category><category>PrivacyRights</category><category>social media</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Friendster to sell for $100 million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/friendster1.jpg" />Does anyone remember <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Friendster/">Friendster</a>? For about ten minutes seven years ago, it was the hottest thing in    <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Friendster_to_sell_for_100_Million_to_Undisclosed_Buyer'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialnetworking/">social networking</a>. The site that effectively kicked off the social media movement didn't stay in vogue long, however, eventually riding a wave of user referrals to Asia. Meanwhile, MySpace, Facebook and Twitter came along, taking over the sector -- and the hype that comes with it. </p>
<p>Well, Friendster is worth something to somebody, it seems. The company is due to be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B25X020091204?type=technologyNews" target="_blank">sold at the end of the month for $100 million</a>. The social networking service is tops in Asia, which is where more than half of its 100 million-strong user base can be found.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Friendster to sell for $100 million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/">Friendster to sell for $100 million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19266617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>friendster</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>ms</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>richard kimber</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/facebook.jpg" />Who needs <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/venturecapital/">venture capital</a> money when you have litigation? Facebook was awarded $711 million in damages Thursday in an anti-spam case against Sanford Wallace, an internet marketer. The popular social networking platform went after Wallace for <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33549173/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">tapping its users' accounts without their permission</a> and sending fake posts and messages.</p>
<p>Wallace has quite a reputation for spamming, having gained the nicknames "Spam King" and "Spamford" back in the 1990s, when he was good for up to 30 million spam e-mails a day.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/">Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antispam</category><category>can-spam</category><category>facebook</category><category>federal trade commission</category><category>ftc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>malware</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>sanford wallace</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>spam</category><category>spammers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google wants eardrums, not just eyeballs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/goog-google-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) makes it easier to search for websites, e-mail messages, passages from books and videos. Where you haven't heard much about Google's search capabilities -- or Google in general -- <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE59R5SF20091029?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=11604" target="_blank">is the music business</a>. </p>
<p>But, that's about to change. On Wednesday, the search giant announced that it was partnering with music services such as Pandora, Lala, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) MySpace, and Rhapsody by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/realnetworks-inc/rnwk/nas" target="_blank">RealNetworks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/realnetworks-inc/rnwk/nas" target="_blank">RNWK</a>) to help users find, listen to and ultimately buy music on the web. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google wants eardrums, not just eyeballs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/">Google wants eardrums, not just eyeballs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/google-wants-eardrums-not-just-eyeballs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>music</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace music</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>nws</category><category>online music downloads</category><category>online music player</category><category>online music sales</category><category>online music service</category><category>online music store</category><category>realnetworks</category><category>rhapsody</category><category>rnwk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch loves MySpace, but is it paying off?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Rupert Murdoch" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" />Doug McIntyre wrote this morning that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>)'s MySpace.com <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/murdoch-hopes-to-fend-off-facebook-with-open-source-myspace/">will be challenging Facebook</a> in the social networking space with its new open-source platform. This means anyone and everyone with programming and/or web knowledge will be able to wrap their hands around MySpace's hundred-million plus registered users and create applications and useful features that users of the social networking site will love and use -- and will keep them coming back more often for longer periods (known as "stickiness" in the web universe).<br /><br />Although Rupert Murdoch is now touting the growth in MySpace since News Corp bought the web property two years ago, I still see no solid figures on how the property is being monetized and how profit growth is happening. Yes, Murdoch says that social networking has become "explosive" in the near past. That is very true, and it's something I noted in <a href="http://vz.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/why-facebook-is-no-threat-to-google/">a post on Facebook yesterday</a>. <br /><br />MySpace and Facebook may be garnering a huge slice of eyeballs these days, but are they monetizing that traffic? What are page views and visitor counts if <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071018/murdoch_web_2_0.html?.v=2">little to no 'valuable' revenue</a> is being generated? Some would say all revenue is valuable, but I disagree. If irrelevant ads show up on web pages, they count as being viewed (an "impression"). Does the viewer do anything with this "impression?" Is this growth being measured?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch loves MySpace, but is it paying off?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/">Rupert Murdoch loves MySpace, but is it paying off?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071018/murdoch_web_2_0.html?.v=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1016213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/rupert-murdoch-loves-myspace-but-is-it-paying-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>Google</category><category>MySpace</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Counting time, not just traffic, on the web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>All that click counting is well and good. And growing page views are an advertisers delight. But how much time are people really spending looking at various web sites? </p>
<p>Jay Meattle at <a href="http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/25/top-20-websites-ranked-by-time-spent/">Compete.com </a>has a great breakdown of where people spent most of their time on the web in December 2006. Some of the results are surprising.<br /><br />Twenty domains account for fully 39% of time spent online. MySpace.com (a division of the News Corporation, NYSE:NWS ) was the big winner, taking a lion's share of 11.9% viewing time (27,999,906,051 minutes) followed by Yahoo! Inc.(NASDAQ:YHOO) with 19,898,123,587 minutes. According to these figures, 11.9% of ALL TIME online was spent at MySpace.com!<br /><br />The big surprise is Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG). It came in only fifth with 2.1% (4,959,635,138 minutes). The figures for YouTube (#12 with 1,327,25, 263 minutes) were separate, but even if you add them together they don't get close to Yahoo.<br /><br />Also, some sad(to me) appearances in the top 20: Neopets.com at #18, accounting for 0.3% of viewing time with 593,851,415 minutes, and adultfriendfinder .com at #19 for 0.2% of viewing time with 575,584,893 minutes. </p>
<p>Maybe Christmas is a lonelier time for some.<br /><br /><br /></p>
<a href="http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/25/top-20-websites-ranked-by-time-spent/"></a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/">Counting time, not just traffic, on the web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/743520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/28/counting-time-not-just-traffic-on-the-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adultfriendfinder.com</category><category>Compete.com</category><category>Google</category><category>MySpace</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>neopets.com</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maura McCormack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. to sell MySpace? Who would buy it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/myspace_logo.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Will Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation (NYSE:NWS) rid itself of the famous social gathering website MySpace.com in order to get a big return on its investment? That rumor is swirling about these days amid reports of a possible shift in where finicky and trend-obsessed teens go online. Presumably, they are heading for the "next big thing" -- whatever that is.<br /><br />Sure, Murdoch picked up MySpace.com for $580 million just this past summer in a move that was seen as brilliant because the price was abnormally low. These days, companies spend billions on completely unproven business models and trendy websites that have billions of page hits but which aren't producing the cash flow or the potential to become a long-term financial and marketing entity. Call it "dot-com 2.0." I sure do.<br /><br />The scuttlebutt now is that Murdoch my be looking for a buyer for MySpace. In recent comments, he said that he thought News Corp. could <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2006/11/14/report-murdoch-says-myspace-worth-6-billion-sees-200-million-users-by-mid-2007/">garner about $6 billion for the web property</a>. Others have said that a price tag of $10 billion to $20 billion is even feasible. Hogwash -- but I would like some of what these people are smoking. MySpace is *not* a $6 billion business by any measure whatsoever, unless the sheer number of pageviews in some analyst's marketing statistical package translates into pure cash play. It doesn't. Yet. Maybe never.<em> </em>Murdoch's mention of 200 million users by next year is a great stat -- but there needs to be results.<em> </em>Hard results. As in cold, hard cash.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/">News Corp. to sell MySpace? Who would buy it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2006/11/14/report-murdoch-says-myspace-worth-6-billion-sees-200-million-users-by-mid-2007/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/702011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/news-corp-looking-to-sell-myspace-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MySpace.com</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox to broadcast shows at MySpace during MLB playoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/mlb.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In what I consider to be a brilliant move by Fox, the television network says that will be airing reruns of popular Fox Network television shows online, at MySpace.com, during the upcoming MLB Baseball playoffs.</p>
<p>The playoffs and resultant World Series end-up <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fox-airing-tv-shows-online-on-myspace/n20061004175509990015">preempting several prime-time Fox shows</a> during the October and November timeframes, so instead of forcing customers to watch baseball on their television networks, Fox is giving customers a choice of tuning into reruns of popular Fox shows online.<br /><br />That, for one, is the a defining example of giving customers choice in the digital age that is integrating television broadcasting with Internet distribution. In fact, the space continues to morph more and more, and the only critical piece missing is an easy, very cheap and popular device for transferring content or even a computer screen's signal into the living room television. <br /><br />Devices such as the upcoming <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/12/hands-on-with-the-apple-itv-prototype/">iTV from Apple</a> will do just that, as already many other gadgets being sold by many companies do. But, so far, the cost is more than it should be (get it down to less than $100). It is also unknown if the interfaces and designs on the current products are as well-designed as Apple's iTV will surely be. If you have one of these devices, comment on it -- I would love to hear how it works.<br /><br />Will other networks follow Fox's lead and play reruns for a segment of their audience during major sporting events? You know, at least for the wives that have no interest in sports playoffs? Well, that statement comes from the numerous commercials that depict ordinary housewives being bored to tears with sports of all kinds -- a typical marketing stereotype, you know. Seriously though, this move by Fox is really a head-turner. If only more television networks controlled an online empire like Fox does with <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace.com</a>.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/">Fox to broadcast shows at MySpace during MLB playoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fox-airing-tv-shows-online-on-myspace/n20061004175509990015>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/679988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/fox-to-broadcast-shows-at-myspace-during-mlb-playoffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fox Network</category><category>Fox News Channel</category><category>FoxNetwork</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>MySpace.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace video views topple Yahoo, Google and YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/myspace_logo.gif" />Although YouTube gets plenty pf press these days, video postings and sharing at MySpace.com topped all online video offerings in July, beating Yahoo! Videos, Google Video and the venerable YouTube.com in the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/net-sense-myspace-trumps-youtube-google/n20060926011909990047">number of videos served</a>. <br /><br />Over 37 million viewers collectively watched over 1.4 billion videos on MySpace pages in July. This is not surprising considering that the audience at MySpace.com is so large -- the web property rivals Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) for the amount of visitor traffic it gets. In other words, the law of averages probably came into play nicely here.<br /><br />But there is a difference. YouTube has amateur videos and all kinds of clips ripped from copyrighted sources (no matter how much it's policed). MySpace.com probably has the same kind of content, but my guess is that the teenage to upper-20s demographic that inhabits most of MySpace makes the videos that are there fitting to that demographic. That's a total guess but seems rational.<br /><br />On the other hand, the array of content available at Google Video and YouTube spans generations and ages easily. But the difference here comes to targeted advertising. With News Corporation (ASX: NWS) now owning MySpace, the corporate media behemoth will have a pretty influential voice into the targeted online advertising that MySpace visitors and users view (and hopefully, respond to en masse). <br /><br />Google Video visitors are also served targeted advertisements, but the visitors must be much more varied than MySpace.com video visitors. What is the difference here? Hmm, not sure there is one -- depends on who is the larger overall base.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/">MySpace video views topple Yahoo, Google and YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/net-sense-myspace-trumps-youtube-google/n20060926011909990047>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/675087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/myspace-video-views-topple-yahoo-google-and-youtube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google Video</category><category>GoogleVideo</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>Yahoo! Video</category><category>Yahoo!Video</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace and Yahoo! battle on the fantasy front]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/football.jpg" />In this post, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/01/yahoo-can-keep-customers-sticking-to-its-web-properties/">discussed how Yahoo!</a> was primed to continue being a great home to its millions of customers by being a "sticky" and "relationshippy" partner, as opposed to a destination for information. In fact to this day I still find competitor Google to be more of a destination for information of all kinds, and Yahoo! to be more like a community. Although Google has made great strides to change things with <em>personalized this</em> and <em>personalized that</em>.<br /><br />So is there a new game in town? You bet there is, and it's News Corp.'s MySpace.com. With Fox Sports being part of the same happy family, MySpace.com is being positioned as a home to millions of fantasy football players all over the U.S. in a challenge to Yahoo! Sports' leadership in this rather unique, nichy, and lucrative "sticky" business. With live scoring and statistics available to users of MySpace's fantasy football offering -- which cost extra at Yahoo! -- here's another example that may force Yahoo! to up the ante in its offering, like Google's Gmail did years ago when Yahoo!'s email offering featured a measly 2MB of storage.<br /><br />News Corp. execs aren't being lackadaisical or lazy, they are already <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_email/newsanalysis/technet/10308014.html">mingling assets under the Murdoch umbrella</a> in an attempt to grow the fortunes of News Corp. and entrench cross-promotional properties across mediums like television and the Internet. The purchase of MySpace.com gave <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch">Murdoch's company</a> a built-in user base of highly-desirable consumers. If it can keep them by not being a totalitarian corporate overlord, which it has not done yet so far, the future will be brighter than it has been in some time -- except for the competition.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/">MySpace and Yahoo! battle on the fantasy front</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_email/newsanalysis/technet/10308014.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/666960/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/myspace-and-yahoo-battle-on-the-fantasy-front/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MySpace.com</category><category>News. Corp.</category><category>News.Corp.</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's deal with Facebook could become hampered]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/coolege.jpg" />Facebook, the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/digitalentertainment/2006/09/01/facebook-myspace-internet_cx_rr_0905facebook.html?partner=aoltix">website network built for and designed to connect</a> high-school and college students, is treading on interesting ground these days. Back on August 24th the company signed an agreement with Microsoft for the computer software maker to supply and deliver all the advertisements that are displayed on the Facebook website. This is akin to the agreement between <a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/googles-shine-needs-a-good-buffing-for-some-investors/">MySpace.com and Google</a> recently, whereby Google will perform basically the same function by providing search functionality and related advertising across the MySpace.com website property.<br /><br />Facebook is now releasing an RSS-lookalike function that will combine user profiles and related information into a "news feed" format that will, if adopted in great strides, probably cause less actual page viewing throughout Facebook's website. It will also send consumers of the Facebook website to a feed page, not a website page, where potentially less page views and <strong><em>advertisements</em></strong> will be seen. Oops -- less advertisements will be seen? That sounds fishy to me. I wonder how Microsoft would respond to this.<br /><br />Facebook, however, may <a href="http://www.forbes.com/digitalentertainment/2006/09/01/facebook-myspace-internet_cx_rr_0905facebook.html?partner=aoltix">decide to embed advertising</a> into its "news feeds" for condensing user profile information. This would be the sensible thing to do, although it must proceed carefully to not alienate consumers and users of that new feature. With 9 million registered users and 14.4 million user visits claimed in July, Facebook.com has a meaty section of advertising market targets. <br /><br />But as always I question the exact measurement of what constitutes "registered users." Did <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook.com</a> see 14.4 million "unique" visitor pageviews in July, or did the same 1 million users view 14 pages each throughout the month? When ad rates are drawn up data like this is extremely important but usually glossed over. Microsoft is hoping for unique advertising opportunities I would think, not consistent users who at some point may actually ignore ads.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/">Microsoft's deal with Facebook could become hampered</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/digitalentertainment/2006/09/01/facebook-myspace-internet_cx_rr_0905facebook.html?partner=aoltix>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/663953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/microsofts-deal-with-facebook-could-become-hampered/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook.om</category><category>GOOG</category><category>GOogle</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MSN AdCenter</category><category>MsnAdcenter</category><category>MySpace.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace dances a fine line between independence and meeting financial targets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/myspace_logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />When Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp purchased the incredibly-popular MySpace.com social networking portal, the global media behemoth <a href="http://wired.com/wired/archive/14.07/murdoch.html">promised not to distract the founders from what they do best</a> -- provide a great environment for a certain age demographic. They said they would let MySpace continue to be the virtual "mall hangout" for millions. </p>
<p>So far, that has held true, and of course, News Corp. wants to have advertising displayed all over the social website to cash in on those lucrative and captive-audience ad dollars. To that tune, <a href="http://www.infopackets.com/channels/en/windows/gazette/2006/20060810_myspace_and_google_join_forces.htm">Google signed a rather high-profile deal with MySpace</a> just a few weeks ago worth $900 million to do just that. Off to the races we all go now...<br /><br />But are there signs of change at MySpace lurking beneath the proverbial covers? Recently, after some worry-filled days and nights, the MySpace laid-back, but intensely-focused, culture was uprooted as its headquarters was moved from Santa Monica to Beverly Hills, where News Corp. was consolidating its Internet properties. Tom Anderson -- co-founder of MySpace -- is now going through regular corporate drills like budget reviews and executive meetings. <br /><br />MySpace is also about to roll out enhanced photo and video-sharing capabilities that will allow the site to complete with social photo-sharing and tagging communities like Yahoo!'s Flickr and YouTube -- two of the web's most popular sites for sharing photos and videos, respectively. Will MySpace be able to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/24/magazines/fortune/myspace_short.fortune/index.htm">integrate advertising in such a way that it does not overwhelm and scare off its target market</a> of teens and young adults? That remains to be seen. If it can, then Yahoo! and others may need to watch out. The community of the future may not be on Yahoo!'s immensely-popular portal, but on MySpace.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/">MySpace dances a fine line between independence and meeting financial targets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/24/magazines/fortune/myspace_short.fortune/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/659064/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/myspace-dances-a-fine-line-between-independence-and-meeting-fina/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fox buys MySpace</category><category>Fox News</category><category>FoxBuysMyspace</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>Google Video</category><category>GoogleVideo</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>Yahoo! Video</category><category>Yahoo!Video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo's non-conundrum on losing the MySpace.com business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>MySpace.com seems to be the hottest ticket around these days for Internet eyeballs. Specifically, the highly-touted younger eyeballs that many advertisers love to court. There are reports that Google missed the boat on purchasing MySpace.com earlier (<a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.07/murdoch.html">according to this story</a>), and shortly thereafter <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.07/murdoch.html">Rupert Murdoch</a> beat Viacom to land the immensely-popular social networking site for $580 million. That gives News. Corp an instant presence in the online world, although it's been very careful about not transplanting its own brand and identity to MySpace.com. Even the founders are still around and are running the site and operations just like before. Smart move, Rupert.<br /><br />With the just-announced partnership with Google, MySpace.com will now be replacing its generic search engine with Google search, which will most likely be a huge winner for both. Google gets its advertiser's ads in front of billions of page views, and MySpace.com gets a highly-relevant search function that will connect its customers with information just like its customers do now -- they connect themselves to one another.<br /><br /><a href="http://businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2006/tc20060808_969465.htm">Does Yahoo! fit into all this</a>? It could have. The world's largest Internet portal lost out on its bid to supply search services to MySpace.com to rival Google. Although that was a blow to Yahoo!, it was by no means a death sentence to the company. Yahoo! continues to be the leader for Internet-focused eyeballs, garnering more visits than any other web property around. It just won't lose customers like dust in the wind, regardless of the Google/MySpace.com relationship. Sure, MySpace.com surpassed Yahoo! Mail as the most heavily-visited web destination last month (according to Hitwise). That's a problem that Yahoo! should be attacking, but it's far from a death sentence. Yahoo's varying services for customers encompass so many different types of content it'll be just fine -- if it keeps innovating to stay where it is.<br /><br /><font size="-0"><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000"><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/about-the-stock-bloggers-brian-white/" target="_blank"><em>Brian White</em></a><em> has worked in various executive positions in technology and telecommunications and now focuses on editing and writing.</em></font></font><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/">Yahoo's non-conundrum on losing the MySpace.com business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2006/tc20060808_969465.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/652584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/yahoos-non-conundrum-on-losing-the-myspace-com-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>News. Corp.</category><category>News.Corp.</category><category>Rupoert Murdoch</category><category>RupoertMurdoch</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart becoming a competitor to MySpace?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img id="vimage_2" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/hub.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />This was a good one after reading about it -- Wal-Mart's new <em>MySpace-ish</em> website for the totally uncool teenager at its <a href="http://www.walmart.com/schoolyourway">"School Your Way"</a> website -- and its just about as far-fetched and kitschy as I have seen in some time. What are they trying to do here -- re-invent the wheel in the worst possible way? This is most likely a marketing experiment, but you never know how things like this will turn out -- perhaps everyone will migrate from MySpace over to Wal-Mart. <em>Not.<br /><br /></em>Teenagers and entry-college people are generally the most faddish and entranced by fashion and trends, and it is hard to say if this marketing demographic will gravitate towards Wal-Mart as a fashionable trendsetter. Wal-Mart vs. Abercrombie? That's a rather odd comparison to visualize, yet that is exactly what Wal-Mart is trying to accomplish here from my perspective. The ad agency that created the campaign, GSD&amp;M of Austin, Texas, must have some interesting research to back up up what they created.<br /><br />With so many limitations and disclaimers on what visitors can do at the Wal-Mart "School Your Way" website -- no email interchange and a laundry list of what you "can't do" -- will this marketing junket even take off from the launch pad? With this stab at creating a semi-edgy slant of content to appeal to a certain purchasing set, some seem unimpressed by the display. Amy Kandel, 14, of Columbus, Ohio -- "Some of the kids looked like they were trying to be supercool, but they weren't at all, and they were just being kind of weird," and "Are these real kids?" Pete Hughes, 18, said this: "It just seemed kind of corny to me."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/">Wal-Mart becoming a competitor to MySpace?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/digital/article.php?article_id=110520>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/644126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MySpace</category><category>MySpace.com</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why MySpace overtook Google as No. 1 U.S. web destination]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/yourspace.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Was Rupert Murdoch placing a large bet when <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/2005/07/19/Murdoch_myspace">he decided to purchase MySpace.com</a> for $580 million? Sure he was -- but the media baron knew that having an outlet for online advertising and eyeballs was going to be a big business. Yes, the MySpace.com contingent is nothing short of amazing. So amazing, in fact, that MySpace.com became the No. 1 leading web destination in the U.S. just recently, passing such Internet stalwarts like Google and Yahoo! <br /><br />Keep in mind that MySpace.com is frequented by kids and teens more than anyone -- and Google and Yahoo! are frequented by just about anyone with a web connection. That fact speaks to the heart of the "MySpace generation" -- those who are spending much (if not most) of their leisure and social time online. Are malls and other physical hangouts on the decline? Hard to say -- but MySpace.com and text messaging are changing the social strata of today's kids.<br /><br />As much as 4.5% of all web visitor traffic was sent to MySpace.com last week, making the social portal the most popular web-based destination in the U.S. Forget all those business trips being booked on <a href="http://www.priceline.com">Priceline</a> or <a href="http://www.hotwire.com">Hotwire</a>, or all the email being sent at <a href="http://mail.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Mail</a>. MySpace.com trumped them all. </p>
<p>With Google receiving so much press lately with the flood of product releases it's had, can it learn from MySpace? It can -- and that lesson is: make a compelling and personalized portal and people will show up. The more customized a&nbsp;web destination is, the more people feel in-tune with what's there instead of a cold, non-personal visit. Information by itself is good, but personal relationships can sometimes be better.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/">Why MySpace overtook Google as No. 1 U.S. web destination</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060712.RMYSPACE12/TPStory/Business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/642011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/12/why-myspace-overtook-google-as-no-1-u-s-web-destination/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>GOogle</category><category>MySpace</category><category>MySpace.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The MySpace search advertising dilemma -- who will win out?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/myspace-logo.gif" />With <strong>MySpace.com</strong> being all the rage these days (on sitcoms, even), it's looking for a search partner to join in in bringing advertising to the site in ways that both MySpace and the chosen partner can make a nice revenue stream. Google and Microsoft are, at this time, the apparent front-runners to being the default search partner for MySpace? Who will win out? A more important second question -- will the target demographic and <em>socio-economic class that predominantly uses MySpace</em> respond to ads on that social network like the standard web search user?<br /><br />There's been talk that <a href="http://www.clickz.com/features/article.php/3565776">advertising on MySpace</a> -- <em><a href="http://www.myspaceman.net/">in any form</a> </em>-- will not nearly be as lucrative as search-based advertising is on the general internet. The age group that uses MySpace (by and large) are prime folks to market to -- that's for sure -- but they can also be the most fickle with annoying ads (and the most resourceful at not even responding to them and <a href="http://adblock.mozdev.org/">blocking them</a>). Google, which has had enormous success with its relevant and unobtrusive text-based ads, would be the optimal choice if the advertising displayed at MySpace follows along the already-established guidelines of the Google universe.<br /><br />With the potentially-lucrative ad income MySpace and the chosen search partner will share, there are definite reasons for having your ads showing up on the MySpace network (for sheer visitor numbers alone). But, are you listening, Google and/or Microsoft? To be successful, you must ensure the actual way that ads are displayed along with the relevancy is suited for the specific audience. This is something Google has the upper hand in (my guess) at this time.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/">The MySpace search advertising dilemma -- who will win out?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 May 2006 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.ft.com/cms/s/b2f9a994-e9e0-11da-a33b-0000779e2340.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/23/the-myspace-search-advertising-dilemma-who-will-win-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>MySpace</category><category>Myspace.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More competition for Google -- a MySpace Search Engine?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/look/" rel="tag">LookSmart Ltd (LOOK)</a></p><p>Bambi Francisco, a columnist at MarketWatch, has a very interesting piece this week: <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B8204D015-0D7A-45A9-B39D-16C3F6D773C8%7D&amp;keyword=">MySpace-engine</a>.  </p>
<p>Despite being the second most trafficked site on the Web, MySpace is still a teenager when it comes to monetization. True, generating $200 million in revenues is no small feat (especially for a company less than three years old). Then again, companies like Google and Yahoo! are sucking-up much of the enormous amounts spent for online advertising.</p>
<p>So, why shouldn't MySpace jump into the search game? One idea would be to purchase a company like LookSmart (Nasdaq: LOOK). The company has made a comeback - and more importantly, has the necessary search infrastructure (which took hundreds of millions to develop over the years). And the market cap is dirt cheap: $95 million. In fact, the company has $44 million in cash and liquid securities.</p>
<p>According to Francisco, about 8.2% of Google's traffic comes from tools on MySpace.com. Interestingly enough, it is the biggest source of traffic for Google. So, it looks like a no brainer for MySpace to have its own search engine.</p>
<p>Actually, this morning,  I talked with the CEO of a company called <a href="http://www.foldera.com">Foldera</a>. It's a Web 2.0 collaborative tool focused on small to medium-sized businesses. His product also pushes lots of traffic to Google. "Why not try to monetize this large amount of corporate traffic?" he told me.</p>
<p>Yes, many online communities are asking themselves this question. And, with the huge amounts of money at stake in the online advertising market, Google will need to deal with fierce competition on all fronts - not just from Yahoo and MSN.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/">More competition for Google -- a MySpace Search Engine?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B8204D015-0D7A-45A9-B39D-16C3F6D773C8%7D&amp;keyword=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/617726/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/more-competition-for-google-a-myspace-search-engine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Foldera</category><category>LookSmart</category><category>MySpace.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
