<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NASDAQ 100 relative to composite: Outperformance overdone?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/ndxnasdaq.jpg" />Since hitting an interim low on March 5, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nasdaq-composite-index/%24compx/nai?tabs=quotesandnews">NASDAQ Composite index</a> has rallied 10.3%. However, the large cap-laden <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cboe-nasdaq-100-index/%24ndx.x/nai?tabs=quotesandnews">NASDAQ 100 index</a> has done even better, outpacing the broader benchmark by four percentage points.</p>
<p>In part, the relative outperformance of the narrower measure reflects the fact that investors have increasingly favored large, well-known companies with broad exposure to booming economies around the globe.</p>
<p>More recently, unsettled market conditions have spurred investors to seek shelter in the shares of firms that might fare better than those with less resources at their disposal.</p>
<p>Still, given the near-vertical trajectory of the relative advance and the fact that the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cboe-nasdaq-100-index/%24ndx.x/nai?tabs=quotesandnews">NDX</a> (which has an equivalent exchange-traded fund, or ETF (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-exchange-traded-fund-trust-powershares-qqq-trust-series-1/qqqq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">QQQQ</a>) ) is nearing multi-year resistance relative to the Composite, odds are that the narrower measure is poised to lose a bit of steam, at least in the near term.</p>
<p><em>Michael Panzner is a 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets and the author of</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/141959608X/thenewlawsoft-20">Financial Armageddon: Protecting Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes</a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/032124785X/thenewlawsoft-20">The New Laws of the Stock Market Jungle: An Insider's Guide to Successful Investing in a Changing World.</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/">NASDAQ 100 relative to composite: Outperformance overdone?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/961838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/nasdaq-100-relative-to-composite-outperformance-overdone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Nasdaq 100 Index</category><category>Nasdaq Composite Index</category><category>QQQQ</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bearish hedgies throwing in the towel?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/largespeculatorshortposition.jpg" alt="" /></em></p>
<p>Each week, the <a href="http://www.cftc.gov">Commodity Futures Trading Commission</a> publishes a report known as <a href="http://www.cftc.gov/cftc/cftccotreports.htm?from=home&amp;page=cotcontent">the <em>Commitments of Traders</em> Report</a> ("COT"), which breaks down aggregate trader positions ( "open interest") in certain futures and options markets into three categories: commercial, non-commercial, and nonreportable.</p>
<p>According to the CFTC, commercial operators, or "hedgers," are "engaged in business activities hedged by the use of futures or option markets." Non-commercial operators, or "large speculators," include individuals and firms, such as hedge funds, that engage in large-scale speculative buying and selling. Nonreportables, or "small speculators," comprise all other participants, including individual traders.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bearish hedgies throwing in the towel?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/">Bearish hedgies throwing in the towel?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/948087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/bearish-hedgies-throwing-in-the-towel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breadth</category><category>commercials</category><category>Commitments of Traders</category><category>Commodity Futures Tradings Commission</category><category>CommodityFuturesTradingsCommission</category><category>COT</category><category>Futures</category><category>Nasdaq 100 Index</category><category>NDX</category><category>nonreportables</category><category>speculators</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is NDX's double-digit gain driven by single-digit participation?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a></p><p>Since bottoming on March 5, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cboe-nasdaq-100-index/%24ndx.x/nai?tabs=quotesandnews">Nasdaq-100 index</a> has been on a tear, gaining 12.77% through yesterday's close. </p>
<p>Yet, if you break things down and analyze the performance of the index's constituent members, it paints a slightly disconcerting picture. Despite upbeat talk from bulls about the health of the market and the rally's sustainability, the advance so far has been narrowly-based.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>), for example, has played a major role in boosting the index, accounting for more than 20% of the upswing. Rallies in three stocks -- Apple, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Intel Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">INTC</a>) -- comprise nearly a third, while seven stocks are responsible for just under half the gain over the past four months. Finally, only 13 out of 100 stocks, or 13%, account for two-thirds of the overall advance.</p>
<p>While this heavy lifting by a small number of shares doesn't mean the Nasdaq-100 can't go higher still, history suggests that rallies lacking widespread participation sometimes lack long-term staying power.</p>
<p><em>Michael Panzner is a 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets and the author of</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/141959608X/thenewlawsoft-20">Financial Armageddon: Protecting Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes</a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/032124785X/thenewlawsoft-20">The New Laws of the Stock Market Jungle: An Insider's Guide to Successful Investing in a Changing World.</a></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/ndxmovers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/">Is NDX's double-digit gain driven by single-digit participation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cboe-nasdaq-100-index/$ndx.x/nai?tabs=quotesandnews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/929749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/29/is-ndxs-double-digit-gain-driven-by-single-digit-participation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Nasdaq 100 Index</category><category>NDX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
